StampChat Archives
Archive:
August 1 - 15, 2003
August 15, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Interesting postcards
I know Xmas seals tied to postcards and covers are a popular collecting area,
but what about other types of seals and labels?
Here are a few I recently picked up at a local antique show:
Postcard 1 shows
some type of WWII patriotic seal or label, tied by the postmark.
Postcard 2 is an
atypical Xmas seal from the Lutheran Sanitarium, again tied by the cancel.
Postcard 3 I don't
know why I really bought it...novelty I guess. Apparently the card got torn and
someone used some old Official Seals to "mend" the card. Unfortunately, the
postmark just misses tieing it to the card. I assume it was mended before it was
sent.
August 15, 2003 prometheus
Forgot to mention
i really liked the Mail truck on the Raft 9 franc also
Noticed that some of these stamps have gone down in Cat value since 94 is that
the power of the internet bringing the world to all, or just the way the market
goes
August 15, 2003 prometheus
Thanks to all = Info on Zigzag Roulette
I guess I can assume that they are/were not a very pleasing to the Stamp
Collector method of perfing stamps.
Here are some of the treasures I found in the pages of those 94 scotts nothing
great but I did need the orange spec del 15c MNH
anyone need the share points
Foundlings
The only one that appears used is the Russian OVPT which I am guessing is a CTO
has full untouched gum on back.
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Take care! Talk to you soon! {:o)
August 15, 2003 Louise
It's rawer than Ilgi's recent albums (Saules Meita, Seju Veju) and great
listening for when I'm painting.
Postcard
OK. Will do - remind me later, but I'll be back to Lodz soon.
Going to turn in now - take care!
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Also contemplating on creating an instant chat on my own website.
{:o/
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
Louise No, haven't heard that one, yet. {:o)
You can send a scan of that postcard, even though I do remember how the picture
side looks like (from the auction description picture).
August 15, 2003 Louise
Ah, very nice...very nice.
Have you heard Ilgi's "Agri Gada"?
On topic...do you want me to send you scans of that Riga postcard I mentioned
the other night?
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
http://www.lettonica.info
Louise Well, funny you should ask... Was just contemplating on where to
do next update. {:o) Perhaps I'm going to scan some modern Latvian covers - have
many thousands of them - not an easy task to complete.
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
Ah... Just getting very sentimental whilst listening to Latvian Dziesmu Svetki
music on CD-Rom, which I bought during my recent vacation in Latvia. NOIP
Dziesmu Svetki music is songs from a 1000 man/woman strong choir and no
instruments - simply gives me goosebumps of joy.
August 15, 2003 Louise
Ah hello, sveiki! Anything new? Rather bored tonight...think I need a
break from the computer and a decent meal...how's the site coming along?
August 15, 2003 sveiki!
Good Morning/Day/Afternoon/Evening!
TGIF!!!! {:o)
August 15, 2003 David Benson
Zigzag Roulettes
Prometheus, Gibbons calls them Zigzag roulette.
Zigzag Roulettes (French, perce en zigzags), Short straight cuts at angles in
opposite directions, producing sharp poimts on separation. US usage favours
serrate(d) for this type.
Another example of US and English using different philatelic terminology.
David Benson
August 15, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Outage fallout
Not too surprisingly, Siegel's website is off the air. I poll it, Shreves, and
Bennett for new auctions, and I haven't been able to get Siegel's to come up for
a day now.
Jim
August 15, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Serrate roulette
Just to point out the obvious...
Prometheus those stamps have their own Scott numbers.
Loading web sites Ever since I installed the patch for the Blaster virus,
web sites often don't load completely. I get a white screen and the indication
that the site is done loading, and a "Refresh" is necessary to actually see the
site.
I'm on a phone modem but the problem is not due to slow loading, it happens
quickly and it appears that Internet Explorer just decides it has done its job.
It seems that computers are becoming more like humans every day. "Hal" thinks he
just has to show up, doing any real work is an extra.
Duncan
"Open the pod bay doors Hal."
"I'm sorry I can't do that Dave."
August 15, 2003 prometheus
Forgot to thank Bill W
Thanks for the info on those perfs.
August 15, 2003 prometheus
Dittoes on that link Chip
thanks
August 15, 2003 Dave Price
Chip G
Thanks for providing the link to the Economics History site. Facinating!
Dave Price
August 15, 2003 Bill Weiss
Various
Prometheus; it is called serrate roulette. I have never seen those fake
Columbians so thanks (Bill C.) for sharing them. I doubt that any of them would
fool anyone!
August 15, 2003 Chip G
Economics History
Seem to have messed up the link. I was trying to point Dave P. to:
How Much is That?.
If I mess it up again, it is www.eh.net/hmit/
C.
August 15, 2003 Prometheus
Perf Question = NOIP
I know this stamp has little if any Value But what kind of perfs are these type
called/named
HERE
August 15, 2003 Prometheus
Hartmann is still there in Kentucky
and their list of Books just on forgeries is tremendous
if you are already aware of this site sorry, I found it neat and some items are
priced under what i found at the Bay
Herelink
August 15, 2003 prometheusI
Stamp books
Today I found some nice MNH stamps in a set of 1994 scott's i bought, and also a
copy of a Catalog from Leonard Hartmann Philatelic Biblipole #9 Now I have 60
more books I need to find.
August 15, 2003 09:30 Dave Price
Thanks to Bill W, Bill C, and Chip G.
Thanks to all for commenting.
Chip G - That site looks interesting. I'll have to look it up. Special thanks
for that!
FWIW - Some one told me once that any thing of value that can be forged has been
forged, or will be soon. I just assumed that about the stamps too.
Dave
August 15, 2003 George K
"Cost" of the Columbian Series
Bill:
Geez, if it wasn't for that same fancy cancel all those Columbians have, it
would be a pretty nice set.
:-)
August 15, 2003 Prometheus
Jim Watson = Thanks
One day I hope to have some of the Caliber of yours.
I keep telling myself I'm only 23 and most of you older guys will
one day part with those one way or the other. LOL
August 15, 2003 07:10 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
"Cost" of the Columbian Series
Chip G The original cost of the complete Columbian mint set
I posted before
was 12 cents American.
August 15, 2003 Chip G
"Cost" of the Columbian Series
(more) Dave P: using that site, the face value of $16.00 for the
Columbians in 1893 would have had the same purchasing power as $318.76 now.
About the same cost as a discount airfare from NY to CA.
Chip
August 15, 2003 Chip G
Old Money
Dave Price: If you want a site that will put 'old money' in perspective,
I suggest that you wander around the
Economics History site. There are numerous calculators
there that will help you to find out things like:
- the 5 cents that it cost to mail a letter in the US in 1857 had the purchasing
power of $1.09 in 2002.
- an auction lot that sold for $500 in 1970 actually sold for the equivelent of
one at $2,290 today.
- a lot more.
Also has historical exchange rates for 40 currencies back to 1913 and the US
Dollar/British Pound back to 1791
It is a cool site that I use frequently.
Chip
August 15, 2003 Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 15, 2003 07:33 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
Egypt to
France in 1875. It was mailed from the French Post Office in Alexandria.
Prometheus,
That's a great card!
jimbo
PS: BTW, we had a taste of New York last night. A substation blew up and we were
without power for an hour and a half. We took the time to sit on the lanai and
watch a great lightning display over the gulf in the fringes of Erica.
August 15, 2003 Roger Heath
Columbians
Bill-
That is really a nice little collection. Looks like a French Colony overprint.
);>)
Roger
August 15, 2003 23:58 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Columbian Forgeries
Bill Weiss Here is a collection of
complete
Columbians I bought in the original sales sheet.
August 14, 2003 Prometheus
Todays Postal Card aug 15 1943 homemade
Nice use of an Index Card mailed for free from somewhere in North Africa ,front
and here is the
Back
The writer has a apo 520 address but the cancel is a Apo 522
my book on APO's has question marks for Exact dates in Aug of 1943 for the 520
apo but shows Tunisia for the 522
It's after midnight here on the east coast so it is today here already
August 14, 2003 22:29 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Forged Columbians
Bill Weiss A few gems from my collection are
HERE and
HERE and
HERE and I will
post a complete set of really gorgeius ones later.
Bill
August 14, 2003 Prometheus
Thanks = Brian
Was just wondering why so much for a JUNK lot as described by seller, as a non
expert thought maybe the CSA was something.
August 14, 2003 Brian R
Prometheus Re: CSA stamp in that lot. I doubt it. That's one of the most
abundent issues, horridly toned, and the commonest of cancels, $5 tops IMO.
Either there something in those revenues (which I know nothing about), or
someone sees the opportunity to fill a bunch of normally moderate slots, with
badly damaged, yet real, examples.
August 14, 2003 Bill Weiss
Forged Columbians??
DAVE; The 1893 set, because of the high denominations, as you correctly point
out, were out of the financial reach of most collectors, but on the other hand,
they stayed readily available and probably as late as the 1920s could be bought
at face value. The Columbians, including the high values, are NOT rare. Finding
them in top quality mint-NH condition is VERY difficult, but Average/Fine copies
are readily available. I am not aware of any forged Columbians. There are lots
of reperfs, regums, flawed copies around for sure, but not forged.
August 14, 2003 Dave Price
NOIP
Recently received a list of interesting U.S. stats from 100 yrs. ago. It gave
the average wage as 22 cents an hr. If true, and assuming that in 1893 wages
were no higher, how many collectors would have been able to buy a high denom
Columbian just to add to their album? Given this, any comments on how many mint,
forged, uncertified copies there might be circulating out there?
BTW - ootage. As in the ootback or an oopen window.
August 14, 2003 Jim Watson
Oops, wrong board! That's what happens when you have several windows open. (and
are not too sharp after the wine with dinner. . . )
August 14, 2003 04:15 Jim Watson
Tudway SFL
Richard,
Nice item! The material I found indicated the Tudways were producing sugar in
1689 and well into the 20th century. May still be business as far as I know.
August 14, 2003 Bob H,
ootage
Eh?
August 14, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Massive Power Outage
...except for Toronto, which is suffering through an ootage.
Jim
August 14, 2003 3:45PM Bill Weiss
Massive Power Outage
A massive power outage has struck the eastern US and parts of southern Canada,
beginning at 4:14PM (Eastern time). New York City has literally hundreds of
thousands of people in the streets and Manhattan is crippled with people who
have no way to get anywhere but walk. No power for subway travelers, etc. Has
also hit Detroit, Cleveland, parts of Michigan & Ohio, Toronto and parts of
Ontario in Canada. Media says it is NOT terrorist-related, and they expect power
to be restored within a few hours. It's a hell of a sight to see hindreds of
thousands of people on the streets of NYC with nowhere to go! So far, there
seems to be no panic and everything remaining calm.
August 14, 2003 Bill Weiss
No #500
Clark; the stamp is an offset printing (#526-528) and can not be a #500. It's
the wrong printing plus the wrong color shade!
August 14, 2003 David Moser <stamphick@dospalos.org>
Keyword Spamming
Roger.. That one is almost the worst. There were a couple sellers that
put the whole USPS postage calculator in their ads which included every country
that one could send mail to from the US.
David
August 14, 2003 David Benson
Roger, any idea of his name or phone number,
David Benson
August 14, 2003 Roger Heath
Keyword Spamming
David Benson -
Can you telephone this
seller and ask that all country names not be used in descriptions? This
person is keyword spamming at its worst.
Roger
August 14, 2003 Louise
More stamps
This seems a little expensive. Also look at postage costs - OK so may send
whole wallet but four dollars?
August 14, 2003 1320 Clark (reperf)
Misidentified as 500 Type Ia
Any opinions about this item being offered as a Type Ia
500?
August 14, 2003 Classicbruce
Firewalls2
Philatarium Dave - unless one *never* goes online at all, there's always
risk without firewall, it's only a matter of *degree* of risk (I should be
saying that to Joy, not you, sorry. But I did notice her posts about it, I think
others already said much the same): With low-usage 56K, the risk is obviously a
whole lot less than say cable-modem, (and others have explained why very well)
but the risk is still there with dial-up. This is a somewhat controversial
topic, especially now that XP has the built-in version. I've read articles,
attended tech forums, and I work with IT Security people, but no one seems quite
sure how effective the native XP firewall really is.
Without XP's version, though, I agree that nowadays, I'd say a small firewall
almost is a MUST HAVE. Though, you can avoid a big-league firewall product IF
you have both up-to-date AV *and* a good antikeylogger application. Those two
should cover most potential problems quite well, IMO. Of course, these different
protections are usually offered bundled now, so the point may be somewhat
moot...But jury's still out on exactly how strong the XP firewall is, how much
faith we should place in it, last I heard. Anyone hear more on it?
And then there's another question: "can you be too safe"? Yes, you can. You can
spend too much for your needs (a), and (b) some of this protection is either
downright annoying/confusing or causes performance hits...
August 14, 2003 Classicbruce
ZA, etc.
Dave C BTW, I forgot to say "thanks" for your comments on ZA, too, I
appreciate the added input.
A stamp-related comment for a change: A "grumble" from me...I just received my
first APS China circuit, and guess what? Not one single Chinese stamp prior to
1949 out of 11 circuit books. I intended to buy some 50s-70s ROC & PRC material,
so that part was okay, but what happened to the older stuff? I didn't see an APS
category called pre-1949 China :-) Maybe it's just a fluke circuit?
August 14, 2003 11:20 Dave ("philatarium")
firewalls 2
Forgot to mention that, even though I just have a dial-up connection, it detects
and blocks a lot of intrusion attempts. Some days there are none; some days
there are a dozen or more from different sources.
I think joynest on the eBay board was asking about the usefulness of a
firewall if you have a simple home computer with a dial-up connection. I used to
follow the common wisdom that you didn't need one under those circumstances, but
after one of those big internet attacks a couple of years ago, I decided to get
one as a form of cheap insurance, and, as I said, have been surprised at what it
has caught.
Perhaps in this day and age, with so much malicious behavior out there, it is a
more prudent choice than it once would have been.
August 14, 2003 11:08 Dave ("philatarium")
firewalls
Just for the sake of completeness, I will say that I have the Norton Internet
Security 2003 firewall application, and, from my low-tech user perspective, I've
been very pleased with it.
Earlier versions of it were like what was described for Zone Alarm; it
interrupted often. The most recent version seems to have smoothed out the
interface a lot. It also "wraps around" the Norton Anti-virus app if you use
that, too, so it's a pretty smooth usage experience.
Perhaps one of the more knowledgable industry people can say whether or not
Norton is viewed as effective as ZA et al.
August 14, 2003 Classicbruce
Zone Alarm
Clark Thanks for the ZA info. I guess I should DL & try ZA again. 3 years
is a long time in the tech world, so it's probably much improved since then,
when it was a little buggy and had conflicts with other software I was running
(not Linksys, though). The main reason I want a very strong firewall is for
blocking keyloggers, which AVs don't catch very well (and I don't quite trust
XP's firewall on this, either, at least not yet, with new MS security patched
coming out daily).
An embedded keylogger worm can cause *mucho* grief - I know someone that went
through a keylogging tragedy recently - they had pretty much an entire identity
theft from it. Much worse trouble than any virus could do. Probably I'm having a
paranoid over-reaction from that misfortune, but: I've seen what a keylogger can
do (built one myself in Visual Foxpro 8, in fact). Not hard to build, the hard
part is plucking out useful stuff (passwords, CC info...) from all the "keyboard
chatter" which can fill up pages and pages of total gibberish (note that the
keystrokes must be translated from ANSI char-strokes, etc. into a form readable
for humans). I guess this is where the hackers that do keylogging are a step
ahead of me, getting something useful out of the large logs of gibberish they
receieve back from their embedded key-capture program on your computer...
Anyway, I will also look at some of the more specific antikeyloggers, too,
besides trying ZA. But ZA is supposed to be very good at catching keyloggers,
from what I've heard, and that's my goal.
August 14, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave P
I think unhappy bunnies are more like slaughtered lambs.
Though they would probably have been gloating gophers if RM had withdrawn
stamps.
August 14, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Printers
Duncan, the best printer, short of a business-quality printer,
would be the HP 5100 LaserJet. But most won't be willing to pay for a
laserprinter and will trade off quality for price. Canon also makes some nice
wide-format bubblejet printers (or at least they did three or four years ago -
I've been out of the market for a while).
An alternative is to use a bubblejet printer to design your pages, get fifty
or so of them finished at a time, then find someone with a laserprinter to print
out "final version" copies for you.
Jim
August 14, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Quick eBay survey of £2 machin with missing £ sign reveals currently:
14 listed
Highest bid $88.58
All priced (6) under $100 have bids, except 1.
All over $100 have 0 bids.
My advice, don't buy yet!
August 14, 2003 John Cunningham
Zone Alarm
I had frustrations with early versions on Zone Alarm as well. I purchased a new
PC about 9 months ago and purchased Zone Alarm Pro and have been very pleased
with it. The process involved to customize it to my preferences was quick and
simple. I hardly know it is there anymore. You would be surprised how many
attempts there are to see if your system can be compromised on any given day.
I also updated XP last night and was able to download and install 14 MB's of
updates in under 6 minutes. Cable modems are terrific.
John C
August 14, 2003 Dave P
Machin £2
Jim WS I saw that. It does contradict what a lot of people originally
said, whether false info from sellers or a change of heart I don't know.
Embarrassing for De La Rue, but a few extra pounds for Royal Mail - and they
need it with the possibility of post strikes looming, wonder how much that would
knock Ebay? I guess those who paid £100+ for cylinder blocks are not happy
bunnies.
August 14, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Duncan
I was in Office Depot yesterday and they had HP scanners on sale for $36,
obviously not the best, but no one should have an excuse for not scanning stamp
images.
Dave P
I see from Linns that the Royal Mail is not removing the £2 from circulation and
so far over 34,000 have been distributed.
August 14, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
HP 1220 printer
A while back we discussed the best printer for making custom album pages larger
than 8 1/2 x 11 and the HP1220 was a popular choice. My son tells me it is on
sale now for US $330 minus a $100 rebate. That is pretty much in line with the
$220 price often seen on eBay. He just recently bought one at work and was
delighted to hear that it was a popular choice here.
On another note, the internet seems to be a little erratic today, frequent
refreshes are necessary to open sites.
Duncan
"The candle shop burned down a few days ago. We stood around and sang happy
birthday to Paolo."
August 14, 2003 Prometheus
NOIP = Inverted Jenny's
Do you think the block of In Jennies in this lot Ebay 2944778241
will be trimmed? reperfed or is the Value in the CSA stamp
BRIAN R did you see this?
August 14, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Gód dæg eall.
Dana
Very pretty stamps.
If you don't mind me adding an aesthetic comment, I would add a center command
to the immage such that it appears squarely in your thumbnail boxes.
August 14, 2003 04:12 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a picture postcard from
Peking in
1908. The card involved the Imperial Japanese Post Office, the French Military
Post Office, and a souvenir maker! It also has one of the nicest postcard
compositions you've ever seen.
August 14, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia <bagaglia
- at - wanadoo.nl>
Your kind e-mail
Dave F. (it is I, again)
Thank you for your kind e-mail and for your wishes.
CYE, please.
Now, the weather here is less warm (fortunately) today. I will make the travel
during the night (hoping that the Gotthard tunnel, if we get there, is not stuck
or closed and... fingers crossed).
Good continuation to All,
Paolo
August 13, 2003 20:25 Dana Krueger <dkrueger
"at" kfl.com>
http://www.kfl.com/images.index
Another country collection added to my website
A & S...I have added another country collection to my on-line collection
site, South Georgia. Good
night all.
Regards, Dana
August 13, 2003 1929 Clark (reperf)
Blasted/ZA
Bruce
I used the current one on available on
Zone Labs web site. I do not use it on my system because I have a Linksys
firewall/router. I had some problems with ZoneAlarm when I tested about two
years ago, but the current version seems much more user friendly having help and
a tailered recommendation page accessible from each popup. The bottom half of
the page in the free version is a marketing pitch for one of the paid versions.
It is possible to have the intrusion attempt alarms remain in the background so
that they do not keep popping up.
It is necessary respond to a few popups to give Internet Explorer and your email
client permission to access the internet. After a few minutes the programs you
normally use can be enabled. The only problem I saw was the use of a formless
"web style" interface like the useless home version of the McAfee virus scan
software.
August 13, 2003 Bruce
Updates
Jim, this is probably one of the least good times to Windows Update. I just did
some optional ones, and they were verrry slow, plus a couple web disconnections
(fortunately now it keeps track pretty well, so you don't have to start all over
when you re-connect). I'm not even getting much spam today, in fact hardly any
(on a + note). I'm attributing most of this to the blasted virus (appropriataly
named when you say it like that!) I did visit NAI to read about Blasted, and it
can do pretty strong DoS attacks, which may be affecting some web things. Looks
like a good night to watch a Schwartzenegger movie! (maybe I'm gonna have to
learn to spell his name corrrectly pretty soon)
August 13, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
My apologies for not linking to San Marino site.
I'm not using XP or 2000 but thought it a good time to update windows anyway.
After a 35 minute download, what they don't tell you is that it takes another
hour to install (depending on how many updates you have to download.
August 13, 2003 Bruce (Classicbruce)
Blasted/ZA
Clark, what Zone Alarm version do you have, if you don't mind my inquiring? I
have an older one (V3.0 I think it is? Maybe 3 years old, anyway), that I've
installed/uninstalled twice in the past few years, as both times it caused too
many problems, despite catching an occasional "intruder attempt." Of course now,
I also have the XP Pro firewall, Windows auto-updates, a range of up-to-date
McAfee products, Mailwasher for filtering email at the server source, and a few
other tools to provide *fair* security - but I have no "real" firewall at home
currently - though I'm only a 56K user (there's a technical reason I'm not
broadband yet).
I'd prefer a "real" firewall (a Zone Alarm upgrade, perhaps) if it's become
less-intrusive and easier to use than my old version, which was a real pain -
generally it left me guessing a lot of the time whether to "allow entrance" to
my PC. The old ZA version often only provided an IP address to decide whether to
allow entry much of the time. Not very user-friendly, and it had constant
intrusive popups asking me "do I want to allow etc IP address in" (which
sometimes I had to do some quick research on to decide if it was okay. And I'm a
techie by profession, though of the network variety, and I don't deal with my
workplace firewalling, certainly no expert on them). But if it gave *me* (a
network Admin) that much trouble, I couldn't even imagine a non-techie using my
old ZA version. So, what I'm wondering, are newer versions a lot more "usable,"
would you say? I suppose I could do a trial, but thought I'd ask opinions first.
August 13, 2003 17:47 COVERWIZ
Libya, Lockerbie Families Sign Compensation
Deal
One much, by contributers to this board and the eBay one, maligned dealer family
from the Mid-Atlentic will benefit greatly from this deal. Wonder if they will
stay in the stamp business...
August 13, 2003 16:37 Dave ("philatarium")
Paolo: If you see this before you leave, CYE. Thanks! Otherwise, bon
voyage et bonnes vacances!
August 13, 2003 1608 Clark (reperf)
Blasted! (virus)
There is a free download of the Zone Alarm firewall software available, that
should prevent this particular virus from accessing your home PC. It provides a
second layer of protection, particularly against yet to be discovered "buffer
overrun" problems in the MicroSoft Win XP/2000/NT software. Even if the current
patches are installed, your system may still be vulnerable to as yet
undocumented (or undiscovered) problems.
After I installed Zone Alarm at a friends house last weekend, the first
intrusion attempt from the internet was detected less than five minutes later.
Fortunately, the patches had already been installed. Having a software or
hardware firewall may prevent having to find out whether the patches actually
work.
August 13, 2003 Bruce Campbell
Blasted! (virus)
Reading posts about this. We had a panic at work today - no one reported the
virus anywhere, but the IT Security people were in a frenzy all day! Some
Server/Workstation Admins (I'm one) did not implement the patch last week, as
instructed, leaving wide-open security holes. Man, I'm glad I took care of my
dept last week, the Admins that didn't do the patch got royally chewed out.
BTW, I'm in Maryland US, and yesterday the entire state Motor Vehicle Dept was
infected and were closed all day. It's not a real damaging virus (as in
destroying files), I gather, but it "took out" the entire MV's network, whatever
sort of actions it does, it can disable a network pretty easily.
August 13, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia <Bagaglia
at wanadoo.nl>
anonymous id's
Dave F.
I hope that the problem can be solved without the need of moving to another site
and I modestly offer you my full support when I will be back.
I am so sorry you debated to delete my anonymous post (under the pseudonym
"Anonymous Bosch") , which did make sense and not in Aramaic but in English. It
happens that in that website, from which someone copied, there was a bad mistake
in a name. I can never forgive mistakes, once they've been notified.
Paolo (leaving for holidays from now)
August 13, 2003 David Benson
Dave, IMO the only way to resolve the question whether there should be sign in
or not is to ask the users that use their names or Ebay ID's to vote,
David Benson
August 13, 2003 sveiki!
I have no hard feelings towards anyone. Step forward, please. {:o)
August 13, 2003 Angelo Maria R.
Paolonon so se ho da imparare di piu' dai francobolli o dalla
meccanica dei fluidi,molte delusioni in entrambi i campi,btw my name and middle
name made a clear surname
August 13, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
No! Il problema è di meccanica razionale applicata all'idrodinamica, avendo
isolato una particella fluida (punto di vista lagrangiano) ed applicando le
equazioni cardinali in forma non semplificata od avendo determinato piccole
superficie di controllo a ridosso della pala (di profilo Munk 7) tra qui
calcolare i bilanci energetici. La soluzione al problema posto non la trovi nè
nel Citrini-Noseda nè nel Marchi Rubatta, te lo posso garantire. Infatti, che io
sappia non è nota matematicamente. Comunque se la trovi rendimelo noto, perchè
mi serve. Paolo
August 13, 2003 14:47 Dave (moderator)
anonymous id's
Paolo: So good to see you back here. And thanks for letting me know about
the "Bosch" post, as I was debating about deleting it.
I don't know if you looked in here over the weekend, but there was much
discussion about this issue (some of it from me).
To go to a different software package will require moving to another site.
That's not such a bad thing, but I don't want to do it so quickly that we end up
not making the right decisions for the long-term. I would be prepared to make
this move once in the near-term, but it cannot happen immediately.
However, is still bothers me on principle that this would be needed. Just today,
I was on a vast restaurant/culinary website, which does not require
registration, etc. I see no problem with strange posts there, and it may be
because the moderators (there are several, and it has some products for sale, so
it's not a volunteer effort) stay right on top of it.
Thus, I am prepared for the interim to take a low-tech solution to the problem
and just delete posts that don't make sense to me. I have been watching the
board carefully all this week, and some posts have been pulled. But I'm trying
not to be provocative about it either, and watching to see if some threads
develop, such as the one today.
Although I used to be able to read Italian somewhat from the days when I used to
be fluent in French (and many years of Latin before that), please feel free to
let me know if something inappropriate shows up here in a language that you
know.
In general, the board is much calmer than it was, and I hope it will continue to
stay focused on philatelic topics.
And here's the link to the culinary site I was mentioning above. Click through
to see any of the regional boards in the US. (It's actually a very good site.)
www.chowhound.com
August 13, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Scusa, ma qui è lecito scrivere in inglese! Non vedo che diamine c'entri il "puntiglio",
per quanto abbia palle da vendere (sto' progredendo al riguardo). È una chat
board internazionale, di conseguenza è ovvio che la lingua dovrebbe essere un
qualcosa che si approssima all'inglese! Rivela la tua identità! Almeno provaci,
no?
Paolo
August 13, 2003 .
uhm..the use of Citrini-Noseda can help for solve the problem?
August 13, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
The topic of anonimity of posts was brought up some weeks ago, precisely in mid
June, by me. Any development on that topic would just be welcome, having kept in
mind that the basic requirement for a honest discussion at deeper level is
certainly not anonimity... unless you send me the deterministic solution of the
three dimensional problem in applied mechanics of fluid to the sub-sonic
(simplification) motion of a viscous fluid around an airfoil profile NACA Munk 7
(simplification), from any point of view, lagrangian or eulerian, then, upon
verification, I would also accept anonimity ;-).
Paolo
August 13, 2003 .
oh che palle questo puntiglio con l'inglese!
August 13, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia <bagaglia
apenstaart wanadoo.nl>
San Marino
I am back for these two posts, before time, I confess, but for a good reason.
Anonymous Bosch's post was mine. It's referred to Jeroen Bosch, but I fully
understand your deficiency in understanding humour (along with some other
natural deficiencies of bigger entity).
I thought it would have been convenient to honour the website from which
the text about San Marino was copied, it is this.
Stampkiller and your other various aliases, I think I know who you are
(name, surname and address -- I never revealed it to anybody because I am
discrete regarding privacy matters) unless there is somebody else who knows you
well enough who's playing your part.
Please, reveal yourself at once!!! It would be so much convenient for you and
you'd be likely to gain some respect from the others. If you remain stampkiller
or antonius-crap or whatever there is just a remote chance anybody will take you
seriously (even smaller than the chance I got revealing my real identity in
first instance).
Ambassodor of philately: Larry v D-- sorry, I had not read that! Is that
for REAL??? )or am I having visions) You are on the wrong path with philately. I
tolerate you sales list but I modestly think you cannot stand as an example of
anything in philately.
Paolo
August 13, 2003 .
Anonymous Bosch ..i already know the source of J-W-S
August 13, 2003 Anonymous Bosch
San Marino
Barbavara not Barbavera!
August 13, 2003 sveiki!
louise so, why did you leave then? {;o) *hehe*
I'm there now.
August 13, 2003 Louise
Sveiki - update - site loaded ok this time.
August 13, 2003 Louise
Sveiki - am around, honest, but having difficulties loading the site.
Too tired to make my usual comments - busy day behind me and in front of me and
need a cup of coffee!
August 13, 2003 .
JimImages have been sent yet, thanks for your time
August 13, 2003 .
J-W-Syou right...so i used my primary e-mail address scanned for
virus the attachment twice. Anonymous anymore....
August 13, 2003 12:27 Jim Watson
Jim W-S,
Good thought! But I'll live dangerously. . . I guess.
August 13, 2003 12:19 jim Watson <nfn05917
"at" naples.net>
San Marino Postal History
Stampkiller,The 1951 cover might be worth a try. Send it on. The 1918
card might be more interesting but the post date is not legible. You don't what
day to put it up. If nothing else, I'll put the 1951 FDC up and you can do a
writeup of your own on August 20th. I'll give you a reminder.
BTW, I'm Jim. "We used to say, I'm not Mister, I work for a living."
Also, your selected id does not encourage a friendly response, IMO.
Jim W-S,
Nice bit on San Marino postal history.
August 13, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Mr. stampkiller,
do you not find it somewhat incongruous, and I'm sure jimbo can answer
for himself, that a person who wishes to remain anonymous and prefers not to
link to images, should offer to email image files in the middle of a board
conversation regarding the perils of computer viruses sent by email?
August 13, 2003 .
reciver = receiver
August 13, 2003 stampkiller
Mr. Watson, i have found two covers of St.Marino send "this mounth", one dated
08-20- 1951 and a second one dated 08-??-1918.The first one is an FDC of Sassone
A98 sent to Paris and re-addresed Nouey Ville because of the reciver moved
there, the second one is a postcard send to Germany from San Marino with a mixed
franking of SM and italian stamps.Sorry i prefer do no put a link for them, so
if yuo are interested i can send you same images.
August 13, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
By special request, San Marino postal history, purloined and edited:
Public postal services were introduced for San Marino on 7 October 1607, with a
"Postillion who will go to collect and carry the letters to the Post Office at
Rimini". Two centuries later, in 1833, the Republic’s own proper post office was
opened in a palazzo which overlooked the Pianello. However, the mail was
franked, eventually, only in the Rimini office, first Papal, then Sardinian and
finally Italian, up to 1852 with the simple handstamp Affrancata and after that
with postage stamps.
It was only on 1 January 1863, when new postal regulations came into force in
Italy and established that a double tax was payable on unfranked letters, that
San Marino decided to provide itself with postage stamps : Italian stamps were
therefore obtained in Rimini according to need. When the first postal treaty
with Italy was signed on 7 February 1865 San Marino decided to carry on with the
use of Italian stamps, at least "for now", since a restricted postal traffic did
not yet justify the production of their own stamps. Ten years later, however,
the situation had changed.
On 2 March 1877 a postal convention between partners of equal status was signed,
as a result of which the two administration retained "for themselves and in its
entirety, the tax received by their respective offices" for the franking of
letters ; a franking which must "be represented by the postage stamps in use in
the respective states". It was thus that San Marino became the first of the
small European states to provide itself with its own stamps. They came into use
on 1 August 1877, a month later than had been foreseen in the Convention,
because of delays in the delivery of supplies on the part of the Italian
government printing works.
It was felt that the 120th anniversary should celebrate in a very different way
the people who conceived and promoted these stamps : individuals known but only
to specialists in the field and who have never before been remembered with a
stamp.
The first is Count Giovanni Battista Barbavera di Gravellona, who became
Director-General of the Sardinian Post Office in 1859, which later became the
Italian Post Office, a position he held until 1 February 1880, as well as being
a Senator of the Kingdom. His signature appears at the foot of both the postal
conventions between San Marino and Italy, alongside those of the two great
Councillors and Plenipotentiaries of the Republic, Count Cibrario in 1865 and
Senator Vigliani in 1877.
The second is Enrico Repettati, chief engraver for the Officina Carte Valori in
Turin (which appears in the background of the stamp), who designed and engraved,
or at the very least oversaw the production of, all the postal values issued by
San Marino in the 19th century.
The third is Otto Bickel, the active and often unjustly criticised German dealer
in stamps, fossils (my hero!) and virtually anything that could be
collected, who resided in San Marino between 1891 and 1894, diffusing knowledge
and promoting the collection of the Republic’s postal values through the
multi-lingual monthly San Marino-Philatelist and his original illustrated
envelopes.
Last but no means least is Alfredo Reffi, Sammarinese stamp dealer and publisher
of many distinguished postcards (one of which appears as the background of the
stamp), and who was many times a Captain-Regent, who promoted the stamps of San
Marino in a intelligent manner, at first with his sales lists and then in the
1930s through an elegant and well-documented catalogue.
August 13, 2003 Louise
Spam
Yeah, I got that one too, offering me GBP 11m - thought it was my lucky day...
August 13, 2003 Bob H.
spam
Got three offers of wealth for helping people get money out of Africa in last
week - one only $3,000,000 - pikers!
August 13, 2003 Jim Watson
Spam
Noip,
Did anyone else out there get spam from a Mrs. Sankoh in Dabai?
August 13, 2003 10:20 Jim Watson
San Marino Postal History
Stampkiller,
My approach is to post a cover each day which was postmarked on that day at some
time in the past. I like the covers to have adequate scans and readable
postmarks. I also like originations, destinations, and usages that are out of
the ordinary. I generally prefer covers before World War II. My selections are
limited to the cover images I've saved. I've accumulated ca. 3000 images
(including compressions) which probably averages less than four per day to
choose from. Unfortunately, not many San Marino covers come up in the gold pan.
Can you put some up that I might be able to use?
August 13, 2003 Dave P
Blasted Virus
Dave Philatarium (too many darn Dave's here), you scared me into doing another
scan - all clear. I think the problem with this one is it can spread without
email. When I saw the news originally I did a Norton update, usually they do
everything on a Wednesday, but this one got special treatment and was available
from Monday. They are treating it as serious - level 4. I also downloaded the
latest security patch (I run XP) as soon as I got the alert. A lot of systems
have been infected, a company I deal with was off line for 4 hours this morning
while they were disinfecting, and I suspect many Ebayers will be hit judging by
the number who caught the Bugbear worm.
August 13, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
W32Blaster virus
Thanks for the warnings about this virus Dave! After reading about it I
offered to email my son a link to the patch so he could get it at work. He works
for the city. He thought their computer gurus would handle it, so he passed on
the offer.
Of course their system got infected.
The patch for Win XP 32 bit is KB823980-x86-ENU.exe and it's just under 1 1/4
megs, easy even on a dial up connection.
A computer savvy friend tells me this one is serious. I see Microsoft does
mention the safety of a firewall for this bug, but I'd recommend the patch too
for sure.
Duncan
August 13, 2003 9:00 Dave ("philatarium")
worm
George: I bet that's right. I know that there are some versions that are
not impacted by this. The one I'm particularly aware of that is not affected is
Windows ME. I used to have that until I "upgraded" to XP, and ME is still the
one my friends whom I kind of watch out for computer-wise have. (Diagram that
sentence!)
August 13, 2003 Bob H.
current worm
George,
that's my understanding - the version of this worm is not backward compatible...
August 13, 2003 George K
The new worm
Anyome know anything definitive about this? I have a laptop with Windows 98. The
Microsoft site has patches for a number of versions, but not 98. Is this one
naturally immune because it's too primitive or what?
August 13, 2003 8:02 Dave ("philatarium")
Microsoft worm
Just to share a personal experience. I have Norton Anti-virus set to
auto-update, and, coupled with Norton Internet Security always on, I thought I
was pretty well covered against all those potential threats out there. But I
decided to run NAV last night for a full system scan. I would have bet good
money that there's no way it would have found anything.
