StampChat Archives
Archive:
October 16 - 31, 2003
October 31, 2003 Brian R
low points
Ebay is so messed up right now (friday night is patch the house of cards
programming, right?), that I can't pull up any listings. So I wandered over to
Yahoo to see whats up.
The first 3 listings I viewed were all Riny218.
Same old scams they were pulling on ebay too.
Makes one feel defeated.
Perhaps scammers shouldn't be banned,
but instead burned at the stake.
We could even fuel the fires with their wares.
Good thing Halloween is only one day a year.
I seem to really be getting in the mood.
October 31, 2003 David S.
482A from mixture.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Brian R: Yes, I have been following that discussion, but must admit it is way
over my head (probably because I started following it at a late stage). It is
utterly amazing how much effort (Investigation) people has committed to
determine whether these are genuine printings and not fake.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Thanks for some of the comments on getting the document size down in Word.I was
pretty sure that one was able to save a document in html format, it gets rid of
most of the formatting and other errors Word retains after a while of deleting
pics etc. My sister in law's MSC thesis was done in Word , some 260 pages, no
pics though, that ended up with a size of 750kb. I have checked this morning,
just opened a new page, type a few words on it and saved, 19kb. I probably will
have to go and look at the images included in my doc and resize/resample them.
To zip the doc is not reall ya good option - most of the pics are already in a
compressed format (jpg) so one does not gain much from using zip.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the day
Hi, I am up a bit earlier today - have alot to do (or planned). Have to take my
son to cricket practice at eight, then rush to the other side of town to drop of
a couple of lots I want to sell at our local uction here (if you are late, then
you have no chance to get your material on the tables). Then back to pick up son
again, back home to watch South Africa play Samoa in the world cup rugby
tournament (at 09:30), then back to attend the auction at 11:00, back home to
work in the garden (to keep my better half happy) and so on! With respect to the
rugby I am fairly cynical with respect to South africa's chances - I don't
really expect us to win, especially after Samoa's performance against England
last Sunday.
Anyway, here is todays
Cancels of the day 4
.
The following cancels are represented.
Denmark (Fredenborg 3TOG, 9/1), Denmark (Aalborg, 15/11/01), Denmark (target
68), Denmark (Kjobenh. Baneg, 13/8), South Africa (Maydon Wharf, 12/7/1978),
Denmark (Svendburg, 1/12/1926), Denmark (Kjobnhavn K, 16/5/1908), Germany(?Bruhl,
Bez Coet?, ??/5/1872).
Maydon Wharf is located in Durban Harour.
As yesterday, I have a couple of questions again. What does the use of the K and
the *** in the bottom of the Danish CDS mean/stand for ? If Bjorn M or
Knud - Erik
(sorry to hear about your health problems Knud) is around, could you maybe
please have a look at the queries I have posted yesterday for cancels of the day
3?
What post office is the 68 in the target cancel (Denmark)
What does one call the split ring type cancels the Danish and swiss and I think
Germans so often use? They have these vertical bars in the semi-circular
segments.
On the German cancel, what does the 7-9 E stand for ? It is located after the
date.
October 31, 2003 Brian R
Grinnells
Just an informative post here, to let anyone interested in the saga of the
Grinnells, know thats been a topic on Frajolas board (link above) the last few
days. Apparently, some of the principals involved, have been presenting a rather
passionate defense of them. Of course, I can't understand why either side, is
bothering to debate at this point. The reputation of a certain British cert
service, is currently on the line over them, and the results are due out any
time now. Hopefully, that determination, will put a final declaration on them
once and for all.
I doubt it though.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
482A
KEN L; Why aren't they 482s?? They are probably both 409s and 482s. No one is
good enough to know from the scans in that lot which are which. Darker shades
are generally 409s and lighter 482s.
October 31, 2003 Roger Heath
Swiss Fakes - Time to Vote
I would like to see comments about this auction.
Is this what should be reported to the "Stamp Committee"? Should one wait until
after November 3? If these are identified as as probably fakes, and sold "as
is", do I report the auction? There are so much of this material on Ebay Germany
that limiting reports listed only on Ebay.com is almost pointless. This auction
showed as a Featured Auction on my first page of search returns on Ebay.com
where I'm looking to see auctions available to the US. You comments don't need
to be essay length, but I am interested in Yes and No comments!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2961576974&category=4749
Roger
October 31, 2003 7.42 p.m. john gordon <johnr@castlemoyle.com>
Machin pages response
Jim Whitford-Stark,
Thanks for the link to Jet stamps. I was a member of the GBCC in the mid-90's,
but dropped (almost everything) when my wife and I bought
this lovely building.
I just won a lot of Chronicles which have made for a week's interesting reading
and rejoining the GBCC. I've accumulated lots and lots of Machins. Finally sort
of got time or am making it to play with stamps.I just purchased the latest SG
Concise to bring me up to date and they've got loads more than the Scott
listing.
I've got the 2nd ed of Deegam's catalogue with the first 15-16 updates which
probably should take care of me as I've TRIED to cut most of my collecting
periods off about 1960, except I stretched used U.S. and (mostly) used Machins
to 2000.
(see if the horiz. rule works?)
Chris
I've looked at Bill Steiner's pages and use them for most of my various
collections. I'm thankful he offers them in Pagemaker format as then I can make
them my way too. I think his would match the Scott pages except for not having
anyone's catalog numbers. I play at the Deegam catalog first level which I think
limits me to around 300 or so. Thanks for your suggestion.
John (the spacefiller.)
October 31, 2003 Roger Heath
Pro's Album
Pro-
You know I've got to tell you - send me a scan of the Swiss page or pages you're
working on and I'll send you some to start fillling in. Switzerland 1908 and
back is a good cut-off. If you are collecting later issues, I've got dupes up
through the 1930's.The ones you scanned should stay in the kiloware. (;>( Scan
the whole pahge just so I can see the spaces and years the album suggests, I can
probably deduce which you need. I owe you for the razor cancels so this is an
attempt to make good. I've got cable so fast down loads are easy, your upload to
FTP or on my email is only consideration.
Roger
October 31, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Those 482As
are 409s.
October 31, 2003 Brian R
prometheus
It's a little hard to tell. The photo has all the clarity of one taken through
the bottom of a coke bottle. However, the color looks right, and the facial
contrast is there, to say it has a high probability of being a genuine CSA #6.
Scott value for those that still care, around $10, a couple of $'s less if no
gum.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Expert scanning
if someone else posted this my bad
STAMP?
October 31, 2003 prometheus
BRIAN R
have you seen the csa 5 center in this lot
WHATUTHINK
October 31, 2003 Brian R
prometheus
Don't worry too much. My last check of reality vs. Scotts, leads be to believe
that $70,000 in Scott catalog values, equates roughly to $84 in the real money.
It sure sounds impressive though....
October 31, 2003 Prometheus
and then I see 5.99 for this
6bucksEven and say self you have a bunch that look better than that of
those.
So maybe I too have 70,000.00 dollars worth.
October 31, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
David B
In all my years on eBay I have never seen the same real Mayotte offered in
used condition, which was what I was going for in my collection.
The buyer has at least a reference collection to test against the real thing.
And a reference collection that isn't marred by nasty black backstamps.
I do have used real stamps from earlier issuance, but only one real one of the
stamps in that auction.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Jim W-S
I have no real clue on "value" of my stamps But you're dead on right about the
expense of the reference works. 65 different books and counting later. And then
there are the ones in Languages I don't read (yet) but the Illustrations and
extra info not in the big S are required.
October 31, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
stamps vs literature
In the last 10 years or so, with the advent of eBay and other internet auction
houses, it has become possible to buy almost any stamp that you want, relatively
easily, if not cheaply.
However, to become knowledgeable about a specific stamp, issue or countries
issuance it is necessary to keep up with what has been published regarding the
same.
Depending on your collecting proclivities, this can amount to a substantial
investment in literature.
It is well worth it.
As can be seen by the multitudinous persons who used to ask on eBay stamp chat
board, how much their collection was worth.
They either listed auctions at a price far in excess of the going price and got
no return or at a base price which really surprised them but which could
probably have doubled, if they knew what they were doing.
At the moment, my literature collection may be worth more than my stamp
collection.
October 31, 2003 Jim Lawler <jlawler
at comteck dot com>
Greetings,
IF there is someone in England who could get some covers from the new strike
mail services I'd love to hear from you.
Jim L.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Jim, sorry, just reread the new Ebay/APS regulations, either a whack on the face
or behind is acceptable, the idiots that voted to mark classical forgeries
should be whacked on the behind instead of the stamps.
David B.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Jim, I noticed that your Mayotte forgeries realised almost $ 44,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3488&item=2959429890
Much more than genuine would have realised.
That was without the black blot on the bum, I wonder how much they would have
got if you had created philatelic sacrilege and whacked them on the behind,
David B.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Mallay Tigers are Beautiful stamps
Now to figure out which ones meet my needs (1906 or before) looks like almost
like the wash-Frank series in same stamps different papers years . Oh Fun
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Promo, I will print out the scan and see if it of any use to him. Will let you
know later this week. If not, list it on Ebay, it should realise about $ 3-5.
David B.
October 31, 2003 Prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
David B
Send me your address and I'll send you the Chinese , I don't do BOB,
October 31, 2003 David Benson
promo, Wankies is harder to find than the major cities but not one of the rarer
cancels. The China is nice, I have a friend who is plating them to the original
layout and collects them on cover and with different cancels. Huge study as
there are so many variants.
David B.
October 31, 2003 Promethues
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
also for anyone interested
the last image on the last page is my 29 feb 1892 now to find a 1888
October 31, 2003 prometheus
David B
actually its Wankies on page 4 , the danzig is from a complete set they all look
alike in printing of OVPT
Did you see the Giant chinese express stamp.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
promo, which wanker was that,
David B.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
promo, no reason to doubt it, it has very little value unlike the 2m. that
Matthias linked to.
David B.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
David B + Matthias
Do you think the Danzig Overprint on page one of my site is REAL. ??
Page 1 number 1
I also liked MY Wankers cancel.
October 31, 2003 Chris
Machin pages
John Gordon Bill Steiner publishes Machin pages that
you might take a look at. What level of Machins do you want to play at?
If it is the 8000+ counting gum and tagging differences, stock pages may be the
only way to go.
Chris - plays at the Scott catalog baby level
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Matthias, of course there are exceptions, but virtually all of the German
material I have seen, especially German States that have been listed on the US
site by sellers from Germany have been faulty or badly cut into.
David B.
October 31, 2003 Matthias Bock
David Benson: Not neccessarily, there are a few Germans selling german
material on the US site. I have bought from some of them and was quite happy.
One of them told me there is material that goes for better prices overseas.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Matthias, any seller from Germany selling German material on the US site has to
be suspect. If it was any good it would realise better prices on the German
site,
David Benson
October 31, 2003 14:58 Bjorn Munch
Sale
Knud-Erik,
Sorry to hear that you have to slow down, doctor's orders? Should you be up this
late? :-)
Anyway, I'll buy some, email is coming.
October 31, 2003 Matthias Bock
David Benson: Items have been reported. A previous collection of like
"laughable" forgeries sold as a "complete Danzig inflation period collection" by
the same guy in January this year went for more than $500... *sigh*
October 31, 2003 14.43 Knud-Erik Andersen
Sale
Dear friends,
I don' know if advertizing like this is allowed on this page but if it's not
please remove it! :O)
As I have decided to slow down my activitees due to my health; I will be closing
down my private sales list.
During the next 14 days, I'm offering you to buy what you want to half the price
on the list (yes ½ price!) but i will prefer you mail me a list with the item
number, which you want (instead of using the "ad to card" buttom). Payment can
be done by Paypal or cash. Should you only want to use CCNow - lets talk about
it then.
I will be very happy if you buy a lot, as it will help me to clean up the pages.
:O)
Look here.
K.E.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Matthias, that Danzig is laughable, how could anyone fall for that,
Any bad item he has listed on Ebay.com should be forwarded to Safeharbor
complaints as it can be handled by the SWC and presumably they will realise that
they are forgeries. Any items listed on Ebay.Germany are beyond their
jurisdiction.
The link to complain to Safeharbor is at the base of this page
http://pages.ebay.com/help/index_popup.html?policies=selling-stamps.html
press REPORT and list all the problem items,
David Benson
October 31, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
John
If Scott pages are based on Scott catalog, forget it.
Even Royal Mail album pages suck for machins.
I don't know how Gibbons album handles them.
You might want to email John and Tina Carlson at
Jet Stamps to ask for
advice.
October 31, 2003 Matthias Bock
Forgery alert...
I am sorry this posting is becoming a bit long...
This guy, formerly known as "fricki77", "kopeke99" (these two accounts have
been NARU'd by Ebay) and "geo1122" has a long history of offering fakes of
almost all areas, but with a strong emphasis on Germany and related areas.
(Historical excourse: In 1999, he sold 1980s Berlin stamps with fake postmarks,
while buying the same stamps in MNH at the same time! I have archived an auction
by him showing a Danzig issue with postmarks straight out of the printer - he
used a sample that was printed in the german stamps catalogue as a model,
including all minor errors of the print in the book!)
This
is an example of the stuff he sells. If you look at his feedback, you can also
see he has a long record of unhappy customers. Note that german Ebay is
unwilling to shut him down for good.
Note that he also seems to sell good material now and then, but each and every
expensive overprint issue or anything else well-known as being heavily forged
should be watched very carefully before bidding.
I think this would be one of the people the APS (or whoever will try to improve
things) have to put out of business.
October 31, 2003 1415 Clark Frazier
WinZip
Christo van Zyl,
Try using WinZip or gz if on Unix.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Jim W-S: Thanks, the mail is busy going through. I am disapointed at the large
file size - about 2 megs. I can't believe it is the images - must be something
in the way Word has been set up? Any suggestions on getting the doc file size
down?
October 31, 2003 2.03 p.m. John Gordon <johnr@castlemoyle.com>
http://www.marianstamps.com
As-Is followup
Here's an interesting followup story to the
as is beanie
babies link on ebay posted here yesterday. (The story is the last on the
page.)
Machin Pages
I'm looking for album pages to mount my Machins. I'm tired of using stock pages.
Anyone have any suggestions? Are the Scott Machin pages complete enough? Thanks
John
October 31, 2003 1340 Clark Frazier
Not Line Pair
New acquisition
October 31, 2003 Brian
D2
I have NO idea, I was just baiting you. I can't effectivly figure out my own
W/F's, no way, I'm going to weigh in on the Grinnells.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Brian, presume it was listed on Ebay.Com, what would be the outcome (remember 24
hour deadline),
David B.
October 31, 2003 Brian R
David B
Nah, the seller would just run it on Ebay.au where nobody cares. ;o)
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Bill, but the question should be " If a Grinnell was listed on Ebay " would it
be allowed, stated that a cert. was required (if so, which ones) or slapped on
the bum with a big indelible FAKE. ? "
David B.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
Gambling
BRIAN R; OK, so maybe what I should have said was; poker is not always gambling
when played in the organized situation that I do! Is that more believable?
Seriously, if you were to accuse a professional poker player of being a gambler,
they would laugh at you.
PS The Grinnels MIGHT be real!
October 31, 2003 Chris
That ain't no 5 gallon bucket
I have a batch of 5 gallon buckets out in the garage.
That one isn't tall enough. I bet it is a 2.5 gallon bucket,
or that is one big kitty cat.
Chris - still typing with my thumb
October 31, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Christo
I'd be happy to do it.
Sorry for slow reply but finally managed to get out of my old office before they
started tearing down the wall. 22 years accumulation of maps, books and reprints
takes some moving!!
October 31, 2003 11.52 am Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps
SCW actions
NOIP
First Halloween “trick or treat” visitor half an hour ago accompanied by
parent. My wife gave a small packet of stamps I had prepared with “Collect
stamps – it’s fun!” on the front. I hope for not more than another 4 as that’s
all the packets I have prepared.
Randy Shoemaker
Strength to your efforts, and thank you so much for coming here to tell us
how things are progressing. Too often things may be happening but no one tells
us!
Colin
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Christo, there are hundreds of variants of the franks and some are handstamped
and some are printed. Some of the rarer ones are collected as cut outs as they
are so scarce but commoner ones are usually collected as full envelopes. The
franks of Victoria and Tasmania were used by many different departments and
some, especially the Tasmanian are scarce and are collected as cut outs
especially by Topical collectors,
David B.
October 31, 2003 Matthias Bock
Brian: Without the bucket, he says, but what about the cat...? ;-)
October 31, 2003 Brian R
I love it
The stamp marketing award of the day is given to
this seller. For uncovering a new way to promote kiloware. LOL
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David Benson: Thank you. I was expecting that for the cut-out. What caught me
was that the print said postmaster frank.
Pro: Yor 35 lb box sounds like my kind of stuff too! I can sit for hours just
relentlessly going through these lots of bulk material others figure are to much
work. I have time to spare (only for stamps that is), I get the lots for cheap,
and I find excellent items in these! But sometimes also big sighs when you get
these treasures, but they are really dinged! I bought the Lincoln album today
(R1000 or ~ $145), and it looks to be really be a good buy. Some good cancels,
some classic material from a lot of countries etc. I would like to preserve the
album and pass it on at a later stage, but I don't know the amount of effort it
will take to get the stamps out without damaging the pages. The previous owner
used stamp sheet margins as hinges!!
October 31, 2003 Brian R
things I can relate to
When I was packing up to go to college,
My mama alerted me to three important facts of life.
1) All card games are gambling.2) Alcohol will lead you to trouble.
3) Women who smoke are invariablely promiscuous.
You guessed it. I spend the bulk of my time at drunken poker games, handing
out cigarettes (with a smile), to any girl who wanted one.
Poker ain't gambling....what next, the Grinnels are real?
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Christo, the Victoria 2s.6 is nice and clean and shows the cds. part of a
duplex. It is a late use of the 1st. duplex. The cut out is almost worthless
(sorry) as they are only collected in Australia on full envelopes.
David B.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Guess I should add Downunders are featured.
BILL W - Thanks for the response
So it seems that just as I am ready to Join the Bay community and unload all my
unwanted/unneeded material if I ain't a professional I should not even worry
about it.
October 31, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
Things from an Album I bought
I am gutting an album today also( 4 stamps for me) the rest for my pile
The Stamps have Overprints , cancels and perfins, a couple of Cinderellas they
can be seen on the pages of my site linked above look till monday when all new
views will appear.
And all the Overprints are just one of sets so if anyone thinks badd whole sets
are.
This Album was not played with since 1952 according to previous owner.
Roger H on page 5 I have two swiss which one for my book?
Comments or requests for Views of what might be in Album are readily accepted.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
Gambling
PROMO; One last thought as I go out the door......poker is NOT considered to be
"gambling" when it's played in the organized fashion that I do. It may be
gambling when 6-8 neighbors get together on Friday night and they play 15
different kinds of games, with "wild" cards, etc. Casino poker is usually only 3
games; Hold-em (what I play), 7-card stud and Omaha. Professional poker players
(of which I am not a member of THAT club!) do not consider poker gambling. They
make a good living at it just like anybody who learns a skill, whether they be
an attorney, steel-worker or stamp dealer, and they do not gamble. Got to run.
October 31, 2003 10:05 Ken Srail
482A's
Bill, you don't even need a description like yours. In fact, you should
describe it as:
GUARANTEED NOT TO CONTAIN ANY 482A's! (if you find one, please return the
lot intact for a full refund).
You'd probably get the exact same bid, maybe even a little more for "style
points"...