Well, you can tell by the way this story is going that it did find a
virus. I was stunned. It has never found anything ever from a system scan
because, I thought confidently, it finds everything when it scans the incoming
email, etc. and the definitions are always current. Goes to show ...
So, for those of you so inclined, it might be worth it to first make sure your
definitions are current and then run a scan, especially in light of this new
widespread worm floating around out there.
August 13, 2003 stamp killer
Mr Watson..can you post anything about St.Marino postal history?
thank a lot
August 13, 2003 0630 Prometheus
Today's Post Card 13 Aug 1932=kans ovpt
This little post card of the washington monument at night
is my only used (i think real) copy of a Kans overprint.
Here is SCAN
from Ruby on Vaction in the East to Miss. Erma Shepperd in Oklahoma City.
August 13, 2003 Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 13, 2003 04:08 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a registered cover from
Tahiti to
Austria in 1928. It has lots of colorful stamps.
August 12, 2003 Roger Heath
I'll Bite
I'm in a Mac household and would have thought worms should be found in Apples,
but so far the genetic characteristics are performing flawlessly.
Roger
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
MSBlast(er)
Ya know, I get a lot of crap from friends and family for receiving mail on a
UNIX system, which has a hard time dealing with attachments. Strangely, they're
not giving me crap *today*. Gee, I wonder why...
Jim
August 12, 2003 7:17 pm Steve Taylor (aka philcomp)
http://www.timeblaster.com/tbeindex.shtml
MSBlast(er)
Just got finished cleaning this abomination off my system.
I think MicroSoft has created enough security holes in their Windows operating
systems that they out to be required to post a significant 'reward' for
information leading to the apprehension of some of these worm and virus creators
(a la Qusay and Uday...DEAD OR ALIVE!). They certainly could afford it (sitting
on $38 billion in cash).
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
pink rose
Bill The pink rose shade is likely the pinkish variety that occured in (I
think)somewhere in the 1864 printings. Specialists tend to tell the difference
between the 1861 pinks and 1864 pinks based on the clarity of impression and
paper type.
I assume that's where that will go...
August 12, 2003 Bill Weiss
KEN; Nope, sorry don't have one, and can't say I've ever seen one - at least
that I was aware that it was a distinct listed color shade. All of these #279b
minor color varieties came about I guess within the last 5 years or so as a
result I think of teriffic research by a few dedicated folks who finally got
Scott to list some of them.
Color in philately is not a subject that sparks very many folks. Most collectors
are happy to fill a space in their album with ONE stamp, and to stray into lots
of color shades doesn't appeal to them.
One color shade I got Scott to finally list is a PINK-ROSE shade for #65. For
years it irritated me to see LOTS of 3cent 1861s which when looked at carefully
with a good glass revealed a tinge of pinkness, but not enough to have any
expert feel it qualified as any of the listed PINK colors; #64,64a,64b, yet I
damn well knew I was seeing some pink. I finally showed some examples to Scott
and they listed it. Now the problem is getting the philatelic world to recognize
it when they see it! The first question I got was from Randy Shoemaker - how
will I know it when someone submits it? While I was able to show him an example
- to my eyes - I told him I thought they (PSE and/or ANY expert committee) would
pretty much have to develope their own criteria for defining it, and since PSE
has a good reference collection of 3cent 1861 shades that's what they will do.
To me, it's any 3cent 1861 that you can see some pink in, yet not enough to call
it any of the pink shades, thus....pink rose!
August 12, 2003 18:33 Ken S.
KEN; If you want me to send you the 279Bcs for you to look at, I will gladly
do so. Let me know. We both know how tough it is to put color into words,
particularly the reds.
Bill W., thanks for the offer. I already have a certified 279Bc in my
reference collection plus a few others (slightly different shades/intensities)
that I've kept over the years. I think I'm OK on those.
The one I wouldn't mind seeing (if you have one) is the brown-orange (279Bi).
Every one I've seen claiming to be that looks like a changeling to me
("oxidized" and/or chemically altered)... Maybe I'm just too harsh! (skeptical?)
I'd love to see a certified example but haven't found one yet... BTW, it
catalogs a lot less than the 279Bc, but I'd guess it's (much) more scarce
(either that, or I'm just too picky and keep discarding/ignoring genuine
brown-orange examples without knowing it :-)
August 12, 2003 Bill Weiss
ADDIE
This is just an amusing post to pass a moment or two. The other day when this
board was all agog with back-and-forth about this "addie" clown, I just didn't
have the heart to tell you all, that my WIFE'S name is.....................ADDIE!
(No silly remarks please!).
August 12, 2003 David Benson
Formosa
Christo, re your Formosa Horse and Dragon forgery. The originals are listed in
Gibbons Specialised as s.g. C5-6. The originals were recess printed by Bradbury
Wilkinson and are exceptionally well produced. Your fake is a litho from around
1900.
David Benson
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
registration
I don't want to work.
here is a cover that shows 13 cent rate with registration. The small pen
marking Reg #25 at bottom left gives evidence of registration.
here
is one showing a handstamped registration marking.
here is a 15 cent rate to Germany with 5 cent overseas + 10 cent
registration
And
another
from a small town with just a pen marking with "no 18" at center top.
Finally
a fun one with lots of 1 cent stamps paying registration.
This bypass brought to you by the number 13 and the letter R.
August 12, 2003 Bill Weiss
1889 Registry
Rob is right, in 1889 it was 10cents, not 8cents (went back to 8cents in 1893
when the 8cent Columbian was issued and then stayed 8cents until the 10cent
Registry stamp was issued). My offhand guess without seeing the item is that the
sender merely overpaid the rate by 2cents.
KEN; If you want me to send you the 279Bcs for you to look at, I will gladly do
so. Let me know. We both know how tough it is to put color into words,
particularly the reds.
August 12, 2003 Bill Weiss
279Bc
KEN; Truthfully, neither of those you just scanned looks like 279Bc, but what
that tells me, since your unedited scan looks DIFFERENT to me than the one on
Riny's site, is that it's obviously my screen. No, we have never adjusted it,
and I doubt that either me or my wife would know how! I am truly computer-stupid
- but I know stamps! Now, back to the 279Bc. The ones I have seen (certified)
are a shade (in my words) of a lovely sahade of rose with a tinge of pink and
within the pink is a tinge of purple/blue, yet I would not say that it is the
same as your right-hand scan.
GOLF - While it's true I can hit a wedge 150 yards, at the other end of the
spectrum, I can't hit any woods at all, other than the most lofted (like a
7-wood or 9-wood)!
PATRICK'S COVERS; Item #1 is undoubtably a 10cents + 3cents Registry + First
class usage, item #2 is as Rob pointed out 8cents Registry + 5cents UPU rate,
Item #3 is a Railroad postmark (probably Denver & Rio Grand/Western), and the
last item is not uncommon.
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
Patrick Some help on rates can be found here:
rates by year
Simple to follow, by no means complete - but a good starter.
Looks like the 8 cent registry fee was in 1874 - Jun of 1875. So, that likely
dates your Ohio letter as a registry fee + regular 3 cent delivery - especially
since the stamps are from that period.
Unfortunately, I see the registry fee is 10 cents in 1889 - I don't know if the
rate differed for registration out of country. So, my earlier analysis on the
Bremen letter is in some doubt.
That's what I can do for you...sorry it couldn't be more helpful.
Rob
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Jim and Jim from Jim, Re: "jim & jim from jim", yeah, that's certainly
what it sounds like to me.
Jim
August 12, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
jim & jim from jim
When it happened to me, I got the failed email message before I got my own send
an an email message.
It has to be an aol/eBay screw-up and not something deliberate.
I'm guessing eBay is misdirecting aol messages.
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
Patrick I am at work, so no references available.
I seem to recall that in 1889 you would have 5 cents for the overseas rate and 8
cents for a registration fee. So, that would account for the 13 cents on the
Bremen cover. Are there pencil markings which is a series of numbers
(registration number)? That would confirm that suspicion.
The Ohio item may well also be registration - with 10 cent registration fee and
3 cent mailing.
The Colorado postcard may appeal to postmark or railroad collectors, but I don't
know what else to say about it.
and Bob knows the parcel post better than I. :)
Rob
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Jim, if you got an email bounce, then it almost certainly is not a "new
eBay hack". It may very well be an eBay bug. It may be an AOL bug. Whenever I
see "AOL" involved in something like this, I get suspicious of AOL, because of
their spam filters, their privacy software, and other such things that don't
necessarily work right and are often misconfigured by users. But internet
companies just do not implement new features that depend on mail bouncing,
because that causes other problems (like AOL suing eBay for flooding their
servers).
Jim
August 12, 2003 16:32 Ken S.
279Bc
Bill W., take a look at
this scan.
Riny's (unedited) scan is on the left. I made another copy and pasted it at
right. On that stamp, I changed the "red" to "carmine" and added "blue" (to give
the hue I associate with 279Bc's). Tell me which one you think looks more like a
279Bc...
August 12, 2003 4:28 pm Jim (jaywild)
Email the seller after acution closes--not!!
Sorry, it’s taking me a while to reply to the board—I’m working at home today,
and actually working! J
Bob Hohertz… Yes, by clicking on the user ID. It does work differently if
the auction has already closed—try the auction I gave the number to (2944515083)
and any email, accessed by clicking on the user ID, goes nowhere! Then click
VIEW SELLER’S OTHER ITEMS, open one up, and send an email. Works
perfectly.
Jim Griffith I received an email bounce, purportedly from a1gavin@aol.com,
the same phony bounced email address for all the sellers I tried to contact.
I hope it’s not just my computer. I have a firewall and my Norton AV updates
automatically constantly, so I doubt I’m suffering from a worm or virus.
Actually I'd welcome anyone trying to email the seller of that closed
auction, then select another of his auctions and send another innocuous email
through his ID, and let me know what responses you get.
Jim
August 12, 2003 Roger Heath
Re email problem
I have had no problem contacting sellers with open auctions. That said, what I
have had problems with is going through the "View Sellers Other Auctions". I use
this frequently when I find something I like or seems to have potential. Once on
the sellrs auction page I click on something I wish to view only to get "invalid
item". So since I now know what this seller is selling I go back to my search
page and find the desription there, and click. Bingo, not invalid after all.
There appear to be many things not happeing via the IBM intermediate page that
went into effect a couple of weeks ago.
Roger
August 12, 2003 16:17 Ken S.
While I don't like to disagree with my good friend (and much longer golf ball
hitter) Bill W. :-), the 279Bc's I've seen have a distinct bluish/purplish hue
to them, something (to my eye) not evident at all in Riny's scan (I also look
for the "blue/purple" hue on those 319b's, 319j's, 320c's, 64a's, 64's, etc.)
BTW, I even took a second look at the scan... Quite honestly, it doesn't even
look to be in the carmine family to me (more "red")!
Bill W., have you color corrected your monitor recently? It's possible we're
seeing two different colors from the same scan. FWIW, I calibrate mine once a
month and find it does drift a little...
Unfortunately, I've learned not to trust scans at all when it comes to subtle
hues (I suppose our "argument" is really moot -- you need to examine that one in
person, not rely on a scan.) Anyone who has tried to scan a Scott 64 or 64a
knows there's something about those red/pink/carmine/rose shades that results in
very poor color reproduction...
August 12, 2003 Bob Hohertz
postal rates
The postcard with the one-cent parcel post isn't too unusual, but they are
collectible. Those stamps did not last long for their particular use, and became
available for general use such as your card.
August 12, 2003 15:55 Patrick Lemon <plemon@paladigm.com>
Postal Rates
Rob - unfortunately I am at home and my scanner is at work. The Bremen cover has
numerous date stamps from February 1889. Neither the Parcel Post or Ohio items
have a date. The Colorado postcard has a September 1925 date.
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
Patrick Are there dates on some of these. That often helps explain the
rates and amounts on the piece.
I wouldn't be surprised if a couple are registered mail pieces. Some markings
will be done in pencil and crayon which give hints as to what happened.
Can you scan?
August 12, 2003 15:39 Patrick Lemon <plemon@paladigm.com>
US Postal Rates
NOIP - I have four items of postal history that I am trying to make sense of.
The first is a cover containing Scott numbers 158 and 161, totalling 13 cents in
postage. There is no return address and it was addressed to Ohio. There are no
ancillary markings on the envelope to explain the $.13.
The second is a cover addressed to Bremen, Germany. It also has a total of $.13
in postage, consisting of a #289 and on a U330 envelope. The envelope has a Chi.
& Minn. RPO postmark.
The third is a postcard cancelled 9/7/1925 with a circular stamp that reads "Top
of the World, Tennessee Pass, Colo., D. & R.G.W.R.R."
The last is a post card with a $.01 parcel post stamp cancelled at Sault St.
Marie, MI. No date.
I welcome any insight or comments about any of these as I am terribly ignorant
regarding postal history. In particular, is the parcel post use rare?
Thanks
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Jim, when you say "a few moments later I got", do you mean "I saw in the
browser", or "I received an email bounce"?
Jim
August 12, 2003 Bob Hohertz
fraud???
Jim,
How did you try to send the first one? Just clicking on the user's ID? If so,
somebody sent me an e-mail that way today. If you tried Ask seller a question it
may be another tech "improvement" that is meaningless since you can always click
on the ID to send one.
August 12, 2003 3:20 PM Jim (jaywild)
At eBay, fraud starts at the top
Hi Folks,
Well, eBay has done it again. They have instituted an arrangement to prevent
anyone from emailing the seller of a lot that closed without bidders, and then
disguised it to look as if the problem is a “mail undeliverable” failure. This
is pretty low, even for eBay.
To illustrate what I mean, I missed the close of an auction today
(#2944515083) and tried to email the seller to ask if he was going to relist it.
(The item closed at 99 cents with no bidders.) But I noticed my email went to
DEFAULT and not to the seller. A few moments later I got a
MAIL UNDELIVERABLE message saying “a1gavin@aol.com
is not accepting any mail”. I then went back to the auction, clicked on
VIEW SELLER’S OTHER ITEMS, selected an auction, then clicked on the
seller’s user ID. The email went through fine. (I invite others to try what I
did.)
I then wondered if this was an isolated incident. No. I went to
several other auctions (from different sellers) that had closed and attempted to
email the seller, and got the same weird “a1gavin@aol.com
is not accepting any mail” response.
Apparently eBay is trying yet another tactic to squeeze a few more pennies
out of everyone. Typical, and pathetic. I’m going to post this message to the
“other” board. Let’s see how long it lasts there.
Jim
August 12, 2003 Bill Weiss
#279Bc
While I don't like to disagreee with my friend Ken S., and I am NO fan of
Riny218, the shade of that stamp is correct for a #279Bc! I currently have two
of them, both with Certs (PFCs I think) and the shade is pretty exactly like he
is showing - BUT - that being said, we all know how colors can be manipulated
with scans, so I wouldn't bet that it really is the shade we are seeing.
August 12, 2003 Louise
Anonymous posters
Thanks, Dave, maybe I courted it a bit by mentioning him in one of my posts.
Anyway, goodnight all...I have to be up early again...looking forward to a
three-day-weekend though.
August 12, 2003 sveiki!
Windows Update
Dave Done that, been there. {:o) Just remember one thing - make a back-up
floppy or CD with all mails from the Outlook Express program - if you decide to
download all critical updates. The Windows Service Pack deleted ALL my mails.
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
279Bc
Ken, considering the seller, how likely is it that the scan is less
accurate than the description?
I'm not interested myself, but it caught my attention.
Jim
August 12, 2003 14:47 Ken S.
Riny's 279Bc
Jim, if the scan is representative of the actual color, the chance of
that stamp being a Scott 279Bc is 0%. Of course, scans can be deceiving,
especially on red/pink/rose/carmine shades...
August 12, 2003 14:47 Dave Frick (moderator)
Louise: I did figure out that that beer post wasn't yours, and took it
out, although perhaps not as soon as hoped for. (Thanks for your hint, though,
which brought it to my attention.)
Anyone: If someone has made a post under your name, please send me an
email to let me know (which one), and I'll take care of it.
August 12, 2003 14:43 Dave Frick (moderator)
Just checking in quickly for the moment. I have many people to respond to, so
let me acknowledge that and then make these points:
The Windows update that I posted last week turns out to have been raised to a
critical level. Let me post here what I have received from a friend of mine, who
is professionally in a position to deal with such matters:
An urgent reminder to update your computers with the latest patches:
1. Run Internet Explorer
2. From the "Tools" menu, choose "Windows Update"
3. Choose "Scan for Updates"
4. Install the Critical Updates.
Regards,
-----
Experts: Web worm attacks Windows, spreads fast
Tuesday, August 12, 2003 Posted: 11:27 AM EDT (1527 GMT)
SAN FRANCISCO, California (Reuters) -- An Internet worm targeting Microsoft Corp
Windows users was spreading rapidly around the world on Tuesday, triggering
computer crashes and slowing Web connections, experts said.
The worm, dubbed Blaster but also known as LoveSan or MSBlaster, carried a
message for the Microsoft chairman: "Billy Gates why do you make this possible?
Stop making money and fix your software!!"
Blaster, which zeroes in on Windows 2000 or Windows XP operating software, has
been timed to attack a Microsoft security Web site distributing the patch needed
to stop the worm in its tracks before it hits millions of users.
The worm specifically targets the latest versions of the Windows software and
experts predict home users will be the worst affected. The vast majority of the
world's computers are equipped with one form or other of Windows software.
"I anticipate that Blaster will have its biggest impact on the home user
community as they are more laid back about keeping their anti-virus and patches
up-to-date and may have insufficient firewalls in place," said Graham Cluley, a
technology consultant at British-based Sophos Anti Virus.
Blaster is fairly unusual in that it does not spread specifically via e-mail as
it can travel through a normal Internet connection.
Security experts advised computer users to visit Microsoft's security page to
download the patch. The author has programmed the worm to knock the site offline
on August 16, the experts said.
Blocking the worm's path
A host of European and Asian anti-virus firms reported corporations had
contacted them to say they had been infected as their systems went online on
Tuesday.
Following a quick patch job, many corporate systems were back up and running
without a hitch. But as the greatest damage was expected to be in the home
market, the actual toll of Blaster might be difficult to determine, the experts
said.
In South Korea, one of the world's most wired nations, Blaster was having
limited impact, officials said, as technicians took steps to block vital
Internet ports that prevented the worm's widespread movement.
Once Blaster infects a computer, it scans the Internet for other vulnerable
machines to attack.
In some cases the worm causes the computer to crash, but does not infect it,
said Johannes Ullrich, chief technology officer at the Internet Storm Center at
the SANS Institute in the United States.
"It's dangerous from the perspective that it can consume a lot of bandwidth,"
said Russ Cooper of TruSecure Corp. "Every compromised machine is constantly
attacking."
In January, a worm dubbed "Slammer" that exploited a hole in Microsoft SQL
database software brought automatic teller machines in the United States to a
standstill, paralyzed corporate networks worldwide and nearly shut down Web
access to South Korea.
August 12, 2003 sveiki!
That's right - just friskin' your ID. {:o)
August 12, 2003 Louise
Yes - I logged in at about nine o'clock CET... are you there right now?
Sorry - my mother phoned.
August 12, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Does the word "log-in" mean anything to you?
August 12, 2003 Louise
Czech
Damn! My half-baked schemes for getting rid of my duplicates foiled again!
Though I suppose if I get enough I could always offer them to the local dealers,
who hardly ever seem to have anything interesting in at all (except the
Slovakian National Uprising block, which if I can persuade an English student to
pay me for talking at them for two hours might well be within my grasp, if I can
manage to go without food for two or three days...).
August 12, 2003 David Benson
Dunkin Donuts, if I was going to make a choice based on the evidence, I would
say thumbs down. Too many negatives and unlikely the story of the find is true
as unlikely for them to be found in Hawaii, a New England find might have been
more plausible.
David Benson
August 12, 2003 Louise
Ah right, yes...sorry. But I seem to have uncovered something, eh, Jim?
Greg - how did the auction go for those Japanese stamps?
August 12, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
In the Czech lot, does
"It is our policy not to give information to one bidder without giving such
information to all potential bidders. We have provided sufficient information
within the lot description so informed bids can be made."
This mean they won't answer emails?
August 12, 2003 Greg Ioannou <gregioannou@rogers.com>
Czech blocks
Loise They are all plate # blocks, which are a bit unusual. And that lot
still doesn't have any bids, so my guess is they aren't a really hot item. Nice,
though -- I'm almost tempted to bid on them myself. Always have had a soft spot
for Czech stuff.
August 12, 2003 sveiki!
Louise That's OK. {:o) I'm taking many things very relatively. BTW... I
can see you where there if you get my drift. {:o)
August 12, 2003 David Benson
Christo, re the Formosa, tis a forgery of the unissued Horse and Dragon,
see,
http://perso.club-internet.fr/klaseboe/formo.htm
David Benson
August 12, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Hmmm. What are the chances that
this stamp is what he claims it is?
Jim
August 12, 2003 David Benson
Christo, did I hear my name mentioned. Sorry, it is not a local, just a Revenue.
Even in perfect condition it is not worth much.
David Benson
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
NOIP Anybody know what to make of this Formosa stamp? I ca't find it in
my catalogues. If you can, please let me have o SG or Scott Number and where to
look! Or is it a Fake?
Formosa_Stamp
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Roger/Malolo If you are around, can you please let me know more about
this Canton Bern Stamp? I know it is in "worthless" condition, to quote DB, but
would still like to know a bit more about it. Local post or for use in the
Canton?
Canton_Stamp
August 12, 2003 Louise
Are
these really worth all that? I've got a feeling I could put that together
from my Czsl duplicates at home if I wanted to. Maybe the ones I've got aren't
mint, but I can't remember them being anything special in the catalogue, and a
lot of the ones that are in my album are sets like that.
August 12, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Grinnells
What do ya think gang?
Fake or real?
The other board had a brief mention of the stamps, and here's a link to an
interesting
portion of the study of the Grinnell Missionaries, where the postmarks are
discussed.
I think it was Linns that had a recent article about the provenance provided by
the Grinnell side of the issue, very interesting. Hope we get an opinion soon on
these stamps. My guess would be, if the paper and ink are correct they'll be
found to be genuine.
Duncan
>{{{{*>
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
If the guy currently leading for the fake grill 99 wins it, you can bet it won't
show up for resale as a genuine. (lechatte)
August 12, 2003 Rob Faux
Dave I am not opposed to registering, etc.
In fact, let me point out that there is no reason that any privately created and
maintained discussion area need be open to any poster. While this goes contrary
to the desire that we be open to all opinions, etc... there should be NOTHING
wrong with desiring a conversation that is closed to some.
And, of course, if you go about the logging in method, there is still a
likelihood that those who are really motivated and stuck with too much time on
their hands can sign up and create 'noise', get kicked out, and sign up again...
The real issue here, Dave, is what you are willing to do. It is NOT fair to you
to add extra stress for something you are doing in hopes of allowing free
exchange of ideas and conversation. Choose whatever you need to choose in order
to make this a more pleasant and easy to maintain experience for you - and I
will support (whatever that's worth).
Paul/svieki! Hi! Haven't heard from you in a while - of course, I haven't
been lurking much! :) Dave Paul has some good expertise if you want/need
it.
Rob
August 12, 2003 Louise
Sveiki, a long way down the board by now but no, I don't drink beer at
all...that was posted by someone else who shall remain anonymous. I didn't reply
to it (directly) because I didn't want to set him off again and I hoped that
people would understand that it wasn't my style at all...just shows I suppose...
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Jim W-S Nice to see them being put to good use. They look so much nicer
once there is an explanation accompanying them!!
Greg IoannouGood to hear from you again!! The wine I must admit, is new
to me!! Also see that you are listing under a new handle. Is your address still
the same as last, I am about ready to send you some Oz states, kangaroos and KG
heads!
Christo
August 12, 2003 Richard Matta
Valuation
I was reading the comments on valuing stamps for IRS purposes. I agree with
Richard F - as with anything else (e.g., cars and blue book), you can claim
the book value as fair market, but the IRS is not required to accept it. I once
had to prove the value of a painting to the IRS for a client (the client had to
pay a penalty tax on the "use" of the painting as a pre-requisite for
transferring the painting from one pension plan to another) - there were only 3
experts in the country the IRS would accept to value it and it took about 3
months to reach agreement.
August 12, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Christo
I managed to get some of them
on the site
already.
This is
out
of date, but I can't update at the moment.
I wish they'd leave the site name alone.
August 12, 2003 Richard Matta
Fakes
Here's a
piece of cr*p being sold as a fake, but still drawing the bidders.
Several days to go and the bid is already way above what the stamp is worth,
being defaced with a fake grill. One can only wonder whether the buyers hope to
turn around and resell it as genuine, or put it in an album and pretend it is?
August 12, 2003 10.16 am Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/GB_Special_Issues/
Noise
Dave P
Whilst I would have no objection to signing in, your suggestion of deleting
‘noise’ might be less work for you. Or would it? The point about the ‘noise’ on
the other board in spite of signing in is a valid one.
Colin
August 12, 2003 10:04 Burton SMith <bridge2@erols.com>
Good Morning/Afternoon to all!
To anyone that can help -- I have a few Italian stamps with King Victor Emmanuel
III on them that have an overprint
"Alberghi?" and have "Tassa Di Bollo-Lusso E Scambri" and have a value on them.
Are these a type of revenue stamp?
Thanks in advance!
August 12, 2003 Ken C <kchrist499>
Wisconsin Fishing
Duncan
That photo reminds me of my youth; we spent two weeks every summer in Minoqua
and fished most of the lakes up there. Never did boat a muskie, but had a few
strikes. If I could catch fish like that, I'd give up stamps altogether!
August 12, 2003 nomad55
Duncan....I was wondering exactly the same thing.
August 12, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Why sales drop in the summer
Ken C and with a tip of the hat to David Moser here's one reason
sales may slump in the summer...
Duncan has
gone fishing.
Oh, and Daphetid are you an old model railroad fan?
Duncan
August 12, 2003 Dave P
Although I agree in principal to the idea of registering to post to the board,
how would it work. If it required an initial manual check and approval then it
seems an awful lot of work for Dave F, seeing as this is a labour of love. If it
were automated I am not sure it would help much - the Ebay board requires
registration and look at the recent drivel there. It seems to be another version
of the graffiti culture, have some "fun", don't care about others. Registration
might also scare off the occasional casual poster, especially if the board
appeared to become too clubby. Hmmmm who would be a moderator!
August 12, 2003 .
Larry..yep..and you answered in a second..strange;-)
August 12, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
ken
To keep this board somewhat sane.
I think you have hit the nail on the head.
Knowledgable buyers are still present during the dog days of summer, but in
terms of realizing good prices, you need them to be opposed by the casual
buyers. Unless you are lucky and get a couple of knowledgable buyers going after
the same item. The summer is generally not the time to try to sell off your
prime merchandise.
Let me add my name to those who would be unopposed to registering in order to
post.
August 12, 2003 Daphetid
I thought Dunkin Donuts owned the world
August 12, 2003 Larry
stamplover, you added a post over me with uncorrect information and the way you
react now says enough to me.
August 12, 2003 8:24AM Ken C. <kchrist499@aol.com>
Summer Sales
Hello all! I've been dropping to lurk a few times and find this board
much more informative than the "other" one. But I do recall on the old board a
discussion some time ago about the best and worst times of the year to sell
material. There seemed to be unanimous agreement that summers were probably the
worst.
I've been selling off my US collection since March. I was a bit concerned
about continuing through the summer months, but so far my auctions are doing as
well as, or better than earlier in the year. Its just speculation, but I think
that only the casual bidder/collector takes time off for summer vacation. The
knowledgeable philatelists are buying all year long, and paying good prices for
good material. Does anyone care to comment about his/her personal experiences?
August 12, 2003 Stamplover
Larry
who are you for talk to me in this way? are you the owner of the world?
August 12, 2003 Greg Ioannou <gregioannou@rogers.com>
Seyssel
Hi, Christo! I don't know anything at all about French-Swiss cross-border
rates, but I didn't even have to look up
Seyssel!
August 12, 2003 Larry
Mr. Stamplover, if you don't know what an Ebay Ambassador is or do, do not make
such comments. Be sure that your postings are acurate instead of shouting things
without any background study of what you're talking about.
August 12, 2003 .
Knud-Erik (knuden)
you've touched the right point
August 12, 2003 Dave P
Since when has there been a GB 1st class stamp in
yellow?
Just goes to prove you can never trust a colour in a scan I suppose.
August 12, 2003 06:15 Jim Watson
Knud-Erik,
Not everything in history is pretty. They were driven by a desire to have a
better market for their sugar among other things. They were opposed in the
United States by the states which produced sugar. I don't think it is very
anaologous to the Iraq situation today. Iraq may be more analogous with the
Spanish American war of 1898. Neither remotely resembles World War II, IMHO.
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cross Border Rate
I think that MAC.G must stand for the Macon-Geneve railway line. It runs E-W
from Macon, and then connects to a N-S track along which Seyssel is located.
Seyssel is to the south of Fernex/Ferney.
August 12, 2003 06.05 Knud-Erik (knuden)
http://sudeten.bizland.com/Homepage.htm
Re: Today's dated postal history item
jimbo - I just read this "The Kingdom of Hawaii ended after Queen
Lili'uokalani was deposed in a coup by American businessmen on January 17, 1893.
The conspiracy had the support of United States Marines and the United States
diplomatic representative." Shame - shame!! It's sound like Iraq today! :O) *lol*
K.E.
August 12, 2003 Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 12, 2003 Stamplover
Fakes
Problem is that people still buy this type of
crap.
What's even worse is that the seller is an eBay 'Ambassador' for the Dutch stamp
community! This guy has to give advise to the Dutch novice stamp collectors, how
to start collecting stamps !!!
August 12, 2003 03:50 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
Hawaii in
1898. This cover was mailed on the date on which the United States formally
annexed Hawaii 105 years ago.
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Ferney
Roger, you haven't got a map showing the railway line? I am looking for the
station Seyssel, where this envelope was dropped in the box. Then it must have
travelled via train to Ferney?
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cross Border Rate
Hi Roger, I hoped that you would pick this up! Thanks for the info so far. If
the cross border rate was 2o centimes, then why would this be an insufficient
franked envelope. Taking into account the 30 c tax, can one infer that the rate
should have been 40 centimes (i.e. 15 c too little multiplied by two?).
Anybody out there know what the rate between France-Switzerland was in 1872?
I don't know much about cross-border rates - was there certain treaties etc in
place, determining rates. Could stamps from Switzerland be used on the French
side etc. etc.
oger, could you please also briefly explain to me the Geneve CDS - e.g. what the
abbreviations are for, etc. I presume the Roman numerals following the date slug
is the time?
Regards
Christo
August 12, 2003 Roger
Ferney
Disregard the first sentnce below - 25 centimes it is.
Another
Ferney map.
Roger
August 12, 2003 Roger Heath
Cross Border rate?
Christo -
I don't know the denomination of the French stamp. But
here are three Swiss examples which I have still not yet received but all
went to
Fernex (Ferney). The top two are from Geneve and are the cross border rate
of 20 centimes instead of 40. The bottom is the regular Lausanne, Switzerland to
France rate of 40 centimes. Fernex is said to be 8 km from Geneve, just across
the border. I hope this helps a little. I believe the red 2 is a Geneva delivery
route marking.
Roger
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Sorry, something went wrong with the links, here are the two that isn't
loading.BR>
front markings
back markings
August 12, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Hi, Couldn't connect to the board last night. Was there a problem?
Help Needed With Postal Markings Goodday/evening to all!
I am hoping that someone will be able to help with some of the postal markings
on this French cover. I have been able to figure out some of the markings, but
need some clarity on others. The cover of interest is
here. Scans of
the
front markings and
back markings.
It is a folded letter, dated on the inside 1 May 1872. Franked with a 25 c
blue Ceres (Report/Type I). Cancelled with a Gros Chiffres 1484 (Fernex,
Department Ain). On the same side is a Convoyeur Station Cancel (Undulating
circle), carrying the following notations:
SEYSSEL: Name of the station on which the posatl subagents box was located
1: The date of the month (which is in agreement with the 1st May date inside of
letter)
MAC.G - The abbreviated name of the railway line. Is there anyone who can help
with the MAC.G part? I presume G stands for Geneve (the destination of the
letter). MAC??
(1)The department number (this case Ain)
Faint, red rectangular boxed Affranchissment Isufficant (Insufficient
Franking/Postage)
?Manuscript 30 in black - Is this the taxed amount??
On reverse of cover is Fernex CDS, unfortunately covered by the Geneve Arrival
CDS dated 2 May 1872.
A red manuscript 2 - credit marking?? Who is credited?
Looking at the time between writing of letter and arrival in Geneve, it appears
that Fernex must be very close to the Swiss border.
Although the stamp has got a filing fold through it, to me still a nice piece to
use to learn/get acquainted with some aspects of French Postal History!
Thanks for looking and your help, Christo.
August 11, 2003 2141 Clark (reperf)
Microscopes for Philately
Chuck Harm,
Edmund Industrial Optics
sells a 25x magnifier with a measuring reticule, almost a necessity if you are
interested in measuring perforation holes, etc. The APS also sells somewhat less
expensive magnifiers to members but without the direct measurement capability. I
still use a small 15x magnifier on a swivel base because I can carry it around
in my pocket.
August 11, 2003 David Moser <stamphick@dospalos.org>
Fish
Someone mention fish?
David
August 11, 2003 Roger Heath
Dornier
David -
Here's another
example similar to mine rated 5Fr 10. Mine is 5Fr.30. Going out to dinner.
Roger
August 11, 2003 Roger );>)
);>) again!
August 11, 2003 David Benson
Roger,
have a look here, he has one at 135 Pounds.
http://www.berman.co.uk/acatalog/Postal_History_SWITZERLAND_408.html
David Benson
August 11, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Fishing
When can I expect you, Jim?
Dunc
August 11, 2003 Roger Heath
Switzerland Card
Here's a philatelic air mail
card
that I bought just to get the stamps. I received it today and it turns out to
have been on the
target=_blank>Dornier
X transatlantic flight. Does anyone have a clue what this might be valued at and
its scarcity?
Roger
August 11, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Duncan, don't worry about it. It's to be expected, since you are, after
all, a weenie.
Jim
August 11, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Teasing / Taunting
My conscience is bothering me. Do I tease too much when I visit here?
If I do, please forgive me. Its the Wisconsin way.
If a person comes up here to fish with me and doesn't have much skill, that's
fine. If I am catching trout and he is not, I may give him my favorite lure to
try, knowing full well that it will likely be lost to the logs and rocks on the
stream bottom.
On the other hand if a person puts on airs and brags of fishing skills he
obviously doesn't have, I may pat him on the back and tell him what a fine
fisherman he is, but I will be dropping a few sinkers down the back of his
waders at the same time. And when he tires of stepping on those painful sinkers
and finds himself flopping around on the river bank trying to rid himself of
those same sinkers, he may be teased mercilessly if I happen to hook a fish.
Thats how we deal with liars and braggarts and fools where I live... is it the
same around the world, or am I out of line?
Duncan
>{{{{*>
August 11, 2003 20:10 Dana Krueger <dkrueger
"at" kfl.com>
http://www.kfl.com/images/index.html
anonymous posters
Dave...You have my support to filter any or all anonymous posters. I'm
mostly a lurker, but have read all of the posts on this board since it started
(except a few deleted). To my recollection, there have been no anonymous posts
that have contributed meaningfully to the discussion. A few have been
disruptive; more have been of a complaining nature, not about some aspect of the
hobby, but about the other posters. Many have also been tiresomely repetitive.
They will not be missed by most readers.
Regards, Dana
August 11, 2003 David Benson
I used to be on the list of accredited valuers for donations to museums for tax
allowances. There were only 2 on the list, a well known delaer and myself, a
collector. I was on the list for about 5 years and in that time I only did 2
valuations, one was for the Museum of the biggest collection that was in their
vaults which was going to be transferred to a new Museum with an area
specificallly allocated for the collection. It took a long time as I could only
do it on weekends as I had a business (non philatelic) to run and I needed an
offsider to handle the calculations and paper work. The museum alloted? us 2
guards and a small working area. It took about 6 weekends and we were valuing
the material by page. Normally when valuing I work in decimal points usually
with jumps of $ 1 or $10. This time we worked in $100's at a time as the
collection was valued in the Millions. Very exciting time especially with
literally thousands of Sydney Views and Penny Blacks and Two Penny Blues all in
perfect condition. It is a reminder that most 4 margined copies of these are
tied up in museums and not in collections.
The other valuation I gave was one of the reasons I gave up the honor?. I was
approached by a well known dealer to value an accumulation of hundreds of One
Pound and Two Pound Kangaroos, mostly on Gold Parcel tags. They were in an old
ledger and what worried me was that there was no way of knowing if anything had
been removed and if so would I get the blame. The dealer (who I knew was very
disreputable) stated that was the way they handed to him and he had pencilled
how many per stamps per album page. There was no way of telling if he had taken
but I suspected that many had been removed as there were hinge marks. I valued
them and they were donated to a country museum (I have no idea why) and the
donatee got a huge tax allowance. I did not renew my appointment after that,
As far as I know there is still the same other dealer listed and he is the only
one. I asked him a couple of years ago how many he had done and he told me, not
even an enquiry.
David Benson
August 11, 2003 Richard Frajola
fair market value
The fact that you have signed a number of 8283's and not had them challenged is
meaningless. I suggest that you not tempt fate - the IRS can go after the signer
of the form and hold them liable for difference between IRS appraisal and
submitted appraisal.
You might want to check the legal definition of "fair market value" - sure
doesn't say catalog value anywhere.
As a rule, I won't sign IRS appraisal forms - not worth the liability.
August 11, 2003 19:10 Bob M COVERWIZ on eBay
Fair Market Value
Richard et. al. -- I have signed a number of Form 8283's and have never had one
come back. The form instructions used to specifically mention catalog value as
acceptable. Now it is much more vague. The Publication 561 on Determining the
Value of Donated Property states the following on:
"Stamp Collections: Most libraries have catalogs or other books that report
the publisher's estimate of values. Generally, two price levels are shown for
each stamp: the price postmarked and the price not postmarked. Stamp dealers
generally know the value of their merchandise and are able to prepare
satisfactory appraisals of valuable collections."
One can draw their own conclusions on what or what not the IRS will accept.
They are more specific on condition in regards to coins. The IRS may have more
faith in dealers and catalogs than some of the contributers to this board do!
August 11, 2003 Roger Heath
Noise
One of the results of having taught as a substitute teacher for the past 8 years
has been my experience with students who just want attention. With more than 50%
of families breaking apart during a childs youthful years, the school system is
the only entity that sees the children on a regular basis. Parents are working
two jobs, or absent; the TV is the only companion until the child starts to
realize it is an independent being. At this point, usually middle school years,
one must be aware the search for independence by these children can be guided or
not. I'm of the belief one can either participate in guiding or decide it's my
problem. Children who create such a continuous disturbance in class must be
removed if any learning is to proceed. If the child is not removed, everyone
suffers, everyone learns nothing they didn't already know, and they sit getting
angry at the impolite disturbed child. The sad aspect is the child should not
really be held totally accountable, conditions are not right for full
accountability.
I believe it is different for adults. If an adult does not wish to participate
in a constructive manner, they have many other things to do with their time.
Harrassing a chat board is rude, immature, and not constructive.
David - If it is necessary to your mental well being to change the Board, you
have my full support. I don't mind a sign in procedure. I wish to have a forum
where we can sit at our computers and pretend we're all in the same room working
on our collections and occasionally make comments about our finds, how well our
day went, where can we find information, etc.
This is a club, no doubt about it. I think we should be having discussions where
everyone should feel comfortable expressing themselves face to face. The only
time this doesn't work on the Ebay Chat or now here is when fakes and forgeries
are discussed. Why? Because there are some con games going on. We're not
discussing occasional misidentification, we're talking out and out attempts to
sucker beginning and intermediate into buying items that add nothing to a stamp
collection. Reference, nonsense!! The only thing to reference them with is the
item they were photocopied from to determine quality of the copier. That is not
stamp collecting!!
I have no problem with you deleting any post on your board.
Roger
August 11, 2003 Bill Weiss
NOMAD; that comment about auction agents wasn't meant for you, it was meant for
"anonymous" below! Sure, virtually everyone who uses an auction agent does so in
their own name, and receives either the lots or the bills directly from the
auction house, just as you do.
August 11, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
RPSL expertizers are not anonymous either (still).
August 11, 2003 nomad55
Hi Bill....I never expected an auction agent to keep secret who he was bidding
for. Whenever I've used an agent, the lots are sent directly to me, I pay the
house the stated amount, and the agent and I settle up his fee totally separate.
System's worked so far quite satisfactorilly.
August 11, 2003 Bill Weiss
Auction Agents, etc
For the record, folks generally do not use auction agents to achieve anonymous
bidding, they use an agent to (possibly) SAVE MONEY! No-one may bid in a public
auction, through a professional agent, without the name of that bidder being
revealed to the auction house prior to the sale UNLESS that bidder has
previously arranged with the AGENT to bid with the house under his (the agent's)
name. If anyone thinks they are anonymous when they bid through an agent, they
are just kidding themselves. Most professional agents will only bid for their
own account for a third party if they
know that party extremely well and trust them 100%, otherwise, the agent becomes
legally responsible for the bids, the money due, the extensions, etc. They are
therefore reluctant to bid this way and if you don't believe me, ask one of
them!
Regarding anonymous expertizing, up until recently PSE always listed the names
of experts on the certs. All experts are required to fill out a form for each
item expertized so they see the names of any expert who signed on an item before
them, the person(s) who administrate the committee of course knows who saw what,
etc, so it's not all as anonymous as you may believe.
August 11, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Anonymous postings
Dave, there's a term that gained popularity in the height of USENET days
- "signal-to-noise ratio". I htink it has its roots in short-wave or
radio-related stuff. Anyways. Meaningful discussion is "signal" and banality is
"noise", and USENET groups worked to achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio.
That's why I used that phrase.
There *is* a point to a certain level of noise, as general friendliness and
playing around makes a forum a fun place to be. Lord knows I've engaged in
plenty of off-topic banter. But anonymous posts tend to be of the negative kind
of noise, that contributes to nothing except the poster's own ego or desire to
behave like a three-year-old.
Jim
August 11, 2003 Bill Weiss
Anonymous Posts
DAVE; I don't usually monitor this board as much as the last few days either but
tonight I just happen to be on here a bit more than usual. Let me be the first
to step up to the plate here and tell you that your post (below) is full of
courage and inspiration! I am going to add nothing to it, but it is simply a
GREAT post, and we all should thank you for it - and I do!!
On the matter of a Linn's article, by all means, when your ready, communicate
with me about it. I am pretty sure I can get something into print about this
board, either by you writing it and me pushing it for you or me writing it with
you (and also pushing it!). Whatever. We can do it!
I am going to be away for about a week fairly soon, but after Sept 1, I will be
at your service (I don't want to be too specific about my away dates just yet).
August 11, 2003 ?
noise?
i guess it is noise since one does not want to hear something unpleasant
can you remove my posts now?
seems like someone engage in a conversation with me
oh well - i will leave you all now so there will be no more noise from me
August 11, 2003 ?
taunting?
seems to me like there are more taunting against those who are anonymous than
any other group
will be interesting to see the fine line between censorship versus moderation
are you now going to remove any disrepectful posts or just those from not the
"in" crowd?
think hard
August 11, 2003 17:47 Dave Frick (moderator)
This whole situation over the last few days has really set me thinking.
Essentially, all I've hoped we could have here is a polite, civilized discussion
about stamps. Sometimes it's about a controversial issue, but it can still be
done politely. It can also be done with respect.
I'm sorry that discourse in our society has become so polarized that asking for
civil discussion is considered "wishy-washy political correctness". It's not.
It's what civilized people do, and, as quaint a notion as it is, I think most of
us in philately still aspire to that.
And so ?, et al, the problem is, posting anonymously here is blatantly
disrespectful for everyone else who posts here in name. And you're wrong about
the anonymity in philately: in every case you've cited, the "anonymous" party is
known to someone key in the process: either the agent, the expertising
organization, or someone else germane.
In the case of anonymous posts on here, you are known to no one, and it comes
pretty close to taunting a crowd.
Also, Jim G correctly identified the term I couldn't put my finger on:
most of this anonymous posting (and we're seeing a lot of it on eBay right now,
too) is just noise. It's like walking up to a group of people having a
discussion at a party and just starting making "nyah nyah nyah" noises at them,
and then saying, "oh, gee, just don't listen to me if it bothers you." Come on.
Until I address some software issues (and this whole experience has strengthened
my resolve to do so), I will be more proactive about removing "noise" on here.
If I inadvertently remove someone's legitimate post by accident with that,
please let me know and I'll try to restore it.
Also, if someone posts in your name on here, and I've failed to recognize it as
such (although I know most people's styles now), please email me and I'll take
it off.
Bill W: Once these issues get resolved, then I think I'll want to talk
with you about a possible article in Linn's, etc. A change in software may
result in a change in the web address, so I'd like to get that resolved first.
Then hopefully this can be a more robust, meaningful board to the philatelic
community.
I'm ashamed of how low it sunk this past weekend.
August 11, 2003 ?
anonymous post
a lot of philately is anonymous
bidders use agents to stay anonymous
expertisers on certificates are anonymous
somtimes, a post to a chat board should be anonymous just to avoid ill will if
meeting in person
you don't like what someone post, just ignore it
August 11, 2003 sveiki!
On the same topic...
When I was on vacation I almost bought a T-shirt with the text: "Ignore me! I
might just go away!" {:o) Could be usefull at work...
August 11, 2003 sveiki!
Anonymous vs. Registration
It is possible to keep up a chat board without a registration procedure. Each
post should have an automated date, time stamp. Then, a simple tracking program
could do the rest and it would be possible to block the IP numbers that belongs
to people not behaving.
Oh... Currently we have three "anonymous" IP's out there.
August 11, 2003 Prometheus
Louise = Reply
You might be amazed at what people will put in a bank safety deposit box some of
the things are just nonsensical.
I've seen lots of newspapers -( The day Kennedy was Killed for example or Nixon
resigns) Rabbits feet, lots of Costume/junk jewelry. Timex watches . etc.
You never know what someone finds valuable like little pieces of paper with gum
on back.
August 11, 2003 AtdInvest reseller
what's wrong?
August 11, 2003 David Benson
Bill, the other day a seller in Holland who bought A4 sheets and selling
singles, now a seller in France who is selling them in mixed lots of pairs. Not
much Ebay can do as it is only the US site that will have the APS check and the
non US sites don't have the proviso for a self regulatory stipulation that the
item is genuine.
David Benson
August 11, 2003 404 Prometheus
Richard F = my original question
State Auction Question =NOIP
the state of Florida is having their unclaimed bank deposit boxes sale this
weekend in Tampa.
I printed out the catalog and notice that most of the Stamps/ stamps related
items are Reserved at very high values.
Does anyone have any idea how they set these values ???
The C-1 -C3 used set is reserved at $150.00 and they were Killed by the cancel
,have been hinged, and the perfs are not very pretty either.
way down below I posted a scan of some of the Catalog listings
August 11, 2003 15:58 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
They come back in many forms
Dirk They come back in
Many Forms to haunt you, and in
such High Quality too.
August 11, 2003 sveiki!
Louise The answer to your question is "Chatten". {;o) Do you drink beer?
*yuck* {;o) A nice brandy would do, or a glass of semi-sweet Georgian redwine.
{:o)
August 11, 2003 sveiki!
Hi! {:o) Sorry, I haven't been active earlier today, but carried away by other
business. Was out dining fancy...
August 11, 2003 Richard Frajola
IRS
To whoever said that it was - Catalog value is not fair market value as
far as the IRS is concerned.
August 11, 2003 stamp killer
anyway i'm leaving for several days, so bye:-))))))
August 11, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Anonymous posts
stamp killer, "scared"? No. Dismissive? Yes. Anonymously, anyone can say
anything, with no fear of retribution or accountability. But a person who
identifies himself in a post is willing to put his name behind his words. Also,
a reader can also qualify his words with knowledge of how experienced the person
is (or isn't). So for me, an anonymous post is just noise, not to be taken
seriously. So banning it only improves the quality of discussion here.
I also personally suspect that most people who post here anonymously do so
because they know their comments would be uniformly ignored or castigated if we
knew who had written them. So no loss there, either.
Jim
August 11, 2003 David Benson
Knud, one of the underbidder snipee's is a very good friend of mine. He only
buys on Ebay to resell in Singapore. Judging by his bid it would realise a lot
more in Singapore.
David Benson
August 11, 2003 Louise
Ah, Knud-Erik! Can you tell me what the Danish is for "chat"? I registered on
your site this evening and can't quite manage to navigate it. It would be OK for
me if the Danish characters were loaded - I don't speak Danish, but parts of it
are similar enough to English to be able to figure it out eventually - but it
doesn't help when even the symbols are coming up wrong (unless you meant to use
the Czech "r" all the time of course).
Thanks. Hope you are well and that business is booming.
August 11, 2003 13.55 Knud-Erik (knuden)
http://sudeten.bizland.com/Homepage.htm
Snipers
I love
snipers!
K.E.
August 11, 2003 Bill Weiss
Anonymous Posts
Dave F.; of course it's your board to do with as you please....personally, I see
nothing wrong with you deleting any anonymous post, no matter what the topic. If
this practice is stated in your introduction (Anonymous posts automatically
deleted unless a board member responds) or some such notice that you feel is
fair to all parties, then I support that decision 100%. Further, you might
consider giving just as a good general advisory to board members that they think
twice before responding to any anonymous post. Perhaps if all board participants
start to consider the anonymous posts as something to be totally ignored, they
will just cease, which in my view is not a bad thing.
Obviously, if someone comes on with a sensible comment or question and another
participant wants to respond and does, then great, no harm done, and the
reponding party might even advise the new poster that the board usually requires
identified posters, so please do so in the future.
August 11, 2003 COVERWIZ
Sorry about that
Don't hit the refresh button on an old screen -- sorry...
August 11, 2003 Louise Stanley
****trying hard not to rise to the bait****
August 11, 2003 12:37 COVERWIZ
Prometheus
Concerning value of the unclaimed bank lots: IRS considers Scott catalog value =
fair market value. Thus the auctioneers are obligated to protect what they
regard as the market value, which of course is not real world, especially as to
condition etc, which the lotters may, but probably don't, know...
August 11, 2003 Louise
Stampkiller - without wanting to get into a big discussion about it, that's the
point - here you can just do anything. On a login board you'd have a recognised
id and therefore not be anonymous.
Prometheus - good luck with your auctions and your quest for a new watch.
I may have got this wrong because I'm guessing at what the auction is about but
if someone felt strongly enough to keep stamps in a bank vault then there must
be something of interest in there. Me I'm sticking to the Russian market and
hoping to snap up a few bargains there, but here in Warsaw folks know their
merchandise better than those people in Lodz (1950s album from the Warsaw Days
youth festival for ten zloty; issue of "Swiat" (World) magazine from the week of
Stalin's death for 50 groszy in Lodz - not sure about dollars, but that's GBP 2
(or five dinners in a greasy spoon canteen) as opposed to, oh, about 10 cents).
August 11, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Stating the obvious
To Anonymous... um, I think most of us had already figured out thw Fly
By identity (nudge nudge wink wink), but your analysis was well done, much
like a researcher identifying an authentic Robert E Lee letter.
I guess sometimes its good to state the obvious. I held off for a while, but
your letter gives me the courage to post the secret printing method for making
great stamp images to fill those empty album spots...
The secret is revealed.
Duncan
August 11, 2003 David Benson
Greg, the only other possibility is a local Postmaster's overprint but I looked
carefully and they all look like Shanghai or London overprints.
I think your original opinion of $ 10 was optimistic,
David Benson
August 11, 2003 David Benson
Greg, no idea why the China went so high. The only explanation has to be cancels
and I can't see anything special. Hope it goes through OK but don't count on it,
David Benson
August 11, 2003 12:59 Jim Watson
BRM rates May 1971
Bob,
Beecher and Warukiewicz says rate for less than or equal to 2 ox was 2¢ per
piece between August 1, 1958, and September 14, 1975. Greater than 2 oz was 5¢
per piece between August 1, 1958 and March 2, 1975.
August 11, 2003 Prometheus
Coverwhiz = Thanks
I wondered where they got their values from the coins/jewelry usually are priced
decently as I am a Newbie to stamps this was my first go around paying attention
to the stamps.
August 11, 2003 .
.
Anonymous posts=who is it?,it might not be that hard..put yur thinkin caps on.
due some posters hav consistently terribel grammar and speling?
but weight,there might even be a deader givewawway.what about terribel
punctuashun and capitalization?what if we all looked back over the last few
months of posts..is'nt it odd to omit a space after a period??you'd think that
maybe only one person would do something like htat.how about no space aftrer a
comma?.wild!all those bad typists,with bad information,with unique punctuation
skills even tend to show up together,then all idsappear for a week at a
time,sometimes even answering each others'posts.you might see some obveeeeeeoous
similaritys.!you be da judge.i woulnd't dare make any accuzashuns.
yur probably all different people,really,just happen to be equally mistaken
when it comes to filatellleeee and poor at englisch,maybe you'all were in the
same inglish class,learnin those you-neeeeek punctuation skills,..btw,did i do a
good job of Imitation?they say tha'ts the best form of flattttery!
August 11, 2003 Prometheus
Older Japan Question
For those of you into Japan stamps anything here
Older
that is of interest are just make the whole thing a buck to start.
Thanks
August 11, 2003 12:25 Bob M -- COVERWIZ on ebay
BRM rates May 1971
Does anyone have a source that would tell the Business Reply Mail fee per
envelope in May, 1971 while the first class rate was still 10c. TIA for any
help!
August 11, 2003 Louise
Ah, sorry, Greg, didn't realise it was you selling it...
Good luck anyway.
August 11, 2003 Greg Ioannou <greg@rogers.com>
The high bidder tried to buy the item from me privately (for $20). He registered
when I refused his offer. I can always try to sell it to the underbidder if I
don't get the money. Still curious to know what there was of value on that page.
I was expecting one sniper, not four!
August 11, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Greg - I guess I'm just as suspicious as Louise, you'll notice he jst became a
member yesterday. But who knows, he may have just been browsing and found
that item and had to sign up, just to get it.
August 11, 2003 Prometheus <prometheus@yada-yada.com>
Need to see more of listings
If anyone would like to see more of the philatelic listings in this auction
email me at above address and i'll email you some scans. of the catalog
I will be attending i do need a new watch.
August 11, 2003 Louise
Greg
Call me worried but I don't like the chances of that seller getting any money...
August 11, 2003 Prometheus
State Auction Question =NOIP
the state of Florida is having their unclaimed bank deposit boxes sale this
weekend in Tampa.
I printed out the catalog and notice that most of the Stamps/ stamps related
items are Reserved at very high values.
Does anyone have any idea how they set these values ???
I do plan on posting my 100 dollars cash just to preview
(i need a new rolex) I was just astounded by the High reserves.
An example of the lots is in this
CATSCAN
Thanks to anyone who understands how they do this.
August 11, 2003 Greg Ioannou <gregioannou@rogers.com>
Snipers!
God bless
snipers! So what was on that page that I missed? I expected it to go for
about $10.
August 11, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Anonymous posts
Dave, maybe you could restrict anonymous posts to those who can actually
spell "anonymous"?
Jim
August 11, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Moderating
Dave, I'd strongly suggest that you *not* get into the business of
editing posts. This board exists at your whim, and when your whim disappears, so
will this board. Eventually, you *will* get tired of keeping it up. If you avoid
the issue of editing posts, you'll probably keep this up a lot longer.
Jim
August 11, 2003 10:52 Dave Frick (moderator)
anonymous id's
Fly-By: Colin said so much better than I ever could what the
issues seem to be. Although a few people on here use nicknames, I think in
every case, I know who these people are, either through direct
communication, or through our interactions over time on eBay (and in which case
that's where their nickname comes from, their eBay id.)
In thinking about this last night, I realized that the concern I have with
anonymous ids is intent: I become a bit on alert that someone intends harm, or
to disrupt the board, or to attack another poster.
You have put together coherent thoughts, and now, as Colin said, I have a better
idea where you're coming from, so my concern level is a bit reduced. Thank you
for posting enough that I begin to have a feeling for your perspective.
However, stampkiller, you still cause me concern, and perhaps that's what
your intention is.
Others: When we have random shots from anonymous posters, that aren't
really trying to make a point other than possible disruptiveness, if you'll
refrain from replying to them, then I'll start deleting them. (Actually, I have
done this occasionally in the past.)
But if you reply to them -- and you're still very much free to do so -- then I
do consider those posts as having been engaged, and am reluctant to delete them
after that. Also, I would need to delete that portion of your comment directed
to them, so that the "flow" of the board would be consistent. Any thoughts on
this?
August 11, 2003 10.10 am Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_GB_Machins/
Magnifying glasses
Chuck Harm
Some years ago I found an old Epidiascope – remember them? It had a double
focussing lens with 2 lenses which I now use for intricate work. It doesn’t show
a large area, but small areas end up HUGE. It might be difficult to find one
now, but perhaps see if you local college has one stuffed in their basement and
offer to take it away!
Colin
August 11, 2003 10.08 am Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps
Anonymous posts and Authenticity of items
Fly by
Good morning from the UK. Like Bill My request to you was that I liked
to know who I was talking to. In the discussions about anonymous posts, I have
not detected anyone being nasty to you. I always suspect that anyone who will
not put their real name to posts has something to hide.
A couple of years back I put a post on the other board stating that with on
line buying I don’t know how dealers with the overheads of shops can survive, as
with no overheads most sellers on line can only get about half what they would
charge in the shops, and are satisfied with that. For example I bought a MNH
Japanese 1949 flying geese (CV Sakura £125 – SG £130) at a knock down price from
£100 to £70 (and I gave him about 1,000 Japan kiloware) from a local stamp shop
in Bradford, W Yorks, UK. I can get one at half that price on eBay. That dealer
has gone out of business and is now a pub landlord! RIP our last stamp shop!
Incidentally I also bought a NZ accumulation for £100 which included, he said, a
mint QV 2/- catalogued at £100. A good buy, I thought. When I examined it
closely at home, I found that the semi transparent strip had hidden a faint
handprinted “Specimen” overprint, and when properly described a first bid of £40
got no interest on the SG on line Auction. As it was part of his closing down,
and for many years I had regarded him as my personal charity I was not worried
and would not have demanded a refund. I did at least make about £70 on the
resale of the other stamps on eBay, and the QV 2/- is now in my collection.
I am not a dealer but just a collector in the process of selling off my
collection. As a general rule, anything I bought from a dealer, or on a New
Issue Service over the last 15 to 20 years is not worth putting on eBay – I
would make a substantial loss.
I can now understand from one of your posts why you are screaming at those
who give honest (and to my view, accurate) opinions on whether items sold are
genuine or not. Had you come clean and said you were a dealer with a shop to
support all would have been clear. And I have great sympathy with you having to
face the tremendous competition of on line selling. That’s why it is so
important that you let others know who you are and where you are coming from.
Most posters, especially members of the eBay Users Stamp Club (EUSC) , do
this and it makes it so much easier to talk reasonably and understand when one
of us gets a bit heated, as does happen to the most reasonable of posters! I
wonder if the EUSC will become an Internet Users Stamp Club?
And don’t forget that Dave Frick set up this board so that the items
about authenticity could be openly discussed rather than be deleted (as was
happening) from the eBay board. There are quite a number of items on eBay where
the provenance is questionable, and others that are a threat to philately in the
future, as well as unsuspecting buyers today. Not surprising that authenticity
is a major point of discussion on this board – that’s why it was set up!
Why do you not just put your name to your posts? Your comment about being a
dealer helps us to understand, and the more you tell us about yourself, the
nicer you will find the other posters here!
Have a nice day
The rain and thunder here in the UK this morning will give the gardens a good
soaking! Nice for them – I think I will stay at home!
Colin
August 11, 2003 duncan Doenitz
Security
Jim I just tell people I'm a sniper. Most of them don't know about eBay
so that's enough to povide some measure of safety.
Dunc
August 11, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
duncan
I think I would make a distinction between selling well and selling unusually
well. Personally I might have a problem spending $20 on a stamp that catalogs
for $2. But that's just me.
My other hobbies (link is down at the moment)preclude anonymity but provide a
safe haven for my stamp collection.
August 11, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Watching and learning
Jim W-SI'm just trying to learn about the hobby Jim, and I know that US
#563 is selling well in all of its color range when the stamps are in great
shape. Here are two more very recent examples...
blue green
and
light green
But I'm afraid I'm a little dense, I don't recognize the underbidders, although
I do run across one of the bidders quite often.
By the way, you or anyone else can contact me at croberts33 "at" juno.com, which
brings me to another subject. I have been burgarized twice and a serious
collector friend was also robbed, so we no longer make it openly known that we
are collectors. I also distribute my used copies of Linns (they go to a Seniors
gathering place) but my address is removed. So that's my view on being
anonymous.
Duncan D
"Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
August 11, 2003 Don H
Newfoundland Revenues
Bill
Thanks for the answer on the Newfoundland Revenue stamps.
Don
August 11, 2003 1625 BST Ed.B
Just a normal weekend
Seems like the other board had a normal weekend yesterday. One poster telling
the world that he was going to spend the night with his wife, another shouting
all the time then signing all her posts 'Peace', low flying aircraft everywhere
and to top it all some demented fool throwing his toys all over the place.
It makes this this place seem like a haven of tranquility.Ed
August 11, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
DD & JB
If that were my collecting area, I'd give some close scrutiny to at least one of
the underbidders.
August 11, 2003 Prometheus <my
real name by the way>
Today's Postal aug 11 1893
110 years old mailed in Chcago to Dayton Ohio ,
From the Columbian Exposition a Official Sovenir Postal Card
of the Women's Building
Neat
From E. A. Meredith to Miss Markland
August 11, 2003 04:14 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
Germany to
Peru in 1885. Here's your chance to learn about the Guerra del Pacifico!
August 11, 2003 Roger Heath
Signatures
Here's an interesting 1796 Italian
letter to Lausanne where my guess is that a secretary wrote the letter, and
"joseph buffonetto" signed it.
Roger
August 11, 2003 23:43 Dave Frick (moderator)
Frank: Welcome! Just step over the debris we've left around here and make
yourself at home! It's not usually this bad. Actually, thanks for introducing a
new philatelic topic. But very sorry that you took quite a loss.
Bill W.: I think I'll be soon getting the specs together for the software
that I need, that may give us some of the features we need, without giving up
other features that we value. Sounds like it would be easy, but the tradeoffs
are significant (not to mention the effort to set it up). However, after this
weekend, it bears researching again.
August 10, 2003 Fly-By
Still Lurking
Well gee thanks Bill,I'll be nice tomorrow too!
August 10, 2003 8: 09 PM Frank
Early Tokelau items
The earliest item I had was a seaplane cover from about 1947. I had sent the
cream of my collection off to Singapore to be photographed as I did not know how
to scan and photocopies were unacceptable and the 14 covers were stolen. To see
some scans and read some articles I wrote on Tokelau go to Stamp2.com, click on
exclusives and have a read. The article about meeting the prime minister is a
fun one for sure.Right now I have to high tail it off the board as I either
spend some quality time with Brenda or look for a new wife. To all a good night.
I'll respong tomorrow. Regards.
August 10, 2003 8:30PM Bill Weiss
Chat Board Identity
Have been away all day and have now taken time to read today's posts - and what
a day of posts!! The only comment I want to make is that I agree with George K.
that the identity of a poster should be mandatory. While an un-named poster may
indeed have something valid and/or valuable to say, I think he has way more
credibility if he identifies himself. I'm a big believer in standing behind what
you do or say. To me, it's just like expertizing. If I give an opinion for an
expert committee or on this board, or wherever, how much is that opinion worth
if I won't put my name to it? Further, I also agree that often times those who
won't identify themselves are merely looking to "make trouble" rather than
contribute something really meaningful. Notice that I say all this even though
"Fly-By" was NICE to me! Now off to bed!
August 10, 2003 J.B>
and check out the ridiculous shipping fee
August 10, 2003 J.B.
Duncan D...WoW $61.00+ for a stamp with a $1.40 c.v.I wonder how mant
more of them he would like to have at 1/2 of that price.I just bought 8 of
them!for less than a buck each.
August 10, 2003 David Benson
Frank, what is your earliest Tokelau item,
David Benson
August 10, 2003 David Benson
Frank, sorry, the chisellers, cheats and crooks are still listing even with the
addition of the warning. So far Ebay and the APS haven't shown their hand what
they will do. If they come down on some then IT MAY clean up some of the act,
otherwise just status quo.
David Benson
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
Frank = How about some scans
I am not familiar with your chosen collection could you share some scans.
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Frank
Fraid not.
Australia and NZ are high on my list of places to go to though.
Especially if I can get to either by island hopping.
August 10, 2003 7:50 PM Frank
Tokelau and Jim Whitford-Stark
Have you been to the atolls? It takes 23 hours by boat from Western Samoa to get
there and everyone sleeps out on the decks I'm told.
August 10, 2003 7:47PM frank
New to the board
Hi,
Just sampled postings for the day and this chat board is definitely interesting.
I was listing on ebay some old catalogs today and when I got to the end of the
listing process they now have a BIG warning that sellers are required to
accurately list items for sale including describing faults, alterations, repairs
and fakery . I think this has the potential to cut out a lot of the cheats,
chislers and stinkers. All depends on whether ebay carries through with its
threat to delist items it deems improperly described. See, there is hope and
probably a lot of credit goes to the heated exchanges on chat boards like this
and the site called: Stamp collectors against Dodgy Sellers. Regards, Frank
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Frank
No volcanoes in the Tokelau's.
Nice coral reefs though.
August 10, 2003 Bill Longley
Don Heale,
1938 Newf revenues are perf 13.75, 14.25
1943 Newf revenues are perf 12.
Hope this helps.
Bill
August 10, 2003 7:19 PM Frank
Tokelau/Union Islands
Hi,
Hope you are all enjoying summer as I am here on Long Island, New York. Would
like to chat about Tokelau Island stamps and covers. The islands, 1,500 miles
north of New Zealand, were fomerly known as the Union Islands and before that
part of the Gilbert & Ellice Colony. I took it up since there were a finite
number of stamps since the first issue in 1948. Well, then I got into fdc's,
commercial mail etc and you can guess the rest of the ongoing adventure.
Regards,Frank
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
Brian R =reply
Brian the little booklet was just thrown into a box with a few coil line pairs,
the others i linked earlier, these
Triangles a
couple of Gimbel's Stamp News Magazines from 1948 and two copies of scott's
specialized 1954 and 1965
This is an Estate/collectibles auction and they have no clue on most things they
sell they just try to lump like items together.
August 10, 2003 Mr. Pigeon
Rob Faux: how about
Pigeon Mail.
August 10, 2003 Roger Heath
Investment potential
"they have the same investment potential that unaltered stamps do"
I wonder if horse breeders feel the same way about stallions vs.
geldings?
Of course maybe there's vet who can sew'em back on claiming, " They look OK, and
you can't tell difference when I'm finished!."
Roger
August 10, 2003 Don Heale <dheale@excite.com>
Newfoundland Revenue Stamps 1938, 1943
Hi Folks,
I have a bunch of Newfoundland Revenue Stamps ... Caribou issue of 1938 or 1943.
I'm not sure which year, and there appears to a significant difference in value
of the $5 denomination. Can anyone tell me the difference in the two issues. I
understand that they have different perforations, but don't know what the perfs
are. Any differences in the design or color?
Thanks for any assistance.
Regards,
Don
August 10, 2003 Brian R
Prometheus That booklet is a classic. I would dare say that it is more
collectable (for the "shtick" value) than 98% of the "classic" forgeries we
discuss.
I shouldn't have to say it, but when something like that is provided to you,
by a dealer/auction house, don't walkaway.....RUN!
August 10, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Oops, this one...
here
August 10, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
US #563
Nice color variety and great centering, but wow what competitive bidding on this
one so far.
Duncan D
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
dave f
Thanks for suggestion, but I don't belong to that one.
Probably just as cheap to buy the book as to get it from the other one.
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
Should have spelled it Apfelbaum
Brian R = and others here is the little booklet i referred to earlier
Reperfingsecrets
two interesting quotes from this booklet
1. As an aside there is nothing wrong with a reperforated,regummed,or repaired
stamp providing it is offered that way. usually they have the same investment
potential that unaltered stamps do.
And if i understand correctly that he got into some kind of trouble with
stamps This is a great statement that closes the article which he offered as
a public service.
2. One reperfer boasts that even he cannot tell his own work when finished, But
this was only a boast and if there is no honor among thieves why should there be
honesty.
August 10, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Anonymous posts
I guess I had no idea we were really anonymous, I assumed that our moderator
could see the IP's of those who posted here.
Personally, my experiences online have involved games, particularly WWI and WWII
flight sims where we fly in online combat with and against each other. It has
always been normal in our games for players to adopt an online persona, with
nearly everybody flying under ficticious names, it's part of the fun.
But on our game bulletin boards, we must register. No problem, in fact it
prevents problems. I still enjoy selecting an anonymous online name, but I
definitely believe that our moderator(s) should be aware of who we really are.
On a similar subject, there can be problems when email addresses are displayed
online. It surprised me to see how many people used their email address as an
identity at eBay, even though for a while I did the same thing. Spambots
routinely examine eBay searching out active email addresses for spam. If you go
to an informational site to learn about spam you will find eBay specifically
mentioned as a source that spammers use.
I'd recommend that if you wish to post your email address that you do it like
this:
duncandoenitz "at" juno.com
And then a legitimate user can use the address by substituting "@" for "at"
while keeping the address invisible to automated spambots.
Duncan D
"Does a mime listen to blank tapes?"
August 10, 2003 sveiki!
Done! {:o) The update of my
Riga Postcard webpages is finished and all links in that part of the
webportal should work now.
August 10, 2003 15.27 Knud-Erik Andersen
http://sudeten.bizland.com/Homepage.htm
A rant!!
AAAAAARG (og så sku!!)
For 3 weeks ago I bought a Danish Postal wrapper from 1890 (or around that
time) sent to Hong Kong and redirected to China with a nice German P. O. cancel
Deutsche Post) on the back and it was sent to me registered from Netherlands and
I have just got the message it's proberly lost (stolen). This is the 4th time I
have lost mail (registered or not) from Netherlands but this should have been
one of the pearls in my exhibit, which I'm going to show last in this year. What
the heck is going on in the Netherlands?? The security looks like it's non
existant!! Now I'm depressed - it's looks like I'm into a period of bad luck.
:O(
K.E.
August 10, 2003 George K
A board that would not permit anonymous posts
I would support a board where everyone was required to post under their real
identity. After two years of following the various stamp boards, it is my
experience that people only hide behind false IDs in order to carry out personal
attacks or defend the indefensible. It's sort of like use of the private
auctions in the Stamps category; why use them unless you're a crook with
something to hide?
And "newbies" to eBay are not necessarily stupid, or uneducated, or new to
computers or the internet. I'd give them enough credit to be smart enough to
understand why anonymity is bad for real and honorable open discussion. I am
sure they would be intelligent enough to fill in a little registration form,
too.
August 10, 2003 Chuck Harm
Microscopes for Philately
Anyone - I have been thinking about getting some kind of microscope to examine
stamps with. With my declining eyesight and the need to closely examine perfs
and printing I need soemthing better than a magnifying glaas. I have looked at
stereomicroscopes, digital etc. Curious if anyone has any experience here and
can make any recommendations I am interested in being able to examine printing
techniques, perfs, and design details. What magnifications are right - I have
been looking at a range fro 10x to 40x. What types are useful? steromicroscopes?
digital microscopes? Any advice on specific issues or models? Or am I crazy and
should just get a higher power stamp magnifier?
Thanks
Chuck
August 10, 2003 sveiki!
Topical Covers
Well, that one... {:o)
August 10, 2003 14:17 Dave ("philatarium")
Rob: Always glad to see you around. Post anytime!
Jim W-S: You might be able to check them out from the APRL and at least
see if they would be meaningful for you. (Again, a link which I intend to have
up at some time:
http://www.stamplibrary.org/ )
August 10, 2003 Louise
Which one?
August 10, 2003 sveiki!
Louise was that post meant for me? {:o)
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
Louise Ya! things like that. No worries about when you post. :)
killer Then, perhaps you should direct your post? Follows directly after
mine - looks like you mean me.
You shouldn't be so touchy - read the smiley's - I'm mocking myself more than
I'm responding to you. It's Sunday, it's nice outside. I'm at work... I don't
want to be here, so I've wasted time playing on the stamp chat. :) Thus, I will
get back to work - inadvertantly, you reminded me that I should either do my job
- or go home! :)
August 10, 2003 stamp killer
Faux don't be touchy,it wasn't for you
August 10, 2003 Louise Stanley
Topical covers
I have a couple of Russian/Soviet covers posted at sea, which weren't that
expensive (which is why I have them in the first place...!!!). That's probably
going to be a very easy thing to find. If you're patient I can get scans of them
together, but not until I get back to Lodz in 2 weeks time.
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
killer Yes, I guess I am. So, I'll just get back to work. It's all I'm
good for anyway.... :P
Fun, let myself do some stamp board posting here without having done so for
months - and I'm a timewaster now. :)
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
postal history subtopics
All Something I'm trying to do with minimal expenditure with no hopes of
completion and only sporadic attention is to try to pick up examples of various
types of postal history subtopics and/or cover collecting subtopics for areas
some folks will claim are philatelicly contrived. :) It's partly a
self-education endeavor and partly a education endeavor for others.
so, intersting sub-areas of interest I can think about off the top of my head
include things like Tonga Tin Can Mail, Rattlesnake Island covers, Zepp flights,
rocket mail, ballon monte covers, SCADTA mail, mail carrier covers, steamboat
mail, etc.
Wondered if others might enjoy coming up with a list of areas such as these that
one could put together examples of inexpensive, but nice looking covers, to show
others who might like to get into collecting.
Rediculously ambitious? Yes. Fun? yes. :)
August 10, 2003 stamp killer
timewaster
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
Jim Only two places I noted Kerr were
here and
here
Shows up rarely in the U.S.
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Thanks rob
I first saw Kerr advertized as four volumes for $75.