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Now here is a nice cancel. Maybe some of the Australian crowd (David B, Greg I
or Marius) can help with this
Colac (Victoria)
cancel. I have also found this
Postmaster Frank
(Victoria) stamp with Melbourne cancel. Any ideas on these? i found these in
an old collection i a Lincoln Album I have bought today.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
#482A Lot
PROMO; I need to run, but you make a good point. If all 297 are really only
#482s, then the lot catalogs $147.00 and to buy it at $45. or so would be no big
deal.....BUT what if it ends up selling for, say, $300., and that price was
arrived at by bidders because of his puffed-up descriptions? I don't have a
problem with the gambling aspect of the listing, only the possible misleading
descriptions of the seller. Why didn't he just say this; "Here are 297 copies of
the 2c 1814 Imperf stamp with Schermack perforations. Scott value $147.00, but
who knows - could there be a #482A lurking in the lot?" Or some such less
misleading description.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Bill W
thw 482a question - are the 297 shermacks worth the 40 bucks , Did you consider
that a lot of the Hits were just from the lurkers that have seen that link
posted on at least 9 boards I know of.
Have you no Hope in miracles, Can not lightning strike sometimes?
I (what do I know) find his marketing fairly astute , with 1000's of items
listed he needs to get views -views = bidders.
You play poker what is wrong with a little Internet gambling
in the form of taking him at his word that they are unsearched?
Or is your view only a complete dummy would even attempt to sell those without
checking. ??
October 31, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Experts and ebay
Bill: Exactly the problem. On the one hand, there would be a clear problem with
ebay refusing to recognize PF, for example. But, if Greg Stolow wanted ebay to
recognize his photo "certificates," he probably would have no luck since the
marketplace in general treats his certs or guarantees as a joke. The problem is
where the line is inbetween (which is why anti-trust attorneys command upwards
of $350-$500 per hour, LOL). This would be a huge headache for ebay. For
example, it could institute what appears on the surface to be a reasonable rule:
a seller cannot certify his own material. But, then what about Chris Ceremuga?
He is one of the primary sources for quality and rare Western Ukrain, Skalat,
Polish Expeditionary Forces, etc., and he is the recognized expert for this
material. Most people who want this material contact Ceremuga first, and are
more than willing to also have his expert opinion on the material. Nobody that I
know of claims that Ceremuga takes advantage of his specialized expertize to
manipulate the market and engage in a conflict of interest. However, Stolow
expertizing his own material, big joke.
October 31, 2003 Matt Liebson
Alison: as an antitrust lawyer, I would relish the opportunity to defend a case
alleging that eBay had monopoly power in any aspect of the philatelic
marketplace. A lot depends on market definition but I don't think any sort of
antitrust claim is going to fly using eBay as the defendant and stamps as the
marketplace.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
Experts
ALISON; OK, I understand the difference, but why would eBay be subject to being
forced to use expertizing groups or individuals that the rest of the world's (or
country) marketplace won't recognize? If eBay can show, for example, that only
one out of 10 (ficticious numbers here) public auction firms will accept the
opinion of expert X, why then should eBay have to accept the opinion of expert
X? Or wouldn't they?
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
#482A x 297 copies
I am particularly annoyed that this listing (eBay #2960815058) still has not
been removed. I filed the complaint night before last. I now understand that
these things take time, but this is an especially fraudulent listing and
description for several reasons.
First, the buyer states that if genuine, there could be over $1,000,000. worth
of stamps in his lot. That's bad enough, but then he says that you have a good
chance of finding ONE #482A and threrefore end up with a stamp worth
$25,000/$50,000. (because that's what they sell for). Mathematically, since
there were many millions of the 2c imperf stamp of this period produced and to
date, only (I believe) 35 copies have been certified, the actual correct odds
are more like a million to one, not 297/1 as he implies. This kind of
description is both irresponsible as well as fraudulent.
So far over 740 hits have occured for the listing and the bidding is now at
around $40. so he obviously hasn't convinced manby folks yet, but the listing
should be removed.
October 31, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Anti-trust lawsuits and auctions firms
Bill Weiss: The difference is not between ebay and private auctions firms, but a
marketplace like ebay that is so huge and worldwide versus an auction firm that
has a smaller market share. To me, it would present a clear problem if the
world's largest marketplace for collectibles (ebay) starting playing favorites
with expertization firms -- but this is because ebay is so big, and playing
favorites then shuts out certain expertizers out of the world's largest
marketplace.
October 31, 2003 Bill Weiss
Expert Committees
Scott Trepel makes a most interesting discussion as it relates to auction houses
deciding which expert committees to recognize and the anti-trust ramifications
thereof. He maintains that his particular choice is based on his peception of
what the marketplace wants. I have no reason to doubt his sincerity and accept
his observation, but what would happen if the auction firm only honors the
opinion of, let's say, one US expert committee and when asked why, responds with
a fuzzy answer or no answer or a questionable answer? I am wondering if then a
competing expert committee would have a legitimate (legal) complaint? ALISON
implies that the anti-trust rules would be different for a private auction firm
versus eBay. Is that correct Alison?
October 31, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Other Countries and Addie's artwork
Brian R: You are quite correct that even if the US Attorney does not care about
Addie's artwork, other countries might feel differently and force ebay to do
something. This is how the Country of France strongarmed Yahoo into changing
their policies and not permitting the sale of Nazi memorabilia on Yahoo
auctions.
October 31, 2003 Dave P
The postal situation in the UK gets progressively worse. As from midday today
all postboxes throughout most of Greater London are being sealed. Although I am
in a theoretically unaffected area, because of the centralisation of sorting I
am currently receiving about 5% of my normal mail. Wonder if there will be any
interesting postal markings when they come to clear the backlog?
Chris OUCH!!!
October 31, 2003 Chris
Dammit
Last night the ice storm that Alison was out in claimed me as a victim.
I fell down my front steps and tried to put my hand through the railing.
This did not work, and I ended up with my right ring finger bent at an angle
not seen in nature. The ER staff was very nice (the triage guy took one look at
it
and had me iced and ibuprofened in about 30 seconds) and I got x-rayed, set and
splinted in about an hour. I am now typing with one hand and my thumb.
Pain isn't bad, but this is annoying. The ER had a lot of fall type accidents.
The lady with the broken tailbone was a lot less happy than I was.
Chris - after I got back from the ER i spent a while working on stamps to calm
down
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Jim W
Thanks for the reply- just asking my normal inane questions.
Do you consider all mail on a first flight Philatelic?
Or just First /First
for example with more than one Zepp in service could not a regular piece of mail
be used on a first flight of the Hindenburg that has all the fancy marks ,but by
then the service was regular use and items sent on the First Hindenburg flight
Might just be normal mail?
October 31, 2003 07:14 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Prometheus,
I would agree that today's registered airmail cover is obviously philatelic. It
is also a domestic usage entirely within Switzerland. I have not made much of a
deal of trying to sort out the philatelic-non-philatelic usages. More often than
not it is obvious as in all the first flights, complete sets of stamps, etc. I
think that with a few exceptions, the covers did some sort of postal duty and
were generally handled in accord with postal procedures. The recent Wilkins
cover was an exception.
October 31, 2003 Scott Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
Anti-Trust
Alison is 100% correct. I love anti-trust law (it's a hobby).
There are two issues, and they could be applied to ANY auction firm, including
my own.
The first is:
Is there an effort by one or more of the dominant market players to set the
rules to favor one expertizing service over others, or to undermine one or more
expertizers, thus reducing competition in the marketplace for expertizing
services and/or creating a more favorable enviironment for the dominant market
player?
The second issue is:
What are the damages and to whom should they be awarded (the expertizers, the
consumers, or both?)
These anti-trust considerations must be balanced against another issue: How can
the auction firm establish the final arbitrator when there is a dispute over
opinions between two auction firms? And how can that be done without creating
the appearance of anti-trust activity?
For example, if we sell a stamp as Mint Never Hinged "on extension" subject to
certification, and the P.F. says "Genuine, Previously Hinged", but PSE says
"Genuine Never Hinged", which opinion takes precedence? How do we establish
policy without appearing to favor one over the other?
This is the stuff of litigators' dreams. Frankly, I don't worry too much about
it becuase it would be extremely difficult to assess damages and there are many
obstacles to proving anti-trust activity. We are basically following the
market's command, and the market tells us to use the P.F. as the final word.
I would love for the ASDA to hire legal consultants to evaluate this issue and
recommend a policy that is fair and addresses the anti-trust issues. Maybe Ebay
could pay the legal bill?
October 31, 2003 Scott Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
Shoemaker Hypothesis
Randy asked what I do when presented with a group of uncertified questionable
items. It's easy.
The Scott U.S. Specialized Catalogue, p. 5, states (in bold):
"Values for early and VALUABLE (my emphasis) stamps are for examples with
certificates of authenticity from acknowledged expert committees, or examples
sold with the buyer having the right of certification."
Also, p. 51, after Scott 318:
"All examples of Scott 316-318 must be accompanied by certificates of
authenticity issued by recognized expertizing committees."
There are other similar cautionary statements.
Therefore, I always have the Scott Catalogue to justify pre-sale certification.
There are other postings to respond to, so I'll be back.
October 31, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
Christo
Don't worry about it I have 35 pounds of stamps and most of my day is spent
taking care of my three year old so I have lots of time to look at stamps.
Besides it gives me something to do and I'm finding
more interesting stuff in this box.
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Jim W - Todays card
Your page says Domestic Use but would not you consider That a cover made up JUST
for stamp collector types.??
October 31, 2003 prometheus
Happy Reformation Day
Why Isn't The Discussion of fakes and Forgeries being held on the Ebay Board??????
Would this material/postings last anytime in it's own thread on the collectible
board??
I find it Odd that Real discussions about what most of us consider a serious
matter are taking place Not on their provided venue.
" eBay encourages open communication between members of the eBay community. We
provide this discussion board for collectors, experts and friends to chat with
each other. We invite and encourage all members of the eBay community to use
this discussion board. This board is not connected in any way with the company,
and any messages are solely the opinion and responsibility of the person posting
the message. "
Found some nice stamps to lick and stick today. Packages are much nicer looking
with old stamps on them.
Yes Reformation Day I am a Martin Luther Fan
October 31, 2003 03:48 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a registered airmail cover flown within
Switzerland
in 1926. The cover franking includes a téte béche William Tell block. Take a
look!
Happy Halloween!
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Christo, good example, a fiscally used Northern Rhodesia 20s. KGV is a good
spacefiller and is available at a heavily discounted price., The 20s. is
currently cat. in Gibbons at 170 Pounds and a nice postally used example should
realise about $75-$90. Fiscally used would only be about 1/4 of that. It is only
when the catalogue value of a postal cancel is mentioned should there be any
change to description.
David B.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Sorry, I mucked up the link. Here is the
fiscal cancel
now.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David B, David P, Marius: Re the discussion of fiscal cancels on postage stamps.
I would agree to a seller stating that there is a fiscal cancel on the stamp. I
don't know if I agree on the $1 value for them though. Sellers shouldn't deceive
through their descriptions. But if the buyers are aware that these are fiscally
marked, then it is an open market place hich decides on the value to be put on
it.
Myself am currently selling a lot of Northern Rhodesia KG V with a 20/- stamp
with a .jpg>fiscal
cancel. Postally used example cats at $200, and SG would even be higher. I
think that a lot of collectors are unable to fork out that amount of money - I
would think that if such a person is looking for a good copy of an expensive
stamp, that is a good alternative.
October 31, 2003 David Benson
Dave P., it is not only GB Postal Fiscals but any Postal Fiscals that have been
fiscally used. In some cases, when catalogue value has been quoted, they should
be treated the same way. Inform the seller that the item is incorrectly
described, either change or zap. In some case it is the buyers ignorance but
that is no excuse as the wording of the description doesn't mention fiscally
used. I know that this may beyond Ebay and the APS Watch Committee capacity but
if ever GB decides to copy the US system it will be of major importance.
David B.
October 31, 2003 Dave P
David B I totally agree with you about the HV's with revenue cancels. On
the same theme there are the UK Postal Fiscals. Because they are listed in
Gibbons they are regularly listed on Ebay, quoting cat number and often value.
95% (or more) of those listed have fiscal cancels and as you know are worth a
tiny fraction of the postally used. Don't know whether it ignorance or a
deliberate attempt to deceive by the sellers, but some at least sell for stupid
prices.
October 31, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the Day 3
Thanks to all for the discussion re the cancels.
Jim W-S: I forgot to upload the pic. Here is the link for the
French MB's again
- let me know if it doesn't work. If it is OK by yoy, I would like to send you a
copy of what I have compiled to date in a document. Would you be willing to just
quickly review and comment on it with respect to the content, style etc. Any
suggestions on how to make it better will be appreciated.
Promo: That is very kind of you! Could you please let me know what I should look
for for you? I know mini covers are one aspect. Could you maybe just describe
what type of slogans, fancy cancels you are looking for?
Here are the Cancels
of the Day 3. They are all on Denmark stamps. A few are not so clear,
especially as the stamps are too small to host a complete CDS.
The following cancels are present:
Svendborg (9/11/1953), Kobnhavn (17/7/1951), Fredericia (28/8/1956), Kobnhavn
(20/9/1942), Grena (3/10/1969), Faborg? (11/2/??) and Kolding/Koelding??
(20/8/1897).
There is a variety of cancellers present. I know the single ring and the double
ringe CDS. What are the ones with the split centers and vertical bars called?
Then I would also like to know what the numbers/letters at the bottom of the
CDS's mean. There is a large 1, some have * * *, and others have OMK
Regards
October 30, 2003 David B.
Brian, what I can't realise is that with the new regulations coming into force
this week and the forms that the seller has to agree to before an item is
listed, is why Addies modern manufactured muck is allowed to continue to be sold
albeit with an indelible mark on the reverse. I would have presumed that the APS
have read the listings when he tried to sell his business that he admitted that
he had the handstamps and the equipment for the manufacture of the prints. That
should have been enough evidence to show that the material was being made by
himself which should have been good enough reason to disallow the sales.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Brian R
last post
I'm off too bed now, but I've got a question of Alison. Say someones forging
stamps of some another country, and that country wakes up suddenly to whats
happening. Isn't ebay in serious jeopardy of being sued as a co-conspirator for
allowing it (especially because they've been repeatedly notified)?
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Marius, thanks, but there are hundreds of examples. There is a problem with
Scott's notation about fiscally used and that also should be remedied.
Brian, There have been many emails sent to various PO's regarding Addies
replicas but they have all been ignored.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Brian R
Addies quap
I think the best thing to combat his sludge, is a letter from an issuing country
he's defrauding, to ebay. Didn't Canada have a problem when they saw examples of
his "art"?
October 30, 2003 Marius
Fiscals
HERE is a perfect example of what David is talking about. Quoting postally
used price and suppling a fiscally cancelled stamp. The 10s is fiscal and the 5s
looks cleaned or at least a very light cancel.
Total real value $1 each.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Chris, mainly because the value of postage stamps with fiscal cancels are not
considered postally used and their value is very much lower than postally used.
Some sellers quote postally used prices when the stamps have obvious fiscal
cancels. Some fiscal and telegraphic cancels are more difficult to determine and
these are usually only worth a small fraction of genuinely postally used. If a
catalogue value is shown then the listing should be changed or terminated. It is
common practice for some sellers to list Hi face Value KEVII & KGV with obvious
fiscal cancels and catalogue value noted. The sellers know about it because I am
many others have informed them on numerous occasions yet continue listing them.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Chris
Question About High Value Commonwealth
D2 You mention high values with fiscal cancels as a problem area.
What do you recommend eBay do, not allow them to be sold, or have fiscal
cancel prominently in the description?
Chris - not bothered by fiscal cancels, if the stamps are cheap
October 30, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Counterfeit stamps
David: I have read the article now. Are you interested in how this applies to
Addie, and if this makes his actions criminal? The problem is that US Supreme
Court case I posted about on the other board about a year ago. In that case, the
Court held that the US Congress did not intend to criminalize the making of fake
foreign stamps for sale to collectors. Any US Attorney's office in deciding
whether to charge someone like Addie, is going to read that case and take a step
back. Of course that is an old case, and the law has since been amended and
strengthened. If there is any interest, I will look for that old case again and
post it tomorrow.
October 30, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Anti-trust lawsuits
Bill: The problem is that ebay is not just another "auction house." From a legal
standpoint, there is a huge, huge difference. The problem is that ebay is the
largest marketplace in the world, and only ebay, not other auction houses,
would/ should have anti-trust concerns. If an expertizer's opinions were barred
from the biggest marketplace in the world, arbitrarily or capriciously, then
there is going to be a problem.
By the way, some people wonder why I keep coming up with this stuff. It is the
litigator's mindset, always looking at the downside, always looking for a way to
muck things up with a litigation theory. This is what my clients hire me to do
(at least the civil ones, the criminal ones hire me to find ways to muck things
up with novel constitutional and procedural theories). Anyway, this is all just
hypotethical for me. I have no actual interest in starting any of this
litigation, I just see it as a possibility (and therefore, so would ebay
lawyers).
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Alison, it is 3/4 down on this page,
http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/money_illustrations.shtml
David B.
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
"Approved Experyizers"
ALISON; My last post of the night, but I beg to disagree with your statement
that non-approved expertizers would have a good anti-trust case. Virtually EVERY
public auction firm that I am aware of has a limited group of expertizing bodies
they will recognize. Some (quite a few) US auction firms will only recognize ONE
expert committee on US stamp extensions. I have never heard of a competing
committee sueing an auction firm because that auction firm won't accept their
opinions. Now if you seriously feel that a non-approved expertizing group (or
individual) CAN sue an auction firm, or eBay, I sure would like to hear how that
works from your perspective as an attorney. Goodnight.
October 30, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Various
David B: No, I cannot find the link. What is the URL?
Bill Weiss: In effect, ebay already has that policy, they just do not enforce
it. They require sellers to guarantee the genuineness of what they sell and do
not allow sellers to sell As IS as to whether genuine or not. As least, this is
Dan Neary's interpretation of its rules. Problem is, ebay does not enforce this.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy, thanks, you sound like a very concsientious philatelist who is happy to
help clean the mess, no matter how much work and time it takes, keep up the good
work. I wish you good luck,
David Benson
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
ALISON; Glad to see that you also have a real life other than lurking on this
board! Thanks for your input. Randy asked the question of Scott Trepel earlier
as to how he would handle such stamps in a public auction format. Scott
apparently hasn't visited here lately, but I am pretty sure he would answer just
as I would - since I also run public auctions. We would advise the owner that
these stamps can not be sold without accompanying expert certificates, or, at
the very least, that without certificates, the prices realized will be so
disportionately low compared to selling with certificates, that they stand to
lose a great deal of money. That being said, we have had many sellers still
insist we run them and let the buyers pay for the certification. Now if eBay had
the same sort of policies that honest public auction firms have, namely Terms of
Sale which specifically allow buyers to have ANYTHING expertized that they want.
No questions asked. You want to get it expertized, be my guest. Further, if the
item comes back OTHER THAN AS DESCRIBED, we will refund not only the purchase
price, but the costs of expertization as well. eBay could, in my opinion, if
they wanted to generate confidence and goodwill in the marketplace (philatelic),
establish such mandatory buyer protection policies. This then would force all
sellers to agree to and adhere to, these buyer protection policies. Then, if a
seller wants to waste his time (and money) by listing trimmed #315s, fake coils,
etc., well hell, let him, because he's going to end up spending more on costs of
expertization then he's ever going to sell.
Such a buyer protection policy would, in my opinion, cover virtually EVERY
single stamp lot sold on eBay. End of problems with those lots. Group lots and
collections are a tougher nut to crack, but give me time, I'll figure it out
(just kidding!).
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
Legality
Boy, now that's one to ponder. The legality of being legal. The world is DOOMED.
Happy Halloween :-)
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
David Benson
David -
No. But I would probably volunteer anyway.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Alison, did you see Jim.G's link to the US Treasury site about counterfeits,
David B.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Jim,
most probably because someone at Safeharbor.UK knows something about philately
unike Ebay.com.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Actually David B,
The eBay.uk site seems to be more on the ball at cancelling outrageous
auctions than most of the other sites.
I could well be wrong.