Thought, that looks good.
Later found out they are paper bound with about 50 pages in each.
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
Brian
I don't have an answer re: the duck stamps, but it is possible that Bill Norberg
at Golden Valley Stamps in Minneapolis, MN might have an idea re: sources to
help you. He does sell ducks regularly - and Leech Lake would be known up here.
:)
Try this email address: bnorberg@gvstamps.com
Tell Bill to be nice to you since I sent you his way. :)
Rob
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Brian
ROTFLMAO.
August 10, 2003 Brian R
anyone?
Some time back I posted a question about duck stamps. It elicited a response
from a regular who was obvioulsly quite versed on them. Recently, my gentle
prodding, of friends and relatives, for old licences has paid off. I've received
a batch, of thirty or so licenses, from the late 60's to early 80's. They detail
one sportsmans travels across the upper midwest, mainly N&S Dakota, MN, and WS.
A nice selection of federal and early state duck stamps. A second nice suprise
was that they are in spotless condition, as opposed to the usual waterstained,
scuffed items, that served their purpose.
Particulally intriguing, are several MN fishing licences from the 70's. They
dispaly a local revenue "leech lake indian reservation, validation stamp" Does
anyone know of a good resource, that I can draw on, to determine what I have?
The reservation stamps are serialized (none higher than #4000) so are likely
quite rare. Now the question is are they collectable?
August 10, 2003 Rob Faux
Jim W-S I think $75 is probably pretty normal for that book. Don't have a
copy myself b/c have yet to see one any cheaper than that price....and, I must
admit my focus is truly elsewhere...
Clark Any setenant (connected) stamps of different designs MAY have
additional value - depending on the issue. Popular topics sometimes do better
than face. (for example, the 3 cent baseball issue regularly does well). But,
rule of thumb for most collections of this sort that are UNUSED is to tell
people what the face value is. That does not imply you will get face value for
it if you were to sell it.
On the other hand, this sounds like a great start if you wanted to begin your
own collection!
Rob
August 10, 2003 Fly-By
Just in passing
Dave
As to earier comments,there are those who would derserve a certain amount of
respect and those who do'nt.The ones that I mentioned earlier are respectable
types,not that I will allways agree with them,and then there are the types that
everytime you turn around sceam FOUL,these are the ones that erk the heck out
me.Do they have good intentions or are they hoping that someone will drop a bid
so they can step in.It has happened in the past.I have had customers that come
in and do the same,Thats a fake!they will say hoping you will sell it
cheaper.Yes I do sell stamps and make a decent living at it.I have seen many
forery bring as much if not more than the original!Yes there are those who
actually collect forgerys and are willing to pay big bucks for them.As I told
Chisto I see nothing wrong with buying a less expence forgery if properly marked
as such if you cant afford a genuine copy.(ie)c3a & 5a. not everyone can afford
these stamps,even when they become available.
My biggest gripe are the ones who allways want it for nothing usually around
10% or less.And e-bay is where you find most of those kinds.Stop and think If I
sold stamps at 10% in the shop I would have to buy them or rather steal them and
sell in such a great quantity just to pay the rent.So yes I have to try to get
an honest percentage just to keep the lights on,let alone eat.In the 1800s the
dealers would pin stamps to the wall or on cork boards,which left pin holes in
them these stamp still carry value,But not accordiny to some of this
bunch,Foolishness such as this is agravates the fire out of some of us older
collectors and dealers.Thusly The only problem I have is with the ones that yell
wolf everytime you turn around,Like I said same old thing day after day
eventually gets old.
Christo
Thats right you collect what ever you see fit.if all well centered and M.N.H.
stamps are your forte then go for it.But never let some one else tell you that
you ca'nt collect what you want!And BTW I am not hiding behind anything and will
openly discuss any statements.Many others us ID's not thier real name.When
addressed as such.
August 10, 2003 Roger Heath
Thanks to David
David -
I think you missed the boat by not joining Lavar and running for Governor. Your
moderation techniques will be useful in Sacramento. You don't need to apologize
for not having the links organized and in working order today, tomorrow will be
fine!!
Roger
August 10, 2003 Brian R
prometheusLOL...that is one interesting phamplet indeed! They didn't have
a beginners guide to bid rigging available too, did they?
August 10, 2003 12:26 Dave ("philatarium")
Louise: I just remembered that on the links page (which you can get to
above), there are several links to Russia websites, some of which looked quite
detailed. Thanks to Guillaume for those recommendations.
And as long as I'm talking about links, I'll apologize for not getting any
further along with them yet. I've kept everyone's recommendations, and will get
back to that project again soon.
August 10, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Have no idea. {:o) Text on all three: "Benefitting the Victims of
War". The 1 kopeck stamp furthermore has the text: "Fellinskaya Gorodskaya
Uprava" - City Council of Fellin (Viljandi in Estonian). The other two stamps
have text in Latin, I guess, within the arms. All three stamps are from 1916 -
during WWI.
First time I see them, don't know anything about them, why they were made etc.
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
Rich Wong = Thanks
Thanks for the information Bought a small collection of coil line pairs at an
auction and those were mounted right along with the others.
Although I had given Fly-By's answer a little thought because a little booklet
with the collection was titled Reperfing by Apelbaum(sp) Guess I should look
thru that booklet if I can figure out where I pitched/stored it.
August 10, 2003 David Benson
Chuck, re. Trengganu, I knew that they were worth at least full Gibbons as I
cannot recall seeing them used before. The 6c. took off 1st. but that was issued
just before the Japanese invasion and used must be scarce but I didn't expect
the 3c. to jump as well. Just another example of Ebay finding the level amongst
international collectors.
David Benson
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
christo
Yes, and many thanks.
I'll be scanning some of them later today and cye.
August 10, 2003 Brian R
found stamps
Clark The advice given about most post 1930 stamps, being worth around
face value, is sadly true. They were extensively hoarded, so much so, that they
still often turn up, paying the postage on many mail order dealer items. The
ones pre 1930, can be worth considerablely more. That depends on the issue. I'd
recommend getting a cheap price guide, with photos, from the supermarket. You'll
be able to quickly evaluate if you have good items. BTW--5 of the first 6
airmail issues, have cataloge values of over $100 each, for fine
condition-unused, so this is likely worth your time.
August 10, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Brian RYou are 100% correct about the rush. But I think this is all
created to an internal weakness we as humans all have - greed - always thinking
that this is the opportunity to get that $10 000 stamp for peanuts!!! But one
learns to recognize the trait in you, and attempt to keep it in check. I
empathize with your position with respect to making unsuspecting buyers aware of
what they are getting into. The fact of the matter is, however, that person has
to make his own choice - you can't make it for him!
Dave F I would support a board which won't allow posters to hide behind a
false ID (or even no ID). I think this is one of the biggest problems brought
about by Internet. A person who is posting is invisble to the recipient reading
the message. One is unable to read the face, the eyes, the body language etc.
etc which accompanies normal discussion. Also, a lot of people write things that
they would never dare to say to another person's face, under normal
circumstances. So frequently some messages are taken out of context because of
this. And I find it difficult to really take statements such as e.g. Fly By
serious as he/she does not like to defend his/her statements openly, but choose
to rather hide behind a false identity
Fly ByI agree with you - anyone can collect whatever he/she wants. It is
not something to be forced upon a person. So I have chosen to collect only
stamps in faultless condition (i.e. no creasing, no thinning, no missing perfs
etc). If it is not in that condition, it can't go into my collection. And if I
can't get hold of certain stamps, so be it - I'll stay without them. But that is
my choice.
Jim W-S Hopefully there was something of use in there!
Regards
August 10, 2003 Louise
Dave - yeah, Sveiki should be around in a bit.
This is unusual for me to be logged on at a time when everyone else is active.
August 10, 2003 11:40 Dave Frick (moderator)
Clark: In re-reading my response, I realize I should have added: check
out from your local library. In my experience, they usually have the most
recent copy in the reference section, but that past years' versions circulate.
Odds are good that as long as it is relatively recent, the values should not be
much different (if at all).
August 10, 2003 11:35 Dave Frick (moderator)
Clark: Since they're US, I actually think that makes it easier to figure
out. One thing you can do is likely check out a fairly recent copy of the Scott
Postage Stamp Catalog. For US, you have 2 options: There's a big multi-volume
set, and the US is in volume 1. However, there is also a US Specialized volume,
and is, I think, much easier to use. The illustrations are larger, there's more
information, etc. For that reason, it's also easier to get a bit distracted by
the details (special cancels and the like), but that's not so bad either.
I agree with what Jim W-S, that most of the material is maybe worth face value,
but some of it does carry a premium, and you might have some of that. One bit of
good news is that it's a Scott album, and, depending on the make of the album,
may not have been so targeted to the casual collector as some of the makers of
the time were. It also means that most of the Scott numbers should correctly
correspond to the current numbering system (hopefully). (I'm not a US collector
either, so take all this with a grain of salt.)
Nonetheless, there are pitfalls, especially for early stamps that have small (or
miniscule) differences in appearance but significant differences in value, and
the original owner of the album may not have always been able to correctly
identify the item.
On the other hand, much of the more recent material, which it sounds like you
have, is more easily identified, where the face image is unique and, when you
see it in the catalog, you know you've got the right item. (Again, doesn't
always hold true, but increases your odds of being right.)
I'm sure people much more knowledgeable and helpful than I will be able to jump
in here and expand upon this advice.
But do be careful: you may find that once you've mucked around it for a bit,
that you'll actually become interested in it! You may end up wanting to expand
upon what's already there. (And there wouldn't be anything wrong with that
either!)
Louise: Good luck with your questions, which are so far beyond my
knowledge that I won't even attempt to fake a reply. I know we have some
regulars who check in who are more familiar with that area, so I'll keep my
fingers crossed that someone will jump in. (I have noted that the vacation
season has resulted in a slack-off of regulars posting in. Some we haven't heard
from in weeks.)
August 10, 2003 Louise
Anyone know what or where
these come from?
August 10, 2003 Jim W-S
dave F
I don't have Scott with me but using the one example I have and the Scott quote
by seller, your formula still works out as Scott being about two thirds of
Sakura. Not that it really matters much.
BTW if anyone has or knows of source for Allen Kerr's Manchuria overprints book
cheap, I'd like to know. $75 for 250 pages of softbound manuscript seems a
little expensive.
August 10, 2003 11:17 AM Rich Wong
Huck Printing Press
Prometheus
Forget what Fly-by said about your 1973 10c Crossed Flag
pair. They were printed on the multicolor Huck press, Per the Scott
catalogue, it "used many recess-engraved plates of smaller size than
any used previously." "Joint lines appear after every two or four
stamps." It "was first used to print the 1969 Christmas stamp" and
the 1969 6-cent Flag over White House stamp.
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
clark
I'm not a US stamp collector but have garnered sufficient information from the
boards to give you a rough answer.
Firstly, without seeing condition its hard to tell.
Secondly, most post 1930 sells at face value or less.
Pre 1930 somewhat better.
Album adds some, but not much, value to collection.
August 10, 2003 Clark
Thanks for the welcome Dave
Yes they are US stamps...Trying to keep a 1 1/2 year old entertained
and stamp fact searching at the same time caused me to omit that
minor detail;-))))
Thanks again
Clark
August 10, 2003 10:49 Dave Frick (moderator)
Clark: Welcome to the board! There are regulars who check in here that
are far more experienced that I am at how to go about addressing your question,
and will know where there are some links to pages/sites that can help get you
started on this.
If you have a scanner, feel free to scan some images, especially of the earliest
stuff, and provide links here to the board, and people can help give you a
better idea. Also, you didn't mention whether or not it was US or international,
but I'm guessing US?
Check in over the next few hours, as people come and go on here, but someone
will address your question.
August 10, 2003 10:42 Dave ("philatarium")
Jim W-S: My general rule of thumb, and it is merely that, is to take the
Sakura value in yen, divide by 100 (for exchange rate, a generous factor), then
divide by 2. That usually takes it down to something like a market price. I've
found that Sakura prices are what Scott used to be: high so that dealers could
work off of a percentage of it. That said, I did find when I went to PhilaNippon
that many Japanese dealers were working off of 100% Sakura, especially for more
recent material, but I attribute much of that to the fact that that was such an
expensive show to be at that retail was to be expected.
August 10, 2003 Louise
Dave, Brian - Thanks for your kind comments. Rest assured I hope it won't
come to moving the board. I will be around for another two weeks but can't
guarantee anything after that, as I will be moving back to Lodz; one of the
reasons I "disappeared" was the lack of home access to the internet and the
spiralling bills in cafes. But the places where I might be working usually have
internet access for free, so work permitting I'll be back after that.
Back to philately: My problem is at the moment is that I'm away from home on a
course in Warsaw and my stamps are all back in Lodz, except the ones I pick up
here at the open air market a couple of streets away when I get the chance
(Russian sellers with tons of the same stamp, and a few Poles, but I reckon the
merchandise is at least genuine, even if it isn't the inter-war Baltics I'm
currently salivating over on eBay) and the ones I brought back from Britain with
me (eg the Montenegrin one I was asking about the other night). I have plenty of
access to stamps here without relying on eBay - I think the hobby is more
eagerly followed out east than at home in Britain thanks to the promotion it got
under communism as a socially acceptable way of filling a few spare hours - and
a friend who collected as a child has offered me her entire Russian collection,
which is nice of her because I still have a long way to go on my Soviet
collection (yeah, not worth very much, but to me a nice commem image is more
interesting than a valuable definitive, although I do as it happens collect
Soviet postally used, because of the relative rarity of them - Brian -
agree wholeheartedly with your stance on this area).
Anyone got any good ideas on making up packets of stamps, not necessarily to
sell on eBay (long way off - it'll be years yet before I get a credit card) but
just to see if I can shift some of the inter-war Czechoslovak duplicates that I
got in a pack of 500 or so which turned out I think to be a dealer's lot. Not
that I'm trying to make a quick buck, just don't think any of the stamps are
worth all that much by themselves and thought that it might be more useful for
people if I collected them into sensible sized lots.
By the way, if anyone is familiar with Warsaw, Interfil have got a nice new
building round the corner from where they were. I know some lurkers on the eBay
board had experience with Polish stamp dealers, so just passing on some info. If
anyone in turn knows where a decent bourse is here - or in the rest of Poland -
let me know!
August 10, 2003 Clark
Newbie with a bunch of stamps
Looks like I have inherited a Scotts Album with stamps from the late 20,s and
early 30,s that is half full thenfrom 1935 till 1985 the album is full. Also
most of the airmail stamps are in it at the back.All stamps are unused and
appear to be in great condition.
Any idea what the stamps may be worth? Just a ballpark figure
would help a bunch.
Thanks in advance
Clark
August 10, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave F.
Thanks for your reply to chuck, I was going to ask a similar question.
Will check out Linns later.
Interesting, but Scott value for old stamp I linked to last night is only half
Sakura for mint.
August 10, 2003 Brian R
Dave F
Despite being part of your recent angst, I do hope you won't install, the type
of software your considering. The newbie is the life blood of our hobby, and
extra hurdles for them, will be a big disincentive to post. Look at how activity
has crashed on the ebay board. I'm refering to the appearence of new people, not
the lack of posts from the regulars, due to other reasons.
August 10, 2003 10:00 Dave Frick (moderator)
Brian: Well said. (Cye, btw.)
August 10, 2003 9:55 Dave Frick (moderator)
Chuck: I definitely agree with you on the first paragraph of your post.
As for the recent Japanese stamps, I think the reason Scott values them so high
reflects the (fluctuating) exchange rates prevalent at the time. It looks like
to calculate mint prices, they took the exchange rate at the time of issue (or
up to a year later), calculated the dollar equivalent, and then doubled it. That
was the mint $ value. Then it looks like they knocked about 1/3 off of that for
used. So you're right, it does not in any way correlate with Sakura values,
where the exchange-rate effect does not influence the catalog value.
That said, I haven't dealt with a dealer in Japan in recent years. But I did
work with someone about 10-12 years ago, and I noticed she still advertises in
Linn's. (Do you get that?) In the ad, her name is listed in Japanese order, and
using a now-somewhat-rare form of Romanization. Thus, her print name in the
Linn's ad is "Kawanisi Setuko", but we would pronounce it "Setsuko
Kawanishi". If you don't have a Linn's handy, let me know and I'll
transcribe the full ad for you. In addition to recent assortments, she does
operate from lists for recent issues as well, and accepts US International
Postal Money Orders for payment.
Louise: Thanks for your kind remarks. And I've been meaning to welcome
you on here. I do remember when you were participating actively on the eBay
board, and glad to see you back. I too have been trying to hold off on buying on
eBay these days, partly because of trying to effect a job change, and partly
because I still have so much material to go through as it is. Do feel free to
stay as active with this board as you'd like!
August 10, 2003 Brian R (the new calmer version)
ChristoYour comments are well said. Especially, your nod to the fact,
that there is a second component to this whole issue. Namely, it isn't (nor
should it be) our duty, to protect the pocket book of the idiot. I was so
disturbed by the recently discussed R.E.Lee letter, that I endevored to contact
the winner, and simply invite him to read the comments of this board. While that
discussion got heated too, I think some pertinant points, got mentioned. As far
as I'm concerned, I'm able to forget it now (and have), I've done my duty as a
good citizen. Whether or not the bidder actually comes here, and if so, what he
does with our observations, is entirely up to him. After all, it is his money,
on the line.
Your run in with a certain poster from yesterday, is also, quite illustrative
of what troubles many of us. You learned the hard way about the value of a
couple of his Merson issues. Wouldn't you have "nibbled" at that auction
regardless of who the seller was? As a seller, I'm sure you realize, that those
same stamps you now have laying around, will incite the same adrenalin rush, in
the next collector, should you re-list them. This is the dilemna, created today
through simple greed, that our children and grandchildren, and all future
collectors will face. I might be calmer, but my opinions, haven't changed. We
have only two duties as collectors and good citizens. The first is to alert
others of the problems in the hobby. The second, is to face those responsible,
and call them, and treat them, as what they are ---criminals. I take no perverse
pleasure in screaming at miscreants. I'd be much happier, quietly pouring over a
big pile, of unidentified Wash/Frank issues. I do love the hobby, and because
so, find it painful to stay silent. The day that I rationalize, or accept, the
activities of addie and his ilk, is the day I'll know its time to put away the
album.
BTW--I also share your opinion that postaly used items, especially errors,
should be worth much more than their unused siblings. I'm more than happy to
collect the prior at a reduced price. Whoever created the cult of MOGNH (or MUH
for you colonials) did me a great service!
August 10, 2003 Chuck Harm <macalusoharm@sprintmail.com>
NOIP at the risk of reigniting a fire, I do think it was interesting that i
never saw any response to the request to mark the modern reproductions with
facsilmile on the back which should have no impact to someone wanting an
acknowledged copy to fill a space. Also there was no response to the scan
providing a comparison of the reproduction to the genuine stamps despite the
claim that the reproductions are of very high quality. I think these were both
straightforward attempts to fcatually discuss the issue and the lack of response
saidd volumes to me.
Dave F. - I have been starting to spend more time on my Japanese collection
lately, especially the modern stamps. I collect postally used and have noticed
for stamps of the last 10-15 years , Sakura prices are well below Scott. Do you
know of any dealers in japan that sell modern postally used stamps at Sakura
prices? I would welcome any contacts you can provide.
Dave B. - Any idea why your Trengganu 3c is up to $30? My catalog checks with
Scott, SC and Tan (ISC) have indicated a price in the $7-12 range. Is there
something special about the cancel? Or is this just two people trying to fill
the last hole on the page and willing to pay a premium.
August 10, 2003 Louise Stanley
Well said, Dave
I for one would second what you've said. Not really going to get involved
because I long since gave up buying on eBay and don't want to go back on as a
regular user until I get a regular job that allows more than the
hand-to-mouth-to-stamp-album language student existence, but it seems to me that
the people with the most to defend are instantly detectable from the people
willing to make a coherent, intelligent point against the abuses of the trade
going on on eBay.
Stamp collecting is a hobby, any professional site or group of experienced
collectors will tell that instantly to people who think they have struck it
lucky with their granddad's old album (sometimes it's rather painful to a newbie
to find out that their stamps aren't worth tuppence, but that's often how to
separate the wheat from the chaff). Sure, there are full time dealers and big
volume sellers on eBay aren't all bent, but in the main it is still a hobby. It
is sad to see people who think the only reason to take up a hobby is to make a
quick buck out of it. If I want images of stamps I'll cut up my magazines,
Michel cat or draw my own.
I for one would happily register as a member of a new forum. It may not stop the
problem people but it would reduce traffic. It's a shame to make it an exclusive
"club", but it might reduce the accusations and counter-accusations and personal
attacks.
Sveiki - will check back in on the site tonight!
August 10, 2003 9:21 Dave Frick (moderator)
Fly-By: I'm afraid I cannot really figure out where you stand: I thought
the people you were having problems with are the people you now seem to be
supportive of. Or that may have been sarcasm. I'm not sure. And I suppose it
doesn't matter.
But I think you are incorrect in connecting mastery of a subject with economic
activity. In short, "if you really knew what you were doing, you'd be earning a
living at it." There are still many people who treat this has a hobby. Indeed,
one of the most knowledgeable individuals in detecting forgeries, Varro Tyler,
was a professor of pharmacology, and was even more proficient in publishing in
that field than he was in philately. I don't know if you're American or not, but
it seems to me, as an American, that it is a peculiarly American way of thinking
that equates money-making ability with respect. One does not necessarily follow
from the other.
Do please be aware that anonymous posting is a privilege on here, a matter of
trust. I must say that after the experiences of the last several days, I am now
looking once again at an entirely different board software that will require
everyone to go through a one-time registration and confirmation process, ip
address logging, and the ability to put a specific poster on a monitor system,
where their particular posts would be subject to review before posting, while
the majority would not be. I don't want to do this. I am opposed to it on
principle, and I don't want to create so many technological hurdles for people
who may have valuable stamp knowledge but are not so computer-savvy.
-- Dave (still crabby after the last couple of days)
August 10, 2003 Fly-By
Socialist Stamp Party
christo
heres the answer
You are not allowed to collect anything that you can not afford to pay full
C.V. for.Some Sperati Forgerys are actually worth as much if not more and that
makes this bunch madder than h--l.Collect what what you want to,I do'nt care,but
they do..Its kind of like going to the grocery store in old Russia,You can only
have what the dictator will let you have,Interesting thought..they are just
jelous that Addy is making money and thier are not.If you want to add a 2 dollar
fake in place of a 2 thousand dollar origanal go ahead,but mark it as such.
Fly-By
August 10, 2003 Fly-by <nobodycares
@ urstuk.com>
collin-xzepher
what does it matter who I am! Could it be that I am right,I doubt it!as I
said earlier Its the same old hash day by day hour by hour,the same few going
over the same old stuff.? if they know so much they should spend some time as
experts at a museum or an expertizing service and get paid for thier
knowledge.You refered to (richard 1-covers)he is good at what he does,I'll give
him that but even then I know a few dealers that will disaree!and I'll that
alone.Bill W.knows what he is talking about most of the time.David B.is never
wrong! Thats good we need the input from those in the know,But on to the rest,I
find it hard to understand people that feel that they have to interfear with
others,with consistancy..Just think if you run off everyone who has a differance
of opinion there will be no discussion.Wow would'nt that be exciting!Shame
Shame.just like being in the old U.S.S.R. So go ahead run everyone off and see
who is left,I think you'll find that the only ones left will be the same hand
full,Go ahead scroll down,count the posters see how many of you there really
are,Minus the one that (said he gave up) I guess that meant that he will not be
back.How wonderfull the board did'nt need his input anyway right.Hmmm how
thoughtfull.
prometheus sight line for cutting machine,or a coil line pair thats
been perferated..now I wonder who could have done that?
August 10, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Addie and more
The discussion of (I presume your day/night refers). My first comment is that
the discussion went exactly the same way as others when addie joined e.g. the
ebay stamps discussion board. Pretty much heated and personal faire flung
around. The discussion normally appear to emd when somebody was wanting to get
more detailed knowledge re Addie's printing method etc.
I am a fairly new collector. And I must admit that I have learn't a lot, some of
it the hard way. And yes, I also had the blood rush through my veins (like
buckfever) when I chanced acroos addies auctions the first time. And of course I
won two lots (Merson issues). Once I have received these sheets I realised what
they were, and I undertook to never buy his material again.
But isn't this what has happened in the past, from the beginnnings of stamp
collecting. So many stamps issued, impossible to collect them all, especially
the high values of sets - so who is going to step in to fill the void for the
collector? In steps people like Fournier, Sperati etc etc. I think this was
facilitated by the advent of the prewprinted stamp albums. Sheesh, I have only a
B & W picture in this spot, doesn't look nice, I need to fill it. Where will I
get a copy. Same reason why someone mentioned cutting colour pics of stamps out
of colour catalogues.
For instance, why is horizontal pairs more collectible and higher valued than
vertical pairs of the same stamps. Because of the pre-printed albums.
Why do collectors strive to get unissued copies of printer errors via underhand
methods - greed, hegemony?? I would attach more value to a stamp with an error
which has been commercially used, than one that is MNH!!
This hobby has been plagued by this sort of thing for ages. People need to
think about what they buy, yes. I do believe that they should be educated, yes.
But if a person does not want to use/apply that knowledge, you/I have done our
bit - we can wash our hands. What don't people understand when they read addies
auction description?? When people bid even after reading that description, what
much do you think it will help to inform them of what they are actually bidding.
Not much I think...
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
RIGA Postcards = reply
SVEIKI! = Nice postcards
August 10, 2003 sveiki!
NOIP While you've been busy with the ongoing discussions - I've been busy
on implementing my webpages to a new web portal structure.
This is the latest updated page (beware - many links are still dead, but
will be corrected the coming month). Members features are not available, yet.
The long text on the "Postcards" entry page (the one I've linked to) is
completely new - directly of the press, so to speak. {:o)
A good continuation to you all!
August 10, 2003 Prometheus
Back to Newbie Questions
I know this is called a Coil Line Pair
Here
Its a line of color between a pair of Coil stamps,
What is this pair called
WHAT
They are not coils yet they have the same type line??
Thanks
August 10, 2003 07:35 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Richard,
Thanks for your information. It led me to some interesting further information
regarding the Tudway's Parham Plantation in Antigua. I've incorporated new
information in the page.
August 10, 2003 Richard Frajola
Jim W Addressed to Tudway. That and the Codrington correspondence are two
major sources of colvers from Antigua.
August 10, 2003 06.03 am Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_stamps
Modern Reproductions & incorrect descriptions
Richard Vagner
Well said!
Michael EngelThis issue has only just cropped up again as the
reselling of the reproductions seems to be under way. You have missed weeks of
happy sharing on a wide variety of philatelic subjects. I agree that it seems
improbable that eBay will protect people from themselves, but that does not mean
we should not keep trying. After the survey (see below) and the new connection
with APS things look more promising that some unethical selling may be
curtailed.
Fly-by-Post
It would be nice if you were to identify yourself – I, for one, like to know
with whom I am conversing. Some may think that this issue is only the concern of
half a dozen regulars. To show the strength and breadth of concern on this
issue, everyone should be aware of the survey on the subject organised by
Richard (1covers) and sent to eBay a while back.
157 unique eBay ID’s put their names to this.
Dave FrickYou have a difficult job at the moment and you will not be able to
please everyone. It seems to me that your insistence on issues being discussed
and the deletion of personal comments is the right one. Keep it up!
Colin
August 10, 2003 03:56 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a stampless folded letter from
Antigua to
England in 1850. It was probably sent soon after the British G.P.O. took over
the mail in Antigua. This SFL is a current
target=blank>eBay offering.
August 10, 2003 Richard Vanger <wengier@bigfoot.com>
Forgeries
First.. I am not an expert!!!! Having reached 70 and having collected stamps for
nearly 60 years, I have gathered a little knolege on stamps.
1..Forgery = Fraud = stealing somebodys work for gain, without the owners
permision.
2..Selling forged articles without marking each one = fraud..
3..Selling these labels as,Reprodactions or nything else to the new and medium
collectors is damaging to the hobby. When my grandson or his son inherits one of
these items in my collection ( and it is not permenantly marked) he has no
knollege of its value, only what the catalogue says. So not knowing he will try
and sell it as a real thing.
That is why I prefer a bad copy of the real thing than any amount of forged
spacefillers.
Richard V.
August 10, 2003 Dave P
Spam blocking
Those who have had difficulty getting email through might be interested in
this
news story. Among other things it details how AWOL is filtering spam.
August 10, 2003 0950 BST and Hot, Hot! Ed.B. No
relation to the other B.
Backwards and Forwards
Maarten: Are you still wanting that Canadian NATO - OTAN stamp as I have
found a couple.
Ed
August 10, 2003 Roger Heath
Swiss collection
It seems to me someone has defineately had an official word with this seller.
When all these fakes were offered individually, th eseller was trying to get
away with selling "as is". Now the spiel is:
"a)any lots listed as accumulations, collections or country lots which may
not be returned for reason of faults(if any),lack of genuineness & errors of
description & numbers of stamps in the lot.". Normal auction catalogue
verbage!
So the lot below is unreturnable. Paying the postage is even taking a chance on
the value of these items.
Roger
August 10, 2003 Roger Heath
Vacation over early
Last night I noted an interesting phenomenon where riny didn't have any auctions
on offer. As John points out below riny is back and has apparently spent his
time wisely organizing his collection. The Swiss selection is wonderful. All the
classics in row with identifying labels stuck directly over the cancels. I would
have bid on this except I'm a cancel collector and can't read them. They all
seem to start with "blo_". BTW - there are 16 genuine stamps ( the #63 & #64 are
real but the values are in the cancels which are always questionable, this
series being notorious for having forged cancels), 12 facsimiles blob cancels,
and 2 Strubels (the blue most likely a one margin #21and the green 40 centimes
too difficult to determine margins.) I must say it is difficlut to say which is
the best stamp in this collection.!!! Probably the set of 3 semi=postals which
catalogue at $25.00 with legible CDS. Unprofessional opinion = Opening price off
by 2 decimal points, and lot will sell for around $15.00 some day.
Roger
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=696&item=2945186393
August 10, 2003 David Benson
Maarten, they were from the changes that were made the last time he was NARUED.
When he was reincarnated after a weeks penitence he made a few changes
presumably to abide to a directive of Ebay.
David Benson
August 10, 2003 Maarten Willems
On Addie:
Did anybody ever ask Addie why he is SELLING things with 'NO MONETARY VALUE' (as
he says in all his eBay descriptons)? I've always considered that a weird
paradox.
August 10, 2003 David Benson
Just for the records, I did not bring up the subject of Addie or Larry. I think
it is important that it be discussed from time to time especially as there are
10's of thousands of new Ebay users every day and most believe that the
descriptions are correct.
All sellers on the US site state that the items that they are selling are
genuine in all respect and that the descriptions are correct.
This is only one of the sellers who are blatantly disregarding that and has a
couldn't care less attitude about flooding the market with worthless material
that he admits that he is making himself.
Hopefully the APS will come down on him but there are many like him on other
sites, especially Ebay Germany which has many modern day fakes listed. It will
only be time before they are also stopped.
I also find it strange that a representative from the APS hasn't been sighted
here or on Ebay Stamp Chat informing anyone what their plans where and the
format how the system will work.
David Benson
August 10, 2003 George K
????
John:
Are you saying there are lots of people on this board who have worse than
Stolow??????
August 10, 2003 George K
Greg
There is only one Greg I have any truck with - St*l*w.
August 09, 2003 John
Rineys Bargain Fakes
August 09, 2003 John @ Magnolia Stamps
I do'nt belive it Riney has listed a stamp properly identifide as a fake!look
here target=_blank>look here and theres another one too!
Fly By
Thanks for the acknowledgement.
On Greg Stolows behalf!not that I like him or anything like that!He is not
in a cell.And I'll leave it at that!There are those of you who have done
worst or just as bad.
BrianYour sarcastic attack was totally uncalled for.I simply made a
statement that I felt was correct.I do have 2 letters signed Robert E Lee.wether
you believe it or not I do'nt care! And I'm not going to waste my time showing
them to you or anyone else because all you'll do is howler fake or phoney.If you
ask me your time would be of more use at the museum,I think that there are
several in Chicago,that could use another expert.
I give up,there is no since in talking to you folks any longer, There are
none of you that are willing to give the benefit of doubt to anything.As fly-by
said there are only 5 or 6 of you that know anything about everything so I'll
just leave it to you to go back abd forth among yourselfs complaining about the
same crap everyday.Just think no differance of opinion!How frieking Wondreful.
Good Day to all of you,
John in Ms.
August 09, 2003 22:41 Dave Frick (moderator)
For what it is worth, I think you are both talking about two different Gregs.
August 09, 2003 David Moser
Greg D.
George K.. The only place you could blister Greg is on his own board as
he is an outspoken critic of any form of censorship. (among other things).
David
August 09, 2003 1028p hobbes9324 <hobbes9324@aol.com>
fly-by-post rant
Sigh - in regards to the Robert E. Lee letter in question -
Lee letters are rare - Lee letters from the field are much rarer.
His handwriting is VERY consistant in all the copies of his letters that I have
seen. While people's handwriting may vary slightly, especially over time, and as
mentioned I make NO claims to being an expert in the area. I'm not blind,
either.
His signature, which I have about 30 or so copies of on various documents, is
always the same. It is not at all similar to the signature on the letter in
question.
If the letter is real, it would be worth a significant amount of $$ -
much more than the $1000 or so some victim coughed up on Ebay.
I wouldn't use Addie's stuff to line my catbox at home, but if he wants to sell
it, and his buyers are happy with what they get, I don't think it's any of my
business. I DO think he should permanently mark his items for what they are, but
that's just my opinion. Likewise, if the person who bought the Lee letter frames
it and tells his family and friends that it's real, and gets a thousand dollars
of enjoyment out of it, good for him.
But don't pretend garbage is gold.
August 09, 2003 10:20 Dave Frick (moderator)
Brian: No apology necessary at all, and glad that you'll stay around. (I
don't have your email, but feel free to email me if you'd like, and I can follow
up with you a bit.)
NOIP: Thanks to others for your words of encouragement. Like others have
said, I've learned so much from these boards, especially the old eBay board in
its earlier incarnation. I didn't want to lose that opportunity, and that's why
I took the plunge with this, that one day when things were getting really bad on
eBay. Believe me, this is not an ego thing, and, indeed, I think about passing
this on to, say, the EUSC as a group effort. Perhaps that will be worth
exploring at some point. I ended up having to change my plans for today so that
I could stay near a computer throughout the afternoon and evening.
As for people being granted forums, again, I'm not doing it because I think both
sides of a controversial issue are perfectly correct. I'm doing it because I
think, again, it is dangerous for me to allow someone to essentially make
charges against another person without them being able to respond. However, if
it turns out this is a problem for people here, then let me just turn this over
to someone else who has no concerns about liability issues. I will not put
myself at risk so that others can just fire off a comment willy-nilly. I hope
I'm clear.
August 09, 2003 George K
Addie and his ilk
I agree with Brian R; call a crook a CROOK.
Those of you who remember the eBay board know that Addie would come on
periodically and, with his signature articulateness resembling that of pond
lichen, would defend(?) his "product". The same arguments about marking his
fakes were made to him over and over and over again, only to be met with his
outlandish, bizarre claims of saving the hobby from the "philatelic goddes"
(sic), before calling all the honest people names.
He has never sold anything I am aware of other than his rotorootergravure
Xerox copies. To those of you who would grant him a forum here, please look at
his feedback. If we can say that 2/3 of sales generate feedback, then he would
have sold TEN THOUSAND lots of this trash, and his initial 5,000 victims grows
exponentially as his "wares" are resold. At some point he needs to be STOPPED,
and I would much rather have a few outraged people like Brian that might keep
taking the next step to getting him a cell right next to Stolow, than a thousand
others trying to convince him with reasonable arguments.
And speaking of Greg, if HE ever tried to stop by and defend his criminal
activities, I guarantee you I would blister your screens with a stream of
vitriol that would make Larry Flint blush.
The good thing about allowing him here this time is that, unlike the eBay
board, he is on record now.
August 09, 2003 Fly-By-Post <Nobodys
Business@urstuk.com>
http://American Stamp@urstuk.com
First off let me say good evening to all,before I start my rant.
It seems to me that there are a certain few,you know who you are that just
have to much time on thier hands,You know the ones that just go back and forth
between this board and the other one!
question is directed at those of you who think that you are experts in every
field,Stamps,Autographs,Coins,Paper Money,If you know su darn much why the
heck are you not in business as such you waste you presious time arguing
between the same 5 or 6 people,it does not make since,If you knew half as much
as you think you do,Wht not get paid? Buy ahh maybe you do'nt thats why your
stuck here pecking away at your keyboard wasting time here!Now for the second
part of this,Why do'nt you guys have your own stamp shops,where you could sell
only what you deem as being real or authentic? Bill w. is the only one who does
it on a regular basis and the guy in ms. does it part time.
Now on to Addy,he has offered on many occaision too go heads up with any of
you one on one,but I've never seen or heard anyone direct any sort of comment
directly to him,instead all comments are about him not to him!
The R.E.Lee letter that strirred up such a stink.maybe and maybe not,I would
have to say that one might have a tendancy to write differently from time to
time,I know I do.But than again you are all experts on everything so what does
it matter!
on to Brians remarks to john in ms.What would it matter if he were to post
his covers and letters,all you would do is say they were were fakes!
So in closing let me say this.Some of you need to get a life as the younger
generation would say....
Fly-By
August 09, 2003 David Moser <stamphick@dospalos.org>
Where is Gregg Deeter when you really need him?
David
August 09, 2003 Brian R
RogerFurthermore...I promise to quit calling you Rodger (had a college
friend who spelled it that way).
August 09, 2003 Brian R
Well, I took Duncans advice, and had a couple of cold ones, and have
calmed down. Sorry Rodger, your advice was good too, but there is a
dearth of beaches to blow steam off on, here in the midwest. I appologize to
all, for my momentary insanity, but I've held my tongue, for a certain poster,
for too many times. Shades of grey, are for the artists, philatelists call
colors as they see them. My rural upbringing has also left me with an often
glaring lack of eloquence. I realize that my rant, will likely lower many
posters view of me, but that too, is something I can't change now.
Most of all I'd like to appologize to David Frick. I know this board,
is your personal creation, and I've been one of your most enthusiastic
supporters. I'm sorry that it was me, that put you into the position of
exercising the very thing, that inspired this boards existance. I will temper
the enthusiasm, and hold my tounge when proper, from now on.
August 09, 2003 Rob Faux
Jim W-S Nice pickup.
August 09, 2003 Bill Weiss
Topics
I say "Amen" to Duncan's comments below. Indeed, we should discuss whatever
topic "floats the boat" of the party discussing. I just found the Addie thing
going back & forth endlessly as getting nowhere so long as the honorable board
members are telling him what a crook he is and him denying it and refusing to do
anything about his selling operation. If we thought for one second that he would
mark his junk on the back so that no-one else can get hurt after the initial
sale, I would say go at him, but it is obvious we are treading water.
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
roger
He wasn't
entirely a snipper, but close enough.
BTW Scott is grossly underpriced and in case anyone is worried, I know it
isn't 13f/12f 1935 litho (approx $240 per single).
August 09, 2003 Rob Faux
D.D. Interesting comments nicely said.
Something we all easily forget is that there is an unending cycle of new people
entering any hobby that need to hear the things that have been said before. For
those of us who have seen it before, it can get old. The trick is to keep it
clear and useful, while still maintaining an undertone of welcome and
helpfulness to those who want to learn and be a part of the community.
But for the help of some wonderful people, online forums such as this - and my
own innate curiosity - I would still be completely lost in this hobby. (as if I
know what I'm doing now)
I am still painfully aware of how much I don't know - but I AM proud of how much
MORE I DO know now - just a few years after getting into this hobby seriously.
Rob
August 09, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Ethics and this board
I quit coin collecting a few years ago due to abuses in the hobby... whizzed and
doctored coins, the outrageous amount of stuff produced by the US Mint to milk
profits from collectors... and switched to stamps in 1982.
It was very discouraging to discover the abuses taking place in this hobby as
well, and as a result I limited myself to harmlessly collecting common stamps
and just enjoying the pure fun of it, stopping entirely for several years at a
time but always coming back to the hobby.
One of the biggest eye openers for me though was learning of the sensorship on
eBay and the subsequent establishment of this site.
Yes, there are problems in stamp collecting just as there is in coins, antiques,
collectible cards, and so on. And if those problems cannot be discussed here,
then where???
Thank you so much Dave and all you folks who provide this forum and take part
here, you have no idea of the real influence you have on neophites like me. Here
at this site we can learn about some of the abuses of the hobby, but also we
find so many great links to the "good folks" and their contributions to the
hobby. Things like Jim Griffith's album site (my personal favorite site), and
sites for Confederate stamps, Paolo's stuff, the common sense direction given to
us by guys like Bill Weiss and others who understand the business portion of our
hobby as well as their ncredible knwledge of the stamps and history itself.
But I feel that we all have a responsibility to address the problems that occur,
even if we can't make them go away completely. Apathy certainly is not part of
the solution. Trust me, the cops get tired of fighting the thieves, spouse
abusers, white collar criminals, drug pushers, and the rest of the dregs of
society, and they also know that they will never "win" their fight, the trouble
makers will always be there. That is no reason to abandon the battle.
If questionable items and questionable ethics regarding eBay sales are going to
be discussed, some people will obviously be revealed as unethical (or worse). I
say "Good". If cockroaches scatter when the light hits them, lets open the door.
Brian, have a frosty beverage of your choice and take a break if needed, and
check out some of the good things happening in our hobby. But don't give up the
fight.
Thanks to y'all for listening and contributing.
Duncan
August 09, 2003 Bill Weiss
Lee Letter
The R.E.Lee letter sold on ebay was not even remotely genuine, and despite that
fact, many folks bid on it, apparently oblivios to the fact that it was fake.
These are the kind(s) of items that really bother me, where a buyer gets taken
(in this case) for well over $1,000. The fact that Brian R. was good enough to
contact the winner is a credit to him.
One school of thought is, of course, "buyer beware" where it is the
responsibility of the buyer to educate himself as to the authenticity of what he
is buying BEFORE he plunks down his money, and if he fails to do so, well, too
bad for him. Personally, I feel that a buyer of ANY product should have the
legal (and certainly moral) right to expect that what he buys is "as decribed" -
in this case, a genuine R.E.Lee ALS, and if, for whatever the reason, he
receives sometrhing other than a genuine R.E.Lee ALS, he should be entitled to
the full protection of the law, as well as his fellow human beings, in this
case, Brian R's intervention, and to hell with ebay's rules.
August 09, 2003 548p hobbes9324 <hobbes9324@aol.com>
Robert E Lee letter
Just in passing, I dug thru some of my philatelic literature and found an
interesting article in an edition of the STAMP SPECIALIST, written in 1946
(India Edition) in which the lead article is entitled "The Field Letters of
Robert E Lee" - with photographs of two letters written by Lee in 1862 and 1863.
While I make no claim of being a handwriting expert, the two in the book are as
far as I can see identical to one another in terms of handwriting. Not
surprisingly, the letter recently sold on Ebay is not remotely similar. Not that
this will keep idiots from running off at the mouth about it's being genuine, of
course. No need to let facts get in the way......
August 09, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
I moslty agree with David B.'s statements on his USEFUL TO PHILATELY
campaign against illustrations (or something very similar to auction catalogue
pics) offered as collectibles -- this is unrefutably clear (I have examined some
of that stuff in the flesh) -- and I feel I should thank very much Dave F.
for his contributions of any kind and for having created and being mainteining
this board, always fully agreeing with his interactions with it. Well done!!!
Off for holidays, Paolo (I will look forward to read from some of you in
September)
August 09, 2003 Bill Weiss
Addie, Etc.
I have stayed out of this discussion because I feel the situation being
discussed so vehemently by all parties, is at the moment, unresolvable, and much
time and talent can be wasted in trying to resolve what can not, at the moment,
be resolved. I tend to agree with Mike Engel who says that constant whining
about Addie & his products does not obviously, produce a satisfactory result for
those who are complaining. Only formal action can accomplish what this board can
not, so to beat this subject to death is, in my view, unrewarding.
In my heart, I agree with Brian, and would not want him, and his interesting
posts, to depart because he feels slighted. He is a valuable contributor here.
He is frustrated because he wants to "call a spade a spade" and he's being
slapped on the wrist. I feel his pain. This guy (Addie) surely knows in his
heart that what he does and the product he produces, is garbage. That does not
bother him, and all of the moaning from this board won't change it, so let's
move on, and not give him a forum to attempt to defend what can not morally be
defended. If he honestly felt that his creations were being marketed in an
honest way, he would have no problem at all so marking them on the back for what
they are, but he will not address that obvious solution, for obvious reasons.
Everyone who is honorable here, which is most of the participants, can vow to
get this guy if and when the time comes, in a proper forum, through a proper
complaint procedure. Next topic????
August 09, 2003 Roger Heath
Deletions
David -
Your Board, your call.
I promise I will never second guess your judgement, even if you unfairly delete
one of my sarcastic, derogatory, personal attacks.
);>)
Brian -
You need a little time on the beach, it would be criminal to waste part of the
summer stuck inside reading posts on a computer screen.
Roger
August 09, 2003 Brian R
I will further state that I understand your dilemna too, despite being part of
what created it (thank you, Richard). At least here, the moderator is known, and
the reason for the moderation is given. I hold no personal grudge, only
exasperation. As a group, there has got to be a point, where we say
enough discussion. Illegal acts, are illegal acts, and their products or
producers, no longer deserve the decency of a forum.
I do, and shall, respect the fact, that this IS your board. If you think my
comments go to far, I will live with the deletions, or honor your request to
leave.
August 09, 2003 Brian R
Marius It would seem that a person gleefully telling a room full of
people, that he has committed criminal acts, and intends to keep doing so, is a
personal claim to the title.
August 09, 2003 Michael Engel
Fakes and forgeries
Roger--Confirms my suspicions and I certainly agree with your evaluation of
these dealers.
August 09, 2003 Richard Frajola
David Frick I feel for your dilemna. I, for one, think you did the proper
thing in deleting posts that you, at your sole discretion, felt should be
deleted. It is YOUR board.
August 09, 2003 Marius
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you can call anybody a criminal
until they have been convicted of a criminal act.
August 09, 2003 David Benson
Dave and Brian,
This board was set up becuase of the problems with Ebay Chat and especially the
REPORT button which was used whenever any subject was broached that offended
Ebay.
I agree that personal attacks should not be allowed but comments about material
should be openly discussed especially when an admitted forger brags about what
he is doing.
I have personally met one of his customers who spent over $ 1000 on his material
with the hope of keeping some for his collection and disposing of the balance.
When they arrived he realised that they were modern manufactured instead of
being of the period that was alluded to in the description and communication.
They were given to his local club for wall display purposes.
Ebay has been asked many times if they could have an expert on call or staff
that could make decisions that Safeharbor couldn't. It is fairly easy to divide
material into three groups, definite fake, possible fake and genuine. All
material in group 1 should be delisted immediately.
David Benson (who will leave you alone for the rest of the day).
August 09, 2003 Roger Heath
Fakes and forgeries
Michael-
They have cornered the market and are now able to offer such a mix of quality
that one should avoid most of those auctions unless one truely really totally
undescribably believes the guarantee claim or has a lot of money to burn. I can
think of other dealers who I would go to and willingly give them my money
knowing without a doubt they are honest. They are not claiming ???, "as is",or
nor returns on these items.
Excuse me, my printer is warm and ready to execute some prime examples of
philatelic art. Since Ebay now has a specific category, I've just got to find
appropriate items to fake. Piece of cake!!!
Roger
August 09, 2003 Brian R
Dave I will not deny that i'm hot under the collar. You have a poster
here, openly admiting, (with pride no less!) to the illegal reproduction
of copyrighted material. Stating that he is a criminal, under such
circumstances, isn't name calling, it's a confirmation of his own words.
I fully understand why you have had to delete anonymous, mean spirted posts,
from cowards before. I agree totally with it.
Am I, or am I not, responsible for my own words?.
August 09, 2003 16:07 Dave Frick (moderator)
Brian: It's not wishy-washy political correctness. I bet if you'll step
back from this a bit, you may be able to think of other reasons why I'd be
concerned about leaving such remarks out there.
August 09, 2003 Michael Engel (joehill)
Fakes and forgeries
Incidentally, my own collection is pre-1940 worldwide (not US). So I like the
discussions of detecting old forgeries, and I enjoy people showing off their
items, like the daily covers. Incidentally, I'd certainly like to know why it
seems harder to find these collections on eBay--I used to see non-dealers offer
these regularly, and I got some nice items at good prices. Now it's just manth,
roecy, nystamp, rubystamp and the like. Is this my imagination, or did the
market dry up?
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Michael
I cannot disagree with you!
August 09, 2003 Michael Engel (joehill) <mengel44@aol.com>
Fakes and forgeries
Jim W-S
I see where you're coming from, but I only get involved if the seller is clearly
inexpert--in such cases, I am actually educating someone. I avoid confronting
the obvious frauds. And I don't have any sympathy for people with thousands to
spend who don't try to educate themselves--I assume they're not spending baby's
milk money, and they deserve to learn the hard way, as many of us have.
August 09, 2003 Brian R
I fail to see how calling someone, who openly admits to criminal acts, a
criminal, is a personal attack. Seems to be more a statement of fact.
I make my statements openly, under my own name, and am prepared to defend and
debate them.
Instead, they get deleted?
I can grasp why ebay does such things. I don't think that you'll find anyone
who will deny that it is based in their desire, to keep from being named as
co-conspirators, in any legal action from the defrauded. Why you are prepared to
do it, I can only summize is based in wishy-washy political correctness.
In any case, I'll leave you your board, and a final point to ponder as well.
Maybe the problems afflicting the hobby aren't really the criminals. At least
one here openly admits to such acts with pride. Maybe, just maybe, the real
fault lies, with the spinelessness of collectors who stupidly tolerate their
mocking input, in the name of what I'm still searching for....
Goodbye all--Brian
August 09, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Fakes and Facsimiles
Its unfortunate that some messages have been deleted...
Has anyone explained yet why these products should not be marked as fakes,
facsimiles or copies?
I still prefer to consider them forgeries if they carry a country name and
denomination but are not legitimate products of that country's postal sysytem.
Oh, by the way, since they are not marked to avoid confusion as to whether they
are real or fakes, what would happen if some were used as postage?
And would the liability extend to the producers and sellers of the items,
particularly since they deliberately decide NOT to identify their works?
Sorry if I've raised old and tired questions, I'm kinda new to this stuff.
Duncan
August 09, 2003 15:45 Dave Frick (moderator)
Mr. ADT & others: I am trying to read each post carefully to determine
whether or not it describes or criticizes the "activity" or the "product" versus
the "person". I believe David was describing the products you are offering for
sale, rather than calling you a name or describing some personal inadequacy.
Please free feel to email me with any posts made that you feel attack you
personally.
To reiterate from the top of this page:
Differences of opinion do occur, but please use the powers of explanation,
reason and learning to make your points and persuade your audience. More
thinking is changed by the clear exchange of ideas rather than by emotion and
vitriol. Please avoid the use of profanity and personal attacks.
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Michael
The "je m'en branle" attitude only works to a point.
You admit yourself to having taken action.
The fools have to be educated and the "illiterate cretins" who market the stuff
may be semi-literate, but have sufficient intelligence to continue in their same
old ways (adjusting where circumstances necessitate action).
August 09, 2003 05:39 Jim Watson
Lavar for Governor!
NOIP,
Our friend Lavar is getting into the
news. Cheer him on!
August 09, 2003 Michael Engel
Forgeries & Fakes
Mr. Moderator: Forgive my exaggeration. Of oucrse,everyone has the right to say
what they please, and I know I can raise my own topics. But I honestly think
there's too much antagonism on this board, and a lot of it comes from these
fights over adtinvest and the like. I don't think it's out of line to suggest to
people to think whether this line of discussion is useful or enlightening. I
sure don't learn much from them, and I think "newbies" are simply put off by it.
August 09, 2003 ATD INVESTMENT
DAVID FRICK
I understand but if youwant to be fair you should delete some statement from
DAVID BENSON which is attacking since the biginning and you have done nothing
about.If you want me to participate in this forum you have to be fair with
everybody not with few.I am just defending myself.Most of the people in this
chat when it comes to Larry or me they no manners and not education
whatsoever.ATD
August 09, 2003 15:23 Dave Frick (moderator)
Michael: I would beg to differ with you, it's not "always the same
thing". A number of different subjects have been discussed here, and you're free
to introduce a philatelic topic as well.
Without these kinds of discussions, I don't know how people learn more about
their fields, and are able to make more informed and discerning purchases over
time.
Again, please feel free to share something of your collecting interests, ask a
stamp-related question, etc.
August 09, 2003 15:15 Dave Frick (moderator)
Mr. ATD: I'm afraid that I am going to remove your remarks as well,
because this is clearly a personal attack and not at all related to the issues.
Please feel free to explain why you do what you do philatelically, how you do
it, or whatever else, but a personal attack on someone else is not appropriate
here. And to demonstrate my fairness, I did just delete someone else's remarks
that were of a personal nature about you.
August 09, 2003 315 PM Michael Engel (joehill)
<mengel44@aol.com>
Forgeries, fakes, etc.
Every so often I wander onto this board. And it's always the same thing--people
getting their bowels into an uproar about the chiselers who sell fakes,
forgeries, etc., and the morons who buy them. Now, I understand that serious
collectors want to protect the integrity of their chosen field of collecting. I
collect political items as well, and the same issue applies there. I see
forgeries and fantasies of presidential pinbacks all the time on eBay, and
sometimes I contact the seller if I really think he/she is ignorant. But does
this problem really warrant these endless (and tiresome) debates and
discussions? If people insist on being fools, you won't stop them. And if these
illiterate cretins who market the stuff make money on it, you won't stop them
either. Who are you trying to protect, and why? So--collect, enjoy, and discuss
philately. Don't waste time interfering with the love affair between the crooks
and their suckers.
If some moron wants to buy that phony Robert E. Lee letter, let him. He's happy
and it doesn't affect you.
August 09, 2003 15:12 Dave Frick (moderator)
Brian: I hope you understand, but I had to delete some of your post. I
understand your point, but I felt you were going beyond the bounds of the issues
and making an allegation, and I just don't think this can be permitted here.
On a similar note, I do think it's really important for anyone, including Larry
and ATD, to be able to give their perspectives as well, and they are welcome to
do so.
As long as anyone's remarks stay on the issues and not go personal, they are
welcome here.
And I will remind the board at large that this is a public site, and that you
are personally responsible for your remarks.
I will do everything I can to keep this a level playing field for all
participants.
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
You mean theseMen
in Black?
August 09, 2003 Brian R
men in black ?
Why David what are you saying? Such a thing would seem to imply that
ADT's offerings are illegal. His absence, from such a willing and waiting
market, would further imply, that he knows this.
Maybe you could explain to me, how someone like that, is as good for our
hobby as he claims?
August 09, 2003 David Benson
Brian, if he agreed to your suggestion there might be a knock on the door in the
middle of the night by some men in uniform.
David Benson
August 09, 2003 Brian R
I wonder if addie will take requests. I'm one of those poorer collectors,
who has yet to fill the spots for the dollar value
Columbians, in my album. I hope he'll whip up a few sheets for the betterment of
the hobby. I know I'm still eagerly waiting.
I Just can't seem to understand, why he keeps ignoring a potental customer
base, that is ready to buy, buy, buy.
Maybe he'll explain to us, just what it is, that keeps him out of that
market. :o)
August 09, 2003 David Benson
Richard, that varies with what he tells his buyers. He tells them he bought them
in the 1970's in South America. (amongst other fictional stories).
David Benson
August 09, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
RW - Since he has made it pretty clear that he is the manufacturer of
these "products", then I see no problem using his id even in the title, since
that is the name he is producing them under. I see it as no different than
offering a "Ford car", or a "Barbie doll". It could read "atdinvest
fake", with a full description of what exactly the item is, without even a hint
of a personal attack. If he wants to be famous, so be it.
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
christo
Thank you very much for the stamps in todays mail.
August 09, 2003 David Benson
I am sure that Addie is on the APS hit list and that his time on Ebay will be
limited. The sooner he is out and that type of material banned from Ebay the
better and safer Ebay will be to the stamp community.
David Benson
August 09, 2003 RW
Modern Reproductions
IMO, clearly the failure by the source, and/or any resellers, of the "Fla Fakes"
to mark the backs "Fake" or such makes the amount of ethics perfectly clear. I
doubt those arguing otherwise to justify continued listing and / or production
of that drek will ever "see the light." IMO, their light comes from money, pure
and simple.
Why would a miscreant appear here and pseudo-defend his sales? Maybe
"in-your-face" game playing arrogance, the equivalent of a victory dance in the
end zone? Or maybe thinking his BS may be taken as sincere and inhibit observers
from pursuing redress with full vigor?
One suggestion, would it be allowable and feasible to insert very similar
listings, timed to end a few seconds prior or subsequent to his, in the same
categories, with one of his own reproductions (ideally the very same one for
sale) offered BUT with full disclosure and "FAKE" marked on the back? Enough
keywords perhaps including "adtinvest" that gullible newbies reading down the
list would feel compelled to click onto the public info version?
August 09, 2003 12.32 pm Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
Modern Reproductions
Addie had the right question when he asked why people buy his items. It
seems to me that there are a few possible answers.
1. In the past I have used illustrations of high value GB or Commonwealth stamps
when I knew I would be most unlikely ever to be able to afford the real thing.
Addie has said that his aim is to help people in this, though they could do as I
did and cut them from auction catalogues. The latest perforated reproductions
however are more realistic, and that of course is the danger.
2. I suppose some buy them for ‘Reference’, but surely the genuine article is of
much more value.
3. Sometimes when I see a lot of early Japanese stamps sold as forgeries, I just
wonder if one or two just might be genuine and there is a temptation to
buy in the hope that I know better than the seller! So far I have resisted that
temptation, but some may think they know better and buy hoping that they just
might get a real bargain.
4. Some buyers may hope to sell them on “As Is” for a big profit to people
who know no better at a later date. Incidentally, Larry can hardly be
accused of this seeing his ‘Buy it Now’ prices. The big danger, as has been
pointed out ‘ad nauseam’, is that some people down the line in the future may
pay big money for them, believing them to be genuine, or may have unrealistic
expectations, as Prometheus has just stated in his post. So why are
they not marked ‘reproduction’ on the back? If they were so marked, very few
people would object to their sale. The only reason I can think of is that
initial sales would be reduced as buyers in this category stopped their
purchasing. It seems to me that it all comes down to money, rather than high
Philatelic motives, and even at this late stage I would hope that Addie, and
Larry would mark these reproductions for what they are.
Colin
August 09, 2003 Prometheus
Larry = a thought
I needed at least two of the items you have listed But Now I wonder are they
real, guess I'll find them elsewhere.
August 09, 2003 David Benson
Larry, I had a look at your other listings and you have some nice material which
should sell at respectable prices. The prints you listed will drag you down and
give you a bad name. It is unlikely that any will sell and it will cost you time
and money. Donate them to your local stamp club as reference material to warn
new collectors of the dangers in collecting and especially from buying on Ebay.
David Benson
August 09, 2003 David Benson
Addie, don't you feel sorry for the poor saps who got conned into buying these
fake covers,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3488&item=2943957588
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3488&item=2944296473
They are not up to you usual " high " class of work, just fake handstamps on
genuine covers.
p.s. when you list the material, do you read the note that states that you
believe the item to be genuine,
David Benson
August 09, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Shameless behavior
Larry, there's an old expression, "if you don't like the message, shoot
the messenger".
Since you have chosen to lecture me on shame, I feel the need to respond.
You have chosen to give no answer to the repeated question about why you don't
mark your items as fakes or facsimiles. So the only conclusion apparent to me is
that you recognize that the only "value" in these items is that eventually they
can be sold to some gullible victim as real. I've seen the comparison of the
real stamp vs a copy, and the "artwork" is obviously of no value.
So if you choose to put up a smoke screen by ignoring that simple "facsimile"
question and instead providing a lecture on shame, believe me I know whose
behavior is shameless.
Actually I am amazed that you have appeared here. Actually I sense that you have
a conscience and that your statements here are meant to rationalize (to
yourself) why it is OK to sell your items.
I hope you take a second look at yourself in the mirror, I still maintain that
there is hope for you yet.
Here endeth the lesson for today.
Duncan
"If we have free speech, why do I keep getting a phone bill?"
August 09, 2003 Roger Heath
ATDINVESTMENT
DDT is popular in many countries!! I don't happen to think its a good choice,
therefore, agree with the ban on its use in the US and other countries. It may
serve an immediate purpose, but the long term consequences are detrimental to
the environment.
I find it interesting that whenever one of your items comes up for discussion we
seem to be talking about your product and you always talk about us. This is
where you and I are different. I'm quite willing to discuss production methods,
business plans, your effect on the hobby, etc. with you, but you never respond
to any philatelic questions. Why the secrets? Why not talk about your products
and how you determine the collectability of them. I'm certainly not envious or
frustrated (other than deciphering some of your rambles).
I am still waiting to see some of your Cuban - African military postal history,
if it exists. That is somehting we could discuss without becoming personal.
Since I've never seen any offered on Ebay, I might assume it could realize quite
high prices, relieving you of all the hours at the scanner and printer.
Roger
August 09, 2003 Prometheus
Larry Question
As a newbie to stamp collecting I love to read as much as I can about this
hobby.
What other Chat boards do you read.
I feel that your listings are clearly described for what they are but would like
to see them marked also just so my kids don't get burned 20 years from now
trying to fill the Holes I will leave in my album.
August 09, 2003 ATDINVESTMENT
ROGER
Mr.Roger.-
If my stamps are of so poor quality as you stated why are so popular all over
the world?Doyou want to knowwhat is your problem and the others cavemen like
David Benson and followers,that is envy and frustration because you lack the
knowledge to do it and the only thing you and your "friends" do is to attack
nand guess.Discussing with you is a wasting of time,and insulting my
intelligence trying to explain whatis done.
Larry don't waist time this people lack the intelligence to understand any
discussion is like talking to a wall.ATD
August 09, 2003 Brian R
John in MsYou have several R.E.Lee letters? Please do display them along
with those multiple #39 covers you have. Yes, I'm so certain that that letter is
a fake I AM prepared to eat my socks. Go wonder through some on-line
cats, You can find Lee's signature on hand carried letters from as early as the
1850's. every one of them displays the same upright awkward "R" To find a
"new" letter from Lee, from the period when he was wearing grey, especially one
of such import, is as unlikely beyond description. Certainly not to be played
out on ebay.
As for the two CSA #11f's you showed me, There is a reason that I gave you my
opinion privately. I DONT THINK THEIR REAL. I also gave you the reasons why, and
links to places, and other real ones, so you could come to the determination
yourself, without me seeming to be the bad guy. Congradulations, on selling them
to some poor sap instead,....you should be proud.
August 09, 2003 Roger
Manners
Larry -
Since you are now here and involved in the discussion of your items, why don't
you mark them on the back with the traditional word used for your type of items
- "facsimile". This is the traditional means of describing a reproduction that
is made from modern materials and from modern techniques. Forgeries were
attempts to duplicate the originals, yours obviously aren't because the quality
isn't there and the technique is wrong. Fakes are contrived items that didn't
exist, most of Addies early work fits into this category, his current work
resembles poor computer scans of drawings of stamps. (Did you see my post below
where I compar4ed an Addie to the real stamp.) Perforations in paper doesn't
make it stamp, adhesive on the back of a printed page doesn't make it a stamp. A
picture of a stamp isn't a stamp, so your auctions are not forgeries.
My commentary of your auctions: When the only person supporting you in your
"right" to sell these things is Addie, you really should be reevaluating your
place in the history of stamp collecting. Addie knows his!! Please think about
yours.
Roger
August 09, 2003 Prometheus
Todays Mail 1895 St Louis
Nice little Postal Card can't find my book to give # but I like the crisp killer
Boone
August 09, 2003 Larry
Good manners are far away on this stampboard. I had to read on another board
that my items were discussed here. Nobody from the posters had the "manners" to
send me a mail or message so I could give my opinion about the in their eyes
"wrong" items.
"shame on you" as I quote, think about these words when you're starting such a
bigger discussion about someones listings without informing him of her and be
sure your knowlegde about what you post is correct.
Larry
August 09, 2003 16.50 GMT Alec (infla-alec)
Auction Interference
I buy mainly from the European ebay and there it is considered good manners for
someone to inform a bidder or seller that something they are buying / selling is
being discussed in chat room "x".
I personally have informed many sellers that item "y" is in my opinion forged. I
then also tell them why I think that is the case and refer them to the relevant
literature. I have also been the recipient of some expert opinions on material
that I have had for sale. In such cases I add that opinion to the auction
listing and find that the buyer is very happy also to know the reason why it is
considered a forgery.
In 99% of cases both seller and buyer appreciate the input. Remember that not
every seller / buyer is an expert. We all have had to learn about our own
speciality somewhere, sometime, be it now or 60 years ago.
Yes there are cases of some selling blatant forgeries and that is another matter
entirely.
August 09, 2003 john @ magnolia stamps
signitures
Brian
Boy oh Boy,Everytime someone puts something up for sale that you don't agree
with you raise the roof,Be prepaired to eat your socks or what ever you can
choke down!Do you sign your name the same wat every time!I think not!And neither
did Gen.Robert E Lee.I have several letters signed by him and none are signed
the same!But than again they are all fakes too,as well as the ones at the court
house and and a few other places that have his writings,ie.The Vicksburg
Ms.battlefield and the muesum at Jackson Ms.Hell man the man did'nt even exsist
he was a figment of someone else imagination ,So therefore everything he wrote
and or signed is a fake.BTW I sold the 2 perferated stamps to a collector
in memphis tenn. who was proud to get them.He studyed them for about an hor
before the purchace,I only got $300.00 for the pair.Hmmm I was going to give
them to you but they too were fakes.
Just my 2 cents worth.......John
August 09, 2003 07:19 AM Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 09, 2003 7.09am PT Paul Barsdell <paul.b@webone.com.au>
Jim & Jim No, I don't know why there were different spellings even at the
same time. Jim W.'s explanation is probably close to the mark. Now, off to bed.
Paul
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
jimbo
Sort of ebonics run rife?
Seriously, spelling changes frequently support a major societal change, e.g.,
Peking to Beijing.
Mapmakers, particularly ocean-going map makers liked to be consistent.
Admitedly such was not the case up until the 19th century when maps were closely
guarded secrets, particularly in this part of Africa.
But by 1875 the geography of the west African coast was pretty well known to the
western world.
I would imagine that the position of postmaster was a fairly well-respected job
and one occupied by a person of above average literacy, so the reason(s)for the
changes are not immediately obvious.
August 09, 2003 06:14 Jim Watson <`>
Jim W-S,
I would venture the suggestion that the evolution of the spelling was successive
attempts of English-speakers to anglicize the sounds of another language. I
suspect that some of the overlap was due to the frugality of the postmasters in
making do with what was available. It is also possible that the clerks did not
recognize a difference between handstamp 1 and handstamp 2.
August 09, 2003 06:08 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Paul,
Thanks for that information. I think that pretty much confirms the history of
the Quittah post office. It is interesting to watch the western world decide how
to spell local names in non-western locales.
August 09, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Paul
Any idea why?
August 09, 2003 5.47am PT Paul Barsdell <paul.b@webone.com.au>
I have just returned to Canberra from Sydney, where last night I attended a
meeting of SSS/MSG Sydney members. The focus was on North Borneo. As always, a
very pleasant evening.
Jim WatsonUp to 1957, when the Gold Coast was granted independence,
three different names for Quittah appeared on postmarks - Quittah (1875-1903 and
1911-1927), Kwitta (1894-1909) and Keta 1907-1921 and 1928-1957). As you can see
from the dates, there was overlap of cancels with different names.
Paul
August 09, 2003 04:13 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a postal card from
China to
Germany in 1901. It was sent without a stamp as Feld Post.
August 09, 2003 02:48 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Business is Slow
In the last two weeks, about 10 percent of listings sold for about a tenth of
catalog. Lots of work and high listing fees. Guess is that listing and the
paltry final value fees were higher than gross profit on the ten percent of ten
percent. Time for vacation. Guess who?
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Interesting
This is an interesting find.
August 08, 2003 8:40PM Bill Weiss
Auction Interference
DAVID; If I understand correctly, it is not only an ebay violation to interfere
in an auction, it is also civil law. Any interference in ANY transaction is
taboo. That said, I would be interested in hearing an attorney explain to us why
it STILL is or is not auction interference even to suggest to the winning bidder
to just "drop by" our little chat board and see the folks talking about the
bogus item you just bought?
Now I am done for the night.
August 08, 2003 Bill Weiss
BRIAN; Yes, perhaps that was a bad example since the letter definately added
substantial value, but I have seen similar poor-quality common designs go for
$30+, which amazes me since I have trouble getting $35-45. for somwhat scarcer
in nice condition - and I wrote a book on the subject!
DAVID; Please understand that I would not just barge at a buyer, but indeed
would use as much soft-sell as possible. A guy who paid nearly full Scott value
for a US 10cent 1847 with pen cancel and cataloged by the seller for full CV was
simply asked by me if he was aware that a US #2 with pen cancel cataloged $800??
That's it.
In the case of the Lee bogus ALS, if it were me, I might just tell the buyer
that I was strongly considering bidding on it too, until I checked it against
proven Lee signatures and, gosh, I just didn't think they looked the same, and
well, since I'm no expert, I was afraid to bid, so gee wiz, I wish I had YOUR
courage to bid on such an item for such a big amount of money.....or some such
approach.
I know you mean well, David. We are all here because we care, otherwise why
waste the time?
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Bill W I have to side with alison on that union patriotic. The
existance of the letter kind of muddles things on how much the bidders valued
the cover. I'm not really good on them, but personally, I'd say thats a $10-12
cover, tops. I see that design at almost every show I go to (and that one is
battered).
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Bill & Dave I just sent an e-mail to the winner of the R.E. Lee letter.
Basically, I informed him that there was a lot of discussion here about it, that
he might want to see.
Other, than leaving the stamp chat address, that pretty much sums it up. Zero
mention about anything like our opinion of the authenticity, only an invite to
come by.
If I get in trouble...I'll tell 'em, "Benson made me do it"!
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Brian, anything that might hinmder the sale, whether before or after is
considered Auction Interference. Just a tactful note might help like,
" I noticed that you bought a Robert E Lee signed letter. This is being
discussed on XXXXXXXXXX and some of the comments might interest you. It may be
to your benefit if you read the comments and joined in.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Civil War Patriotic cover with letter
Bill W: That letter sold so high because it was listed under Civil War Militaria
in Collectibles. The letter alone, without the cover, if it had been transcried
would probably have sold for twice that amount.
August 08, 2003 Brian R
sincere appologies for the syntax of that post, but the sentiment comes
through...
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Bil & David Exactly how do you tactfully the someone they just got
screwed for a grand? I've considered send him an e-mail to the tune of "hey I'd
like to buy that letter", but first it would have to expertized since thats NOT
Lee's signature. Definately, not an accusatory approach, but one that
would/should set off some major alarm bells.
Technically, isn't the auction concluded? How could ebay consider it
interference (either way) at this point?
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Bill, I am not scolding you, I am just mentioning it. I don't do it directly as
I just mention to the buyer that they should come here or to Ebay Chat where he
can ask questions regarding the authenticity. To mention directly that the item
is crap and that is passed on to the seller is just asking for trouble,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Bill Weiss
Civil War Patriotics
BRIAN R; look at ebayitem #2186316322 for a good example of what I was speaking
about the other day. Crap quality bid too high. Can't figure it out.
August 08, 2003 Bill Weiss
DAVID; I have done it quite a few times, and frankly, I don't care if it
constitutes interference. Further, I believe you have told me on previous posts
that you do it too - so why are you scolding me??
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Bill, what you are suggesting is called Auction Interference and is harshly
dealt with by Ebay if the seller complains,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Chris, presumably the figure of 500 full time employess in Trust and Safety is a
slight exageration, he most probably siad they need 500 full time employess
instead of the 2 part timers they have now. What they need is a full time
philatelic advisor who can act as a go between Ebay and APS.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Bill Weiss
Lee ALS
BRIAN R.; I saw that listing and immediately knew it was bogus. Sure, the
bidders were fools, but I do think someone might consider contacting the winning
bidder and SUGGESTING that he might consider having the item authenticated, or
whatever, to enable him to either get his money back or cancel the sale. I feel
that if someone at least tells the winning fool that something may be amiss,
then if the buyer ignores the info, all that could be done, was done.
August 08, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
swastikas in postmarks
I suspect that summary of what was allegedly said at the APS lunch might be
totally incorrect / misquoted. Almost all the figures quoted seem to be totally
wrong "eBay is on track to sell $21 billion in merchandise this year" (!!!) so
the other information is probably totally wrong as well. One needs to speak to
somebody from the APS who we know who was actually there.
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Alison, judging by his comments it appears that he has little philatelic
knowledge. There is no reason why the term WWII was mentioned, Swastikas were
used on stamps, cancels, cachets, censor markings and censor tapes before and
during WWII. It might be better if someone that knows the subject could handle
Ebay's answers otherwise it would never be finalised.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Swastikas in cancels and censor tape
David: I am going to send him some scans, and then call him Monday morning on
his direct line and just pin him down on this. It irritates me that he said
something different at the APS lunch than he put in writing to me.
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Alison, also ask him about German censor marks with the emblem.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Alison Ruttenerg
Swastika in postmark Update
It was Dan Neary who spoke at the APS Luncheon, not Dan Cleary. It was Dan Neary
who I had the email exchange last week about the Swastikas, and he explicitly
told me in writing that Swastikas in cancels were not allowed. Therefore, this
contradicts what he said in his speech at lunch. So, I emailed him again and
asked him to clarify about Swastikas on cancels on stamps and covers. As usual,
I only got half a response. He responded with this: "A swastika cancellation
mark on an real WWII stamp is okay." But, this still does not answer the
question about the Swastika on the cover itself. With most Third Reich cancels,
especially the commemorative ones, only a piece of the cancel itself is on the
stamp and the rest of the cancel, where the swastika is, is on the cover. I
emailed him again and he has not responded to the question about covers.