I can only view the eBay.com site within a restricted time-span ( determined by
which computer I'm on).
October 30, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Legality of requiring certificates for certain
types of stamps
BillWeiss: Looks like I missed all the fun while out in the ice storm getting
together Eddie's Superman costume for tomorrow. I do not see any problems, per
se, with ebay banning the sale of a particular stamp without a valid
certificate. The problem is going to be enforcement: What happens when one is
buried in a large lot or estate sale? Would seller's of intact collections have
to pull out such items from the stamp albums first? What constitutes a "valid"
certificate? Only designated expertizers? I guarantee that this could spawn an
anti-trust lawsuit against ebay by expertizers not on the list of "approved"
expertizers. What about an old certificate? How old is too old? Etc. etc.
Example: Most collectors of post WWI overprint issues think that Western Ukraine
issues (except for the cheap People' Republic set) should not be bought or sold
without a certificate. My informal survey over the last couple of years is that
more than 50% of Western Ukraine on ebay is fake. But, who would enforce a rule?
APS? APS does not have the expertize, even the Scott catalogue cannot get the
Western Ukraine right. Chris Ceremuga is the only one that most of us trust to
expertize Western Ukraine. But, he also sells alot of Western Ukraine. Is this a
conflict of interest? Based on some of the discussions yesterday and the day
before, some would say yes. I personally say no because I trust him. But,
anyway, the magnitude of all the details and the sub problems that can evolve
are depressing.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy, another personal quetion when you reappear,
did you know what the workload and the time constraints would be when you
volunteered ?.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
Ma' Bell
Is eBay just a phone booth and you hear the tinkle of coins when you complete a
call? Deep breathing or obscene call or what ever?
Scary thought.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Jim, another problem with those is that most of them are listed on Ebay.UK where
the WSC has no jurisdiction,
David B.
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
PSSS-
Bill W.-
I am enjoying the opportunity to get involved with this community. Hope I can
help to shed some light on the SCW voodoo.
AS for all the recurrent problem offerings...What can we do? I'm not sure
LEGALLY. Gotta' do something though!
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
A&S, I think you misunderstood the intent of my comments. Clearly, in the
best of all worlds, every one of these problematic issues should be accompanied
by a cert. But in practical terms, many people will resist a $25 cost to list a
$100 stamp like a 352. But that's kind of irrelevant for my point - I'm looking
at it from eBay's point of view, and how the various options fit into their
existing scheme.
Saying "this is allowed" or "this is not allowed" is (theoretically) easy for
eBay to handle, as they don't have to put a lot of thought or effort into how
SafeHarbor handles complaints. But "this is allowed, only of you do certain
things" is much more problematic. If the rules say "disclaimer must be
prominently displayed", how does SafeHarbor quantify "prominently"? What if they
put it at the very top of their listing, but in really small text? What happens
when APS decides to revise the disclaimer, but sellers have copies of older
versions? Where do sellers go to get the disclaimer for a particular issue? How
do sellers even know that they have to use the disclaimer? Can a seller
prominently link to a disclaimer, and is that good enough? If so, what anchor
text is he required to use? And what do they do if they get a complaint that
someone is listing a 315 without a disclaimer, only the seller doesn't actually
say "315" anywhere in the listing, forcing eBay to have to recognize a 315?
Even if the condition is "must have a cert", who do they accept as legitimate
expertizers? How recent must the cert be? Are cert copies allowed?
And so on. "All or nothing" fits in relatively well to a "just a venue"
enterprise like eBay. But "only if" is not as easy to handle, and eBay may very
well not want to handle the headaches that come with it. And if they don't, I'm
not sure I blame them, seeing as how they're not stamp people.
Jim
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Yes David, that was exactly what I meant.
Clark
Due to time constraints, I must admit to being guilty to not scaning reverse of
a stamp.
However, if someone requests a view of the reverse I will provide it.
It takes maybe 3 minutes more to upload same image to auction as an "add to
description".
However, someone like a certain Dutch powerseller who wont even respond to
emails is not going to change their ways.
His scans are usually good, however, and so big you have to diligently go
searching for the stamp amidst the black background.
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
Clark Frazier
You ARE THE MAN!!!!!!
-Randy Shoemaker
Adios...till tomorrow
October 30, 2003 1800 Clark Frazier
315, used single
My favorite topic. The real problem is that the Scott catalog lists a value for
used singles off cover. They should not. Perhaps Siegel could do a census. It
would be short. Meanwhile, I need to add another stock page to hold all of the
wannabes.
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
Parting Shots
Let me leave you with something to ponder...
Say I'm Scott Trepel (sorry Scott...this is just hypothetical...sort of) and I
have a consignor come to me with a nice 482A sans certificate. Along with this
482A, he consigns a 356 pair, 388 pair, 491 pair and a 544 used single. None of
them have certs and with my level of expertise I am somewhat less than
enthusiastic about their genuiness. The consignor is expecting to get
advertising and each lot photographed in color in my next US sale. Sound
familiar? What do I tell the consignor about whether I will abide by his wishes
and spend my valuable time and put my good name behind his consigment? (Scott -
you might even chime in hear).
Let me know what you all would say to him. What would happen to my good name and
the auction companies name if I let these items be listed in my catalog? What
would happen to my reputation?
Till later!
PS- I have 140 emails from SCW in my inbox just from yesterday and today. I have
to look at them...open the lots on eBay...consider them...type a response to the
lister on SCW. Then he has to put it together to send to the APS. 140 of
them...how long will that take?
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Jim, I presume you mean GB Officials and not BC officials.
I would also like to see Hi Value British Commonwealth stamps with fiscal
cancels also included in the list of problem items.
David B.
October 30, 2003 1756 Clark Frazier
Due Diligence
Jim Griffith,
We really are discussing due diligence on the part of the seller. A proper
listing of any confusing variety should include a large enough color corrected
scan, sufficient to show the shade, type, relief or other pertinent details of
the stamp for all to see. If the stamp has a grill, the back should be scanned
and if it has a certificate a readable scan should also be provided. The listing
should describe all of the pertinent characteristics including, but not limited
to, the type or relief, the watermark, and any other identifying characteristics
as well as the certificate description and all defects. I realize that not all
sellers are capable of scanning (easily fixed) or describing (not easily fixed)
confusing varieties or detecting defects.
The real problem sellers are the ones who deliberately obfuscate their scans and
know what they are selling, but sell it anyway, hoping that the buyer doesn’t
find out. The market place may eventually fix part of the problem by creating
the expectation for better scans and descriptions. A number of helpful posts on
improving scans have appeared on StampChat and the eBay Chat Board over the last
few months. Perhaps, some need to be reposted. Optimized scans aren’t all that
large and will load quickly, even if the stamp is shown at 2x or 3x its actual
size. If you know a seller you trust who has scans that need improvement,
contact them with specific suggestions. Better scans from better sellers would
make it easier for buyers to make more appropriate choices when bidding.
Postal history buyers are probably more sophisticated than the average "space
filler" and have a better chance of detecting problems if the scan is
reasonable. It is may be sufficient for a seller to post a good scan and let the
item will sell itself assuming it is correctly categorized and has a title with
some key words in it. I wish confusing types and varieties were like that. In
many cases, I do not consider bidding because I can’t tell what is being
offered.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Jim,
It may be a problem but judging from the comments of a member of the SWC they
are causing the most time and time that can be saved is extremely important to
busy people. It may have teething problems but it would save a lot of work and
even Safeharbor should be able to handle the problem without it even going to
the SWC. Judging from the comments those particular stamps are creating the
major percentage of the workload and if they can be eliminated from the process
then more time can be spent on other items before the 24 hour deadline is
passed. Bill brought up the subject when he mentioned that the 24 hours had
passed and an item had been sold for $ 20.50. It may only be a trivial amount
but the seller has a pair of scissors (or possibly now can afford a guillotine)
and he will try to offload more to suckers.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Back from BBQ and then my computer crashed.
Jim G
I would like to see all UK and BC officials and specimens also presented with
certs or marked as fakes.
If not, whammo.
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
RANDY; Thank you so much for your positive responses. My main concern when
asking about the "minimum time" frame was simply to try to decide, for example,
when I have some free time, where I should be looking. Perhaps I'll start to
navigate the NEW listings first. Seems to me then, that anything I catch - or
anyone else here catches - will give eBay/APS plenty of time to work.
Regarding automatic items that are widely faked, it's a great idea - but is it
legal? I'm only asking. Maybe Alison can tell us - where is that girl? While I
know eBay can pretty much make their own rules, do they have the legal right to
automatically declare a seller's stamp as too suspect to offer? At least on a
stamp by stamp basis, eBay can always say that the system in place whereby two
SWC members must recommend the takedown, is fair. The other way hardly does seem
fair - automatic removal solely based on frequency of fakery!
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
I've got 9 minutes left!
Any more questions?
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy, thanks for your visit and hope to see you here in the future,
David Benson
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
To all-
Any more burning questions? My wife is giving me dirty looks :(
I've got to get off about 9:00PM EST.
But...it seems as though most of you are curious about the success and future of
SCW/eBay so I will try to attend your sessions every evening or so. I've got
bushels of REAL expertizing to do every day and my evenings must be somewhat
dedicated to my family. However, if you can save up your questions to when you
know I'm on the Stamp Chat board, I'll try to give you the straightest answer I
can.
Sooo...any more ideas or questions? I'm always up for ideas. Every questions has
meaning to more than just one person so hopefully we can answer even unasked
questions by some.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
David, "requiring a cert" was what Randy said. Much as I like it, I think
it's problematic. My idea was "require them to prominently include an APS-drafted
disclaimer in their listing". Something like "Instances of Scott #315 singles
should be viewed with suspicion, as they tend to be faked from Scott #304.
Buyers of such an issue should assume that they are buying a fake, unless the
issue is accompanied by a n expertized certificate attesting to the issue's
authenticity."
Jim
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy, thanks for your reply. I am sure all of the SWC are busy people and Ebay
and the APS should be grateful for all of your efforts. I hope that none of them
get frustrated by the amount of work. Becuase of the time restraints I presume
the best thing to do would be increase the number of volunteers as the workload
is not going to decrease.
I like Jim's idea about certain problem stamps being automatically cancelled
unless it is accompanied by a valid certificate. Sound like that will decrease
the workload at least for certain US items.
David Benson
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Randy, the biggest problem I see with it is that it sort of creates a
third class of eBay items - "allowed", "prohibited", and now "allowed if you do
something special". It requires eBay's SafeHarbor people to have to know a
little bit more than they know right now, and it also requires eBay to find some
way of making those disclaimers available to sellers (which probably takes some
thought). But the up side is that it creates a simple pass/fail situation for
all of those, as well as forcing the scammers to include a note that effectively
says "since this item doesn't have a cert, I'm scamming you".
Jim
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Brian, it was almost certainly to protect their subscription base. If the
most interesting articles are available through the web, without wading through
advertisements, where's the incentive to pay for the service that Linn's is
offering? What with philately on the decline in general, Linn's almost certainly
needed to protect its bottom line.
Jim
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
David & Jim
Jim G.-
Excellent idea...I will bring it up tomorrow with the powers at be.
David B.-
As I just mentioned a few minutes ago...our time is GRATISIMO! We all volunteer
because we want to see eBay flourish in the future and we all know what has to
be done. Hope it gets done!
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Brian R
Jim G
Now that I think about it, you're right. Most of the nicer stuff, I see
appearing, is postal history in nature.
Noip Does anybody know why, a little over a year ago, Linn's decided
to close off their archives to all but registered subscribers? It there some
sort of publishing value to articles over 6 months old? I used to see plenty of
links around the web to their site. I would think that kind of free publicity
would be valued, not discouraged.
October 30, 2003 17:27 Jim Watson
APS & eBay
Bill W.,
You have asked what is reasonable as a target for this sort of a process.
Let's start with the SafeHarbor step. I believe that eBay would consider
themselves quite successful if they could get the first step of dealing with a
complaint taken care of within 24 hours. It they achieved that level of response
it would, I believe, be as good or better than any sizable concern using the
internet. I know I hardly ever get an e-mail response from such people as HP,
MS, etc. in 24 hours. It often takes days to complete such a response.
Second, with time zones and other coordination issues, I would believe that the
SCW and APS process would be a remarkable achievement for it to be accomplished
in 24 hours.
Next, the seller has 24 hours to take action.
The final response to noncompliance is, I think, fairly rapid, a couple of hours
at most.
If I add all that up, 72 hours would be an admirable target. To do it any faster
would require much greater resources than any of the participants are prepared
to apply. eBay is not going to create a whole new SafeHarbor operation waiting
to pounce on stamp complaints so I think you're stuck with whatever process time
that takes. You can probably get the SCW and APS steps speeded up by having a
continuously running committee using instant messaging but that requires having
employees not volunteers. There will still be many patients which require time
for some research. The success of such an operation would be undercut if there
were many false negatives. Finally, we all believe that anyone should have a
chance to correct a mistake or offer further data. I doubt if you could expect
anything better than the 24 hours planned allowance for the offeror to respond.
Overall, I think a real-world expectation of much better than 72 hours is not in
the cards.
BTW, this is still just my ½¢
I'd be interested in anyone's observations concerning their experience with
such processes.
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Randy, have the APS put out a standard disclaimer for specific "problem
issues" (maybe tie it in with what Scott publishes after those issues in the
specialized catalog). Require anyone selling such a lot to prominently display
that disclaimer in the listing. Anyone who doesn't include the disclaimer gets
their listing whacked. It wouldn't even need to reach APS in that case - if
SafeHarbor sees "315" in the title but no disclaimer, it gets whacked.
Jim
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy, sorry to ask a personal question,
are the members of the SWC being paid for their time or is it all voluntary,
David B.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
proofreader, where were you,
ANY KNOWLEDGE not NO KNOWLEDGE,
David B.
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
Jim B -
I agree with your 'slippery slope' but I do not have the time nore inclination
to go over fifty 315 lots every night. Bill Weiss has a valid complaint.
Unfortunately, their is not enough time to wade thru all these bogus listings.
Short of that...the only ting you can REALLY do is clamp down on serial abusers
and make life for them unbearable. Then...up springs another incarnation we go
after. I can even smell them now when their feedback is as low as 1!
Any other ideas??? I'm open to listening to ANYthing.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 David Benson
David Benson
Randy,
Thank you very much for your reply, it is actually the 1st. direct reply I have
had to any of my questions I have ever asked any APS representative.
There are 10,000's of thousands of British Commonwealth items listed and the are
some bad ones amongst them. Is there any member of the group that has no BC
knowledge. I know that you cannot speak for the knowledge of others but would be
most grateful if you could make an enquiry,
David Benson
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Randy, personally, I agree, and I'd even extend your policy to include
coils 350-356 and 385-389. But that's a big honkin' slippery slope, and I'm not
sure it's worth getting on. One could make the same argment towards grilled
issues, or Schermacks, and pretty soon, there's an open ban on virtually *any*
easy-to-fake issue.
Jim
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
to David Benson
I for one only know US. However, from lots listed on our SCW group, I can see
others are watching Germany and other European countries. I'll see if I can get
you some more info on that. I really can't say others specialties at this point.
I only consider US lots listed.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
To Bill Weiss, et al
Billi
As a matter of course, I personally will no longer look at used (or unused for
that matter) US#315/304 as I consider them all 100% FAKE if not listed with a
cert. Of the certed items, I consider another 50% of those FAKE trimmed stamps.
I looked at over 150 crummy used 315's in my forst two weeks with SCW and told
them I would no longer look at these lots as I consider every one of them BAD!
If you looked at the THOUSANDS of chopped 304's made into 315's, you'd think
315's are worth about a nickel. Unfortunately they are worthLESS!! Why waste my
valuable time on 315's????? You must admit that this is not a good use of
resources.
I for one have voiced an opinion that all 315's, 316's, 318's, 321's, 322's,
349, 352, 387, 356's, 388's and 491's ONLY BE ALLOWED to be POSTED with a valid
cert. THEY ARE ALL BAD and until someone can list one certified genuine one on
eBay...they remain ALL BAD. Why bother past that... at least from my perspective
of volunteering ALOT of time gratis. Until that happens, we are wiping out a
giant ant hill one ant at a time. Mr. Watson was correct precisely on the time
constraints required to get things to the APS and get a response going. Why do
you see more and more 3 DAY or 1 DAY listings. Believe me...our efforts are not
going un-noticed. We ARE driving some of these guys underground...burrying
some...and some slip thru our net...for now!
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Brian, I don't think you're right about your "nicer stuff" comment. I
think it's possible that many nicer *postal history* items are showing up. I
think that eBay has gotten a lot of press in Linn's in the past year for certain
covers getting really good results on eBay, and I think that the postal history
people are taking eBay more seriously because of that, and that's what you're
seeing. But I collect U.S. mint gem singles, and it seems exactly the same to
me. So I don't see an overall trend, yet - certainly not one that I can
reasonably attribute to the APS.
Jim
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Randy,
Just one question regarding the SWC.
How many of the 8 members have knowledge of non US material and which areas,
David Benson
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
BRIAN; Of course you are right.
October 30, 2003 17:01 Dave F. (moderator)
Just on briefly, and wanted to discuss something pleasant.
For those of you who subscribe to Linn's, the November 3rd issue has an article
discussing a philatelic item from our own Bob Lodge. Article is the
"Dollar Signs" column by Charles Snee, page 66.
(Apologies to those without a copy of Linn's. I assume it is not available on
their website without a subscription. Since they started charging for everything
on there, I stopped visiting. I would have thought they would have a more
attractive price break for their print subscribers.)
October 30, 2003 Brian R
Bill W
I'm not so sure that having a direct link to the SWC is such a good idea. Not
all of the poster/lurkers of this board have the best of intentions. For
evidence, notice how fast some sellers show up, once they hear a link is on here
for one of their auctions, and their getting picked on. The obvious cause is
someone here is looking to stir the pot. I wouldn't be hard to overwhelm a
committe with volumes of spurious reports. Who would serve on such a volunteer
committee, under such circumstanses? It may be best they remain faceless to the
masses.
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
Fake #315
That 5c 1908 imperf (eBay item #2959972351) only sold for $20.10 so the guy who
bought it probably won't starve, but that's not the point. As I said below,
suppose the item sold for thousands. Can eBay negate the sale AFTER it has sold
when it was reported BEFORE being sold? If not, why not? So if me, or some other
good samaritan contacts the buyer NOW, then we are guilty of auction
interference!
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
Reporting Fraudulent Items
RANDY S; THanks for your comments and I'm sure that both you and JIM W. are
correct that "it takes time" but let me ask you this; how much time would you
consider to be the minimum amount it would take? Of the two lots I reported last
night, the trimmed 5c 1908 imperf (#315) has now sold without being yanked, so
OK, I didn't spot it in time, but what consitutes a reasoable amount of notice?
Also, can items be reported directly to the SCW or must it all come from eBay?
October 30, 2003 Brian R
reasons?
I dunno, maybe the word is getting out, that ebay is serious about cleaning up
the place. Has anyone else noticed, that over the last month, some REAL nice
items have been cropping up? Stuff like that blockade cover, that Scott T
bought earlier this month,
or this (real BTW). I just don't seem to remember as much stuff of this
calibre. Not that it affects me, the only way I can afford something like that,
is if find it in a thrift shop for a buck.
....but I can dream.
Anyone else seeing more high level items showing up, and do any of you care
to speculate, if the ongoing purge has anything to do with it?
October 30, 2003 16:33 Jim Watson
APS & eBay
Bill W.,
The process requires that Safe Harbor identify the complaint and forward it to
the SCW members. Then, two of the eight SCW members must concur in a judgement
that the item does not comply with the 'Code of Conduct' and forward the item to
APS. Next, the APS does an evaluation including confirmation if necessary and
then send a message to the lister. Then, 24 hours is the target for a response.
Think, if you will, how long items remain on the eBay Stamp Chat Board and
even this one before they are answered. Think, also, of one's own responsiveness
in answering e-mail. I've just gone through an e-mail exchange with a person
half-way round the world and it took over 36 hours. And I think we're both
pretty good. Unfortunately, the process of getting the item to APS does take
some time. We all know SafeHarbor has often been a 24 hour process after we get
an autoresponder e-mail from our submission. All that says is that the item has
gotten in someone's inbox. The inbox after weekends is huge. I don't know but
I'll bet that getting it past SafeHarbor is often a 48 hour process.
Now think of the time it takes to get a committee to sign off on an e-mailed
draft. I think you're expecting better service than is reasonable with the state
of the art.
Yes, it is true that you are expert and certainly qualified to make such a
judgement. But 100s of people are trying to scam eBay every day including
defamation of sellers they've had problems with and just simple mischief. How
can they tell you from anyone of the others? I imagine that eBay does take some
time confirming that this is an appropriate judgement. For example, they
certainly take a look to see if the offering in question matches the complaint
and that the item in question is a stamp and not a piece of crockery.
Just my ½¢
October 30, 2003 Randy Shoemaker <randyshoemaker@netscape.net>
http://www.psestamp.com
SCW-eBay-APS
I note from a few of the past days 'chats', there are questions about what kind
of 'reporting' SCW gives the APS. I can tell you from my personal experience
since the inception of this relationship, that the SCW group reports just about
everything you can think of as far as fraud and misrepresentation go. Be it
chopped down 304's, inaccurate catalog values, fake coils, unfair terms of sale,
innappropriate use of secret auctions, fake stamps, fake covers, poor scanning
to deceive bidders, use of 'little old lady collection' descriptions, relisting...over
and over again of dinged lots, etc., etc.
If some of you thought our scope was narrow, believe me, it's not.
Unfortunately, it takes LOTS of time to go thru thousands of lots looking for
'problem children'. There is a fair 'pile' EACH DAY and most are sent to the APS.
The APS assets are limited by the available resources of that organization. So
far in the experimental stage...things are going reasonably well. Judging by the
metrics, we see definite progress. We hope to be more comprehensive in the
future but as I posted some months ago when the word on SCW first went out to
the 'chats', we must learn to walk before we can run. Each group in this
alliance of eBay, SCW and APS is making every possible effort to bring about
necessary changes to streamline this process. Give us some time and I would
guess you will be pleasantly surprised. But...this is a daunting task and cannot
be done on the turn of a dime. Chin up tho'...we are working hard at it!
If you have any questions, I would be glad to answer any reasonable query.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 30, 2003 Bill Weiss
eBay Report
You will remember that last evening I reported two fraudulent listings to eBay
to see if they would be pulled off as a result of the APS/eBay relationship.
Well, I am disappointed to say that both of the listings are still there 24
hours later, and the one (a trimmed used US 5c 1908 imperf (#315) goes off
within the next 35 minutes and has, so far, over $20. bid on it. Now as part of
my report to eBay I did mention to them that I was a qualified expert who worked
for both APEX and PSE - thinking that might help speed things up! Obviously, it
did not. Now I do understand that the #315 listing was kind of close, but
suppose it was something that sold for thousands of dollars and was fraudulent?
If eBay can't get a fraudulent listing off in 24 gours, I am not convinced this
policy is very valuable. On the other hand, I am especially anxious about the
second lot, which, at the time I reported it, still had nearly 5 days. Let's see
if, and when, that one comes down.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Jim, nicer London MB on Chile, never seen one before.
sorry, I don't know Australian modern rates, (1940 is modern to me), possibly an
overweight letter, I think Registered was 8 1/2d but not sure,
have to go out now, PO, Bank and Lunch in that order,
David B.
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Another link to
moveable
boxes and a question at bottom of page which seem to be right up David
B's street, so to speak.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
David B
Yes Must be Eketahuna Measuring CDS there would be room for E and under 10x the
LI is a U
October 30, 2003 David Benson
promo, most smaller offices used cds. unlike the larger offices which used
duplexes with heavy killers.
David B.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
David B
I only collect Used stamps and it is filling hole right now.
when I have more than one of any stamp I always try to pick better cancel UNLESS
it has part of something else - Mail room, epoxs, ship mail, Regis.. etc. or a
color ink
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Christo
I'm getting a file not found on your French BM link.
Is it just me?
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Promo, check the NZ, are you sure it's not Eketahuna,
David B.
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Promo, has to be, there is no other cancel it could be apart from Eketahuna.
Still a nice item and worth keeping if you collect cds's. on NZ.
David B.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
David B
Could be an E missing from front of the town name and the U part might be what I
read as a LI slight gap in bottom of U maybe
October 30, 2003 prometheus
son cancels - christo
OK so I looked at 5000 stamps and found 11 that qualify ,clear readable almost
complete, I guess that countries that use large CDS
would make them impossible except in cases of large stamps.
Christo have started filling an envelope for you.
Only one I might keep is a nice new zealand ketahlina 1899
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Dave P: Thanks for your surname - sometimes one kind of lose track of ebay
handles! Just a general statement here. I am not trying to collect all of the GB
and French MB cancels on cover etc. These cancels I am displaying is mainly
material I picked out of my accumulations etc. If I see a nice CDS, or any other
fancy cancel - in it goes.
Bjorn M: The Odder 2 came up for disccussion sometime last year on the ebay chat
board. Knuden gave some nice pics of the development of these cancels etc on
covers and postal stationery. I have retained that discusion and worked it in as
well.
October 30, 2003 Dave P
Christo I had just found my reference to the French BM cancels when I saw
your post below. To get a full set of GB and French marks on cover would be a
real task. The only example of the Newhaven MB I remember seeing was in an entry
at (I think) London Stampex several years ago.
"P" is Parsons, not Phillips, "orthorpteran" on Ebay.
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Bjorn M: :-) I can only laugh at myself. I copied and posted your comments, and
while I was working it in there it just jumped out at me - my apologies!
October 30, 2003 12:09 Bjorn Munch
Cancels
You're right. While W doesn't occur in Norwegian names, that doesn't prevent
then from building a shopping centre and calling it DOWNTOWN.
And didn't I tell you that 78 is Vordingborg?
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Bjorn M: I hear you about the jpgs - won't use. Re the
Porsgrunn cancel,
maybe you'll be able to see better - it does look like a W though.
Maybe Knud Erik can help wit the P O name for the target 78 cancel?
October 30, 2003 11:42 Bjorn Munch
Cancels
Yes, the middle one. Neither rare nor early, just very nice. Especially since it
will be sitting next to its "big brother" 24 SKILL in my album, this has an even
nicer KRAGERØ which is also slanted to the left.
As for other cancels: yes, Porsgrunn is big enough to have sevaral post offices
with their own names, but I can't guess form the letters you quote, except that
it can't ba a W. ANKERTORGET on your first scan is a sub-office in OSLO. 78 is
Vordingborg. TOG in the ODDER cancel means train. As for the '3' in ODENSE C (C
for Central), I don't know. Maybe just the number of the cancel? A large office
like Odense C would have a number of hand cancels.
Please don't use the JPGs from the catalogue, it's copyrighted material and I
really shouldn't have put it up...
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Bjorn M: I am just guessing - the center one - maybe rare town, early useage?
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels Part 3
I have updated the info with respect to PO names, country names and dates. For
Cancels of day 1:
Mohaleshoek (Lesotho, 28/03/2002), Anhertorget (Norway, 14/6/1979), Stange
(Norway, 9/11/1937), Grimstad (Norway, 21/6/1977), 78? (Denmark).
For cancels of day 2:
Luxembourg (Esch-S-L'Alzette, 22/?/18??), Norway (Porsgrunn, 12/11/1993),
Denmark (Odder 2 TOG, 27/10/18??), Norway (Egersund 1370, 12/12/1973), Portugal
(Lisboa Central R, 21/8/1928), Denmark (Odensec 3, 25/9/1989) and France
(Southampton France MB, 22/11/1900).
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the day PART 2
PART 2
This is what I am proposing to do. I am compiling all the images and comments
into a Word document at this stage. This is why I am coming back to some of you
with more detailed queries, so that I can put forward the best/most complete
available as provided from this board. I capture the name of each contributor's
comments after his/her comments. I will include for instance the jpg's of Bjorn
M this morning with respect to defining the quality of cancels, as well as the
cancels scanned by myself. .
The next step is to make this info available to all who is interested. In
order to keep results forthcoming, I will post the comments for each page from
my book of cancels, once that particular page has been completed. It should take
9 days of links, plus another day to update and then to publish/upload. This
brings me to the question of how do I make it accessible. Do I email the Word
document to anyone interested, can Dave F maybe take that Word document and
convert it to a HTML document on his site, or should one create a web site for
this project. I have absolutely no knowledge on website maintenance and
creation, and I don't know if I become involved in that, whether it will
distract me from my real interest (the France - USA covers for the period 1849 -
1876). Any suggestions will be welcome.
Further, do you think that the scans are to big, too small or OK? Would we
benefit by having larger images?
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the Day Part 1
Thanks for all the comments so far. I must admit, it has attracted a lot of
participation to date, and I have learn't quite a lot. I need to ask a couple of
questions, hopefully some of you can comment.
Bjornmu: Wit respect to the Porsgrunn cancel. I had a look at the other partial
name. I can see waht appears to be DOIN- - - OWN (or UWN). Any idea on a
possible name? Also, waht do you mean by sub-office. Something like Porsgrunn is
the centarl PO, the other is a smaller office falling under the Porsgrunn PO?
And another one for Bjorn M. What PO has the 78 target cancel (shown on the
first cancel of the day link).
And another one: what does the "3" in the nine o clock position in the double
ring of the Odensec cancel stand for?
David P: Thanks for all the info on the MB. Just for completeness sake, what
does the P stand for - Phillips? I also link here a scan of what the
French BM cancels
look like (see Jim W-S posting). It appears that Cherbourg, Dunkerque, Port Bail
and Plerin are the rare/scarce ones. Picture from V Pothion, 1998, France
Obliterations (sans Paris) 1849 - 1876.
Prom: Yes, those would be welcome! You are quite right about how difficult these
types of cancels are to find once one starts looking for them! So consider the
luxury cancels of Bjorn - they must be upright, well centered, complete with
crisp and clear lettering -it will take ages to get a decent collection of these
going.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
Bjorn
I'm guessing the Numeral cancel
October 30, 2003 10:47 Bjorn Munch
SON Cancels
Speaking of which: guess which of the three stamps made be BIN
this item?
October 30, 2003 10.18 am Colin Judd UK
Unoffical strike of Postal Workers in London UK
All posting to the UK
Please note that there is an unofficial strike of postal workers affecting
London, Essex and some other counties in the south. Post boxes are being sealed
to prevent people posting and building an even greater backlog. We are advised
not to post items that go through London – as all post from overseas does. I’ll
post again when the matter settles.
Colin
October 30, 2003 prometheus
Thanks for the insight Roger
As I am looking at a cover there think I am OK .
October 30, 2003 Roger Heath
German Auction Error
Pro -
Thanks for the link to the German Auction site. Really great scans, but sometime
they show up
errors,
such as lot #2379 Switzerland.
The period of validity for this stamp was 14 November 1920 - 1 March 1923,
though in reality the stamps were only used on air flights between 14 November
1920 - 14 January 1921. The first complete set of Swiss airs was issued on March
1 1923. So the illustrated stamp with “guarantee” is a remainder used by the PO
for internal accounting purposes, since it is cancelled Aarau 27 VII 23. Should
be severely discounted from catalogue value as prices are for flown stamps with
confirmable dates.
Roger
October 30, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
Christo your SON cancels
When you posted your fist batch I thought well that should be easy to do,
Then I started looking thru stamps.
It is very hard to find SON that are readable/clear and I now understand the
challenge that you have undertaken.
Would you like the two oldies shown on the last page of my site linked above.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
Lars + Matthias
Thanks for the reply
October 30, 2003 Lars Boettger <alpha2
at pt dot lu>
Aix-Phila
prometheus
Visited their booth on the Sindelfingen Stamp Fair a week ago, good stuff, one
of the larger German auction houses.
October 30, 2003 Matthias Bock
German auction house
prometheus: Familiar in so far that I know the name of the house. No
direct buying experience. Maybe you should ask at the
german Ebay stamp board, I think one or two of the regulars have bought
there before.
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Moveable Box
The French version had Angl. BM instead of MB.
I have only seen example from St Malo.
October 30, 2003 Chris
More eBay user ID analysis
I've been doing a bunch more searches on random IDs and then following feedback
trails.
It looks like a lot of the IDs that actually were doing transactions went dark
in 2000.
This makes sense as 2000 was the economic meltdown here.
Plus eBay is no longer young, hip and withit, my guess is that most active users
of eBay
are over 30. Looking at just the chat boards, my guess would be over 40.
Chris - after you're over the hill, you pick up speed
October 30, 2003 prometheus
link failed retry here
HERElink
October 30, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
GERMAN Auction House
Anybody that reads/lurks/posts Here famalair with this place
Found an Item I Really Really want and am looking for positive comments on their
material.
Roger H - they have some really nice swiss stuff.
October 30, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Vic
This was the first time I found out they even had a cancel.
I will try to exploit methods of obtaining cancel on letters.
Possessor of 3 eBay ID's that I'm willing to own up to.
October 30, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz
Christo, i agree, navigating their listings sometimes is awkward, why you dont
ask them for the printed catalog? im sure they will mail it to you
Regards
Mauro
October 30, 2003 Victor Horadam <horadam1@airmail.net>
General
Good
Morning
All, from overcast, soon to rain, Dallas.
Jim W-S: Have you tried sending a letter from there, and asking the postman
to stamp it with that Sul Ross Station marking, knowing it will still get the
central station postmark later? If they will do it, you can send one to me, and
I'll return it to you.
October 30, 2003 prometheus
Excellant Cancel discussion
Thanks to all for their postings on Christo's cancels
The info available here is tremendous.
Dave F - Hope you and yours are doing OK
POSTAL NOTE - did anyone see the little shot on the news last night of the
people returning to their Burnt Out house
Mail had been delievered
and the Guy was holding his Car payment reminder
next to what little was left of his Car.
Anyone Out there going to try to save some Singed Mail.
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the Day
There has been a couple of responses in - I'll try and revert to them all later
tonight from home
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Mauro: I have visited the lugdunum website as you have suggested - s you're
right - they have some nice material. I am a bit fed up with searching their
lots though - when you try and move to the next page it reverts to the previous
auction lots one was viewing, if one forgot to close a photo windo, you are
unable to refresh a page etc.
October 30, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz
Matt L: Thanks!
October 30, 2003 Matt Liebson
Mauro: I can check my literature tonight but it does look like Strasburg to me.
October 30, 2003 Lars Boettger <alpha2
at pt dot lu>
Cancels
Christo
The one from Luxembourg is actually "Esch-Sur-Alzette", 2nd largest city in
Luxembourg, the cancellation ist of the so-called "small French-type", in use
from about 1840-1880 (rough estimate).
October 30, 2003 04:45 Ken Srail
eBay registered users
eBay claims the following: 75.3M registered users and 34.1M "active" users (bid,
bought, or sold over the last 12 months). This information routinely appears in
their 10-Q and 10-K SEC filings.
However the REAL number that everyone is interested in is the one eBay
won't publish (LOL!) How many UNIQUE, active users are there? My guess is
that the number is around 10-15M. MANY people have multiple ID's (I seem to
recall a study once which found that the "average" user has more than 2 - many
users have "dozens".)
October 30, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz
Jim W, thanks for your quick reply, STRASBURG definitely fits the blank spaces
... any other options are possible or i should stick with this one?
Regards
Mauro
October 30, 2003 04:26 Jim Watson
Ohio Town
Mauro,
How about Struthers (Mahoning County) or possibly Strasburg (Tuscarawas County)?
October 30, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz
sorry ... here is the
correct
link
October 30, 2003 Mauro Mowszowicz <sales(AT)urured.com>
http://www.uruguaystamps.com
Hi, just found a small US cover and need to ID the city of origin, it reads
STxxxxxxxG, OH (1893 low val. Columbians to Switzerland)
this is the cover, any help appreciated!
Regards
Mauro
October 30, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
October 30, 2003 03:52 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a first flight airmail cover from the
Belgian Congo
to Belgium in 1936. The cover did double duty having been first flown from
Belgium to the Belgian Congo.
October 30, 2003 Dave P
Mobile box
London example here.
October 30, 2003 Dave P
Mobile Box
Christo Yes the town name appears where Southampton does on your example.
here is a London
example. The system was set up as a result of the Anglo-French postal convention
in 1943. I enabled items to be posted later than normal last collection times,
and aboard private ships. The boxes were fastened to the deck of the ship (and
sometimes to the dock-side prior to sailing). On arrival they were taken to the
post-office where they were unlocked, cancelled with the dictinctive stamps, and
put into the post-stream, usually saving a day on delivery times.
At first the stamps were cancelled with a boxed "MB" with the ordinary date
stamp alongside. Later distinctive cancels in the form of a rectangle with
chamfered corners were used and can be found from the 1850's onwards. They can
be found from London, Southampton, Guernsey, Jersey, Dover, Folkstone, Weymouth
and Newhaven. Later the circular types were used in London and Southampton. The
scheme finally stopped at the outbreak of WWll in 1939. Cancels can be found on
both GB and French stamps. Similar arrangements must have been in place at the
French ports, but I do not have a note of the cancellations employed.
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Dave P: Am I correct that the name of the Port (e.g. Newhaven) would be located
and in the place of where Southhampton is in my example?
Just to elucidate me on the use of these movable mail boxes. They were placed on
the dockside for the sailors to put their mail in, or is it rather mail posted
on board the ship at sea, or is it both?
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Dave P, no it is not, it is only material listed on the US site,
that was the point I was trying to find out a few days ago before further info
was forthcoming,
David B.
October 30, 2003 Dave P
Moveable Box
You can make a nice collection of these, the circular type also exists for
London, but the earlier type comes from several additional ports (including
Guernsey and Jersey). They are worth looking for as they carry a premium,
especially the scarcer ones like Newhaven.
APS/Ebay
The news is encouraging. One thing I am not clear on, does it apply to items
listed through .com, or on all items appearing on .com. If an item is listed on
another site, but is available world-wide o it appears on USA listing, is it
covered?
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Colin, I think the coach's excuse was that he failed maths at school,
David B.
October 30, 2003 Colin Judd UK
David B & Marius
From what I’ve heard I gather that the UK team has developed a variation, 16
on their side?!
Colin, who knows nothing and cares less about Rugby!
October 30, 2003 David Benson
Christo, MB stands for Movable Box or Boite Mobile. They were placed on the
dockside for ship's mail.
David B.
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels of the Day
Bjorn M: It is actually MB for mailbox. It is (correct me if I am wrong) similar
to a paquebot cancel. Mail carried by ship from France to UK, and on arrival in
France cancelled with the Southampton cancel.
I think I should collect all the comments that come in on these cancels and
add them to the stock book. Might make an interesting collecion/reading in
future!!
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Bjorn M: Thanks for that scan, it will come in handy! I must admit that I didn't
know about a cancel having to be also upright for a cancel to be called superb!
John Cunningham: Thanks for posting some of your images. I think you err when
you think people will not be interested in what you collect! Why don't you try
and show us some of your Panama-Pacific Expo usages. Some of us learn through
what others show/become aware of what they have in their
accumulations/collections.
October 30, 2003 23:32 Bjorn Munch
Cancels of the day
Well, it's Porsgrunn, actually it must be sub-office but I can't figure out its
name. And what is this Southampton France ML?
October 30, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cancels Of the Day
Another day, another link. In this
Cancels of the Day 2
you'll find:
Luxembourg (Esch-S-L'Alzet?), Norway (Podsgrunn), Denmark (Odder), Norway (Egersund),
Portugal (Lisboa Central), Denmark (Odensec)and France (Southampton MB).