August 08, 2003 David Benson
roger, looks like the description did not attract many viewers. Anyone who
collects Switzerland would have jumped on it just for washing the stamps off to
get nice cancelled stamps at a bargain price.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Roger You are so right!...Thanks for putting that into perspective. Its
fun to snicker at the goofyness of bidders, but the ingnorance of sellers, is
something I definately support, and seek out!
With out it my collection, would be a lonely, barren, place. ;o)
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
I didn't mention that the lower three cards appear to have the special 1932
Geneva Peace Conference cancel. It's difficult to tell, the scan isn't sharp
enough.
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Sellers without catalogues
This seems an appropriate point to share a new aquisition. I would have thought
that a seller would have been curious enough to have checked the stamps on these
cards. So, we don't necessarily need all sellers to be 100% experts in every
category!!! Those of us who are treasure hunters must have opportunity once in a
while. It will be very interesting to discover the true tone of these cards.
Roger
August 08, 2003 Brian R
That Sherman letter still makes me sick. I remember physically looking at that
auction because the seller had it ID'ed as a Cario letter. I could use a better
cairo cancle or specifically a receiver. I saw the seller said Cairo OH...and
just moved on. LOL
Of course, it was likely the Ohio thing, that focused him in on it.
August 08, 2003 nomad55
That was Matt. He also has the nasty habit of finding good stuff where the
dealer totally overlooks the major selling point.
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Clear Scans
You guys sure are getting picky!! );>)
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Nomad I forget...was it you, or Matt L. that found the Sherman
letter about six months back?
August 08, 2003 Brian R
O.K....here is a
genuine R.E. Lee signature which is swipped from a Siegels's catalog. You
can see it's way different, and the genuine is from only three weeks earlier.
August 08, 2003 nomad55
Brian - I'm not a handwriting expert either, but having done more than my share
of historical research, I've got a good idea on what to look for. Every so often
I can pull off ebay an envelope written by someone of note based on the
handwriting, info that the seller does not know - for example, one envelope
addressed by Mrs Jefferson Davis, and another addressed by Mrs Ulysses Grant.
Both have subsequently been re-sold.
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Nomad Actually, I somewhat remember the text, for that letter from some
history book. I think the forger? copier?, only got the place wrong. IF that was
real, 20-25K might be realistic. Maybe someone knows where the real item is.
All I had to see was the "R" to seal it for me. I'm not a handwritting
expert, but Lee used a upright blocky sort of R. It was kind of half cursive and
half print, very destinctive anyway, and very different, than the item.
August 08, 2003 nomad55
I sure would want a closeup of the signature that I can compare to genuine Lee
items pictured in catalogs.
August 08, 2003 Rob Faux
Brian One would think they would also want clearer scans...and that they
might wonder about the sale without returns being allowed?
$$ != brains
I guess some people in this world don't think $1K is much money.
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Furthermore, Lee and his whipped army, were limping back to Virginia, from
Gettysburg, when the supposed letter was written. He was NOT sitting around the
Potomac shore, idley making observations, about mundane daily topics. You would
think anyone ready to throw a grand around would do a bit of checking....
Maybe, i'll contact the underbidder, and try to sell him a bridge. He still
has some $$ left LOL
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Idiot bidders
Roger & et al Since you've brooched the topic, I'll agree that the
bidders of the modern, fake qwap, are fools or dreamers. However sometimes, I'm
actually reassured, when I see that rank stupidity isn't exclusive to philately.
When I saw
this item and its description my thoughts flashed back, to the stamp seller,
that claimed he didn't have the time, to cert the $7,000 stamp. I suppose this
auction is just far enough outside of the stamps categories to avoid that no "as
is" declaration?
The only thing I can positively assert, is that is NOT his signature, and
I'll eat my socks if its even a period item.
August 08, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Swastika in postmark
David: I just sent an email to the person who responded to my questions in
writing about the Swastika and asked for a clarification as to what the new
policy is. I want it in writing before I start listing my WWII fieldpost covers
again.
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Ebay statistics
David -
The numbers certainly can't be trusted! I have just dealt with selling GB stamps
from a colelction, and gathering stuff for my Swiss collection, so broadness is
very limited. I've done deals with people in 28 different countries!! Ooops,
Ebay!! Maybe Ebay doesn't recognize a country when a person signs in. I know I
have difficulty working around some signin features of websites where it doesn't
allow a hyphenated city. Kailua-Kona is the official PO designation of my
"city", so I can imagine some of the workarounds for citizens of other countries
that don't use the US address system.
As to active users - I wonder if that is different ID's or email addresses, or
what!
The members of the Trust and Safety Department must all have been to Hogwart's,
and wearing their invisibility cloaks.
I'm off to challenge some more windmills before dark.
Roger
August 08, 2003 David Benson
I presume some of the details are wrong, without checking there are must be more
than 27 different countries, would be closer to 100.
The comment about Swastikas is about the opposite what an Ebay spokesman told
Allison and I won't even comment on the fact that 27% of all parcels in Germany
are Ebay related, most probably closer to .0027%.
Anyone want to count 30,000 categories, sounds like someone has their decimal
points mixed up.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 David Benson
roger, some interesting announcements, some of them should have been mentioned
on Ebay announcements,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Louise
Roger -
Shouldn't think there'd be a problem. Might even get some cross-pollination of
boards, although it really is dedicated to US matters, some of quite technical
nature. However at the moment I can't get enough of reading about stamps.
Talking of which, having slowly come back to eBay in the last week or so, I am
now at the critical juncture: sign back in and risk a repeat of last year's
financial debacle, or stand forever on the sidelines looking at all the nice
pretty bits of paper going past my eyes?!
Sigh. I guess I shall just have to do the Right Thing and abstain for a while
longer.
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Virtual Stamp Forum
Louise - Thanks for the link to the forum. The most interesting comments were
from Lloyd of Lloyd Stamps concerning APS - Ebay partnership. I hope it is OK to
quote his message (and I hope the HTML pastes appropriately):
Dan Cleary, head of eBay's Collectibles division, spoke at the APS Affiliates
and Chapters Luncheon Friday. Some notes:
eBay is on track to sell $21 billion in merchandise this year. If it were a
country, that would make it the 15th largest
country in the world. It has 75 million active users (that is, some activity
within the last 24 months), and gets 70,000
new users every day. There are 30,000 categories, and on any given day, 21
million items are being offered on eBay.
Users come from 27 different countries.
17% of all packags sent through the German mail system are eBay transactions!
As of last week, eBay now permits the sale of covers with a swastika in the
cancellation. Stamps and coins have
always been exempt from eBay's swastika ban, but cachets are another matter.
Most of those "spoof" e-mail messages that claim to be from eBay come from
Romania. eBay usually knows about
them within minutes of their transmission, and shuts them down...but it's still
a big problem.
As of 3 weeks ago, you can no longer see e-mail addresses on eBay. The service
has also announced that it will no
longer allow User IDs that mirror e-mail addresses. If you have one, you will be
notified to change it.
40-60% of all items close within 7 days.
This APS-eBay partnership is pioneering for the rest of collectibles.
eBay employs 500 people full-time in its Trust & Security operations.
The stamps categories were recently changed; there will be more changes in a few
weeks, and eBay is going to seek
APS input on future changes.
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Roger, most of Addies buyers are from outside the US and mainly bidding on
material that they presume emanated from their own country but of course they
have never seen them before and cannot locate any literature about it. I noticed
that the APS already 8 experts in place to check US listings and that there
expertise is US and that they hope to get some non US soon as that is where the
majority of this type of material is.
Did you notice that some of the old material has come out of the woodwork,
Specimen overprints and some of the old RF handstamps.
I suggest that every reader should look at every lot that he has listed to see
how gullible Ebay buyers are,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Re: New fakes
David -
I looked at the many items Addie has for sale. It amazes me how many have 1 bid.
In a "Private" auction there is no way of knowing whether there is only one
stupid collector or a whole bunch!!!! My hope is that the winner of all the
$6.99 auctions pays cash using a new $7.00 bill.
Roger
August 08, 2003 Louise Stanley
eBay
Found something that might be of interest:
Virtual Stamp Forum
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Me, there have been hundreds, maybe thousnads of letters sent to Ebay and they
have all been ignored. It is just the problem that Ebay did not have anyone that
had any (or almost any) philatelic background and had no idea what was a forgery
or a photocopy. Now they have an arrangement with the APS (for material only
listed on the US site) it may make a difference. I would not like to see all
forgeries banned as in many cases they are an integral part of collecting and
study. The APS has to make definite statements what is allowable in normal
listing, under fakes and what should be banned. Until that is done then anyone
can make whatever they like, list it and wait til the money rolls in.
The seller Atdinvest is selling other home made material apart from the ones
under discussion. I suggest you look closely at some of the otehr material
listed.
see.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItems&userid=atdinvest&include=0&since=30&sort=3&rows=25
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Louise Stanley
Crna Gore and Oswiecim
Not knowing that "Oswiecim" and Auschwitz were the same places would be
scandalous for a person who claims to know modern Poland! The stamp does have
"Auschwitz" on it - though again it's mostly off the stamp; I was just surprised
because it is quite near Katowice which I always thought of as in Germany in
that period. But there you go - going to have to brush up on my Austro-Hungary
knowledge, because I had great fun picking out from the 5p box in Reading all
the A-H stamps with names of places that are now in Poland, Hungary, Czech
Republic etc so that they could go into my collection as well as the countries'
own issues.
Thanks for all your help. I'll have a look again - no access to scanner I'm
afraid, out all day on a course and nothing except a printer here at the flat -
but the Montenegro/Crna Gore explanation sounds the most likely; I may have
misread the Cyrillic "P" as a "Ts/C" which would probably fit with the theory.
August 08, 2003 Brian R
As much as this will upset my CSA buddies, I think I'm strongly in agreement
with Richard F. Its time to ban ALL forgeries from ebay. There is only
one reason, why some sellers continue to run such crap, in the legit stamp or
postal history catagories. That is to be "trolling for suckers". Sorry, Dave
F if this seems a personal statement to you. Just how does one tell
somebody, who knows their commiting illegal acts, a blatent criminal, and do so
nicely?
If, as a hobby, we are to continue to argue what forgeries are O.K./not O.K.,
we run the risk of claiming we're "a little bit pregnant". For the sake of the
hobby's future, now is the time, to wash our hands of all of it.
August 08, 2003 ME
JUST a Thought On these Fakes
Would it do any good for everyone to report/send a complaint to Ebay on these
items, or just more banging of head on wall???
A lot of folks read this board and I was wondering if a concerted effort might
help move them to the proper category.
August 08, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Jim Griffith Hi, I didn't take your comments negatively. I think from the
small bit of discussion that came about last night (your day time), I have
learnt something, and wold probably agree that I might be too quick too react
here. However, this is now the third or so time that this has happened to me,
and previously I just left the thing too late and were unable to claim my fees
back. I am normally fairly patient with buyers, I don't enforce the "contact me
in 3 days rule".
It is nice when you get to your PC and within a day or so the buyer's message is
already waiting. If not, I compose and send out an e-mail with all the details
to the buyer. But, I do get a bit worried when somebody is not trying to contact
me afterwards, it is like talking to the big hole in the sky up there somewhere!
And yes, I am like you, I do sell off material of areas/stamps I don't collect.
But I do that to generate dollars to enable me to buy material (French postal
history) on ebay/other sellers in the world. I cannot afford to convert my
currency into dollars - I will never be able to afford what I really want to
collect!
Regards, Christo
August 08, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
People who produce this sort of stuff are taking advantage of a legal gray area.
Here's my understanding of the situation, although I'm not a lawyer. Yes, U.S.
law protects stamps, but only U.S. stamps. In theory, the U.S. may or may not
honor extradition requests from other countries asking to prosecute someone for
violating those countries' laws, but that's a lot of effort for such small
abuses. Yes, copyright law protects against this kind of abuse, but copyright
law is largely a civil matter, not a criminal matter. As such, only the
copyright holder can commence legal action for these unauthorized reproductions.
There *is* a relatively recent federal law which makes large-scale copyright
violations illegal, but there are numbers ($ losses, # of violations, something
like that) which govern when it kicks in, and it's primarily used against
software/music/movie pirating.
So in short, yes, what Atdinvest is doing is technically illegal under either
civil or some country's criminal statutes. But it's not enough to attract the
attention of those people who have standing to file suit. As "bystanders", an
eBay person might have standing to file a fraud suit, but Atdinvest uses enough
wiggle phrases in his descriptions to escape that. It *could* be argued that
even though he describes his lots as facsimilies, he continues to post them in
"authentic stamp" categories instead of strictly in the fakes and forgeries, and
*that* constitutes an attempt to deceive. It's just a matter of whether or not
someone's willing to pay to make that argument. And even then, damages would be
minor, unless the plaintiff could swing class-action status.
Jim
August 08, 2003 ATD INVESTMENT
DAVE FRICK (MODERATOR)
Mr.Frick .-
I am not taking my comments to any personal level Sir,just trying to be polite
in front of so many insults.I think thatI withdraw from the chat,because is like
talking to a wall,and is a wasting of time with no result in the matters.Thank
you ATD
August 08, 2003 12:03 Dave Frick (moderator)
comments
Again, please, I ask to keep your comments focused on the issues being
discussed, and to not take them to a personal level.
Thanks!
August 08, 2003 ATDINVESTMENT
QUESTION
Mr. RW -
By curiosity from what site of your bed did you wake up this morning? ATD
August 08, 2003 11.48 am Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_GB_Machins/
New GB Machin £2 missing £
Dave P
Was I? Heck No! The first I heard of them was here on this board,
regretfully.
August 08, 2003 ATD INVESTMENT
QUESTION
Mr.Peter Spencer.-
By curiosity,what did you have for breakfast this morning?ATD
August 08, 2003 Dave P (orthorpteran)
Colin Were you lucky enough to pick up a copy of the new £2.00 with
missing "£"?
August 08, 2003 26:56 Peter Spencer
Sorry, RW! Your comment must have appeared while I was 'composing.'
August 08, 2003 Peter Spencer
ATDI Forgeries
Perhaps someone on this board has a U.S. legal background and can fill me in on
these queries:
1) Doesn't Florida or the U.S. have laws against the production of forgeries?
2) If the first answer is yes, aren't the laws enforced?
3) If the answer to the second question is no, given the renown of the U.S. tort
system for lawsuits, why hasn't anyone brought a civil damages class action suit
against known forgers?
August 08, 2003 Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
Japanese Philatelic S/S
Oh - on pages 5 and 6 of the web Site.
Colin
August 08, 2003 11.22 am Colin Judd (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps
Japanese Philatelic S/S
Dave Frick
It is interesting to see that of the series of 10 issued 1961 – 3, the last 6
are clearly marked on the reverse of the stamps, as is the reprint of the1934
Air Sheet showing 4 of the 1929 Airmails, to prevent any abuse by collectors and
sellers down the line. The first 4 were not so marked, and presumable they saw
the error of their ways around 1962.
I have put the images of those 10 and of the Airmail sheet and the 1947 Sport
block of four on my website here. http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps.
I was confused by these, and thank you for your translations. It is interesting
to note that only one of the 12 is a copy of a genuine sheet, and as I have
said, those ‘stamps’ are clearly marked on the reverse. A wise proceedure in my
opinion.
Colin
August 08, 2003 RW
Bogus Stamps
Aren't there copyright laws that apply to this pointless drek from Florida?
Certainly if a scan of an image from a catalog could be demonstrated, but also
might a royalty be due under copyright laws for the engraving offices and/or the
individual artist (engraver)?
August 08, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
Reproductions
Roger H, the poor resolution of the "product" leaves one name for such
"reproductions" as far as I am concerned:
low quality color illustration
ie: it is not a forgery, and neither is it a postage stamp, so I fylly agree
that it does not belong in the Ebay stamp categories (of course can be in the
Cinderellas category)
August 08, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
To All who partecipated to the poll Horse vs. Lion: I summarizized your
kind replies
here.
Thank you for the interesting website, Jim W-S!
Kind regards, Paolo
PS: ATDinvest -- It is totally useless for me to waste time to explain why your
items are wrong and should be banned. In fact, I did so several other times in
the past but you (along with some of the others) never took me in consideration.
"Paganini" does (or tries not to) not repeat and doesn't like to hear echo's of
his words! ;-)
August 08, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Non-payment
Bill and Christo, my apologies if you took my comments on the two week
span to be a criticism of your methods. I have no doubt that many sellers,
especially high-volume sellers, consider two weeks of non-payment to be
sufficient time to start acting. As an occasional seller who simply sells off
his extra material, my perspective is different. I intended my comment to be a
suggestion, not a criticism.
Jim
August 08, 2003 Prometheus
Bogus Stamps
Are they Memeographs??
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Reproductions
I thought I'd
illustrate (courtesy of Paul in Chicago) the "quality" of ATDINVEST art
works. In case you have difficulty, the real stamp is on the left, the quality
used on cover reproduction on the right!!
In my opinion the basic reason for creating a forgery is to deceive someone into
thinking its something else.The historic legitimate forgeries were made to avoid
payment of postal fees, or to fool collectors into thinking they were buying a
valuable stamp. Classic "fakes" were made for collectors and sold at the time as
"re-creations". Forgeries are collectable, classic fakes are collectable, but
these were nearly all reproduced by original techniques and with original
materials.
A picture of a stamp is not a forgery!!! It doesn't matter the method of
printing since it is a picture of a stamp using wrong inks and wrong paper.
I believe that all Stamps items that are thought by the seller to be forgeries
must be listed in the Cinderellas, Fakes Category. If a seller cannot determine
through reasonable research, ie opening a catalogue, a possible logical ID for a
stamp, it should be listed in the above category. It should be incumbent on a
seller to have shown due care in offering an item for sale, or to have paqlced
the item in the appropriate category.
Roger
August 08, 2003 Brian McInturff
Fakes, Forgeries, rubbish
larry and ATD Why are you so against putting facsimile on the back of
these so called reproductions. After all, it isn't the real thing. It's a copy.
Did the Post office authorize you to reproduce their material for resale? Hmmmm.
One must ponder this.
August 08, 2003 Richard Frajola
Richard B I assumed that ebay was going to (if they haven't already)
banned the sale of all "as is" items. As to forgeries being listed as genuine -
that is where I hope for relief from APS involvement.
August 08, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Richard - I rather agree. That would eliminate alot of items being sold
as forgeries. But, wouldn't that just increase the number of forgeries being
listed as "genuine", "possibly genuine", "as is", "???", "cinderellas,
"reprints", "I don't have enough knowledge", etc...., especially if ebay
continues it's "we are not experts" stance?
August 08, 2003 Richard Frajola
PS - I have decided that ebay is quite likely to throw out the baby along with
the bathwater and ban the sale of all forgeries. Although I think this is most
unfortunate (as I have always liked pre 1870 forgeries as "history of stamp
collecting"), I think that is the only reasonable solution.
August 08, 2003 Richard Frajola
ATD If, as you claim, scanned (digital) images are NOT used in the
process, that leaves only one of the conventional photo processes. I know enough
about printing to know that you do not have any "patented" process that only you
use. If you use a photo process, that would make your "products" more similar to
auction catalog illustrations.
Whichever of the known methods you are using, IF you clearly state rather tha
beat around the bush, how (digital or photographically) and when (like made in
1999) the items were being produced, I think that you would receive a lot less
grief.
August 08, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
atdinvest - I recall on the ebay chat board, that you said all these "forgeries"
were from an oldtime forger back in the 1950's. Now yopu admit that you are
making them? Do you still send out your "newsletter" about forgeries?
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Addie...tell us more about your process. It seems no different than me, going to
the local supermartket, and paying 25c per copy for Hi-Res color photocopies. If
I did so, wouldn't I be equally "satifying the phlilatelic community"? Do tell
us what, exactly, makes your "product" any different that that.
August 08, 2003 ATDINVESTMENT
Mr. FRAJOLA
Dear Mr.Frajola .-
The only scanner used is to put images on our server to show on ebay as you or
any other seller do.The question #2,the answer is not.For the question # 3 I
said before we don't use printer for that.The technology is our secret,and the
experts could be guessing for years and they will never found what the technique
is being use.We are to proud of our knowledge and secret.If you do it on a
printer is terrible and very poor quality,we don't do that.We are the only
source that the worldwide philatelic community have to fill all the empty spaces
in their albums with the most rare and valuables pieces,at the top quality
better than the realones,and we do have those rarities.PleaseMr.Frajola read our
feedbacks,check for yourself.I hope that your curiosity is satisfy.ATD
August 08, 2003 George K
I have a couple questions for Mr. Atdinvest as well:
1) Why are you unwilling to put "COPY" or "FORGERY" on the back of whatever
it is you wish to call your "product"? This would alleviate ALL the criticism
that you seem to attract with your offerings.
2) Is the Canadian Postal Service just, like, you know, not with it
concerning your efforts to save philately from the "philatelic goddes" (sic)? I
heard they would like to speak to you about certain of your Canadian
"reproductions".
August 08, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
fakes
Larry
You said "Sure, their is a risk someone sell them sometimes as real but is that
a reason not listing forgeries?"
Well in continuation of Bob H's question, why not mark them as fakes
instead of listing them as fakes on your site? Obviously that simple step on
your part would be a big help in keeping the hobby honest, at least on your
part. Search your conscience.
ATD gave you some advice, he said "keep going".
Yeah, if you want to be a bottom feeder, sure. Here's a better idea. Get
involved in a more legitimate part of the hobby instead. You have already
damaged your reputation but you can repair the damage if you have good
intentions, but the longer you stay involved with this junk the worse it will
get.
Good luck. No joke, I hope you separate yourself from this part of the stamp
hobby.
Duncan
August 08, 2003 Richard Frajola
ADT Maybe it is a matetr of language. I agree with your comment that your
stamps are "not computer printed" - computers don't print, printers print. Your
honest response to a couple specific questions would be helpful.
1.) Is a scanner used to capture an image of the genuine stamp or other source
for design?
2.) Is the scanned image used as a master for printing?
3.) Is printer connected to a computer?
August 08, 2003 ATDINVESTMENT
PHILATELIST
Mr.Philatelist.-
You just have the answer in your message,our customers buy from us because they
know that our stamps theyatre not photocopies,or scansfrom catalogues or
anything like that,they know are reproductions from the genuine stamp itself,and
the quality of printing is not made on computeras some "philatelic goddes"
say.We have to much pride to do that,our goal is to satisfy the worldwide
philatelic community,and we do it.The technique is superior to any other stamps
reproductions,we are proud of what we sell,and if you have any doubt,readour
feedbacks.ATD
August 08, 2003 8:47 Dave Frick (moderator)
modern reproductions
I had wondered some day if someone whose auction was criticized would come forth
here to defend it. It is fair that they be permitted to do so.
And so, Larry & ATD:, you are welcome to explain your positions
and reasoning.
If the discussion on both sides remains focused on the issues involved, then
some learning and discernment may take place. But if this devolves into ad
hominem (personal) attacks, then we just become the cyber-equivalent of a
barroom brawl.
So, on both sides, please make sure to keep the focus of this discussion on the
issues, not the people behind the issues.
Many thanks.
-- Dave
August 08, 2003 philatelist
ATD INVESTMENT - If people want such "items" why shouldn't they print their own
(or make color photocopies of stamps from some collection or color photocopies
of pages of some famous auction catalog etc) instead of buying from you? Much
cheaper that way! Color copies cost as little as $1 a page!
August 08, 2003 Bob H.
fakes
Why not just mark them on the back as "fake" - and not in pencil, either?
August 08, 2003 ATD INVESTMENT
STONE AGED
Dear Larry don't botter explaining to this people they are just caveman from the
STONE AGE like DAVID BENSON AND FOLLOWERS,my advise don't waist your time,keep
going,they are just a minority with envy for your success.ATD.
August 08, 2003 Brian R
Chris C You've captured my sentiments exactly. Well said.
August 08, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
"forgeries" vs "modern prints"
Larry, as far as I am concerned these are not "forgeries" but merely
"illustrations of stamps" or "reproductions" or "photocopies". Really I see no
difference between such rubbish and simply cutting out color illustrations from
some auction catalog and calling it a "forgery", or making color photocopies of
some stamps on gummed paper.
I can add that in my view the only forgeries that should be collected are postal
counterfeits. There may also be some benefit in collecting reprint-forgeries ie:
things made using altered original plates, or odd examples of dangerous fakes to
make identification & comparison easier. However in general IMO any
fakes/forgeries made to defraud collectors, no matter when they were made,
should be consigned to the rubbish bin. I know many collectors will vehemently
disagree with this as they like to add examples of forgeries by Spiro, Fournier,
Sperati etc to their collections. However, it is in fact the collecting of those
"classic" forgeries that has created part of the demand that is fueling the
manufacture of the modern computer generated rubbish.
August 08, 2003 04:59 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
David and Bill,
Thanks for the B27 help. I've updated the page to include that information.
August 08, 2003 Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Jim Griffith
In my opinion Christo is not out of line. If I remember correctly the time
frame, for ebay, is three days after the auction closed for contact. So I'd say
Christo has already gone beyond what's to be expected.
I'd also second the suggestion about having bidders with less than 10 feedbacks
contact you before they place a bid, we all have to start with no feedback.
Just my 2¢ worth.
Jim L.
August 08, 2003 04:47 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Jim 258 could be B27 upside down.
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Jim, The cancelor for Quittah was B27,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Larry, it all depends on the definition of forgery, you may call them "
forgeries " but I would call them " computer manipulated prints ".
What will happen when a potential bidder or buyer asks you when they were
printed, what will you say " I don't know " or make up a cock and bull story
like the original supplier and say that they were made in the 1930's by
revolutionaries during the Spanish Civil War or underground patriots during the
French Resistance or whatever fanciful stories fit the material.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 04:21 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a registered cover from
Gold Coast to
Germany in 1898.
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Montenegro
David B.
Cetinje is the former capital of Montenegro. {:o)
August 08, 2003 Larry
David Benson & Duncan D For me forgeries and fakes belongs in the same
category, and they're enough people who likes to have a copy of a rare stamp in
their collection or collect forgeries like me.
I don't see any problem selling them on Ebay, as I listed them as forgery. Sure,
their is a risk someone sell them sometimes as real but is that a reason not
listing forgeries? Must I track all the stamps I sold on Ebay because of the
risk a buyer wants to make a profit out of it? My guess is that 10% of all stamp
items on EBay are once bought on a Ebay site and are resellers. You can always
ask a seller for a certificate of genuine for rare and valueble stamps when such
a stamp is listed as genuine or ask an expert for his opinion.
I like collecting forgeries, cinderella's etc., with me many other
collectors, and Ebay is a perfect medium for me to buy and sell them.
Larry
August 08, 2003 David Benson
sveiki, during that period the capital was called Cetinje and most stamps are
cancelled there,
David Benson
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Montenegro
Louise Here's
a modern map of Montenegro (capital Titograd has changed name to Podgorica). The
town you mentioned might be there somewhere, unless it has changed name during
the last 100 years, which wouldn't come as a surprise. {:o)
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Sveiki, there were fiscals issued by Austia for use in Northern Albania but you
are 100% correct with Montenegro. I remember seeing them now with what looks
like normal circular date stamps.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Louise I don't think a stamp with chyrillic text postmarked 1904 was used
in Albania, which was part of the Ottoman Empire (Turks). Their text font at
that time was Arabic.
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Oswiecim
Louise As you probably know Oswiecim is the Polish version of
Auschwitz. It's situated in the most southern part of Poland and was close
to the "Imperial Corner" of the German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires -
see map here. The history
of Oswiecim can be found
here - according to this
webpage, Oswiecim was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire untill it's
collapse.
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Oswiecim
Louise As you probably know Oswiecim is the Polish version of
Auschwitz. It's situated in the most southern part of Poland and was close
to the "Imperial Corner" of the German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires -
see map here. The history
of oswiecim can be found
here - according to
thisoswiecim was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire untill it's collapse.
August 08, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
You are part of the problem
Larry You know how dangerous these forgeries can be. Just because you
sell them as forgeries certainly does not make it right. You know perfectly well
that they may end up being sold as the real thing to unsuspecting victims.
When the next person who buys these from you puts them on eBay under the heading
of the true stamp, not the imitation, does it bother you? how about when someone
spends hundreds of dollars for one of these frauds?
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. In fact, you
contribute to the probnlem in a major way by making these forgeries available.
Shame on you.
Duncan D
August 08, 2003 sveiki!
Balkans
Louise I'm not a big buff on Balkans. But, if text is in chyrillic and
includes the word "Gore", then it would probably be "Cerno Gore" or "Montenegro"
(Black Hills). To my knowledge stamps from Bosnia did not have text in chyrillic
since they we're part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire - and not Serbian Orthodox
(that's where the chyrillic comes in - countries with an orthodox national
church also has chyrillic as language text font).
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Larry, they are not forgeries in the normal sense, they are just fakes. They
were made by scanning a picture from an auction catalog or borrowing a scan and
then replicated into to fill a sheet of paper. They are similar to photocopies
and of absolutely no value philatelically or commercially. Just because you
bought them on Ebay does not give them legitimacy
Roger, the gentleman on the stamp is someone who had the same profession as you,
some teacher in Kidderminster named Hill.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Larry
stolen images??
Get a link from this board and read about my listing of forgeries. First, all
the pictures came from my own scanner and I did not use the same image twice in
my listing. I don't see what's wrong with reselling items I bought on EBay. All
are listed as forgeries, so any buyer knows what he will gets. Any comments are
welcome. Larry
August 08, 2003 Roger Heath
Forgeries
Duncan -
You should know that the gentleman, who is so misplaced on the stamp in your
link, is supposed to be a distinguished Australian philatelic judge. Addie
warned us few years ago that sometime in the future we would all be surprised
with the subject matter and quality of items that would come out of the vaults.
Seeing is believing! Addie went looking on the web for a picture of Mr. Benson,
but could only find a picture of the original cigarette manufacturer. This
didn't bother him at all, since his business motto is, "Anachronistic Wonders".
I'm still waiting to see the Cuban military covers from Angola.
Roger
August 08, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Stolen images
Well now I see they are certainly not always stealing someone else's stamp
images, they come up with a few of their own...
Hahahahahahah...
Dunc
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Duncan, at least that seller has them under FAKES whilst the original supplier
is still listing them under genuine stamps although states they are forgeries.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 David Benson
Duncan, they were all acquired (in A4 sheet form) from the seller ATDINVEST in
Florida. Most of them were originally copied from printed catalogs or on line
catalogs. This is the type of material that should be relegated to the WPB or WC
and hopefully eventually Ebay will get around to banning them.
David Benson
August 08, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Forgeries
Bill C Wouldn't it be interesting to see if the forgeries you linked
here could be linked to someone's catalog, where the forger may be stealing
stamp images?
For example, does Scott produce colored CD images of stamps now?
If a person looks at the forgeries offered in lots 031, 051 and 063, its easy to
see that they all began with the exact same image. The vignette is shifted
exactly the same in all three and the overprint is identical and placed exactly
the same too.
Now, what if that same image was boosted from somebody else's copywrited work?
Seems like they could be in some serious trouble, maybe?
Duncan
"Whenever I think about the past it brings back so many memories."
August 07, 2003 David Benson
Louise, it sounds like an Austrian Military in Albania Revenue, I can't locate a
scan of one but it also fits with the TIRANE cancel.
David Benson
August 07, 2003 7:43 Mark Bardell
Bagging negatives......
Peter
No problems !! I've been using it for a few months now - a pretty good program
overall.
This is my last post for just over two weeks as I fly out to England tomorrow
evening. Will check back in when I get home on Aug 24th.
Adios !!!
Mark.
August 07, 2003 Bill Weiss
Bosnia stamp
Louise; The stamp you describe is probably NOT from Bosnia. Bosnia & Herzegovina
issued its own stamps between 1879-1918 at which time it was merged into
Yugoslavia, but all of the B&H stamps with the design of a "guy with a mustache"
all have somewhere in the design the words "BosnieniHerzegowina" which I assume
you would recognize as being from Bosnia. There was only one 10h(eller) stamp
with the design of a "guy" and he was Emperor Franz Josef. All other 10h stamps
are either a different color or a non-guy design. If you can post a picture on
the chatboard I am sure it can be positively identified by someone.
August 07, 2003 Peter Spencer
Bagging the Negatives
Mark Bardell:
I owe you one!
August 07, 2003 15:17 Dan Van Dyke (ddaannv on
Ebay)
Christo,
no communication since july 25 is not a long time. I usually send a first
reminder at 21 days, and then a formal non-payer alert via ebay at 28 days. That
usually draws a response. If no response by 45 days or so, I ask ebay for a
refund of my fees again through the formal non-payer program.
hope this is helpful.
dan
August 07, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz
Just a quick HI from Columbus, OH APS show, has been great so far. Lots of good
stuff around. Will try to get back with some exhibit pics & other.
Regards!
Mauro
August 07, 2003 Dave P
Machins
A little while ago someone was asking about identifying Machins. I know it is a
bit after the event but I came across
this site. Lists and identifies
over 1400 Machin varieties (on used stamps - doesn't include gum variations!),
and also has a rarity scale, though I cannot comment on the accuracy of that.
Personally I think it is excellent, even has an illustrated explanation of the
differences between photo and litho stamps.
August 07, 2003 12:48 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Tax Loss
D2 My thoughts as well.
August 07, 2003 David Benson
Claghorn, looks like all of Addies home handiwork. Unless they wre listed on on
fee free day it looks like the seller is after a tax loss as his expenses will
be higher than the income.
David Benson
August 07, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave F
Thanks once again for the info.
I was thinking of bidding
on this until I saw it was a private auction.
Pornographic Chinese dictionary?
August 07, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Non-paying bidder
Before you ban low-FB bidders outright, perhaps something like a message in the
auction, "0-FB or bidders with less than 10 fbs please contact me before
bidding" - that was commonly agreed as a method of stopping these newbie bidders
on some of the boards I used to read as a way of filtering out those who were
going on sprees. The problem of banning low-FB bidders is that serious new
bidders are unable to make their case because of some rogues. Try the gentle
option before you start banning people.
August 07, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Non-paying bidder
Thanks to all who have commented on this issue. I would like to clarify a few
points quickly. Normally I am not too rushed with the amount of time it takes to
get a transaction over. But, I do like to at least get confirmation that this
guy is receiving my emails. For two weeks he has basically ignored? me. I have
sent him emails from my PC, I used the payment reminder via ebay etc, etc. I
can't believe that this bidder is on holiday - I have checked and he is still
bidding. In fact, he has won probably at least another twenty auctions since he
won my lots. I am worried, because he has zero feedback. Frequently these days
one find other sellers barring bidders with zero or less than 10 feedback, just
because too many of these don't honour/complete their transactions. It may also
be just the cost of doing business, but one cannot get the final valuation fees
back if one does't follow this process.
Anyway, Jim W-SI will give one or two other sellers a shout tomorrow to
find out re their experience.
August 07, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Oswiecim
Was this town in Austria-Hungary or Imperial Germany?
August 07, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
christo
In this case I'd email mikeldsth and ask him if he/she has been contacted
for extension or just plain contacted.
Normally I would suggest other seller as well, but in his case forget it.
August 07, 2003 L Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl\>
Just to add, the date on the cancel is 17.X.1904. The place name is either too
faint to read (across the top) or not all there (across the bottom are the
letters ...TIGANE... from what I can make out. I'm no expert on the Balkans (as
opposed to the Baltic) and wondered if anyone could explain just where it's
from.
August 07, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Bosnian stamps?
Before I forget and go home to Lodz, where I don't have such regular access to
the Net...
Found this stamp (...typical, it's probably right at the bottom of the Slavonic
countries' envelope I have from my adventures this summer...) : pale red with a
picture of guy with a moustache; the writing is cyrillic, transliterated it
reads "Poshte...P. R. Gore...10 kheler (heller, as in Austro-Hungary?)".
I'm thinking Bosnia and Herzegovina from the turn of the century, but did they
issue stamps at all? Should I file it under Yugoslavia for the time being?
August 07, 2003 11:05 Burton Smith (oggilby)
<bridge2@erols.com>
Sveiki (Paul)-- My daughter and I thank you for the post card. We spent nearly
an hour finding Latvia on the globe and finding information on the internet An
hour well spent.
August 07, 2003 10:56 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Listing and FInal Value Fees
IOmoon How can
This Guy make any money after
Listing and Final Value Fees?
August 07, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Non-paying bidders
Christo, my immediate reaction is that you reacted very quickly to all of
this - the auction closed less than two weeks ago. The guy could very well be a
newbie who went on vacation (it *is* summer in the northern hemisphere, after
all). I'd only react this quickly if the guy clearly isn't on vacation, because
you see him bidding on other material, for instance. Or if he gets other
negatives. I'd give a bidder at least a month before I'd do more than drop the
guy email reminders.