If you have any suggestions, please fire away!
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Marius, League or Union,
David B.
October 29, 2003 Marius
David Leaving it out was appropriate. You did say "English speaking
sites" :-) Heck, they can't even play rugby.
October 29, 2003 Roger
- David
-US );>) I'm strining for that one
October 29, 2003 David
- US
);>)
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Duncan, left out the US, didn't do it on purpose,
David B.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Duncan,
sounds like a good idea but may become cumbersome if each site does it's own
thing and there are some different regulations. It may be better in the long run
if there was an arrangement with the English language sites to have a communal
agreement.
Australia,,Canada,Ireland,New Zealand,Singapore,United Kingdom.
It may take a few years to organise but would immensely help Ebay's integrity.
David B.
October 29, 2003 Chris
Still yet more eBay name roulette
Someone else must have read the same name, as all the major character
names are valid IDs, even "the_leewit", which is a dead giveaway.
Chris - none of them have current feedback however.
October 29, 2003 Chris
More eBay ID roulette
Tried the game again with users glidden, zingara, frop, sedmon and klatha.
Last feedbacks were 2000, 1999, 2003, none and 2002 respectively.
There was only 1 feedback in the last 6 months from this batch.
Chris - 200 bonus points to whoever can name the book I am currently reading,
given this list of names.
October 29, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
eBay / APS and early indicators
I also can echo that I have had a quick and intelligent response from Robert
Lamb, prior to this current APS/eBay topic but fairly recently and involving bad
sellers.
To Jim Watson, thank you so much for your efforts and the posts regarding
the workings of the APS/eBay relationship. The news is very encouraging! And
from what I've seen from eBay UK responses to problems with sellers, there is
also reason to believe they are quite willing to help with cleaning up the eBay
environment.
I've filed a lot of reports to eBay, enough to notice a recent improvement in
response and enough to say that eBay UK does a good job in cooperation with
eBay.com.
RAPID RESPONSE
Bill W I don't know who else might have alerted eBay when counterfeit US
C3a's and the 1901 inverts appeared, but I reported the auctions on Sunday and
by Monday night or Tuesday they were gone. A second seller, from Iowa, was also
involved and his auctions disappeared at that time too.
Dunc
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Jim, I wasn't going to say a word as I know very little and couldn't care less
about the conduct of APS members. I am only interested in the future of Ebay and
that now there will more reliability in the material listed. I have nothing
against the indelible marking of modern fakes although I would have hoped for an
outright ban and not just a slap on the backside with a rubber stamp.
David Benson
Thanks for all your help as most probably we could not have got this far with
information without you and the APS.
David
October 29, 2003 20:11 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
David B.,
As I understand it and as I hope I have portrayed it, the current eBay-APS
relationship is related to the U.S. eBay site - ebay.com. SCW forwards suspect
items to APS for confirmation and initial action. Suspect items have three
things in common: 1) they are listed on the ebay.com site; 2) they are
philatelic in nature; and 3) at least 2 of the SCW watchers believes the listing
does not comply with the "Code of Conduct" which eBay has stated is a
requirement for listing philatelic material on eBay. The action is independent
of the national origin of the lister and country of origin of the material.
APS, on its own, remains committed to having its members comply with its "Code
of Ethics" independent of where the tranaction might transpire. It has a
disciplinary procedure for dealing with complaints of violations. Now, before
you tell me about all the times that APS has failed to act, just recognize that
they have been effective in resolving many issues between buyers and sellers.
October 29, 2003 Chris
Number Of Active eBay IDs
The true number is much smaller than 75 mil.
A fun game to play when you are bored is to go to the search page and
type in whatever id comes to mind. Chances are pretty good that it exists
and that it has had no activity in the last 6 months. I tried it with three
different id's
pulled out of thin air just now. The id's were diane57, metamorph and vinegaroon.
One had no feedback, one had last feedback in 2000 and one had 3 feedbacks in
the last 6 months.
Based on playing this game a few times, my guess is that about 1 id in 5 is
actually doing anything.
Chris
October 29, 2003 Bill Weiss
MIKE W; Sure, it's wrw43@rcn.com, although I will only be here another 15-20
minutes or so, but I can answer you in the morning if that's OK. I'll look for
it.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Jim, as far as I understand it has nothing to do with the residency of the
lister only if the lister chooses to list on the US site. The same can be said
of any US lister who chooses to list on a non US site then the relationship will
not be applicable unless of course the lister is a member of the APS.
If I am wrong, please correct me,
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Michael Walter <harfordstamps@comcast.net>
Bill Weiss
Bill Wiess: Can I have your email address? I have a question that really does
not apply to this board. (It is 100% stamp related)
October 29, 2003 nomad55
To Dave F
Julian was spared through a concerted effort of the fire crews.
October 29, 2003 18:13 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
David B.,
I was referring to the information I gained during a telephone conversation I
had with Bob Lamb. He said that the SCW had called APS's attention to items
which were listed (presumably on ebay.com) by people who were not US residents
(Korea was one example). Further, AFAIK, APS will respond to any querry sent
them by the SCW. That includes philatelic material from any country listed by
anyone on the ebay.com site. The relationship is still in a trial stage the
scope of which does not yet include ebay.uk, ebay.de, etc. How that is to be
dealt with is in the future.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
promno, it may be a small percentage but the number of complaints that are
mentioned in philatelic magazines must have been a frightening thought to some
of the higher echelon of Ebay.
They were lucky in finding an organisation like the APS to handle the problem
philatelic material and other groups to handle diverse areas.
If and when they try to accomodate other international sites I would think the
prospective groups would delve into the pros and cons with more prudence than
the APS.
David B.
October 29, 2003 prometheus
Roger
Total numbers fo listing come not from ebay but a service that tracks actual
auction numbers at many sites.
Off course free listing days and such throw those up sometimes and as we
approach the Xmas season the totals will climb much higher.
I know a lot of people with 5-10 IDS there so I think actual users/members is
smaller than even you do.
In a conversation with someone today they wondered if the GROUPS area was where
the intrusive/attacking scammers were lurking or if it is somewhere else in the
system.
Have many of those here who joined a "group" had ID problems.??
Is the sign in there secure?
October 29, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Pro
I think you have to consider the clientele.
Admitedly most of the posters to this board would be happy to obtain
stamps in the less than $100 price category.
Though, there are out there, collectors who will plonk 10's of thousands of
dollars down on anything that meets their collecting requirements.
They will not do so if they think eBay is tainted.
The majority of the other categories of non-collectibles have items that you are
used to (in terms of cost) in everyday life.
You wouldn't pay $10,000 for a camera that you can go to your local camera store
and buy for $100.
When a specialized knowledge is required to judge the "value" of a particular
item then eBay and its users need to have an external frame of reference.
In art, antique books, stamps, cigarette cards (even Beanie Babies) etc., eBay
needs to know whether the items listed are genuine or designed to rip-off buyer
and thus deprive them of the image that they build up of being a location where
legitimate items can be bought at market price.
To be conceived as the internet "fence" is, I don't think, part of their
corporate policy.
October 29, 2003 Roger Heath
Ebay Numbers
Pro -
You can't place much credence on Ebay totals. You can go to any search page and
it has a number of listings and more often than not you go to the last page and
there are no lots there.
Until my dying day I'll truely wonder how many individuals actually buy and sell
on Ebay as opposed to Ebay ID's. 75,000,000 is the most recent number I've heard
bandied around, but if one half have a second ID, or a second in a family, or a
buying and selling ID, or a second ID for posting to Discussion and Chat Boards.
That would be millions les than claimed.
Roger
October 29, 2003 Roger Heath
Bob Lamb
I would like to add that I also had a very quick response from Mr Lamb
concerning the issues we've brought up. At this point I'm pretty sure he
understands there's a long way to go, but if everyone cooperates, the process
will expand quickly to other sites. I sent numerous links showing German sellers
who have literally hundreds of fakes up for sale. These are items that would
never see an expert, because they are being sold to an unsophiswticated buyer.
(That's Elmer Fuddese. I should only use words I know how to spell. );>)
I'm hoping we'll be able to linnk to sellers auctions by seller, rather than
list every single auction. It used to be much easier to copy and link item
numbers, but the numbers haven't been on the search pages for yearfs now. I
still miss seeing the lot numbers on my search and browse pages. I get the
auction number one must open every auction, how repetative can it get.
Roger
October 29, 2003 prometheus
NO WONDER noip
David B - so with over 12 million listings less than 1.5 percent are stamp
related and Now I understand why this is not a Major problem as They see it.
Would anyone have a guess as to percentage of stamps that are wonky in stamps
cats. ??
makes it(almost) seem like a minor thing after all and Now i can almost see the
other side of the river.
October 29, 2003 5:00PM Bill Weiss
Reporting Fraudulent eBay Listings
I just followed the instructions given in Question one to Bob Lamb for reporting
a fraudulent listing to eBay and I am happy to report it took me less than two
minutes for two different reports. I first reported a used US 5c 1908 Imperf
(Scott #315) which is an obviously-trimmed perforated stamp, which sells within
the next 24 hours. Then I reported that stupid lot of 297 used copies of US
#482A, which does not go off for 4 days+. I think someone else noted this on the
board yesterday and I am wondering if anyone else reported it to eBay. If so,
please say so in a post here as I am trying to determine how quickly eBay takes
care of these complaints, so if I am the first to report it, that's one time
frame, but if someone else here already reported it, I would like to know when,
as that would be a different time frame. Thanks.
October 29, 2003 John Cunningham
Christo You are correct that I collect US. However,1881
is as far back as my mint collection goes so there are a lot of classics still
to be collected. I also collect usages of the Panama-Pacific Expo commem's.
Neither is too appealing to many on the board so I refrain from posting images
and try to learn about other areas from those who have more uncommon items to
show.
John C
October 29, 2003 Bill Weiss
APS Response
I just wanted to make a quick comment or rather, pay a compliment, to Bob Lamb,
the executive director of APS, for the prompt attention he obviously gave to the
list of questions from this board. I think that all of us on this board should
be big enough to admit that once the questions got directed to the correct
person - Lamb - that we received immediate attention. For myself, I was very
pleased to read the information he gave us, and I am particularly anxious to try
making a direct report to eBay following the instructions given in Question 1.
October 29, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Its been a long day !!
Sul Ross.
Not a misspelled cancel !
A long day at work !
October 29, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Yipee !!!
Finally got
a Sul Poss PO cancel.
Pity they don't put it on letters yet.
David B
Looks like about a third of the listings are US.
Even cleaning up a third of the site is better than none.
There are other outlets for non-US stamps.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Jim, thanks, I didn't note anywhere where it said that material was submitted by
non US listers. Could you let me know where that comment is,
An interesting comment in the reply was
" pattern of continuing non compliance by the seller would be viewed as grounds
for permanent suspension by eBay. "
David B.
October 29, 2003 16:13 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
David B.,
My discussion with Bob Lamb did note that APS had some experience with listings
called to their attention by the SCW which were misdescribed (generally
miscatalogued) by non-US listers which they resolved amicably by an e-mail to
the seller noting the problem. I did not get anything regarding action on the
requirements concerning inappropriate use of catalogue values.
I would expect that to fall under the Code of Conducts section: "I agree not
knowingly to participate in any way in the advertisement, sale or trade of any
philatelic material using any deceptive practices including, but not limited to,
false or misleading claims of sales scarcity, value, condition or investment
potential." I cannot, however, speak with any authority.
To my mind, it fits in the category of further detail to be filled in. I'm
sure that the process will evolve to clearer drawing of the lines. Also, to me,
the question of misleading catalogue values is not the highest problem on my
list. I will still start from the premise of 'Caveat Emptor.'
October 29, 2003 David Benson
NOIP,
Just took a look at the current listings of items available on the US, these
include items listed on Ebay.US and on all the foreign sites but available
worldwide, the figures are extremely interesting,
Stamps (192793)
United States (62959)
Australia (3173)
Canada (8093)
Br. Comm. Other (11336)
UK (Great Britain) (4647)
Africa (1698)
Asia (10587)
Europe (35908)
Latin America (4060)
Middle East (5188)
Publications & Supplies (2579)
Topical & Specialty (26970)
Worldwide (17575)
David Benson
October 29, 2003 15:43 Dave F. (moderator)
Fire Updates
If anyone is interested in more local coverage of the fires, the Los Angeles
Times has pretty good online coverage. (The print version actually did a good
job of synthesizing the various stories. The online version seems a little more
disjointed to me, but it's still more in-depth than most of the broadcast media
sites.)
Los Angeles Times coverage
Access to the site probably requires a one-time free registration effort.
As for people I know, one set of friends is still in an evacuation center and
doesn't know whether their home burned down or not.
Another set of friends, who packed for evacuation on Sunday, appears to be out
of danger and never had to evacuate.
However, a third set of friends, who thought they averted the threat of one of
the other fires, is now facing it again. Unfortunately, their adult daughter had
to be hospitalized on a unrelated matter, so they're trying to help pack the
family, including infant daughter, and prepare to leave if necessary.
A new fire appears to threaten a fourth set of friends in yet another area. It's
so close to them and the freeways are so jammed in that area that I don't even
want to disturb them right now and find out how they're doing.
Yesterday, as Jim/jaywild described, the sky was dark and threatening,
with a bizarre orange sun even at mid-day. Today, as moist, cooler breezes come
up off the coast, where I am it is just surreally beautiful. It is hard to
believe that some of these fires are still as close as 30 miles.
As you might expect, the local tv stations are broadcasting continuous coverage,
including evacuation instructions, etc.
For me personally, one of the most alarming things is that someone was arrested
trying to set a fire in a canyon about 5 miles from me. This is what I genuinely
fear, and obviously resources are already spread very thin if something were to
happen. I am probably going to think about what I should pack up, just in case.
(I had to do this about 10 years ago with another fire.)
On a philatelic level, I know of one lifetime collector of Japan who moved a
couple of years ago to one of the mountain resort areas that is now evacuated.
As for Tom Lowe, I saw that he came on and posted once. I only have a
rough idea of where he lives, so am not sure if he is out of danger or not.
For those of you somewhat familiar with the area, the fires range from somewhat
near Santa Barbara, to the Lake Arrowhead, Big Bear and other mountain resort
areas, to as far down as Mexico. (Not continuous, of course, but I've heard that
some walls of fire are as much as 45 miles long.)
Many of the towns and villages in the San Bernardino Mountains, about an hour or
so northeast of Los Angeles, are beautiful and charming. It's not clear to me
how much they have been damaged, but they have all been evacuated.
About an hour east of San Diego is an absolutely charming town of Julian, up in
the mountains. During the winter, you can drive up there, be in the snow, have
hot apple cider, and feel like you're in New England.
It is not certain, but appears probable, that the town may have been destroyed
in the last several hours. That's where a firefighter was killed just a little
while ago. Here is the Chamber of Commerce site for the town, as it was before:
town of
Julian
One last philatelic note: as one might imagine, the volume of mail delivery is
down significantly, even here in an area that is not currently threatened. No
doubt the closure of major north-south and east-west freeways and the shutdown
of the air traffic control center on Sunday, has delayed a lot of inbound
freight. (Although my Linn's arrived today.)
Sorry for the interruption. And Jim W., many, many thanks for your
efforts in seeking clarification.
Be back later.
October 29, 2003 1458 Clark Frazier
From San DIego Union
Postal service
1:29 p.m.
Fourteen post offices in San Diego County are closed today.
The closures are in Alpine, Boulevard Campo, Descanso, Dulzura, Jacumba, Julian,
Mt. Laguna, Palomar Mountain, Potrero, Pauma Valley, Santa Ysabel, Valley Center
and Warner Springs.
In addition, the Fallbrook and Lakeside post offices may open sometime during
the day, depending on local conditions.
The postal service will attempt to provide mail service in all other communities
depending on safety, air quality and access.
Residents whose homes were destroyed by fire or whose mailboxes are no longer
standing may pick up mail at their delivery post office if it is open.
Proper identification will be required.
In San Diego city, temporary mail pickup locations for Scripps Ranch residents
is the Scripps Ranch Carrier Annex, 10060 Willow Creek Road. Tierrasanta
residents can pick up mail at the Tierrasanta Postal Store, 6030 Santo Road,
Suite A.
On Tuesday, 350 delivery routes were cancelled as were parts of 66 others,
according to the USPS. This equates to 152,943 mail boxes not receiving mail,
down from the 667 cancelled routes on Monday, which affected 341,000 mailboxes.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Jimbo, back earlier than I thought,
One other question,
Has there been any provision for the misidentifaction of British Commonwealth
stamps, primarily Hi face values QV, KEVII & KGV with visible identifiable
Revenue cancels misdescribed as postally used especially with cat. value noted
for postally used.
David B.
October 29, 2003 Roger Heath
Dr Seuss
Lavar -
He looks like your Dad!
Bill W -
I implore you to go through your preferences, every link and item one at a time
and confirm you placed the information there. I discovered after my theft that
the "new malolo" had placed an email address to a wireless phone, and a second
contact emali address. Plus a second mailing address. Ordinarily one doesn't
check out the links one never used before.
Roger
October 29, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
The new Dr. Seuss stamp is unveiled.
Jim
October 29, 2003 13:58 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
Mathias,
When I first talked to Bob Lamb at APS eBay's intent to apply it to all of its
sites was not clear. Bob did contact eBay and asked the question. Both eBay and
APS "consider this to be in a test phase at this point and would like to get
more experience under our belts before we take on new mountain tops. If it works
to everyone's satisfaction, [the eBay contact] says eBay would like to
expand it."
The updated web page includes this as a footnote.
October 29, 2003 14:09 Bjorn Munch
SON cancels
I agree that the 20 ore off.sak is a bit blurry. The reason the others don't
qualify is that a lux cancel should be upright. You can find the definitions
from Norgeskatalogen here,
and a definition of lesser qualities
here.
October 29, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Bill W., glad to hear everything was resolved, and that it didn't turn
out to be a weenie thing after all. Whew!
Jim
October 29, 2003 Matthias Bock
Jim Watson: does this mean this code of conduct will apply to german Ebay,
too? It would surprise me...
October 29, 2003 13:58 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
NOIP and EOIG,
I just received some followup information regarding the open questions which
came up during my discussion with Bob Lamb. It was with respect to the question
of eBay's plans for applying the approach to all eBay sites and an update to
make the "Code of Conduct" less America-centric. I've updated the web page to
include it as footnote.
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Bjorn M: A last on I promise. I just had a quick look at the cancels again, to
ascertain why you call them luxe. To me the 20 ore sak does not look that great?
What about the 110 ore? The 20 sak is not as clearly printed, but is well
centered. What about the last Norwegian stamp. The CDS is too big for the stamp,
but the cancel is still nicely centered?
Do you perhaps have a scan of a page or image which illustrates the various
definitions?
October 29, 2003 1345 Clark Frazier
Key Items?
Any opinions about these
Key items?
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Last post for evening
Bjorn M, Knud E . Many thanks for your help in the unravelling of the
address!
Bjorn M: I agree, not all of my cancels will be luxe, if I go that route then
you are probably looking at a hit rate of 1 luxury cancel per maybe 1000 plus
stamps sorted! There really ain't that much in line of SON cancels (my belief
anyway).
Good night to all
October 29, 2003 13:36 Bjorn Munch
Danish address
Carl Plougs Vej 7, 2.tv
DK-1913 FREDERIKSBERG C
Oh, and nice cancels you have, though only the 20 ore off.sak and the 1.80
lighthouse are "luxury".
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Jim, thank for the good work,
I have to urgently go out for a few hours but noted one interesting answer to
one of your questions,
Do the requirements apply to all eBay sites? For example, are ebay.uk and
ebay.de included?
A1. You have to ask eBay that one. I don't know.
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Bill Weiss
Problem Resolved - I think!