Jim
August 07, 2003 10:29 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Here We Go ----->
D2 it is starting
HERE
Forgery
Identification Site
August 07, 2003 Bob Hohertz
non-paying bidder
You don't get your final value fee back if you don't file the non-paying bidder
reports - warning and final request. And why not do it? Money in your pocket for
very little "paperwork" - and if buyer gets three (not sure if more than one
from one seller counts) eBay is very likely to suspend them - get them off the
road so others don't have to deal with them.
Negatives are a totally different operation - can do all the above and not
leave one. Or can leave one and not do above - which is probably the worst
option.
August 07, 2003 COVERWIZ
Non Paying Bidder
You have to decide if you want to leave a negative or not; you'll get your final
fees back; and you may just decide to write it off. This has been a relative
minor problem for me, just a few lots a year. Bothersome as regards to time
wasted, but just a part of the cost of doing business...
August 07, 2003 Bob Hohertz
non-paying bidder
Christo,
On any eBay page click on Help at the very top right - and search on non-paying
bidder. The second link there outlines the process.
August 07, 2003 Christo van Zyl (waves_1)
Non-paying biddersI am not a 100% sure about this. Is there anyone who
can give some advice on this.
I have had a buyer (zero feedback), who had won three items from me (total of
$53.00, items won on the 25th of July). I have contacted said buyer on the 28th
of July via email to advise with respect to total amount outstanding, shipping
options, and payment options etc. I have contacted buyer via ebay payment
reminders on 4 Aug and suggested that if I don't hear from him/her by next day,
I will commence with ebay's non-paying buyer programme on the 5th of Aug which I
have then subsequently done. The buyer has not contacted me since the close of
auction, or after instituting the non-paying buyer programme.
Ebay is not very clear on how to proceed next. Has anybody got some
advice??, or what ebays next procedure is?
Thanks
August 07, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
Richard F, the difficulty here is shortage of material so the auction relies on
material from regular vendors which is a mixture of dealers, active collectors
(upgrading their material or changing interests) & material owned by the auction
house. So in all cases one has to have reserves that the vendor is agreable to
as otherwise one will not get the material to have an auction. Some material of
course comes from estates etc where putting reserves is not an issue, but not
enough material is in that category to make running an auction possible if one
relied solely on that.
Also the dealers locally are rather hopeless so if a lot starts very low it may
still get knocked down very low. So one has to rely on collectors that want a
particular item and are therefore willing to pay a fair price for it.
August 07, 2003 Richard Frajola
Chris C When I was running postal history auctions I think I took in a
total of fewer than 20 lots with reserves in 50+ sales. Times are different now.
Most of those reserves were at levels that I would pay - in effect a guaranteed
minimum net.
What I did was what Bob Siegel did when he was alive. I entered my own bid on
almost every lot (usually below 50% of my low end of estimate range). I had a
couple "blanket" bidders who would buy anything I ran as a single lot at $12 to
use on lots I just didn't want. I executed my own bids just as a would a bid
from anyone else.
This was a good system at that time as real bargains could be had at the auction
which encouraged participation. Competition from auction houses for better
properties has rtealled killed the "real" auction business.
August 07, 2003 Prometheus
Thanks for the Auctions Discussion
The things I have gleaned from the numerous posts have been great.
I have never attended a "stamp auction" But the estate/collectible auctions I go
to have many stamp and stamp related items.
Lately I have been leaving a Bid and then watching the auction in person
I have been Saving 40% to 50% of what I would normally pay for a lot.
I was told by one of the workers that because no live bidding on the item i
wanted the shill/consignner had no idea how high my left bid was.
That is what prompted me to ask about the practice in the first case.
The box of Catalogs and books on stamps (had a few nice stamps in the pages too)
I purchased this week for twenty dollars was a great example
This lot of thirty books etc, I would have normally expected to pay 45-50
dollars for, at 20 I'm more than happy.
Again thanks to ALL who added to this discussion. you folks are great and
are helping me learn more than I ever thought a Chat Board could.
NOIP = books signed by authors sometimes have added value does this also apply
to Stamp related material
NYRBA-Grigore
August 07, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Paolo
Its all in the legs.
Read
"If they also had wings, it would be all over for the rest of us". (sounds
better than "basic anatomy of mammals").
Yours is a horse with the long lower leg.
August 07, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
public auctions
I can also add what is the arrangement with estimates etc at an auction house I
am a consultant for here in Sydney.
All the lots have reserves and these are printed in the auction catalog along
with the estimates. The auction conditions specify that no lots will be sold
below reserve and any bids below reserves will be either deleted or increased to
the reserve.
After each auction the unsold lots are available for sale for several weeks at
reserves but not below.
Having printed fixed reserves gets rid of the "bargain hunter" type bidders that
bid at 1/2 dealer buying prices (ie: people that want to buy mint postage at 35%
etc) and would not win any lots in any case. And that unsold lots can only be
bought at the original reserve saves time as one does not have to handle endless
"negotiations" about prices etc.
August 07, 2003 6:00 Mark Bardell
Negative reader
Peter
You need a small program called "Gutcheck" which can be downloaded at the site
below. Once installed, right click on any users name and hit the Get Gutcheck
option. It will then make a table of all feedback received. Just click the
column for neg/pos/neut and it sorts them out in order so you get all the
negatives in one block.
Mark.
http://www.teamredline.com/gutcheck/default.asp
August 07, 2003 Chris Ceremuga
Auction practices
I can add as an example one Swiss auction house where I have been couple of
times. Some lots are sold at whatever the real bidding is without reserve,
others have "reasonable" reserves of say 2/3 or 3/4 estimate (of course
"reasonable" only as far as the estimate is "reasonable"). However, on some lots
there are hidden reserves either close to or even much above the estimate, the
lot is bid up to the reserve using combination of auction book & phone or an
auction employee/agent in the room. The auctioneer then knocks it down to some
bidding number and one does not really know whether the lot sold or not. One
time I was talking outside the auction room and missed a Batum cover that I
wanted to buy that was estimated at 1000.SFr. On enquiring at the accounts desk
I asked about the lot - at first they did not want to say whether the lot sold
or not and after prolonged discussion offerred to sell it to me for 1500.SFr - I
declined (I later bought that very cover at a London auction at 500pounds).
August 07, 2003 04:44 AM Jim Lawler <jlawler@comteck.com>
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 07, 2003 Peter Spencer
Reading Only Negative Feedback
Jim and others:
I would LOVE to have a program that reads only negative feedback. Is one
available? Such a program could have saved me several obnoxious experiences.
August 07, 2003 03:57 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is an airmail cover from
Malta to
Czechoslovakia in 1934.
Lavar,
Good for you! Let me provide the
first
page of your new website! Unfortunately, it didn't convert very well from
the MS Word file
which was my intent.
August 07, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Thanks to all who commented on
this oval marking, on
wether it portrays a horse or a lion.
The result of the poll is Horse: 4 X horse and 2 X Lion.
(Jim W-S -- Horse
Bob H. -- Lion
Dave P -- Horse
Jim W. -- Horse
Maarten W. -- Liorse, the ramping Equus lionensis aka Leoncavallo ;-)
Beyond the graphic resemblances of the creature depicted in the oval free frank
postal marking above:
1. a Horse would make sense because of the name of the village (Cavalcaselle =
riding seddles) and because of the thematic "mail, postal couriers by horse"
etc.
2. a Lion would make sense because of the Lion thematic of the region Veneto
with the Lion of Venice.
Paolo
August 07, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Lavar, Looks like you might have a little competition coming your way
with the "Terminator" deciding to join the fray! Anyway, good luck in your
venture!
August 06, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Very interesting discussion today. Well, it is official. I have been sworn in as
a candidate for Governor of California. I will be on the ballot unless a lawsuit
derails the election. The ballot looks like its getting crowded after today's
announcements. Now back to work.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Bill, sometimes it is very hard to differentiate between starting prices and
reserves. When I was accepting material and I thought the reserves were too
high, the material was returned if the vendor didn't lower the reserves. I know
it is common practice in Switzerland for full commission to be charged on unsold
lots if the material has a reserve which is higher than the auctioneers
estimate.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Bill Weiss
Bidding
DAVID B; I understand in Germany it is common practice that all public auction
lots are reserved, often at very high prices, yet many lots are then offered
after the sale (and the reserves unmet) to highest bidders at some discount from
the original reserve. All sounds pretty dumb to me. I agree with you that if you
have a reserve, you merely state what it is. Apparently, those houses (like RAS)
who try bidding up to the reserve will argue that the illusion of real action
between the book and the floor may stimulate other floor bidding, thus their
reason for doing it. I personally say "bull" in that I seriously doubt that many
folks will get "caught up" in the bidding enough times to make it a valuable
practice. Further, all it does is waste a lot of time! In my sales, we call lot
numbers one after the other, sometimes rapid-fire and sometimes even in small
groups; ie: 25-35, and if anyone wants to bid between these lots they call out
the lot number and then I give the opening bid. We can sometimes call 600 lots
in an hour and we ALWAYS call 2000-3000 lots in 6-7 hours. I have never believed
that you can make floor bidders bid on lots they really don't care about, thus
where there is no interest, we fly. I am done for the night.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Richard, If the arrangement between Safeharbor and the APS has any clout, then
he should be one of the 1st.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Richard Frajola
David B I will be pleasantly surprised if that person is actually booted
off ebay.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Richard, while you are here. Atdinvest has been listing some of his old RF
handstamps including some covers with have the handstamps and fake cancels. He
has also started listing some of his fake SPECIMEN overprints. These may have
come out the woodwork because of the APS involvement and he wants to dispose of
them before he is booted from Ebay. I know he is on the APS list of problem
sellers and it is just a matter of wait and see what happens.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Bill, never heard it. I have often seen the Auctioneer get into a bind when he
has lifted the bid from the reserve to exactly the top postal bid and has asked
the room for one extra bid to save him posting it. I know of one case where the
bidder was in the room and he caused a stink when it was knocked down to someone
else.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Richard Frajola
Bill W It is done by other houses still but I prefer not to name them.
David B It is a moronic system actually. Some houses over reserve items
and if a consignment does well overall they may try to sell an individual item
to the real high bidder (who didn't meet the reserve) later at the hammer price.
August 06, 2003 Bill Weiss
Bidding
DAVID B.; Yes I have heard of the same thing happening here, many years ago, in
several NYC auctions, where they demanded immediate payment as the lot was
knocked down to the owner/bidder, which of course, stopped the sale, causing
everyone to get really pissed, and the owners also stopped immediately!
I am suprised that since you are so well traveled that you haven't ever seen the
"start below reserve then pass when you don't make it" system. Scott Trepel used
it at Christies and I had it happen to me (when attending Christie's Sales in
NYC) as well as at Siegel Sales. I wonder if any other houses do it, and if
anyone knows, please comment.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Richard, I still can't see the logic of it, if there are no bids then the
starting price should be the reserve.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Richard Frajola
David B The practice of opening lots below the reserve started here in
the Art auctions I believe. I think one house finally got sued by an owner who
had reserved a painting at say $900,000 and they opened the lot at say $600,000
and didn't use "water cooler" bids to get it up to the reserve and it went
unsold at the $600,000. This effectively killed the future sale of the painting
at any price over the $600,000 and they got sued.
The worst practice I have seen at certain New York auctions is the abuse of
"phone" bids. I have seen auctioneer taking bids from an employee holding a
phone that was bussing with the off the hook signal. That is, nobody was on the
other end of the phone - a total shill device replacing the water cooler.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Bill, your comment about announcing a seller bidding reminded me of a Wolffers
San Francisco auction I went to and all of a sudden in the middle of the sale he
refused to accept someones bid as he stated that there was money owing by the
bidder and the bidder had to pay the outstanding amount before he would accept
the new bid. The bidder promptly paid the amount and the auction continued.
There was another occasion at Harmers in Sydney when the auctioneer refused to
accept bids from 2 dealers from Thailand as he accused them of collusion. I
think they were the only 2 public announcements I have ever heard.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Bill, I have attended hundreds if not thousands of auctions in about 10
countries and have never seen or heard of an auctioneer starting the bidding
below the reserve. If there is no bidding then it starts at reserve. I cannot
understand the logic in it although it has similarities to Ebay and hidden
reserves.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 6:30PM Bill Weiss
Shill & "Real" Auctions
First, I am like Richard that I decide what to bid and do so and if I win at or
below that price I'm happy and if I lose to a higher bid then life goes on.
In "real" auctions, virtually ALL have a "hidden" reserve of some kind. Some
houses, like Siegel, for example, let the buyers know there is a reserve by
placing a dot (.) or some similar symbol before the lot. Others, like Harmer,
state that they reserve the right to bid in behalf of sellers. I'm a relatively
little house, but since 1987 we have used printed "start" (reserve) prices on
all US material soild in our sales. A few other smaller houses (Michael Rogers
and Harmer-Schau) also have a printed reserve system or formula percentage
reserve (50% of ENV is reserve). I have always felt that an honest reserve price
system where the amount of the reserve is stated so everyone can see, is the
best kind of auction. It allows the sellers to be protected against "silly"
bidding and at the same time removes any temptation by the owner to try to bid
on his own material - a practice I find repulsive, but if I understand the
language of the Uniform Commercial Code in this country, a seller has every
right to bid on his own material and can not be legally stopped from doing so,
and ALL public auctions are, based on UCC rules considered to be RESERVED unless
otherwise announced as Unreserved or (as Antique auctions like to say) ABSOLUTE,
in which case then any form of reserve or owner bidding would be illegal.
In the few cases I have witnessed an owner attempt to bid on his own material in
my auctions, I have stopped the sale and announced to the other bidders that the
owner was bidding on his own material and it was then up to them to decide if
they still wanted to compete on those lots. That announcement combined with all
heads turning to stare at the owner always caused him to stop immediately.
What I also find repulsive and many of the biggest houses are guilty of this
(including Siegel) is that they will announce a starting bid, and then the floor
begins to compete, and the bidding progresses back and
forth....$5.-$50.-$55.-$60., then the floor stops and the house announces "PASS"
meaning the lot did not meet the reserve! To me this is VERY wrong and plays the
floorfor fools! If the house would merely announce the honest reserve then let
the floor proceed or not bid, instead they play this silly game and then pass.
August 06, 2003 Prometheus
David Benson = Reply
Thanks very much bought a box of stamp catalogs at the auction last night wanted
the AustrailAsian and the Balle, and Zumstein, and the others for Reference use
for my older stuff found a bunch of these Aereogrammes in the back of the
Catalog some Papua-new Guineas, Royal Visit 1963, and a neat Used one from the
1956 Melbourne Olympiad the letter is from a Keith Tucker who was working at the
Olympic stamp Exhibition saying he was sorry but forgot what stamps he was
supposed to send Mrs. Evans in Defiance Ohio but he knew he owed he at least
$2.00 so he'd send an FDC of the Olympic set and some others for her credit.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Promo, to save you working it out, the retail is A$ 25 folded, about US$ 16.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Promo, have a look here under Official Aerogrammes,
retail price in Australian Dollars,
http://www.robinlinke.com.au/PriceList/23austpost_stat_4.htm
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Prometheus
Specimen from Australia Question
Can anyone tell me value not Catalog but market of this type item
as seen in this scan
Aerogramme
August 06, 2003 Richard Frajola
I never worry about shill bidding - I bid what an item is worth to me (or to a
client) and quit. I do differentiate being "genuinely run up" from shilling. If
somebody, for whatever reason, sees me bidding and wants to play the game of
trying to run me up, I'll play - as long as they are willing to own the item at
the price. This is not the same as being run up by the owner which I consider
shilling. In many auction situations, the auction house is the owner.
August 06, 2003 Dave P
That is what I was trying to say, I ignore who is bidding against me,
if a lot goes within my price target I get it, if someone wants to pay more I
don't.
I know of a couple of small auctions in the UK who practice what David B
described. It simply means that if I cannot get there in person (or know of
someone I trust who is attending) then they don't get my bids. I suspect it is
counterproductive in the long run, postal bidders soon wise up to the fact that
they only ever win at their maximum.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Jim, you forgot a plain ordinary, run of the mill collector of Mexico who was
missing that set,
David Benson
August 06, 2003 4:36 pm Steve Taylor (aka philcomp)
http://www.timeblaster.com/tbeindex.shtml
Fake(s) Alert!
Another
one and
another
one both of these from a different seller.
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave P
I agree on paying only what item is worth (though I'd often like to get it for
less) and would also never bid on a private auction.
I also know most of the volcano stamp buyers, having bid against most of them
and sold catalogs to a pile more. However as recent acquisition from other
David might illustrate, I have no control over whether monte might be
bidding cos it shows one of his favorite places in Mexico, that someone idolizes
Carranza, someone collects ww airmail stamps or someone has a fascination with
sets of six. If I ignored it cos I didn't know sellers even though it was within
my price range, I might as well collect rocks. :-Þ
August 06, 2003 4:22 pm Steve Taylor (aka philcomp)
http://www.timeblaster.com/tbeindex.shtml
Fake Alert!
A fake
according to Lyon's book. I've emailed the seller and filed a report with eBay.
It will be interesting to see what happens.
August 06, 2003 Dave P
Shilling
I have very probably been shilled, but although I may have paid more than I
needed to, I have never paid more than I thought an item was worth - at the end
of the day I am afraid I ignore it on the basis that life is too short to worry
about everything. My only rule is that I never bid on a private auction, no
matter how desirable the lot - if everybody did the same they would soon stop,
although I agree that Ebay should outlaw them except for "adult" categories.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
Jim, talking about LaLaLand,
I was at an Auction about 3 months ago and the Auction House had just been
acquired by a new buyer. I was seated in the back row and the new owner was
standing near me. I was surprised to see him bidding on some lots (which of
course he never got). I nudged the person sitting next to me to take a look at
what was happening (he happens to work for an opposition firm). Presumably the
new owner had a note what the highest postal bids were and gave up before they
were reached.
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Richard quote is for "brick and mortar" not Lalaland.
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
It means that if you are absolutely certain that you have never
been shilled after having bought xxx numbers of items on eBay or in brick and
mortar house auctions (to quote Richard) you live in Lalaland.
August 06, 2003 .
Which leaves your "Reality check" relevance where?
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
I'm sorry but you have just qualified your initial statement.
New faces implies possibility of those persons being shill bidders.
Old faces implies you know bidders are not shills.
You are therefore using your acquired knowledge of who is and who isn't a shill
to avoid being shilled.
Presumably this knowledge acquisition wasn't an overnight occurence and must
have involved interaction with each of the "familiar faces".
August 06, 2003 M.
Mr. Anonymous
What Jim is saying is that just because you place your bid right at the end,
doesn't mean that the item you are bidding on has not been shilled PRIOR to you
placing your bid.
August 06, 2003 .
Interesting observation. What does it have to do with me?
Even though I didn't post my entire life summary, I can tell you that I wasn't
born yesterday. Did include your "Reality check" into this sentence: "Never had
the "pleasure" of being shilled".
Other collectors within my fields are not unknown to me. My bid stays absent
when "new faces" with no previous interest in my narrow fields want to
participate.
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Reality check.
If you only bid your maximum amount once immediately before end of auction and
no one has bid, you pay opening price.
If you only bid your maximum amount once immediately before end of auction and
shillers have been going at it hammer and tongs, you pay shill bid plus one
increment.
August 06, 2003 .
Shill Bidding
Never had the "pleasure" of being shilled. Maybe because I (under normal
circumstances) only bid once a few minutes before auction close with the maximum
amount I'm ready to pay.
I'm using more than just 2 ID's when buying - in fact, my ID's are situated in
different countries under different names. And NO - I'm not a shill rigger.
Measures taken to keep busybodies away.
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
David
I must be one of them, could have saved myself
three cents!!
The French Republic of San Antonio.
Je me rappelle l'Alamo
August 06, 2003 George K
Shill Bidding
I concur with Jim W. about the massive time commitment to prove fraud/shilling.
I put in 20-40 hours a week for over a year to build up the body of proof on ONE
SELLER, and I knew both the buying and selling ID's. And I still missed MOST of
the alterations, I'm sure. At least there I had before-and-after pictures to
work with. I couldn't even begin to tell you how to prove shill bidding, because
it can't really be proven in the legal sense from looking at eBay transactions,
just strongly inferred from massive patterns. And if they really are getting
smart enough to form multi-seller rings for this purpose, my hat is off to Jim
and anyone else who can figure out a way to spot it.
August 06, 2003 David Benson
There must be some absolute idiots out there in Ebay Land, why on earth would
someone bid on this,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3488&item=2944561885
David Benson
August 06, 2003 Maarten Willems
Chill bidding?
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Part 2:
Shill recognition:
Remember those other than shills can exhibit the same behavior.
“Boss” is used here to describe shill user.
Feedback less than 100 (generally).
Rarely wins an auction from the boss.
Up their feedback by bidding on less than $5 items.
Pay cash for above items.
Use PO box for delivery of above items.
Boss does not promote use of Paypal, especially if paid for by credit card.
Bids at a consistent time of day (this is a job, not a hobby).
If a reserve, never crosses it but gets darn close.
Bids strange amounts, eg. $1.99.
Has multiple bids to same seller on Bid Page.
Stays on “crucial” auctions to the last second to “milk” jumpy snipers.
Does not sell items.
For the paranoid, the use of a spreadsheet should aid recognition of a potential
shill.
The types of information that can be entered are as follows, I will omit
description of significance of the fields.
Boss
Date boss registered
Suspected shill name
Date shill registered
Category # of item
Description of item
Start price
Start time
Time of suspected shill bid 1. (add fields 2,3,4,5 etc)
Final Price
Did shill win
Time of boss feedback
Time of shill feedback
Total number of bidders
Total number of other auctions bid on by shill in same time frame
Total number of boss’s other auctions bid on by shill in same time frame
Date of previous feedback
Percentage bid/win record
Some of this information can only be found after auction terminates so don’t
start collecting data when bidding on a crucial item.
Remember, boss can have multiple shills working on a single item, one (at least)
is going to be a decoy.
This information depends on whether you want to avoid shills or report them.
A useful tool, if there is an item that really interests you, is “ask seller a
question”. Make up any sort of question and use an alternate ID if you have one
available. The answer, if you get one, may be critical to making a bidding
decision. I'll not elaborate.
A lot of time and a lot of work means about 5 hours per day for at least 6
months.
August 06, 2003 Richard Frajola
Prometheus Shilling is common to every auction format I can think of
except "Chinese auction" (where price goes down until sold) and "Dutch auction"
selling multiples of same item.
Some brick and mortar houses claim all their lots sell using the ruse that any
consignor may bid on his own material to "reserve" level -but, if purchased must
pay buyer commission. As I am not privy to seeing if that premium is actually
paid, so hard to judge.
I have seen other houses blantantly run bidders using all sorts of devices to
shield the activity. It is kind of ironic that the recent press about the
"bidding ring" didn't make much mention of the devices used by sellers to offset
the ill effects of the ring.
Also, some houses have separate companies set up that can bid and buy in an
auction. Nothing illegal about that.
August 06, 2003 Prometheus
Shilling
Thanks to all that replied and to any more who might
I find it interesting that on the big E your first offense is a warning not to
do again,
Ebay states somewhere That they are different from real live auctions in that
Real auctions allow sellers to bid on their own items,
IS THIS TRUE??
Do any of you fine folks who do REAL auctions - see/let your sellers bid on
their consignments, is this normal practice ?
Thanks again for the ongoing discussion
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Shill Bidding
In view of the interest in shill bidding, here is an overview of my experiences
in detecting it. As George will attest from his endeavours, it takes a
lot of work and a long time. Remember, if you are going to forward such
information to eBay, they want to be sure information is factual and not the
ramblings of a fanatic trying to eliminate their opposition.
Old days: Seller characteristics:
High feedback. (+500)
Inspires confidence. – You may laugh, but many buyers do not look beyond the
feedback number. If seller has high feedback, lots of people have been happy and
seller has not been booted.
High Turnover. (+500 items per week)
A sufficiently large number of auctions that it will accomplish several ends.
First, it takes a long time to check up on +500 auctions, especially if a large
percentage of them have multiple bids. Secondly, a few items can be chosen for
“special treatment” such that their purchase will pay for the insertion fees
accumulated by the “decoys” plus more. Third, the high turnover makes for rapid
advance of feedback, at least if the seller is merely a crook, rather than an
incompetent crook. Fourth, most people only read the most recent page of
feedback, they do not regularly search back through old feedback. This could be
(can be) obviated by programs which read only negative feedback. For some
unknown reason :-Þ, these third-party programs did not seem to be
available for very long. “Swamping” the most recent feedback page with cheap,
bogus auctions is also a quick way of hiding such negative feedback.
Numerous ID’s
The greater the number of shill buying ID’s, the more difficult it is to
recognize consistent trends. This has a drawback in that such ID’s are not going
to advance their feedback rapidly. Having two or more shills on one auction
makes for a rapid price increase. One buyer is a sale, two buyers is an auction,
three buyers is a good item, luck, or the presence of one or more shills.
Recent changes
High feedback and high turnover still hold true. Now, shills who have survived
being NARU’d are no longer “star-less” buyers and thus less obvious. Sellers
have grouped together to bid on each others “special treatment” items. Obviously
they are only going to receive one counting feedback from buying this way, but
can also engage in the “most-recent-feedback-page-swamping”. The added advantage
is that the bidders on the auction board have a wide range of star colors,
rather than all being yellow or star-less excepting the shillee.
Shills no longer bid on 60 items per week, only ending up buying one or two of
them. 10 bids per week with a single “unfortunate” buy is sufficient for most
shill users. Cheap auctions (less than 10$) provide shill with an easy way to
advance feedback.
It has been suggested that multiple bids by shills in a short time span is a
current trend, one I have not yet witnessed. This would seem to be
counterproductive since it should be easily detected. If done sufficiently
early, it may cause an esniper to revise their snipe bid.
This is long enough without going into how to expose shills.
August 06, 2003 Maarten Willems
Animal
It is obviously a liorse; a rare animal (Equus lionensis) an
extinct animal, last reported from Italy. ;-)
August 06, 2003 Jim Watson
Horse!
Paolo,
I'm for horse, too.
August 06, 2003 07:21 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Dave P.
Thanks for your correction. It's amusing as that was my first choice and I
seemed to remember the other as having been a previous correction! LOL I've
updated the page appropriately. I also ran a spell checker and found some
much needed corrections.
August 06, 2003 Dave P
Horse!
I vote horse. I believe the horse was a symbol of the "Venets" from even before
they were invaded by the Romans.
August 06, 2003 Bob Hohertz
Free frank
Hi, Paolo! I vote lion...
August 06, 2003 Jim W-S
Paolo
You jest!
Horse.
Found another reason for multiple ID's.
One can use the second to find out things about the first.
Also useful if someone is employing a spam filter which cannot differentiate
between ISP address and real spam.
AOL comes in useful since no seller on eBay is ever likely to block filter it.
August 06, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Free frank mail for the church in
Lombardy-Venetia?
On behalf of Mr.Pino G. I made this
web-page (warning, it is all written in Italian but there are various
tell-tale pictures) commenting with questions one of his covers and have posted
it also on ebay.it stamp forum (here).
The corrispondence dates back to August-September 1858 and it appears to be an
exchange of anagraphic information between the church of Cavalcaselle (small
place without PO at the time nearby Peschiera, were the letter started its trip)
and the church of Marostica, both in the region Veneto.
In particular, we would welcome any precise information, or just an opinion, on
this oval marking here
(also reproduced on the page linked above) which is impressed on cover front and
appears to have assolved the function of a postal franchise marking. Do you
think that is a Horse or a Lion portrayed in the middle?
TIA,
Paolo
August 06, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
brian
I hadn't considered the timing aspect of shill bidding.
Something extra to look out for.
I suspect it occurs a few days before the end of auction in order to inflate the
interest level.
August 06, 2003 Dave P (orthorpteran)
Jimbo
Very minor correction, SEDO is South East District Office
August 06, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
August 06, 2003 04:32 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a registered cover from
Paraguay to
England in 1913.
August 05, 2003 20:26 Jim Watson
Shill Bidders
The 'private' auction is a great shield for shill bidders. It's the reason that
eBay ought to do away with private auctions.
August 05, 2003 Bill Weiss
Various
BRIAN R; No, I was actually referring to USED but in ugly quality. The mint ones
have been doing very well on ebay - way better than in the philatelic market,
which I consider to be unusual, but I do know some of the legitimate buyers for
the unused ones, and I believe those prices are real. Since my book was publshed
in 1995, the prices for unused CWPs has steadily increased, some say as a result
of the book. While I seriously doubt that (they are just much cheaper than used
& I believe that's the greater appeal to many collectors).
JIM G; Yes, this is a big week for me in the "papers" as I am also the first
letter in Linn's (the spot you had a few weeks ago!). You will note that my
letters tend to be "controversial" as I am not bashful about writing down how I
feel. Some do not like me for it, some do. Most understand that's how I am, and
I honestly don't know any other way (It's the old "I have to look myself inthe
mirror thing!). You will not that the APS letter caused a spirited defense by
the Executive Director, and that's fine with me. You can bet that the Linn's
letter will cause some spirited reactions judging by the telephone calls I've
already received. Anyway, thanks for noticing.
August 05, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Jim W-S and Guillaume -- one last note of gratitude: I am delighted to have a
letter where Carcassonne is mentioned! I have a special attraction for that
fortified town!
Best, paolo
August 05, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Guillaume as you can see, the verb "know" avoids my keyboard.
In my previous I meant to write:
"I did not know anything about those abbreviations!"
Bon nuit, Paolo
August 05, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Guillaume Your efforts are very much appreciated in any case!
For instance, I did not anything about those abbreviations!
Now that I know could be I find a mention or a signature somewhere abbreviated!
;-)
I will list the letter as personal correspondence of the Duke
of Orléans, by him encrypted in disguise as a commercial letter, with specific
mentions to his plot on orchesting the "Great Fear"
Paolo (in red is a joke ;-)
August 05, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
American Philatelist
They mentioned my site in this month's issue - they even included a screen shot!
There's also a letter to the editor from one William R. Weiss Jr. of
Bethlehem, PA. Hmmm...
Jim
August 05, 2003 Guillaume
Paolo: Concerning our "lost" efforts on the letter. My friend was the
person you helped last year with his Italian stamps. You provided an excellent
description and expertization. We have not forgotten that and we are now sorry
we could not be of more help to you.
Jim W-S: Yes the 600 credits puzzled us too. 'Carcanorme' we read as 'Carcassonne'.
This is really specialists' material.
Okay, I am off to bed now. Good evening, morning, etc. to everyone!
August 05, 2003 Guillaume
David, Jim, Jim, Paolo, Bill: Thank you all for your kind answers.
David: Thank you for your linguistical input. I have some Russian
"souvenir" sheets (English and Australian style) that were 'issued' by
philatelists' organisations to commemorate philatelic exhibitions. I like your
suggestion 'combination miniature sheets' for the 8-sheets. The problem in this
case is searching through an international site, with native English speakers
from all over the world using different terms.
Paolo and Jim W-S: Thank you for your kind input. My friend told me that
reading 18th century French is further complicated, apart from the handwriting
that is, by the use of certain abbreviations for which you need a special
dictionary (as is the case with Latin).
Jim G.: Thank you for your input on the MNH-issue. I value your opinion,
and also that of Bill's. I knew the fingerprints were dicey, but I was
not sure about the marks.
August 05, 2003 Brian R
BTW....next time you see one of those crappy hanging Lincolns, you are
authorized to buy it as my agent....don't go over $100 LOL
August 05, 2003 Brian r
CW patriotics
Bill W I'm assuming that you are refering to the ubiquitous unused
versions that are as easy to find as leaves in the fall. I consider postally
used ones, esp. in good condition, quite collectable.
To further your shilling point, I've noticed sometimes when there is a flock
of them, all of the bids seem to come at once. It's as if the gang decided that
they'll cruise the listings and prop up things at certain times. Check this out
the next time you see a group. They'll be different ID's, but the bid activity
will fall into a 30 minute window....very suspicious.
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Bill
I don't watch such materials but it wouldn't surprise me.
It takes a while to recognize the shills as opposed to over-enthusiastic buyers.
Probably takes about a month of watching similar material, taking note of all
the bidders and perhaps placing them in a spreadsheet program to start seeing
trends.
If it is material in which you have a personal interest, it becomes relatively
easy to spot the genuine bidders from the newbies and shillers.
August 05, 2003 Brian McInturff
Been gone
Hi guys, I've been out of touch for the past couple of weeks. Work had me out of
town and away from a computer. It's good to be back home. Now it's time to catch
up on all these threads.
August 05, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Christo v.Z.
Many thanks for your kind congratulations on my past birthday!
Guillaume v.T. Thanks to you and your friend for your kind efforts on
trying to decipher that text!
I was aware of that; oddly not the slightest mention can be found regarding the
tumultuously fermenting period, alas.
As for the "MNH" the equivalent definition in Italian is 'nuovo con gomma
integra' (which is similar in interpretation, but NOT in the form, to the German
Postfrisch or the Dutch postfris -- Post Office fresh). IMO The integrity of the
gum is to be considered altered by a finger print or a heavy pencil mark. An
owner's (more frequent) or expert mark can be either reckoned as a quality or as
a defect, depending on the origin, its breadth and the inking.
Kind regards, Paolo
August 05, 2003 Bill Weiss
Shill Bidding
JIM W-S; you mentioned something interesting below while speaking of shilling,
on Civil War Patriotics, I have noted that used CWPs which (to me) are total
crap, seem to get bids nearly always in the $20-35. range whereas more decent
ones which should bring $30-50. don't! I began to notice this when I was trying
to SELL some on ebay. I was listing them generally for 20% or more LESS than
what I paid for them, just to move them, and I know the prices were fair, yet
most got no bids, yet I regularly see the "crap" ones in the $20-35. range! Now
when I say "crap" I am generally speaking of a COMMON design in POOR condition.
Two qualities when combined should make the cover(s) nearly valueless (or
certainly under $10.-15.), yet doesn't. I had never considered shilling, yet
that could explain a lot of "liberal" prices I guess.
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Guillaume
Looks like you got about as far as I did.
I saw addressee had 600 credits for Carcanorme, whatever they are.
Dave
Thats what I thought.
I maybe giving a red-star, power seller a nasty big neg in the near future.
Prometheus
Yes there is shill bidding.
In the old days it was fairly unsophisticated with a seller having several ID's
whom would alternate on bidding on totally diverse material.
I think now the shillers have become more sophisticated, organizing themselves
into groups with specific shillers bidding on material that at least has a
similar theme, eg. US MNH and US Civil War covers verses a combination of
Kyrgistan birds and Italian colonies. They have also managed to get their
feedbacks at least into starred figures so their presence en masse
doesn't immediately arouse suspicion.
August 05, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Mint never hinged
Guillaume, I would consider such a stamp "mint never hinged", certainly,
but I would expect the mark to be mentioned in any write-up of the stamp, and I
would not buy such a stamp myself. I generally avoid fingerprints as well. The
goal of my collection is to display stamps in as good a condition as possible
and as close to the way they were issued from the PO as possible, and both marks
detract from that goal. That's clearly a personal preference.
Generally speaking, in the world of U.S. MNH gems, any flaw (mark, inclusion,
blind perf, fingerprint, bend, skip, whatever) seriously impacts a stamp's
realization. Collectors are more tolerant of offset and perf dimples, as they
can't be avoided on some issues. The Pan-Americans are notorious for bearing
perf dimples 99% of the time, to the point where one without is assumed to be
regummed.
Jim
August 05, 2003 5:08PM Bill Weiss
Catalog Values
I too find it very irritating that so many ebay sellers overstate the CV of the
stamps they sell. I personally feel they are mostly trying to pull a fast one on
sellers. I note it is very common to see stamps, for example, with pen cancels
listed at FULL value, which misleads the bidders badly. The other day a guy sold
a nice 4-margin #2 which cataloged, he said $2,200. and had a pen cancel (which
is $800.), and the stamp brought around $750! So the buyer pays nearly full CV
based on the seller's valuation. On one hand you could argue how dumb that buyer
must be not to check out the correct CV, but my view is that the buyer has the
right to expect accuracy in all aspects of the transaction, which of course
includes, the correct CV as well as a correct/accurate description. After that
sale finished I simply emailed the buyer "are you aware that a Scott #2 with pen
cancel catalogs $800?". I have thus far not heard from the buyer.
On another matter, GUILLAUME asks whether a finger mark or expert mark on the
gum of a mint NH stamp alters its status. No, it does not change its status, but
the marks should be noted for an accurate description because there are buyers
that would be offended by these things, particularly a finger mark, which
definately would reduce the value, whereas an expert mark (which also must be
mentioned) would generally NOT lower the value.
August 05, 2003 4:43 pm Steve Taylor (aka philcomp)
http://www.timeblaster.com/tbeindex.shtml
cat values
I actually find that Scott catalogue values, on average, aren't that far off the
mark IF YOU CAREFULLY ACCOUNT FOR CENTERING AND CONDITION. And I see no problem
with sellers mentioning the catalogue value. Scott doesn't provide valuations
(or adjustment factors) for stamps that are not truly Very Fine. Almost all
sellers on eBay (possibly myself included tho I try to be accurate) overstate
condition. To my mind, it is up to the buyer to determine condition and to
discount (or inflate) the price they are willing to pay accordingly.