Thank you to everyone who has voiced concern over our suspension. We finally
received a call from a live eBay representative who explained that someone had
stolen our identity - again - and apparantly was offering some prohibited items
somewhere on eBay. At any rare, they claim, as a matter of practice they suspend
all eBay activity in such cases until they can (I'm guessing) shut down the
crook.
So now, we are restored, with a new password. The biggeszt problem resulting
from this is, of course, the fact that they suspended all of our upcoming
auctions. They stated that we would be able to relist these lots with ease
merely by going into "My eBay" and hitting the relist on them. Only problem is -
they lied! We have tried everything we know how to do and these lots can not be
retrieved, which means if I want to relist them, I've got to do all of the
manual work over again! Lucky me. Further, of course, while they were cancelled,
there were numerous bidders who assumed they were participating in an auction,
only to find that the auction was suspended, with no explaination to the
bidders, which, of course, makes us look bad, as though we had anything to do
with it! I even had a telephone call from a longtime client who was anxious
because she saw that the item she was currently high bidder on had been shut
down and now wanted to know how to proceed. I calmed her down by telling her
that regardless what happened with the eBay outcome, I would sell her a
duplicate I had of the lot at the exact price she was currently high bidder on.
On other matters, to NOMAD - you have paid your bill, but thanks for asking.
To JIM W. for the great job in composing the questions to APS. I printed them
out and will try to read them shortly. They should provide us with some good
points for discussion on the board.
October 29, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
Christo and Jim W
Thanks to both for the posts.
October 29, 2003 13:20 Jim Watson
Cancels of the Day 1
Christo,
Welcome to the daily club! Good for you! One of the fun things about these
chatboards is that it gives us all a chance to share our interests with
everyone.
October 29, 2003 13.17 Knud-Erik Andersen
Danish adress
Christo
Carl Plougs vej 7 (name
and number of the road) 2 (second stock) TV
(to the left)
DK (Denmark)
1913 (postcode) Frederiksberg (name
of town) C (center.)
:O)
K.E.
October 29, 2003 13:10 Jim Watson
eBay - APS Relationship
NOIP and EOIG,
Last weekend there was considerable discussion regarding the relationship
between eBay and APS. I consolidated what I thought were the questions raised
here as well as some I encountered in reviewing the materials available on both
the eBay and APS sites. This morning I got an e-mail off to Robert Lamb, APS
Executive Director. I got a prompt answer. I have posted the questions and the
answers I received on
Questions regarding eBay-APS plans. There are still some open questions,
particularly about eBay's intent regarding all of its sites but there has been
real progress. Bob was particularly positive about what he perceived as the
results of the first couple of months of operation. I think it is step in the
right direction. I hope that everyone agrees even if not all the questions have
been resolved.
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
My collecttion of SON cancels
All and Sundry: I was reflecting on all the help and patience I have received
from persons on this board (and the ebay stamp chat board as well), and was
wondering how to repay that in kind. So inspired by promotheus and Jim
W's efforts, I have decided to show every day a scan of son on the nose
cancels I am collecting. Doesn't matter how old or young, the criteria is that
the name of the P O and the date should be legible without any difficulty, the
stamp should be in good to above condition, and should be relatively well
cenetered. The cancels don't neccessarily have to be CDS type, but can be
anything which was used to deface the stamp. On occasional stamps some of the
adjacent strips's stamps are visible in the scan - please forgive me for that -
I don't want to spend too much time in arranging material. Also, there could be
some duplication as well. Currently these are housed in a stockbook - at this
stage 37 pages in all, nine strips per page - so it will be a nice project to
keep going here. I normally don't buy satmps for the cancels. Most of these
represent stamps which I have pulled from lots, collections and bulk material.
Any suggestions on ways to improve the presentation, will be appreciated. I'll
be posting one strip per day, so
here is the first of the
Cancels of the Day 1
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Danish Address
Bjorn M: This is the
address. Any ideas??
October 29, 2003 prometheus
Scott T - Thanks for the reply
I asked the question because I have seen the Statement "dealers just dumping
their dross" a few hundred times on different boards and had to ask. I can
readily understand your entering into this marketplace, I have seen some of your
catalogs and I'm sure they do not come cheap.
As a college student who is new to this Hobby (stamps/postal history) I wish I
had the Knowledge required for the positions you are making available.
But I'm sure my parental units would stroke out if I chose to find work when I
graduate in December in something other than the field in which they have made
such a Huge investment.
Besides Auctions have you considered just a web presence (store) to sell some of
your lower values items ??
October 29, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Scott - Will you be bringing any non-US items to the market? There sure is a
lack of intersting Spanish items on ebay right now.
October 29, 2003 Scott Trepel
Ebay
Prometheus:
Dumping? Never.
If there are buyers who do their shopping on Ebay, I want to bring my goods to
their marketplace.
I may be a little late to the party, but during the time I waited, more of the
world connected to cable modems with faster download speed, and upgraded their
computers, so the process works better.
We'll see how it works. Mailing out printed catalogues with lo-value cover lots
is just not economical, so the internet represents a better way (maybe).
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Rob, got it and replied,
David B.
October 29, 2003 Barry Elkins <elkinj@comcast.net>
Scott T
I'm too far away from retirement (~7 years) to take you up on your offer, but
it's something I'd love to do when I do retire.
If you have any material to or from Philadelphia county independent post
offices, please email me.
October 29, 2003 Rob Faux
email
David B Just sent you an email. Hopefully it will work.
For those who may want to reply and the other email didn't work:
fauxr "at" mrs "dot" umn "dot" edu
Rob
October 29, 2003 Duncan D
Common sense and forged items
Prometheus
The lack of enforcement and lack of communication have created a ridiculous
situation.
Whats needed now is some input, some real feedback, indicating to those of us
who are interested plus to those considering quick and easy profits from
unethical or illegal sales that there are negative results from those actions.
And since eBay is obviously taking serious actions to make positive changes,
this seems like an excellent time for that dialogue.
Some simple examples without naming names would be great, to illustrate what is
being accomplished. Unless, of course, nothing is being accomplished.
Dunc
"Would anyone notice if I changed my name to SpongeBob Squarestamps?"
October 29, 2003 Prometheus
Scott T - dipping your toes in the bay
Please don't take this wrong
But my question/thought about this is
Just another dealer dumping their lesser goods there, and while your lesser
goods are far superior to most (i would think) What took you so long to decide
to enter this Market place?
October 29, 2003 prometheus
Duncan D
Why would you support a logical move in the way Questionable auctions are
handled?
Do you think that for such small potatoes there will be any Punishment?
With the proven existence of so many fakes (not just stamps)
do you think that the rash of Ebay adverts on TV and radio are a way of
influencing the media view/opinion of the Bay?.
October 29, 2003 prometheus
Bill W
Did anyone hear what happened to bill W?
I hate mysteries.
Christo CYE.
October 29, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Bill's dilemma... and second topic, a forgers
fate
Yeah I wonder about Bill's problems with eBay, too. He no longer appears to be
NARU'ed at this point, but I bet he had auctions in which buyers couldn't
participate while his status was interrupted.
Wouldn't it be helpful if auctions could be put on "hold" when questions arise,
instead of letting the clock continue to run?
The same situation in reverse happens when obvious "bad" auctions run to
completion before eBay can react. For example, the seller who recently offered
many counterfeit copies of the US C3a inverted Jenny and the #294a, #295a, and
#296a 1901 inverts had multiple auctions ending every day, many with multiple
blocks and groups of the forgeries sold in some of those auctions, which were
eventually shut down of course.
What happens now to the buyers and the seller? He had at least 152 such auctions
so there had to be about 100 buyers who violated US counterfeiting laws by
participating in the illegal sales, some of which closed while eBay was
pondering the problem.
That is a serious question in many similar sales... what if anything does
happen? To me, the seller should be responsible for much more than simply ending
his auctions, he should be required to retrieve as many sold items as possible
and turn over them and all remaining stocks and in this most recent case, the
government should probably also require that he turn over his "vintage
perforator". And he should be penalized for each sale where the items cannot be
retrieved and turned over, so that he does not walk away from the whole episode
with a tidy profit, which in this case based on 150 sales at, say, $10 each,
would be a quick #1500.
There are now hundreds of new invert forgeries out there thanks to this seller,
and it happened quickly. Too bad there was no way to put those sales on "pause".
Dunc
October 29, 2003 David Benson <dbenson@bigpond.net.au>
rfaux, sent you an email, it came back, send me one at my address above,
David
October 29, 2003 10:16 Bjorn Munch
Danish address help
Christo, if you try "Carl Plougs Vej 7" in Google you'll find that "2.tv" is the
correct extension. :-) But I still don't know what it means, I can't figure out
what Danish word is abbreviated "tv" (except television)...
October 29, 2003 09:05 Bjorn Munch
Danish address help
Christo: it should be "Carl Plougs Vej 7", but I have no idea what 2TV or 2JV
could mean. Could be a reference to floor or apartment number. Even if you don't
get that part right, as long as you have his name right it should get to him.
BTW, are you sure it's 7, not 1? I've had the two 1's in my address misread as
7's a couple of times.
October 29, 2003 Bob Hohertz
job
If I knew more about classic postal history in order to describe things, would
be a neat job to have..... closed down my one-man part-time consulting firm end
of last year.
Wonder if Bill ever heard from eBay?
October 29, 2003 Scott Trepel
Nomad:
We plan to stick around a while. And I have enough to keep two or more people
busy.
October 29, 2003 nomad55
Bill Weiss
While rummaging around through a stack of papers last night, I found an invoice
from you for $49. Did I send you a check? I have no recollection, and can't find
such an amount in my check register.
October 29, 2003 nomad55
Scott....sounds like a job I would love, but I'm at least a year to 18 months
away from formal retirement. Maybe then??
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Danish Address Help
Maybe Knud Erik or Bjornmu: I have a seller whose's address I am trying to
decipher. I have emailed him for confirmation of the address but still haven't
received a reply. I would like to complete the deal (by sending his item). I
need to know the alphanumeric lettering after the streets name. It looks like
Carl Plougs VEJ7, 2TV (or 2JV). Which of the latter is correct? Any idea?
Thanks
October 29, 2003 Scott Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
Opportunity
Some of you may have seen that the Siegel firm has dipped its toes in the Ebay
pool. We have had pretty decent success with the U.S. covers placed for sale,
and we'll be trying a few different strategies to see what works (or doesn't).
Over the course of many years, you can imagine that we have accumulated a
significant number of covers in the $50-$500 range. Frankly, the stuff is just
sitting there and needs to find new homes. We do not have a regular retail
selling routine, which is why Ebay appeals to me.
While my staff is handling Ebay from the administrative side, I really need
someone who can scan and quickly describe hundreds (thousands!) of covers on a
regular routine basis.
The person I envision is retired (or has a disability that makes
commuting/travel difficult), loves postal history, and would be willing to work
from home for a fair "per lot" compensation arrangement. To begin, I think it
would be best if our office handled fulfillment, but if the arrangement is
successful and trust is built, then extra compensation could be earned for
billing out sales and shipping.
The benefits to our Ebay describer are:
1. A steady flow of very good saleable material (covers in the $50-$500 range)
2. Association with a prominent "live" auction firm
3. Good compensation
4. Self-regulated working hours (and a really great boss)
Interested parties should contact me with background and references (important).
October 29, 2003 Rob Faux
And maybe I will peek instead of peak.... the latter is more than I can promise.
:)
October 29, 2003 Rob Faux
rfaux"at"thefauxden"dot"com
October 29, 2003 Rob Faux
Odd requests again
At the risk of derailing whatever is going on here, I have two requests that I
only have time to type, then I must go. Please respond to me via email, but I
will also try to peak in here tomorrow.
1. I have a student who is looking to attend school in Australia for a semester.
He is currently looking at the U at Sydney, the U at Melbourne and Macquarrie.
If anyone is willing to give me some feedback or more local knowledge regarding
these schools, he (and I) would be grateful.
2. My nephew is in a class that is currently sending a letter around that asks
recipients to 1. send a note to the school asking for a postcard that
tells/shows something about where people live. and 2. send the note on to
someone else in a different location who would be willing to do the same. This
would go on until May, at which time the last person sends the letter back to
the school.
I think it would be a great learning experience for these kids if I could
arrange a string of people from different countries and locations to mail this
thing around and send postcards to them. Those who are interested, please
contact me via email.
Rob
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Greg Ioannou I get a message that your inbox is full and my service
provider is unable to deliver my email message
Promotheus CYE
October 29, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
Good Day to all - Christo
Christo - I saw it and searched the archives BUT could Not find your emaill
address --Mine is above.
BOB in WA - My noticing the Firearms in Rogers Scan was a protective post - my
sweet girlfriend sometimes scans chat boards looking for me (see if I'm home)
during the day. CYA if you get my drift.
October 29, 2003 Michael Walter
De Goya Nudes
Here is a newspaper clipping (dated Aug. 4, 1930) I found in an old album I
recently purchased. The bottom statement reads: "An indecent picture is bad
enough.... but a postage stamp, whose back side must be licked!.....Millions of
innocent children collect stamps."
October 29, 2003 Richard Frajola
Calves Signatures
Christo Regarding Calves signatures - he usually signs items of lesser
value that he considers to be genuine. He only does "certificates" for more
valuable items and when requested. For auction companies, he frequently will
leave items on an album page and sign above the stamp. He is no longer an expert
for AIEP and his signature on an item does not now carry the weight of "expert
opinion" that it once did.
Expert Groups Just now catching up on some of the comments of the last
couple weeks. I think that it is great that we have three groups (PF, PSE and
APS) now competing to provide the best quality of service and opinion possible.
What happened in the past is history.
October 29, 2003 02:26 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from the
Falkland Islands
to the United States in 1928. It has the stamps of three nations on it. Learn
about Hubert Wilkins!
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
NOIP: I have received an email a short while ago, inviting me to join a group
called "philatelic". The origin appears to be from LiveWorld (hosts to ebay
stamp chat?). What is this all about, or is it just scam mail?
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Matthias & Lars, thanks to you both for your informative posts, Ebay.US is
slowly cleaning up its act but have outsourced it's philatelic checking to an
organisation that is already overworked and understaffed. Hope they can can cope
with the workload when the new system comes into force next week.
David B.
October 29, 2003 Matthias Bock <5bock
at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de>
Christo: There are also fake (or partially fake) classical covers with
questionable or faked certificates and expert marks. However, these are not very
common and often easily detectable by collectors who know about the postal
history of the territory they collect. Most of this classical stuff is in the
$hundreds range anyway, so you should agree on some refunding before
bidding/buying anyway.
October 29, 2003 Matthias Bock <5bock
at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de>
Forgeries and the BDPh
David: As far as I know, there are no such attempts from the organization
itself. The case Lars Boettger mentioned a few minutes ago is known to me as
well. German Ebay does nothing against: forgeries, shill bidding, rip-offs and
so on unless forced to do so by legal enforcement authorities... *sigh*
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Lars, Welcome, sounds like a familiar story, at least Ebay.US will be doing
better than that,
David Benson
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Dave P. To put it into a US perspective, are fake grills on US stamps considered
forgeries, if so, backstamp them FORGERY.
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Lars Boettger <alpha2
at pt dot lu>
Forgeries
David Benson
To my knowledge there was no contact between BDPh and eBay.de (yet). To
illustrate the current misery, a short example: A forged German infla stamp with
a fake signature was reported to eBay security. By the very same man whose
signature was faked... eBay reaction: Zero. So even proven experts opinions
don't matter to them.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Dave P, of course everyone would like a perfect world but Ebay had a chance with
the APS arrangement as they would have philatelists checking the material and
not Ebay Safeharbor juniors. Any experienced philatelist knows the difference
between a postal forgery, classical forgery and modern made muck. The latter is
the type that should be backstamped or booted. The others should be allowed
without any markings.
I cannot make any comments about what category items should go under and I also
believe they should be in a special fake category but so far no one has made any
statements.
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Dave P
Forgeries
David B
I do agree with your sentiments about marking "classic forgeries". I assume the
rule would also apply to early postal forgeries - even where they are worth a
lot more than the genuine stamps, clearly not a reasonable thing to do! On the
other hand I do have some sympathy with Ebay, they have to try and keep the
process as simple and uncomplicated as possible. If the price to pay for a clean
up is that certain forgeries can no longer be realistically sold on Ebay then I
would have to go along with it. What I would like to see is a completely
separate main category under stamps titled "Forgeries" and that this be the
only place where forgeries could be listed.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Matthias, has there ever been any suggestions to any German Philatelic
Organisation about how to clean up Ebay.Germany. I have noticed many modern made
forgeries for sale,
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David B, Matthias: Thanks for the comments (und wilkommen hier Matthias - that
is about as much German I'll be willing to venture before my my name crater!).
I understood your comments re either proof/genuine, I was more interested on the
value of an expert's signature on a cover. I generally assumed that if say
Calves's signature is on the cover, I cannot really go wrong (but see Matthias's
comments below). It looks to me as if Calves uses a small rubber stamp to attach
his signature to items he has investigated.
On the comment one has to feel the stamp in one's own hands (I presume meaning
to investigate from closeby by means of feel - texture - magnification):
Difficult if one has not got that luxury - this is the problem with electronic
auctions. I suppose the one will have to ensure that a return is possible on the
items bought.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Matthias, At least Ebay.US has started something in getting the APS to check
forgeries when a complaint to Ebay comes in and it will help clear some of the
garbage from the US site especially the modern made computer generated copies
but I don't agree with the marking of older well known forgeries, especially
with indelible ink.
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Matthias Bock
David: I did. There is no such thing as a conduct for stamp trade on German Ebay,
or any obligation to mark forgeries as such. One of my current "favourites" is
this collection of Danzig (http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2960546709)
which is nowhere near the 35,000 Euro mark. All key values of the inflation time
have fake or CTO cancels, the better overprints are all forgeries, the seller
has a history of buying from well-known sellers of fakes (see his feedback
profile). Ebay does not care...
Matthias
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Matthias,
Welcome, did you see the comments on Ebay.Germany Chat,
David Benson
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Christo, I don't know, I have seen many items with Calves signature and they
have been OK but would presume a certificate would have accompanied the item. I
am not doubting the item, only whether it is the issued stamp or a proof.
David B.
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Roger H: Next time you do a photo shoot with your team, please ask them not to
suck in their breath so much!! You know what happens when we men suck in ours.
Re the fire photos, they had a copy of the one you posted this morning on your
TV news programme. But they also had another one whch was absolutely fantastic -
I'll see if I can find that one and post the link
October 29, 2003 Matthias Bock <5bock
at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de>
Signatures
A signature does not neccessarily mean anything.
First of all, the experts of old did not have today's knowledge. They have have
thought fake cancels as genuine and all that.
Second, any signature can be forged. Think about all the german forgeries
backstamped "DrDub". Many of these were made
after the death of said Dr. Dub by forgers. There are also forgeries of very
recently deceased experts' signatures (like
Erdwien, who expertised Danzig until his death about two years ago).
Third, stamps are not "protected" in a way only experts could sign them. I could
put my name on any stamp I own,
but it would signify nothing.
So, what it sums up to is: You have to see the stamp itself to be able to tell
if it's genuine. Many forgeries can
be seen as such on scans, but not all of them, and old expertizer's marks do not
help very much...
Matthias
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David Benson: So I am learning something new here. What does a person's
signature (e.g. Calves, Deiss, Roumet etc) signature mean then. That they have
seen it and is OK, or just that they have seen it? A lot of sellers offer their
items in this way, e.g signed Calves. Does this add any value to the item, or
can one take it as "I have seen this item and consider it to be real?"
October 29, 2003 Roger Heath
Final - Final Fire Photos
This NASA site has some incredible satellite photos of various phenomenon around
the world. Primarily fires, volcanoes, cloud patterns, and some ocean currents.
I've just spent an hour looking at page after page. One of the most interesting
images was of clouds squeezing through the Kurile Islands, and of ship tracks in
the Pacific. High speed connection is almost a neccesity but all images have
three different resolutions. This photo is of the current Southern California
fires.
Roger
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Christo, I don't know if signed by Calves means that is expertised. It would
need a certificate to go with it. It is a valuable item and looks genuine but
may be a proof which is not of great value. The only way to tell is the paper
and impossible from a scan. Ask him for a copy of Calves certificate.
David Benson
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David Benson: Hi. I know that this seller is not your favourite to deal with. He
is currently listing
this Ceres block of four, Mint no glue. Apparently expertised by Calves. I
can't remember catalogue value offhand, but it must be in the region of $1200 -
$1500. It also appears to have a few print flaws as well.
Even for an item which will probably realise a high amount, he only offers cash
via mail as payment option!
Also, why does he list this on ebay and not an auction house?
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Prometheus: Did you see my tiny covers I posted for you?
October 29, 2003 Christo van Zyl
John Cunningham: Thanks for responding to my posting. I think that we all can
benefit from civility in our discussions! Sometimes I wish some of the posters
would just step back a bit, and take a deep breath before hitting the enter
button on a posting
So what is your collecting interest? My guess - classic USA?
Regards, Christo
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Another comment on Ebay.Germany,
there is no such agreement with eBay.de. And as far as I know, there is no such
agreement with eBay.com, at least I can't imagine that anybody will backstamp a
possible fake with an irreversible mark. I wouldn't want to pay the indemnity if
it is proven that a stamp was wrongly marked.
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Who said Germans don't have a sense of humor,
Maybe this could be an idea from the German government? Now we have more then 4
million workless people. After this regulation, they all will have a job at ebay
to look for forgerys ;-)
October 29, 2003 David Benson
Some interesting replies on Ebay.Germany. No one has heard of the arrangement,
see,
http://cgi3.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBoard&name=stampsde&limit=default
David Benson
October 28, 2003 Anne
ebay incompetence--you're surprised?
It sounds like another typical day on ebay. NARU a power seller for no apparent
reason, don't communicate (they're just bashful), and generally make life
difficult for your devoted community. Their stock must be going up.
Names During a good semester, about 50% of my students get my last
name right. The most innocuous mistake is dropping the first half. Equally
common however is when they use "Toplin" instead of "Tolpin." Then there are the
ones that used to ask what their teacher's name was when filling out the student
teaching evaluations at the end of the semester.
Dave & Lavar How are you two holding up with the fire? Hope you and
yours are being missed.
Good night to all and to all sweet dreams of Slania forgeries (at least
they'd be high quality, as opposed to those of someone else we know), dweebs and
weenies, and rain in California.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Final for the night
Bennett Auctions -
Nice to read many of the stamps offered by Bennett are RAZOR SHARP. I'll have to
take their word for it, as right now the auctions don't show in Netscape 4.8 and
the images don't show in 7.0. I guess there's no need to see them. Maybe could
get refund if not as described, due to technical glitches.
October 28, 2003 David Benson
Roger, I have left a post on Ebay German Chat asking them if anyone has any
knowledge of the new arrangements,
David Benson
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Fakes Sale - BIN
Maybe word is out. Getting rid of
fakes on Ebay Germany, certainly not bargain prices.
Roger
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Bill's Dilema
I think the Ebay spiderware caught you looking at my expert committee. It was
posted for a glance, not to ogle. You didn't by chance copy the image and
mistakenly post as the image file for all your auctions, did you?
Roger (just trying to be helpful)
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
MARK B; You may have misunderstood an earlier post. We DID get contact with live
help, but THAT person told us that someone from eBay Security would need to
speak to us peronally, but then they never called.
DAVE F; Thanks for your support. You may be correct about what happened,
although the last time our eBay name was stolen, some guy in Italy was using it
to sell something that had to do with computers if memory serves, and in that
case, they did not suspend our accounts, so I suspect this may be something
different, but have no idea what. I guess we will just have to wait and see.
October 28, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Dweebs and Weenies
Be very careful what you say about dweebs and weenies, I suspect dweebs and
weenies are employed at eBay Live Help, eBay Security, and if there is such a
thing as eBay Customer Relations you can bet there is probably a weenie or dweeb
there, too. And some of them may be literate.
Dunc
October 28, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Oops,
last line was supposed to go before Dang.
I write to screen rather than "word" and sometimes miss where I had previously
terminated.
When I edit.
October 28, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Brain
Yep, Chronicles misspelled my name.
It is amazing how many miscombinations of letters can give rise to my name.
But who gives a damn.
There is a "letter to the editor" describing the activities of a certain poster
to this board.
A letter that will either curtail future activities or enhance their saleablity,
depending on the intentions of the buyer.
At least on the North American continent.
And perhaps some in Europe.
Dang Jim, Discovery program called "95 Moons and counting" describes Io
as hell.
That seems to be a little worse than "dweeb" or "weenie".
Though it might seem that new eBay rules will at least curtail listing on the
main site.
October 28, 2003 Mark Bardell
Bill W - Live Help
Bill
Live Help should always keep you on line until they have got your account back
in good stead. If it was me I would try them again. The link below is the one
that I have for live help, although you may have to sit on line for up to an
hour before seomeone gets to you.
Mark.
October 28, 2003 18:59 Dave F. (moderator)
Bill W: It's interesting that you said that the Live Help person said
that someone from eBay Security would need to contact you, rather than, say,
Customer Service (although maybe eBay doesn't recognize that as a concept!).
It sounds to me like your account security was possibly compromised, and that
they had determined that one or more of your auctions had been fraudulently
submitted. (Not that you did that, but that someone hijacked your id and did
it.) In that case, the safest thing they can do is just suspend your account (in
this case, your id) until it can get rectified. That may be why you received no
additional information from them, either. (One of the occasional annoyers on
both eBay and this board has created feedback with stolen ids and phony auction
listings.)
Keep us posted. We're rooting for you!
October 28, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Bill, I already own the domain "dweeb.org" - what more do you want
from me?
Jim
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
JIM G; I'll make you a deal. If eBay tells me it was because I'm a weenie, I
will be pleased to have the label applied to me permanently....BUT.....if they
do not, then YOU must wear the label permanently. Fair?
October 28, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Bill, just glad to be doing my part.
It's a serious concern, because once you get a weenie label slapped on you,
it's tough to get rid of it. Just ask Duncan.
Jim
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
Sorry, I obviously did not mean "Live Hepp"....how about "Live Help"?
JIM G; Thanks man. Your always there, and I love you for it, even though.....it
takes one to know one!
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
ROGER; We contacted Live Hepp many hours ago, then waited over one hour until
they finally contacted us back. As part of what little they would tell us via
computer, they stated that this situation warranted a live telephone call from
eBay Security. They asked when they could reach us. We told them 6PM-9PM Eastern
time, yet the call never came. That's what I referred to earlier when I said I
finally did receive an email from them stating that they tried to call and could
not get through. God fobid they would merely give ME a number to call and a live
person to ask for! They do a great job of making relevent infomation as
difficult to access as possible, and just as difficult to try to remedy a
situation like this.
Don't get me wrong, I am sensible enough to understand that eBay can't simply
make it VERY easy for just anyone to reach a live person just over any little
thing. They would likely be flooded with contacts such that they couldn't
possibly handle it all. But it seems to me that when something as serious as a
total account suspension has taken place that a reasonable explaination should
follow shortly - or am I being silly?
October 28, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Bill, might it be because you're a weenie?
I mean, that's what it turned out to be in Duncan's case.
Jim (just trying to help)
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
To expand on some of your comments about the possibilities for our suspensions,
DAVID B. suggests that because we promote our public auction on the "ABOUT ME"
page could have caused it. We have had the promotion on our About Me page for
many months without contact from eBay, so I doubt that's it. Interestingly
though, last week the "About Me" page suddenly disappeared. It merely said
"Default" when you clicked onto it! We contacted eBay, who came back with what I
regarded as a lame explaination, to the effect that we apparantly tried to alter
the page while they were experiencing technical problems and, oh yes, they were
"sorry" for any inconvenience, but, too bad, you will have to type the whole
page over again - which I just did a day or two ago. But the basic content on
the page was about the same as the one that disappeared.
DAVE F. wonders if it could be because our account with eBay was overdue due to
the previous credit card thefts we had. I doubt that one too, as once before we
suddenly (months ago) got a notice from eBay stating that our balance was too
high and we needed to pay it immediately or have our seller's account suspended
- which also amazed us since the amount was, I think, about $700., which to me,
seemed like an ill-advised demand on eBay's part. Nevertheless, we paid the
entire amount that same day, and that ended that, thus my conclusion is that if
you owe them what they perceive to be too much money, they warn you rather than
outright suspend you.
Last, in case, in my wrath, I have failed to thank all of you who have
contributed remarks about this situation, let me do so now...THANK YOU!
Particularly to KEN SRAIL who was nice enough to call, and to ROGER H. who
apparently sent several intercepted emails.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Bill W Contact Live Help
Bill - Have you contacted Live Help. The person who helped me through my ID
theft situation, seemed to have one of those huge screen many window open
computers and was able to go everywhere at once. They were helpful and in 20
minutes on Live Help I had my account back a new password and emails addresses
changed back. The only thing I personally had to do was go to my My Ebay Page >
Preferences and change my passwrod, the Ebay employee didn't have access to
change it. Everything else the employee was able to enter and fix. Give it a
shot.
Roger
October 28, 2003 Brian R
Bill W
If you'll scroll down, you'll see that Ken S has offered to help. I
assume he's a power seller, and can avail himself of live ebay help, as
required. Maybe, you should take him up on it. If only on the basis, that the
preferential treatment tiers, that ebay has set up sound so offensive.
October 28, 2003 Brian R
comming up!
Roger, name your flavor, and I'll be happy to serve it.
Although, I have no idea, what you and Jim W/S are talking about.
I sense, one or both of you, have been misidentified as someone else.
Or it may be that people are misspelling your names.
Which is an angst I can't come close to understanding.
Remember, that often here, I misspell my own name.
I assure you, this has absolutely nothing to do,
with being issued the EUSC liquor cabinet keys. ;o)
October 28, 2003 5:50PM Bill Weiss
Frustration!
Good evening everyone. As of this moment, we still have not been contacted
although we did receive an email stating they TRIED to call me but could not get
through! Since I WAS on the phone several times for a few minutes each time, I
suppose it IS possible, but my bet is they may have tried one time, failed, and
gave up. Great customer service! We also received an email listing all of our
forthcoming auctions and advising they have been terminated and all fees placed
into our account (refunded). Great! Obviously, that means once this gets
straightened out - if ever - I will have to re-do all of them. REAL FAIR EBAY!
We get suspended without explaination. Try to remedy it by contacting them and
10 hours later, no help.
In many resects eBay is a wonderful medium, but in others, it truly sucks! My
wife's theory about all of this is, since our identity has been stolen twice
before, she assumes it's been done again, and was caught quickly by eBay, but to
protect everything, they suspend everything temporarily. I am not so sure. Many
of you folks seem to write things suggesting that they suspend accounts for LOTS
of reasons. So why don't they TELL you immediately when they do it? See, they
SUCK!
PS I know some of this sounds childish, but I am very upset over this and am
frustrated that we get nothing from eBay to at least explain it. If a reasonable
explaination were forthcoming in a reasonably timely fashion, I can live with
it, but so far....nothing!
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Wrong Name
Jim -
You could have been a Starkey, nickname Jimbo, but you lucked out and became a
geologist instead of a musician.
Nevermind!
Roger, Not related to the Ex-Prime Minister of England, nor the candy bar
manufacturere, nor the engraver of so many early English stamps. The talent is
there for any of these occupations, but the South Seas called instead. Brian,
where are you, I need a cold one.
October 28, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Roger
If only Paul could spell my name correctly, along with about a zillion other
people.
I hope message served in reaching audience that could have been most receptive.
At least we try to warn people about current forgeries.
If people want to buy them, I have no problem, as long as they know what they
are buying.
And the sellers are honestly selling what they perceive are "real forgeries"
rather than color printer manufactured or bogus toy set overprints.
The levels of expertise required to accomplish the different types of forgeries
are I think outlined in Sheryll and my
original article on eBay fraud.
That level of forgery expertise, to a large degree, determines the worthiness of
collecting such items.
However, if someone like Slania had turned to "the dark side", we'd be
experiencing very serious problems.
October 28, 2003 John Cunningham
Christo Sorry to delay a response to your post for a few days. You were
correct that I forgot the value of civility in disagreement. I will work on
incorporating manners in all of my future posts, even when I disagree.
Regards,
John C
October 28, 2003 16:29 Ken Srail
Sorry!
Sorry, Bob's not talking to himself. Ken's just getting senile and putting the
wrong text in the wrong box... I called Bill and offered to help (but at the
same time, expressed my doubts that my PS rep would be able to do much of
anything. They're pretty worthless when you need them to help with something
important.) All Bill needs to do is say the word and I'll get on the phone.
Hopefully, the intial eBay contact with Bill will explain/rectify the situation
to his satisfaction.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
GBCC Chronicle
Jim- It was mailed Oct 24 in Maine. Editor apologizes for delay. Last week I
received a letter from England on third day in the mean time, I haven't received
an item from Mauro in Uruguay (five weeks now), nor money from Northern Ireland
4 weeks now, nor a package of postcards from Northern Germany sent October 14, 2
of the three are registered.
Roger
October 28, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dang Roger, Chronicles gets to Hawaii before Texas!!
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
GBCC & Ebay
Jim -
Yes, I'm still a member and received my October Chronicle yesterday. I noted
your comments about forged GB overprints. Officially speaking on promises of
autonomy, I think it reached a good audience.
Bill W -
I sent you an email through the Ebay system - Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:34:17
PST
I offered a couple of possibilities, but maybe you haven't received it
Roger
October 28, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Knud-Erik, I need your help!!!!
Can you email me at eddiephilatelic@hotmail.com as soon as you see this. I need
the item numbers for the ended listings. Dan Neary, the ebay Vice President for
collectibles dept, has emailed me back but he needs the item numbers of the
erroneously ended auctions before he can research. Or, have your friend forward
to me the emails they got from ended@ebay.com regarding the justification for
deeming the Nazi philatelic items "offensive." Thank you in advance, Alison
October 28, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
What a day, still packing up the office ready for move.
Lectures and Curriculum Council meeting -aaaarrrgghh
Roger
Are you still in GBCC and if so have you got October issue yet?
October 28, 2003 The real Bob H.
Bill's problems
Not I, Jim, not I - wish I could help more directly. eBay says they will let
anybody know why they were suspended - since e-mails didn't get there they may
be going into a spam bucket and somebody complained. eBay tests those and if
they don't get a reply they suspend the account...
October 28, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Uh oh, Bob's talking to himself again...
Jim
October 28, 2003 15:26 Bob H
Bob H., I just got off the phone with Bill W. and offered to call my PS
rep if he thinks it would help (he still had not heard from eBay when I talked
to him a few minutes ago). Good suggestion.
October 28, 2003 David Benson
Another 2 countries added to the list of repatriating stamps to their homelands,
Seychelles & Brunei,
David Benson
October 28, 2003 Bob H.
eBay problems
Bill, I sent you two. Second one was to mention that since you are a powerseller,
if you are anything but the lowest level (bronze) you have telephone support
from eBay. I do not know the phone number and would not post it if I did, but
you must know other powersellers well enough to e-mail one of them and get the
number.
There is also a Live Help function -
Link is here. I do not know if you can sign in to that or not but I'd sure
try it.
October 28, 2003 15:10 Bjorn Munch
29 FEB
prometheus, what I would love to find is a cover dated 29 Feb 1900. :-)
(or 1800 for that matter).
October 28, 2003 3:09 pm Bob in WA
sold as is
Chip -- I heard about that on the national news on NPR. Thanks for the
link, it was fun to read.
October 28, 2003 15:05 Bjorn Munch
Credit cards
I had problems paying with PayPal on Sunday. After a 10s delay, I got a nast
message telling me my CC had been denied. Now this has happened before and (I've
figured) just means PayPal can't contact my card issuer. But this time it lasted
more that 12 hours until it worked again. Could Bill's problem be related? On
the other hand, you'd think he would get some kind of warning.
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
STILL BIG PROBLEMS!
Obviously this is serious. BOB H. says he sent us an email but we did not get
it, which surely means our emails are being intercepted. All of our eBay
activities have been suspended, all of our listed sales cancelled, all of our
bids cancelled, we are now listed as an unregistered user, etc. Someone from
eBay Security is supposed to be telephoning us with the next half hour. I WANT A
LAWYER!
October 28, 2003 Chip G
As Is Auctions on Ebay
...now this is an auction description I enjoyed:
Sold As
Is
C.
October 28, 2003 12:49 Ken Srail
eBay problems
eBay has been having numerous
technical problems over the last several days. It's possible that some of
the problems are related to that (especially the "My eBay" problems...)
October 28, 2003 12:34:56 pm Bob in WA
Wow, I had the strangest dream. It had to do with stamp goddesses and pissing
contests. I'll leave it at that except to say there were different winners for
height, distance, and calligraphy!
Roger -- Nice team! Hope you don't get worn out with teamwork!
Prometheus -- They had weapons? I didn't notice.
October 28, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
eBay
Odd. I was just unable to login to my "my eBay" section, and I'm sure I haven't
forgotten or misremembered my password. I went through the process to change my
password, and that all worked just fine, and I reported it to eBay in case
someone's doing something funny. But there were no changes to my account, no
auctions posted, no bids placed, so I don't know what's up.
Jim
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Ebay Credit Cards
Speculation here-
It is possible Ebay has a problem keeping track of credit card information.
About two weeks ago I received an email from Ebay stating if I didn't provide a
valid CC number to my seller's account, I owuld not be able to buy or sell. I
did not respond to the email, but went to my Me Page and followed links through
my account to get to the CC data input area. I entered the information as all
the windows were blank. I thought, "OK, done", but two days later I received
another email sounding more urgent! I follwed links to the Sellers Help Web Form
and posted a message to the unknown helper, that I had done everything in my
power to comply, and it all the person had to do was look at my account to
confirm the fact.
The verifying factor in these emails from Ebay was the inclusion of my account
sales data documenting my September and October sales. It wasn't a scam, but I
think there was an internal Ebay problem. Like maybe one of the servers crashed
and they had only saved old information!
Roger
October 28, 2003 11:10 Dave F. (moderator)
At Roger's request, I've inserted a disclaimer at that link he thoughtfully
provided for us. (I think I'm going to brush up on my study of Japanese
forgeries, if I have that to look forward to!)
Bill W: No doubt you will have found out by the time you read this, but
I'm wondering if eBay still had your old credit card number (didn't you have to
change them recently?) and your eBay fees were considered past due. Do let us
know what happens once you find out more.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
David D
I'm sorry for the sneak attack. I will be more considerate in future.
When I saw Scott's comment, I couldn't resist.
Roger
October 28, 2003 David Benson
Bill, presume someone complained about your ME page. One of Ebay's rulings is
that ME pages should not mention auctions.
David B.
October 28, 2003 Bob H.
Bill
Sent Bill some suggestions as to what he can do - my e-mail did not bounce so
that shouldn't be the problem. Anything else, he should get a notification of
why.
October 28, 2003 David D'
Roger Heath -
please place a warning in your post the next time you post a link like that -
some of us read this board from work. While I personally am not offended, I
would be in BIG trouble if I was observed viewing that image in the office.
October 28, 2003 Bob H
Bill
Wonder if his e-mail bounced and somebody reported it? Those people never know
what hit them since they don't get an e-mail to explain it..
October 28, 2003 prometheus
newbie question
newbie question of the day, How do I tell if the grill points are DOWN ??
Is there a easy way, study harder, practice,practice,practice??
October 28, 2003 Chip G
Bill Weiss has a problem
yes, it appears Bill W has a real problem (rather than an unreal problem)
October 28, 2003 Scott Trepel
Roger H:
Great minds think alike.