August 05, 2003 to Jim Whitford-Stark
to Jim Whitford-Stark ..about the link you posted before about illegal
stamps..those lituanian sellers are on ebay under the nick of "vargur"
August 05, 2003 David Benson
Guillaume,
I don't think there is a word in English, most probably just plain old " sheet "
may suffice or maybe " combination miniature sheet ". In England and Australia "
Souvenir Sheet " conjures a meaning of a private printing without face value and
sold to raise funds for an exhibition or charity. Just another case of American
English having a different meaning.
David Benson
August 05, 2003 sveiki!
Brian R Well, I simply hate that feeling. It's the third clean swipe of
my e-mail program. Last time I installed something similar the e-mails we're
intact. It's pretty hard to find the right files to back-up (those Outlook
Express e-mail files) and then find the right place to download them again after
an update or similar.
August 05, 2003 Guillaume van T.
David Benson: I have just been catching up on the boards and I saw your
discussion about miniature sheets versus souvenir sheets. Very interesting
discussion, especially for an anglophile linguist as myself. However, I have one
question: How would you call in English the mini-sheets of eight similar stamps
that are often issued (I am talking USSR) together with a set of stamps and a
miniature sheet? A good example would be the complete 1988 Calgary Winter Games
issue: 5 different stamps, a miniature sheet and 5 mini-sheets with 8 stamps
(repeating the set). In German they are called Kleinbogen.
Jim Griffith: I know you collect MNH and I have a question for you as
well. Would you consider stamps with clean gum but with an expertization or
dealer's mark 'mint not hinged' as per your definition? Or are these stamps
somehow tainted/disturbed? I am asking this because I had a discussion with
someone about fingerprints and marks on the gumside.
August 05, 2003 Brian R
Well seviki If Bill Gates had a nickel for everything wrong with his
software.....wait a minute...he does!
August 05, 2003 sveiki!
Windows Security Update
Downloaded the latest Windows Security Update - 10 updates in all. One was
called Service Pack I - it downloaded Outlook Express 6 and now all my e-mails
are gone (or hiding somewhere on the harddisk).
THANK YOU VERY MUCH MICRO$UX!!!
Does anyone know if the e-mails can be imported from somewhere obscure on my
harddisk?
August 05, 2003 Brian R
To go along with the bargain of the day we have the
scan of the day
August 05, 2003 Brian R
bargain of the day. I'll give this seller some slack considering where their
from, on the other hand, I wouldn't be suprised if they DO find the domestic
idiot that this would appeal to! LOL
August 05, 2003 Guillaume
Paolo: Me and my friend stared at your French letter until our eyes hurt.
We could not make out much, but we are fairly sure it is about a business deal
and supply and demand. The writer of the letter paid the addressee 600 something
including a discount for a certain transaction. The rest of the letter seems
some kind of discussion about supply and demand and how that affects prices.
I am really sorry, but that is all we could make out of it apart from some
loose words here and there. The handwriting is too difficult to read, notably
because of the reverse side of the letter "shining" through. Well, at least now
you know it is not about Robespierre or the storming of the Bastille :-)
August 05, 2003 Richard M
Brian R thanks for linking to that stamp, I tend not to get to this board
too often.
Regarding your comment on catalog values - I tend to use the PSE quarterly
report (or online version here) as
a buying guide. Biggest problem is that most sellers (and collectors in general)
tend to vastly overestimate the grade/condition of their stamps. Most used US I
see on eBay (AND OFF!!) fall into the 10-30 point range in PSE's grading (NOTE
TO SELLERS: both Scott and PSE automatically give a 50%/50 point discount for
pen cancels).
August 05, 2003 Dave P
aution = auction
mas = made
sorry, my brain melts when the weather gets a bit warm.
August 05, 2003 Dave P
Jim W-S
Yes Jim, the seller's board shows if it has been paid by Paypal, providing the
buyer uses an aution link. If the payment is just mas separately by Paypal then
of course it doesn't.
August 05, 2003 Brian R
same old scam
Well the new rules ahven't prevented
this repeat scam. Doesn't this fall under the "as is" clause?
August 05, 2003 Prometheus
Shill Bidding = NOIP
While the discussions here have been enlightening and informative. I haven't
seen any discourse on SHILL Bidding
and was wondering if anyone out there thought that much of this goes on at the
Internet Auction sites.
I see it often at Real live Auctions.
And with the Ability to have Multiple Id's at these Venues was wondering if
anyone had given this much thought.
I know some people who have five or more ID's and this makes me wonder???
August 05, 2003 Prometheus
Jim W-S = Link on Illegals
Thanks for that link , if it was on before I missed it.
I found it very informative. And at the Same time disturbing.
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Make that, "in the case of the buyer, it tells me I have paid for it.
August 05, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Off-topic post
To make the stamp collecting public feel a bit better about the fraud that goes
on on ebay,
HERE IS A SELLER of fake sportscards who has totalled over $36,000 just
on current and recent auctions!. Most or all of these cards are inexpensive
reprints that can be bought through many retail outlets for pennies per card.
The difference is that their are no sites like SCADS for sports cards, ebay does
absolutely nothing, and the scammers become millionaires. Sounds familiar,
doesn't it?
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Will someone correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the auction board display to
the seller that an item has been paid for by Paypal, if such is the case.
I know, in the case of the seller, it tells me I have paid for it.
August 05, 2003 Brian R
cat values
One of the first things I'd advise a newbie, is forget the whimsical farce, of
cat values (in Scotts anyhow). sometimes, I wonder what point is it, sellers are
trying to make, by including them. Then again, they just might impress some real
fool, which is what many of the nefarious are counting on.
Io Hasn't the Texas school system sold it's soul to ebonics yet? fel
feee ta corekt mi speeling. :o)
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Interesting
illegals board that I hadn't run across before.
My apologies to Richard if he has previously linked it.
August 05, 2003 1725 BST Ed.B
Heatwave
Dave P: Don't forget the trains that don't run and the roads that melt.
Ed
August 05, 2003 Dave P
Ooops, I do know how to spell because!
On a serious note, is he breaking any Ebay/APS rules there?
August 05, 2003 Dave P
I made allowances beacause he is Welsh, I mean English might be his
second language!
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave
I'm afraid the illiteracy annoys me even more.
August 05, 2003 Dave P
One of the things that irritates the hell out of me is the use of incorrect or
inappropriate catalogue values
this is a prime example. The cataloge value is for this fiscal stamp
postally used. Fiscally used it is quite common.
Rant over, it must be this unaccustomed heat wave (not often we get the high
90's in the UK).
August 05, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave
Not bad, four for the price of one (+P&P).
August 05, 2003 04:56 Jim Watson
Ed.B,
Thanks for that link! I've updated the page to include those pictures of the
ship (and the other delightful Tahitians)!
August 05, 2003 1245 BST Ed.B
SS Tahiti
Jim, excellant history to that cover. Makes nice reading.Thanks.
Ed
August 05, 2003 1235 BST Ed.B
Jim Watson SS Tahiti
Jim,
there is a postcard pic of the SS Tahiti at
http://www.janeresture.com/tahiti_postcards/
some nice ladies also.
Ed
August 05, 2003 03:51 Jim Watson
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
New Zealand to
the United States 1930. This is mail salvaged from a shipwreck!
August 05, 2003 Christo van Zyl
PaoloHappy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you, although it's two days
too late... Happy Birthday dear Paolo.... Wishing you all of the best for your
38th year!
What to do??It really irritates me when you have a buyer with zero
feedback which won three auctions (more than $50 in total) and then does not
answer my emails with respect to shipping and payment. I have contacted him on
the 28th of July for the first time, then yestaerday sent him payment reminders
as well as an additional emailstating that if he doesn't respond by today, I
will initiate the non-paying bidder programme. Aaaarrrgh...
August 05, 2003 00.59 Knud-Erik Andersen
Good morning/afternoon/evening to you all.
K.E.
August 04, 2003 21:25 Dave ("philatarium")
Just checking on quickly for now, but will be back later.
Colin: David is right, it is a privately printed reproduction of the
sports stamps. I have seen them done of the some of the other high-value stamps
(like the geese & moon stamp, etc.). In fact, I have one somewhere. I believe
the writing on the bottom right-hand side will say who printed it. If I recall
correctly, all of them may have been done by a philatelic society in Japan.
If you'd like to send me a larger scan as an email attachment, I might be able
to make out what the organization was. But because it is a private printing,
they are not even listed in the specialized catalog.
Chuck H.: The only stamp whose cancel is readable is on the 50 sen (lower
left), and, amazingly, I can read it. It's "Maebashi". I'm only guessing, but I
know that name as an area of Tokyo. Perhaps it had a PO with its own cancel at
that time, rather than using the Tokyo cancel. Also, the Japan specialized
catalog breaks out prices of used stamps from 1946 - about 1965 with a separate
valuation if cancelled with a comb cancel, like that one is. Generally speaking,
it tends to double the used value if a comb cancel. That still doesn't quite
bring it up to the current auction bid, but, as David said, the collectors from
Japan tend to know what they're doing.
Be back later.
-- Dave
August 04, 2003 David Benson
Chuck, seeing all the bids are from Japan, I presume they know more about the
value than the editors of Scott's or Gibbons which has them at 15 Pounds used.
David Benson
August 04, 2003 Chuck Harm
Japan auction #2943248056
Can anyone explain why this auction is up to $79 for stamps that catalog for
$10? Is there some special cancellation?
August 04, 2003 David Benson
Alison, Addies lots with the Nazi symbols are still active, they haven't been
zapped, looks like the Ebay Gestapo are not doing their job properly,
I will leave a note on Ebay Chat referring to them, presume that will get zapped
but not the lots,
David Benson
August 04, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Thank you Jim. That is probably what these are, but that website has a small
typo: The diamond jubilee is the 60th anniversary, not the 50th anniversary
August 04, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Diamond Jubilee
Alison, I'm a U.S. guy, so I don't know nothing 'bout no foreign stamps
(or even U.S., some would say). But a Google search revealed the following:
Diamond Jubilee Label:
name given to British charity labels made in 1897-98 for the 50th
anniversary of Queen Victoria accession to the throne.
Sounds like what you're talking about. If so, I guess they're cinderellas.
Jim
August 04, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
1897 Diamond Jubilee Commemorative Stamps
What are these? Something Fake designed to mimic stamps? Cinderellas? They
state they are 1897 Jubilee Stamps, but I do not see stamps listed like these in
the Catalogues. I assume they are Great Britain?
August 04, 2003 sveiki!
Paolo As you said - it depends on what one collects. {:o)
Fortunately, the modern stuff is way out of ordinary shopkeepers field - well,
even the established stamp dealers (they just have a wrinkled nose left for
modern stuff *hehe*). {;o)
When I for example travel to Latvia - no one has the faintest idea about prices
on modern philately. Most people do realize that vintage postcards with views of
Riga has some value, but fortunately the other crazy bidders from eBay are not
present when I browse the shops. {:o)
August 04, 2003 Dave P
Jim W-S,
Further to discussion of postal validity of QEII pound stamps, it seems that
this is not widely known,
was a bargain at 25% face!
August 04, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Accc, sorry for the bold!
Hope Dave F. will correct (add a </b>) if I am also responsible of the
darkening of the post immediately below mine.
Paolo
August 04, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Louise and Sveiki!, it evidently also depends on what one collects
or is interested about.
To honour the truth, I for one, being an Italian-Dutch collector buying on
eBay.com, have found great occasions on that site, material that I would have
had to pay from 10 to 1000 times as much (e.g. my 1861 cover with FIRENZE N1
used as canceller which very recently was judged to be the second example
known).
The material I look for is generally not to be found by me neither in the nearby
shops nor in large dealers stocks; but if they have it, that is if I would visit
the right shops (e.g. the known ones in Milan, Turin, Rome) and they are aware
of what they have, I would have had to pay it much more. As for the Netherlands
early Issues, you SURE have got to forget the shops and firmly skip on their
prices (unless you detect a variety, either philatelic or of usage) and refer to
the eBay (or other auction houses) realisations for common-medium material.
Paolo
August 04, 2003 Dave P
Machins (again)
The recently issued photo high value Machins includes what must be the biggest
major UK error in years. On the £2.00 value one stamp (row 18/1) has the £
symbol omitted. Apparently Royal Mail withdrew it as soon as they realised but
judging by Ebay a fair number were distributed. The cylinder blocks are
currently going for £100+ on Ebay, but I have no idea whether this will prove to
be a bargain or way overpriced - no one seems to know exactly how many were
released. What will be interesting is to learn if they were all philatelic
releases or whether any got through to PO counters, if they did then it will
certainly be worth searching through kiloware for a nice used example.
August 04, 2003 sveiki!
Louise And the people at the shops haven't heard about eBay - yet. Keeps
the prices down. I've found a lot of stuff "off-eBay". {:o)
August 04, 2003 02.07 pm Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_stamps
Japanese 1947 Sport Block of 4 S/S
David Benson
Thanks for that – it would certainly explain why I have not seen any others
like it for the Sports issues. It’s just that the British PO issues a
promotional sheet for every new set of special stamps that they hang up on Post
Offices to try to get people to buy them, but then it has lots of explanation on
them, which does not seem to be on that Japanese one. Thanks.
Colin
August 04, 2003 David Benson
Colin, it also may have been a filler for a privately made first day cover.
Whatever it is, it is most probably unofficial and privately printed without PO
consent.
David Benson
August 04, 2003 01.18 pm Colin Judd UK (xzephyr)
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps
Japan 1947 Sport Block of 4 S/S
Philatarium
Some year or two ago I enquired on the eBay board (before I had the ability
to post a link) about this
Dave , and David Benson suggested it might be some kind of Japanese
PO publicity sheet. I cannot find any mention of a S/S for this issue in my
various catalogues, though I may not be looking in the right place!
The sheet is ungummed and the perforations are printed in the same colour as
the ‘stamps’. The printing is somewhat less defined as in the actual stamps (see
the block of 4 in the scan) and the colour is a shade lighter.
D2’s comment seems quite likely, but I have never seen any other S/S of this
type for this, or any other issue, on eBay. Was this a ‘one off’? Or is it the
product of some enterprising entrepreneur of 1947 in an attempt to recover in
the post war period?
August 04, 2003 David Benson
APS
Richard, that was quick, Janet just replied to me. This is her letter like I
said, she is reliable and diligent (and now will add quick).
Hi David,
Interesting description of the covers: "authentic reproduction of genuine
stamps" and "artistic reproductions with no postal or monetary value."
I have taken copies of some of these items and descriptions, and will present
them at Wednesday's APS Board meeting. I have no idea how this discussion will
end up, but at least some of the problems will be presented.
FYI, it is frustrating to us here that the government agencies have not taken
action in this case.
Best regards,
Janet
Janet Klug, Vice President
American Philatelic Society
Home address:
August 04, 2003 12:49 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Surcharges
Roger Just be sure to call it a Handling Fee to keep clean of rules.
August 04, 2003 Louise
Seriously, re: eBay - good luck with the campaign.
August 04, 2003 Louise (recovering eBay addict now
firmly cured) <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Just when I thought eBay was nothing but a bad memory...Since coming off "her",
I've found that with a bit of looking anyway you can find most things you want.
Helps if you live in the country you collect, but still the sale box at the shop
in Reading turned up a good few covers etc for anyone vaguely interested in
Eastern Europe, so I'm not regretting myself tearing myself away from it. That
said, it probably would have been a bit better of an experience if I could have
made more than nine dollars on it.
August 04, 2003 David Benson
Richard, sent with a few examples of the various types of fake covers,
David Benson
August 04, 2003 David Benson
Richard, will write to Janet. I know Janet personally because of the Tonga
connection and she is a diligent worker apart from being a good philatelist.
David Benson
August 04, 2003 Richard W
Brain cells
No it's not, it's MONDAY 8pm as I write. (Good grief, first the currency
converter, now this.) So David there would be nice time to raise an issue
before the meeting.
August 04, 2003 Richard Warren
APS, Ebay, Addie etc
David - I had a response from Janet Klug at APS to my plea for them to
take seriously illegals on Ebay. A fairly positive response, too. Apparently
there's an APS board meeting on Wednesday, which I guess is tomorrow (to me -
it's Tuesday 8pm as I write), at which the APS-Ebay set-up will be under
discussion. The good lady's email address (no secret, it's on their pages) is
TongaJan@aol.com
Time is a bit short, but if you want to raise the Adddie issue, now might be
the moment? Just a thought.
August 04, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
maarten
No idea without dictionary.
Looks to be airmail though doesn't specifically state so (unless I'm missing
something).
August 04, 2003 Roger Heath
Surcharges
Looks like I'm going to add a 2% fee to all the advice I've been contributing on
this Board. For those of you who've been paying cash, send me your refund
request, but rememeber I follow the lead of large coporations and won't
necessarily respond to your request. Any stamps sent to me for expertising and
determined to be "bad" may be offered on Ebay so we both recover costs involved
in making a bad decision. Let me know if you wish to participate in this new
program, it's called the Master Extreme Gold Seller program, MEGS for short.
Which reminds me, did anyone go and short Ebay stock?
Roger
August 04, 2003 Maarten Willems
philatelic vs. commercial
Could anybody say whether this
1951 China cover is used philatelic (probably yes) or commercial? (Rate?
What does all the red printing mean?)
Maarten
August 04, 2003 07:33 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Credit Card Surcharges
Dave P
Here is an interesting fact sheet about charging fees to customers:
New reform on credit card fees
From 1 January 2003 businesses can recover any costs involved in processing
credit cards directly from customers under Reserve Bank of Australia credit card
reforms.
Previously businesses were restricted from recouping these fees from credit card
users so they were passed on to all customers as part of the general markup and
thus affected those who did not use credit.
August 04, 2003 Bill Weiss
Credit Cards
John; Thanks very much! Indeed, that is direct from the horse's mouth, which
clearly shows how they condone an easy way to get around a "surcharge"! Also,
just for general info, their item #2 "A merchant cannot require...above a
minimum or below a maximum" and their #3..."the merchant must accept.." are bull
as well. Last year my wife tried to pay for a car by credit card, and even
though the dealer took her card for the down payment, they refused to allow her
to use it for the balance. We filed complaint with Visa. Result. Nothing! They
never responded. Months later, outraged at no response, I was able to finally
speak to a representative who explained to me that when a customer files a
complaint it is Visa's policy to NEVER respond to the person who complained.
Instead, if they choose, they deal with the merchant and, suppossedly, if they
deem it wise, they take action against the merchant, but never report back to
the person filing. Obviously, we never heard another word, so in effect, the
merchant was allowed to refuse the use of the card in direct violation of their
rules. Again, I compare this to ebay, where "rules" are broken all the time and
they do nothing!
August 04, 2003 Dave P
Credit Card Surcharges
John
The site you linked to applies specifically to the USA. Different countries have
different rules regarding this, as I tried to explain below.
August 04, 2003 6.59 a.m. John Gordon <johnr@castlemoyle.com>
Credit Card surcharges
I've seen some answers already posted here, but here is the credit card
surcharge info
straight from the horse's mouth as it were.
John
August 04, 2003 5:40AM Bill Weiss
Charge Card Surcharges
DAVE; Thanks for the added info. I think your assessment is correct - that it is
a violation of the merchant agreement to add a charge, but if all that needs to
be done to circumvent this is, as in the example I've already spoken about, to
merely increase the buyer's premium by a few % and then discount to those who
don't use a charge card, then to me, there really is no way to prevent the
merchant from paying for his chargecard costs this way. In the example I gave,
we never even received an acknowledgement from Visa about it, and we
specifically asked them if this was an allowable practice (to add the 2% as a
"service charge"). Now if the chargecard company is so concerned about such a
violation, you would think they would at least acknowledge to the party
complaining that, yes indeed, this is not allowed, and the guilty merchant will
be suspended or fined or warned, or something, but no, all we got was a refund
of the 2%, which tells me that all the chargcard company did was wink at the
offender.
August 04, 2003 Victor Horadam <horadam1@airmail.net>
General
Good
Morning
All, from sunny Dallas.
August 04, 2003 04:14 Jim Watson
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
Queensland to
Wisconsin in 1908. From gold to beer!
August 04, 2003 Dave P
Credit Card Charges
There seems to be a lot of confusion over this. In general it is against the
merchant agreement to add a surcharge. It is only actually illegal in very few
places eg California. Even in most US states it is not illegal to do so.
Now for the twist. Because it was felt that the cc companies were abusing their
position, and that effectively cash purchasers were subsidising cc buyers, in
the UK (and I think other parts of the EU) a law was passed making it illegal
for a merchant agreement to prevent cc surcharges, which is why Paypal had to
change their rules to allow UK sellers to appply a surcharge. In practice in the
UK most retail outlets do not surcharge, but in some industries where sales are
high value, low profit margin, such as the travel insustry surcharges are the
norm.
In theory for an international cc transaction the rules applying in the seller's
country should apply, but interestingly Paypal have modified their UK agreement
to allow surcharges only on domestic transactions, ie UK sellers should not
apply a surcharge to "foreign" sales. I am not absolutely sure that this is
legal, but I doubt it will be challenged. All this means is that the additional
25 pence I charge for paypal transactions now gets added to the P&P for overseas
sales! (Sorry sarge)
August 03, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
I have this album...
Patty, check out
this
page here.
Jim
August 03, 2003 20:51 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Stamp Info
Patty Please excuse some posters.
LOOK HERE
for a start for information for New and Non-Collectors.
August 03, 2003 Patty
Do tell....Well is there a Master in the house that Knows the ropes on
stamps????
August 03, 2003 Patty
I have lots and lots of loose stamps in good conditions, couple of shoe boxes
full, all kinds, and 4 albums nearly full, one is a 1950's Scott album. Haven't
a clue what I really have but am smiling as I say it. If anyone could give me
some advice my email is toohot2hndlefem@netscape.net Thanks
August 03, 2003 To Patty
To Patty.
no it's a sado-maso room
August 03, 2003 10"42 Patty
stamps
Hi, is this the stamp room?
August 03, 2003 Bill Weiss
Charge Cards
ALISON; thanks again, but I would disagree with you regarding that the merchant
would have his account terminated. About 6 months ago we registered a complaint
against one of the biggest US auction houses who were adding 2% onto purchases
when buyers used a charge card as a "service charge". The "bottom line" to the
complaint was this; we were refunded the 2% charge and the auction firm merely
then changed the 2% to a discount for those not using chargecards. I mean, whose
kidding who? If a merchant suddenly alters his buyer's premium from, let's say,
15%, to 17% with a 2% discount for any buyer who does NOT use a charge card, and
that in the face of a complaint about the prior 2% "service charge", than to
anyone with a brain all that auction firm did was move the charge from one place
to another! AND, so far as I know, that firm paid no penalty or suspension, etc.
In my view, it's a lot liuke ebay, people get away with things all the time that
in theory they should not if a system worked right. Systems don't work right and
violators go scott-free.
August 03, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Charge Cards and surcharges
Bill W: It is a violation of both the merchant agreement with the credit card
company, and a statutory violation (civil penalties) in most states. Any
merchant caught doing this would have his merchant account immediately
terminated -- which is why PapPal has this rule.They are in effect the credit
card "merchant" and they do not want to have problems with the credit card
issuers.
August 03, 2003 Bill Weiss
Charge Cards
Alison,
Thanks. I really wasn't referring to ebay, but rather to business in general.
When you say "illegal" do you mean it is a violation of a civil law or is it a
violation of the rules of a chargecard Company?
August 03, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Charge Cards and surcharges
Bill W: It is illegal in the United States to charge a surcharge for credit card
use. It also violates both the Ebay and PayPal user agreements to do so.
However, it is perfectly legal to offer a discount to buyers for payments by
cash, money order or check.
August 03, 2003 Roger H
Charge Cards
Bill-
I don't know techicalities, but it all depends on where you conduct business,
which state, which country, etc.
I don't know if you ever noticed but for a long time German sellers were adding
the Ebay fees onto the final auction price. That seems to have faded as I think
they realized customers weren't happy.
Roger
August 03, 2003 Bill Weiss
Charge Cards
Dave mentioned something earlier today I would like those of you who are more
knowledgeable on this subject than I, and that is whether or not is is "legal"
(allowable) to add charge card use by a buyer as a "penalty" (or whatever you
want to call it) by the seller? My understanding, going back many years, is that
merchants (mastercard/visa) are in violation of their merchant agreement if they
charge a buyer a fee to use a card, however I have noticed a fair number of
auction houses either reduce the buyer's premium to those who do NOT use a
charge card, or they out and out charge a fee (usually 2%) for chargecard use.
Can anyone enlighten me?
August 03, 2003 4:44 pm Steve Taylor (aka philcomp)
http://www.timeblaster.com/tbeindex.shtml
eBay a Monopoly?
Is eBay a Monopoly? eBay meets the standard definition of being a
monopoly. They have almost 90% of the 'general' auction market (consisting of
eBay, Amazon, and Yahoo). I don't count other large specialty aution sites such
as UBid because they don't allow consumer-to-consumer auctions. This is not to
say that eBay violated any laws in achieving the monopoly. A monopoly in this
business is the natural result of success...buyers will go where there are more
items for sale and sellers will go where there are more buyers. In this sense it
is similar to the telephone induster where, in the early years, having the
largest subscriber base was what drew more new subscribers. Who wants to
purchase a telephone service if you can only call a small subset of other
people?
Should the industry be regulated? Yes! While I am inherently opposed to
government regulation in general, I think that the consumer-to-consumer online
auction business ought to be regulated. (The states and the federal government
currently regulate traditional auctions). Regulation is the only thing that can
ensure reasonable pricing (relative to costs) given that the business is a
'natural' monopoly. Only regulation can ensure that certain standards of
fairness exist for all users of auction services. I don't simply point to the
fraudulent philatelic goings on but also to the apparently high incidence of
fraudulent sales in other categories including numerous instances of sellers who
don't ship the goods at all and bidders who don't fulfill their obligations
after bidding. I gather from the item descriptions in some categories that
bidders who fail to pay for the items run as high as 10%!.
August 03, 2003 David Benson
Alison, the time between my noticing it and reporting it can be measured in
nanoseconds. I received a canned repsonse thanking me for the information but
absolutely nothing since then. Won't hold my breath but also received a
questionaire asking me about how helpful Safeharbor was. Of course I replied
that IMO they are useless.
David Benson
August 03, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
David Benson: Have you reported the fake Addie covers that have Swastika
cancels. Repeatedly doing this will get him suspended for a month (again).
Jimbo: According to the Safe Harbor representative that called me on Thursday,
censor tape or cancels with Swastikas or any other marking on covers that have a
Swastika violate the policy.
August 03, 2003 Dave St Maurice <davestm@rochester.rr.com>
Currency Conversion
One(1) AUD= 0.65203 US$ or 1.53341 US$= 1 AUD on Aug 3, 2003
I use xe.com for currency conversion. You can also set up a currency conversion
on a home page of excite.com
August 03, 2003 David Benson
NOIP, This is the reply I received from one of Addies happy customers when I
aske dif they knew when they were printed.
The dealer that I bought these from is complete and absolutely honest and all
descriptions on eBay clearly identified these as FORGERIES. As a member of a
national stamp collector society, I can tell you that many times forgeries have
been misadvertised as original. The dealer Mjarcola has an excellent records
with stamp dealers for clearly marking items. If you desire to make a purchase
from this dealer, I do recommend, at my highest level, that you contact him. On
the exact date that these FORGERIES were printed, just a
guess on my part, about 1951 0r 1952.
August 03, 2003 David Benson
Bill, it's not a laughing matter, it's very serious. It is a genuine card with
stamp removed, one of Addies fakes added with one of his old cancels that he
used to use before he graduated out of handstamping class. That one isn't going
to fool anyone but have a look at his others, some already have bids.
David Benson
August 03, 2003 15:18 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
ROTFLMAO
ROTFLMAO
August 03, 2003 15:08 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
going blind
Richard Warren Another handy trick is to go to the bottom of the eBay
home page and click on eBay Australia. Then search for the eBay lot
number. It will show both the selling currency and the AU$ conversion.
August 03, 2003 Paolo Bagaglia
Back from my party.
Sveiki!'s advice is a very good one on not to use hinges on stamps or
covers, generally speaking.
Paolo
August 03, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Thanks for the info, Sveiki! Nearly bed-time, but I've got it up now. Looking
forward to seeing the rest in the near future.
Thanks for the fascinating article on the flags of the SU.
August 03, 2003 Richard W
going blind
David & sveiki! - Thanks!!! I just looked at that ten minutes ago, and
swear I couldn't see $AU on the menu. But this time, it's there. Hmm ... Must be
something I did to my brain cells at a much earlier age. Thanks - appreciated.
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
Louise To see some stamps you should try the first two issues within the
drop box. That's after clicking the "Modern Philately" link. {:o)
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
Louise I'm reorganizing my website, everything is going to be integrated
to a portal. The stamp pictures are there, just haven't corrected the links,
yet.
August 03, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Good job I asked you, Sveiki - I was about to do it but thought I better do some
research first. Just stripped down the album that I was messing about with as an
eight-year-old and I couldn't really get the hang of hinging, whereas I've just
purchased part of a collection and the stamps haven't been that difficult to get
off...so that's why I thought again about hinging them. But stock-books it is
then.
Thanks for the help with the flag - normally I'd know it off by heart but all my
stuff on those matters is back in Lodz and I'm on a teacher-training course in
Warsaw.
Brilliant site! Presumably you are still putting up the stamp pictures? Or is my
computer just playing up?
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
Richard First link at Google doing a search for "Exchange Rates": http://www.xe.com/ucc/
August 03, 2003 David Benson
Richard, I use Universal Currency Converter
http://www.xe.net/ucc/
David Benson
August 03, 2003 Richard Warren
David Benson - here's a tiresome question for you. I'm trying to paypal
an amount to an Australian seller, item listed in $AU. Paypal insists that I
send in $US. Can't find an interactive exchange rate thingy on the net that
actually includes the Australian dollar. You couldn't tell me what the current
exchange rate is, could you? Sorry to hassle.
Richard W
August 03, 2003 Maarten Willems
Latvian forgeries
Bill C - That fake cover is (too) good looking. The scan could fool
anyone. These items should be sold/purchased only after inspection in the flesh
or with a proper certificate. Don't have such a cover yet unfortunately, but I
do have a mint Afrika-overprint set (expertised!).
Maarten
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Have a look here
for an answer about your flag question.
When it comes to hinging stamps - DON'T!!!!
Get some cheap stock books that doesn't harm your stamps and store them in a
cool, dry place. When you later get the time/money/whatever to create a real
collection, then you'll be very happy you didn't hinge/mount your
stamps/covers/whatever.
August 03, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Sveiki - just to check, the Latvian flag under the USSR had the waves
right at the bottom, while the Estonian SSR's flag had the waves half-way up?
August 03, 2003 13:11 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Latvia Airmail Forgeries
Christo van Zyl & Maarten
Here is what
a Forgery Sheet looks like. Maarten How do you
like THIS
Cover! Too bad it is a forgery too.
August 03, 2003 Maarten Willems
Latvia
Christo van Z - Pity that the strip is probably a forgery. I know that
many Latvian issues were extensively forged. The misalignment of the stamp
design and the perforations made me suspicious too. (Still interested as a
reference item though.)It's hard to make sure via a scan. Comparing watermarks
with genuine (expertised) stamps can clarify things.
Maarten
August 03, 2003 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Hello Sveiki! --how's it going?
Thanks for the opinion. Well, it's just a lot of cheap stuff that was too good
to pass up as inspiration but wasn't from Eastern Europe! Was thinking about
hinging them but that's rather ...permanent, but of course stock books are
rather expensive (although the Poles seem to be throwing them out at the moment
so it's possible to get them reasonably cheaply s/h rather than new)
August 03, 2003 13:00 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Latvia Airmail FOrgeries
Christo van Zyl & Maarten The easiest way to tell the triangular Latvia
Airmail forgeries is by the watermark or lack of such. The forgeries lack
watermark so a dip in fluid should be informative. Many of the forgeries have a
lacquer painted fake watermark. Thesse turn a kind of orange over time. There is
no watermark if dipped in fluid. You can also see the watermark by holding the
stamp up between your eye and a bright light looking at the back of the stamp.
If the watermark appears as a lighter design on the back it is OK. If there is
no watermark or if the watermark is darker and possibly with an orange tint,
then it is a forgery.
Look here
for an example.
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
http://www.lettonica.info
Louise It's really funny you're asking today.
Today is the first in a long time I'm updating my website.
Paul {:o)
August 03, 2003 sveiki!
Louise Hi! {:o) It really depends on what your message is - if you have a
message. IMHO You should divide your thematical collections into the spheres you
want to focus on. Be it either a theme viewed in a broader Eastern European
perspective, or a national theme with only one country representing the
political, social aspects within the particular country.
August 03, 2003 David Benson
Addies covers
Jimbo2, re. Addies covers, a few years ago he sold a lot of similar items with
stamps added and his fake handstamps, then he progressed to the computer prints.
It looks now he is going to go into computer prints on fake covers with his fake
handstamps in a way to get round any listing problems and APS involvement about
his computer fakes. Some of the ones he is now listing are laughable and no one
would even give them a second glance but some might and also realise high prices
if 2 or more can be conned.
David Benson
August 03, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Maarten W Basically I haven't got a p[roblem in passing that strip of
four onto you. However, it is marked as forgery in the album which it came from,
and I think we should make certain of these issues before we get your hopes to
high up. I will have to check Bill C's site first. If I can't find any
advice/help there, we will try the knowledge on the board again!
August 03, 2003 12.16 Louise Stanley <luizastanley@wp.pl>
Theme collection advice
Hello all...
Maybe you could give me some advice. Have been collecting Eastern Europe for a
while and have a couple of country collections going; but I also have thought
about starting a themed collection of political and social stamps - everything
from traditional costumes to social reformers - and wondered: is it best to
present them by topic (eg ethnic, political propaganda, industry and farming) or
by country?
August 03, 2003 11:25 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
312
John The square
perfs HERE are normal artifacts of extreme JPEG compression used for the
scan and do not truly reflect the actual stamp. The square perfs alone are not a
cause for worry. You could always ask the seller for a better scan by email if
you are interested.
August 03, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
clark
BTW, those are dangerous looking fakes.
Images of single stamps at a similar resolution would easily fool a newbie.
He could have chosen a seahorse that was better centered!
August 03, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
To follow ken's example, prior to Dave's posting I was only 99%
sure, now I am 99.99%.
Dave
An interesting google follow-up on that PC of the Thames you sent me.
It was addressed to Master Cliffe Luth(?), "Dumbarton" St. Johns, Ryde, IOW.
Anyway, it seems that the ferry boat to the IOW was named Ryde and it was built
in Dumbarton.
August 03, 2003 Dave P
Valid UK
Jim is quite correct, the only GB pre-decimal stamps valid for postage are QEII
£1.00 values (quite useful when I pick up at late castle set mounted mint).
August 03, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Clark
I'm almost certain they are not valid. (That doesn't mean you can't use them for
postage as Ed illustrated with an Eddy 8 cover to me).
Even though Liz 2 sterling £'s are still OK (I think), any from previous
monarchs are not.
August 03, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
It's not the same penny black,though when you can't see it very well, it makes
little difference.
August 03, 2003 john
312
Heres one for clark (reperf) fuzzy picture and all,please note the square
looking perfs.look
here
August 03, 2003 john@magnolia stamps
Dave
I sent the seller the correct information,lets wait and see what he does with
it.
Do I ever have the s..t stirred up on the other board,there has been more
posts there in the past 16 hrs then there has been all week long.
August 03, 2003 Dave P
Penny Black
John
I thought it might be the one that was discussed before. The scan is so bad it
is impossible to determine a sensible value, cannot even read the check letters
or tell how badly the left margin is trimmed. Worth no more than $75 I would
say, and probably a lot less.
God knows why it is listed under QEII.
August 03, 2003 John
penny black
It seems that the same stamp was offered about 2 or 3 months ago!The high bidder
was contacted and warned about it and I recieved a nice e-mail from her,I also
offered to give her a used copy for free since she claimed that she was buying
it for her son who was just starting his collection.Darn honest people she
Refused!
Anyway now this thing shows up again,it is once again being list as unused at a
rediculous opening bid..Whats that black thing in the middle of the stamp
supposed to be anyway.Hmmmm! I know ! CANCELATION mark.I think now I'm no expert
on G.B. (thats io's terratory)(sp) but is'nt the c.v. one that stamp about
$160.00 u.s.
August 03, 2003 Dave P
Would someone look at
this penny black lot. A lousy scan, but is not this a used copy? Something
similar was discussed a while back, is this the same one?
August 03, 2003 0825 Clark (reperf)
Fakes
Are any of the perforated printed objects in
2943729146 reproductions of stamps valid for postage?
August 03, 2003 08:04 Jim Watson
Maarten,
Boy, is my face red! Thanks for catching that
error. That's what happened early in the morning before the coffee. I've updated
the page.
Richard,
Glad you enjoyed it. I came across it in 2000 - I don't know where.
August 03, 2003 Victor Horadam <horadam1@airmail.net>
General
To all who responded to my question about Philatelic Center. Thank you for the
resonses and the detective work. I agree that it certaionly does not appear to
be a scam for all of the work involved and the expense. Yet, too many
inferences, too many threads of connection, and not enough explanation in the
catalogue for me to feel comfortable in bidding. There is a wealth of ni |