Bill W:
The Bissell cover and Cal Hahn article are going out to you today by Fedex. Have
fun.
October 28, 2003 Prometheus
Bob H
He is showing as Not a Registered User.
October 28, 2003 prometheus
OH NO mister Bill NARUed
looks like some one got to Bill W.
October 28, 2003 Bob Hohertz
suspension
Bill - are you SURE that is true? Many of the scam e-mails start out that way.
Have you logged on to eBay itself and looked? If so, go to the Emergency Contact
Board and I'll post a link to Live Help for you.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Expert's Challenge
Bill -
I didn't mention that's My Team, and I have them training here in Hawaii
awaiting the outcome of the Grinnel findings. The BPA will never know what hit
them, if its decision is not thoroughly explained and documented.
Roger
October 28, 2003 prometheus
Roger
you need to retitle that Pic, those ain't guerillas, look at the weapons, JUST
HUNTERS.
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
BIG PROBLEM!!!
I DO have a serious problem....suddenly, within the last hour, we have received
emails from eBay to the affect that all of our eBay activity has been suspended
- for now reason or explaination, can anyone here enlighten me as to what I
should do? How the hell can I get a live message to eBay?? Help!!
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
Great Link!
ROGER; I have to go out for a few hours, but I must say that is probably the
most INTERESTING link I've seen on here!
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Experts Challenge
Scott -
Just what you're looking for, but
they
could be tougher than you guys! [warning: a more adult image than we're
accustomed to on here; you may prefer to check this out from home]
Roger
October 28, 2003 prometheus
Brian
I think that any/every profession has it's cliques/groups,
It's the nature of the Tribal/pack animals that we humans are.
Recently while checking on a Jobsite crew (for my mom) i watched two Structural
Engineers argue over what was the Proper way to adjust a job that some one else
had designed , After two hours with no solution , a guy with no education (but
23 years eperience)
jumped in the hole with a yellow crayon put some marks on the forms and rebar
explained How it could be done , how it should be done why it was the only way
it could be done , and then DID it.
The two experts in their field continued to argue with each other even after the
concrete was being troweled .
The Job Boss and the Inspectors accepted the way it was done and I bet that the
2 engineers are still mad at each other for what each saw as the Others failure.
October 28, 2003 Scott Trepel
Brian R
Excellent idea. Except I would add some half-naked women to cheer us on.
October 28, 2003 Brian R
what to do about experts
I begining to think that the philatelic community, should demand that the big
three expertization services, be subjected to a special edition of suvivor.
Plunk all of the committee members, together down on some malarial infested
desert island, and then subject them to challenges. Misidentify a regum job, and
you have to eat a live centipede. Approve a fake cancel, and you're tasked with
hunting down, and capturing a poisonous snake. That sort of thing. Whoever,
phyically survives, gets to call themselves top dog. It would be quite
entertaining, as well as a faster & better method, of determining an answer,
than having them hurling charges around the message boards at each other.
October 28, 2003 prometheus
NOIP 29 feb
just got a 29th feb 1892 for my leap year grouping -me happy camper.
October 28, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
anne + Duncan
Anne - I was being gender neutral , My girl friend rites in the snow better than
I do.
Duncan- The highest points are awarded on artistic merit. and Penmanship.
October 28, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Scott Trepel, Last Words
Perceptions are strange things. Bill Weiss urged my participation here, which
brought me on against my better judgment. I put forward a clearly labeled
partisan but factual summary of philatelic expertizing as it is and has been
practised in the United States. Then you came on, and Bill thanked both of us.
Now you're leaving in a snit.
If you think an honest discussion of the expertizing process is inappropriate,
that's a shame, especially since so much of it has become the perennial subject
of vigorous gossip in the stamp trade. Here we can get to the bottom of these
rumors and sort truth from fiction if we engage in serious give and take.
It's true I feel violated. Boys Town had sought my advice, first about getting
the Orangeburg coil pair authenticated, next about publicizing the discovery,
finally about selling it. I told Boys Town that Siegel's Rarities sale would be
the best place to get the highest realization. You expressed your gratitude for
that referral with a kick in the teeth. APEX had assembled the best possible
group of coil experts to examine the stamp. You did not trust them. I think I
never felt so disappointed in my hobby as the day in New York when Bill Crowe
said he would certify the pair as fake, because the word was all over town (that
was the Mega Event week), and already the taunts at APEX were being thrown in my
face. I returned home wondering why this was happening, and what good it could
be doing for the hobby. It's one thing for experts to disagree; another
altogether for the disagreement to have an ulterior motive and driving force.
Then to add insult, Bill Crowe's superiors ordered him to resign from our expert
committee. PF staff was never the problem in any of this.
I did not cheer when the truth about the Orangeburg was revealed, previously and
subsequently certified as genuine by the PF, but I did breathe a sigh of relief.
What possible benefit could have resulted from such intrigue?
Dick Graham has a comparable sad story about the hubris involved in PF's
declaring Scott Gallagher's 10-cent Knoxville Provisional cover a fake, and
never apologizing when its error was proven. His grievance predates mine by a
long time.
So we are left with your allegation that you were merely reprising my alleged
"attempts to discredit PF." Pray, what might those have been? Before the
Orangeburg fiasco, I naively believed everybody was doing the best they could,
and would help each other. That episode was the one that sobered me on the
subject.
As best I can recall, my only earlier venture into this thicket was when I poked
fun at PF's report on Harry Hagendorf's miracle Columbian wrapper, inventing a
rate that did not exist and hypothesizing a steamer trunk as contents in
justification for certifying it. My Congress Book article on the 1-cent Z grill
explored every point of view thoroughly and fairly, and made no mention or
suggestion of any alternative to the PF. My history of APEX disparaged no
competitors.
Before then I was a bystander to the Wurdeman scandal, writing nothing on that
subject myself, and certainly not holding the honest PF people responsible for
it. I assigned a scrupulously fair reporter to cover the Sachs/Ivy scandal, and
directed all my polemics against Joe Puleo for his ulterior motives and PSE for
its unholy alliance with Puleo. But Tom Maeder's article, which I published,
asserted his continuing faith in the PF and its steps toward reform. During the
Rosende scandal I also abstained, despite its wonderful material for comedians,
and passed along all the leaked material to other reporters for their
evaluation. So your allegation against me is false, but I won't hold my breath
awaiting your apology.
October 28, 2003 Scott Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
http://www.siegelauctions.com
Expertizing
KEN L:
You cannot make the charge of favoritism and NOT discredit the P.F. staff.
Favoritism by definition requires the participation of both parties: the one
asking the favor and the one granting the favor. I had hoped to see an
unqualified retraction of the insult to the P.F. staff, but along with your
praise of their ethics you characterized my defense of the P.F. staff as
disingenuous. I made my point. I'll leave it at that.
Yes, at a time when you were issuing public statements challenging or attempting
to discredit the P.F., as you have done here, I was one of the Board members who
felt there was nothing to be gained by assisting APEX (although I was not the
most vocal of opponents). Considering the content and tone of your postings
here, which may or may not speak for APEX, I personally do not see any benefit
to reestablishing ties between APEX and P.F., but I do wish APEX every success.
As a P.F. Board member, I am legally and ethically responsible to that
institution and the public it serves. If you wish to describe that as
"partisanship", guilty as charged.
The Orangeburg story and other matters you allude to in your posting are not
subjects appropriate for this public forum. If you wish to discuss any
differences of opinion or concerns over how anything has been handled by the P.F.,
I refer you to the P.F. Chairman, George Kramer, who I am sure will be happy to
respond to you in a more appropriate setting.
Bill W. asked me to enter this discussion, and I did. However, I am
uncomfortable with my role as a defender of the P.F. I cannot speak for the P.F.
or its entire Board, so I will no longer post on this subject. Therefore, you
will have the last word, and I urge you to be moderate and less confrontational,
for everyone's benefit.
October 28, 2003 8:52 a.m.c.d.t. John@MagnoliaStamps
Hi-Ho-Hi-Ho
And it's off to work I go! Yes I hate it but its time to return to the ranks of
the employed.In other words the party is over,and so is the weeks vacation,I've
one more coming maybe I'll take it next month next month,So now it's off to
upstate N.Y. Oh boy big fun and big money as once again I hit the road for more
fun and excitement.So watch for me along the I-75,I-40 & I-81 coridors in the
good old u.s.a. I'll be the one in the big white truck hauling furniture for a
company that employs more illegle mexicans than Wal-Mart ever thought about.
John in Ms headed to N.Y.
October 28, 2003 Bill Weiss
VARIOUS
KEN L; Question; If the "J" grill was nothing more than an essay, how do you
explain the fact that there are obviously way more of the 3c value probably than
all the other values combined? What would be the point to grilling a much larger
quantity of one value> And why the most prolifically-used value?
ROGER H; The point of someone having a professional restorer remove the pen
cancel from the $20. State was obviously to commit a fraudulent act. THe value
of the "mint" stamp thus created was far in excess of the value as a "used"
copy. I doubt that it was done to make an expert service look bad.
October 28, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aiol.com>
Continental Grills
Clark,
Had it not been for John Luff's unique status, no one ever would have regarded J
grills as stamps. Maybe as a joke while they were finishing stamps for Peru,
someone ran one pane each of most U.S. denomintions through the griller. :-) All
serious scholars since Stevenson have regarded J grills as essays, along with
Luff's unused 1-cent C grill and 3-cent B grill. But once such items are listed
in the front of the catalog, it takes a lot to pull them out, especially because
they do no harm there except for the confusion they bring, while moving anything
to the back always evokes terrible wails from the marketplace.
October 28, 2003 05:09 Ken Srail
eBay Live Auctions
eBay Live auctions have been around a long time, and there's "always" a "buyers
premium" on those sales. eBay Live charges a hefty fee for their "services"
(around 5% I believe), so it's common for an auctioneer to just tack 5% on to
their normal buyer’s premium (hence Bennett’s 15% if you bid using eBay Live vs.
10% if you bid by mail, phone, or in the gallery).
I know several auctioneers who have tried eBay Live and have (generally) been
dissatisfied with the results. I've physically attended several of these sales,
and each was filled with technical glitches (and even when it worked, it slowed
the live auction down tremendously – they could hit 75-100 lots per hour, not
200-300). I'm pretty sure Manning/Ivy & Mader tried it a few years ago. I don't
think their effort lasted more than a couple sales. Maybe Harvey will have more
success.
If the technology problems ever get worked out, it probably won't be good
news for auction agents (their role won’t be eliminated, but will be reduced).
The concept is a good one -- it allows you to sit at your computer, follow the
auction/bids "real time", and place a bid in an "instant", just as if you were
attending the auction in person. It’s unlikely this technology will be
“meaningful” though until everyone has a broadband connection and the technical
bugs are worked out. We're not there yet, on either count.
October 28, 2003 Tom Lowe
Heros of San Diego
A&S
Just thought you would like
to see our San Diego heros in action.
I just know that garden hose is going to save us all.
October 28, 2003 John@MagnoliaStamps
David B
Ihad that stamp in 5 differnt shades and did not pay attention to the
cancel,But there was 1 in the lot that I needed back so I bid on it like
everyone else.
Prometeus
If you are interested in canadian stamps I do have a complete collection from
1851 to 1995 that I would consider getting rid of.But it is mint after say about
1940.And a combination Mint & used before that,But keep an eye open I'm sure
that Alison will list more since I sent her several hundred Canadian stamps,She
will more than likely list them in groups,since there were so many.
B.T.W. I'm sure they are all 482a's surely thta dealer wouldn't tell a whopper
Brian R
It seems that I got took a good lashing for making comments about someone
that was adding 15% buyers fees in an ebay auction a few months ago.But we have
the same thoughts on that subject.
John
October 28, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Patrick Lemon
In the US Precancels started with the first stamp. And yes, there is value to
early precancels. Generally it‘s the 1890’s when precancels being their run,
before the 1920’s is considered to be the “Classic” period. Sometimes, but not
always, the precancel is of greater value than the stamp on which it is found.
Do check out Bill’s link, there’s much good info there.
Jim L.
October 28, 2003 03:32 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a cover from
Peru to the
United States in 1884. It came from the U. S. Ship Monongahela!
October 28, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Dave F. -- Thanks. Will post a picture of the cake at a later date (still don't
have a digital camera). My mom's place is ok for now. Have a few friends and
relatives down in San Diego that I am worried about.
October 28, 2003 Roger Heath
Voting
Lavar -
I believe some of the Hawaii votes are finally coming. I assumed they had
already been counted. As usual things here sometimes take longer to complete,
and anyway the surf was up election day, so the polls were closed. It took a
minor scandal to reopen them after the election was closed in California
because, as usual, everyone had conceded before the election was over. I was
able to swing a few votes since I told people you must be a cool candidate
working on briefs all the time. They though California was more formal. Luckily
they never saw you with the "tie".
Roger
October 28, 2003 23:15 Dave F. (moderator)
Lavar: Congrats on the baking fest. You wouldn't have a picture of this
masterpiece, by any chance, would you? Also, my thoughts are with your family
and your displaced mother. Have you learned any more about whether she incurred
any damage? (This is the most frustrating thing for my friends -- not knowing
the status of things.)
October 28, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Well, my effort to reach the 1000 vote mark in the California guvernatorial
election is getting exciting. Out of nowhere, I appear to have picked up 100
more votes, so my vote total is now 836. Can't figure out what happened. I
noticed, however, that I am now well over the 100 vote mark in Monterey County,
which is more than I received in my home county of Orange. Maybe some of the
voters up there got my last name confused with Arnold's last name.
October 27, 2003 Lavar Taylor
I won't be doing a postal history posting tonight as I am back at the office to
work on my Supreme court brief (due in 2 weeks). This after winning the "tallest
cake" award in my son's Cub Scout Pack's annual "Feller's cake bake" earlier
tonight. The scout and dad (or some other man-- NO women) must design, bake and
decorate a cake, based on the announced theme, and everything on the cake must
be edible. This year's theme was "Once upon a time...". Our cake illustrated
Jack and the beanstalk. We baked a sheet cake, covered it with frosting, and
built Jack's house using pretzel sticks and liquified sugar to hold them
together. Built the roof out of uncooked basil fettuccini. Then surrounded the
cake with pretzel squares as a fence, and used cheezits as the stepping stones
in the path to the gate. The beanstalk was made with two 6 inch long circular
pastry tubes filled with some creamy stuff, held together by a long piece of
uncooked basil fettuccini inserted into the hollow middle, through the creamy
stuff, and covered with green frosting. Then some yellow jelly beans for the
golden eggs, and "Fee Fi Fo Fum" written on the front in case nobody could
recognize what the hell we made. I am afraid to find out what it tastes like,
but I will have some for dessert after I get home early tomorrow am.
October 27, 2003 Roger Heath
Varia
Anne-
I always believed that women use their brains in situations as we've seen here
over the last 48 hours.
Brian -
I agree. I think the reason the auction you are questioning is the proverbial
fish out of water. I would guess that many more sellers on Ebay own the items
they are auctioning reather than selling on consignment. From what I've read you
can be certain your stamp won't be sent 1st Class USPS. I guess there is
prestige in using Fex-Ed, which doesn't cover (?) stamps whithin its insurance
package.
NOIP -
I'm amazed at the animosity of the various individuals involved in expertizing
services. The points I get out of it is that APEX takes too long for the
dealers, who are on a deadline to produce catalogues and sell the product.
Generally collectors send items to APEX becasue they are members of the
organization, and don't mind waiting if it saves money. They just spent the
money on the item and it is going into their collection for maybe years.
I'm also amazed that no one else has commented so far as to the ethics of the
$20 stamp having a pen cancel professionally restored (removed) and this
information is not passed on to the expertising committee. It sounds like either
an attempt to embarrass the committee, or attempted fraud. Gee, and I thought
Ebay was the place we were supposed to beware. The more I read some of the
expert testimony, the more likely it seems one should always buy on extension.
Is this an industry pass-the-buck, similar to Ebay passing-the-buck to APS? Is
abrogating responsibility becoming common business practice? Getting closer
every day it seems to me!
Roger
October 27, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
388 Pair (1910 2c Washington coil)
I should've mentioned, I like the seller, I've had good luck buying from him in
the past. I've received stamps from him that were better than described. The
fisheye lens appearance of his stamps may turn some buyers off, so he provides
some good bargains.
Dunc
October 27, 2003 2103 Clark (reperf)
388 Pair
Duncan Doenitz
The holes are well enough aligned horizontally. The change on the left side is
small enough considering that the imperf strip may have been pushed through a
guide or jig to keep the rows in alignment under the (re)perforating machine.
Oddly enough, this pair is a bit short, and the perforations wander along the
center line a bit to the right and have slightly uneven vertical spacing
although they look more realistic. Most importantly, the perforations appear to
be a metric perf 12 instead of the correct 12-66 (about 11.9) as measured by the
Kiusalas gauge.
Ideally, direct examination is necessary, but the seller may already have
additional insight as to what the outcome would be.
October 27, 2003 Brian R
That's what has me really confused. If that auction is a way to place bids on
the books, It looks as if everyone wins. The bidder pool just expanded
exponetially, realizations might go up, and even ebay potentially gets a cut of
the fees.
What is confusing is I don't see it spelled out anywhere, that those would be
bids on the book. What a big time bad taste that'll lead to, if somone finds out
that the bid they "won", can still be hammered down at something more to the
floor.
I think the basic root problem here, is I just don't understand, what that
auction is.
October 27, 2003 Brian R
Bill W
If sellers, attempted to impose the premium system to online auctions, it would
last about five minutes. Sellers would instantly find they needed to offer
rebates to even attract bids. That's why I'm so confused about what that Bennet
auction really represents. Either you offer the item in one world or the other.
They don't blend very well.
October 27, 2003 anne
J Grill? I'm not impressed. It's grossly off center and has some
discolorations. I'll wait for a better copy to come along. In the meantime, I'll
just get back to plating my Port Foauds. Or maybe my high value Luxembourg
Intellectuals. Where's the spice rub?
(somehow the image of an intellectual on a plate sticks in the
craw--especially in light of the conversation on the ebay board.
Pissing contests Hey, I thought this was a gender-neutral board. Give
us girls a break. No way we can compete in this event.
Good night to all and to all sweet dreams of an end to California wild fires,
J grills and other phiatelic goodies, and continuing illuminating discussions of
expertizing.
October 27, 2003 Brian R
help, now I'm really confused
IF that Bennet auction is really an electronic one,
what fool will ever consign items again, to one of the traditional houses?
IF it is, are they nipping the consignee for a sellers premium too?
Maybe I'LL start an electronic auction service, with full premiums attached too.
Seems the only loser in this, are those that operate as agents.
and the sellers.
and the buyers.
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Last Post of Night
BRIAN; Yes, I was going to say the same thing, and that is, what's the
difference so long as it's a "traditional" auction as well as online? If you
accept the validity of the BP in a non-online auction, then it should also be OK
if also online. Now my question to you is, suppose in the future online sellers
started to impose a BP and it became widely used (assuming it's allowed on
eBay(?), then what would you do - stop bidding online? Don't misunderstand me
here, I just want your opinion, I actually agree with you about an online BP.
CLARK; So far as I know, there is no "new" facts about the Continental grill.
They are not really rare on the 3c ("scarce" is more appropriate). I'm somewhat
suprised at Brookman's comments, but I will say that I have never seen a USED
Continental grill, although Scott does price it on the 2c value (#157). Let's
see if any of the other board experts can add to this topic.
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Duncan, yeah, well, I may have cheated a bit on 2531Ab, 2531a, and
2187a/2187b. I ordered them from Vic, and I'm sure he sent me the correct
variants, but I'm not sure that my originals were the main variants and not
*also* the minor variants. The tagging is very similar for all of them. So until
I can visit a dealer with all of the variants compare what I've got with what a
dealer has identified as the correct tagging, what I claim are the correct
tagging variants probably aren't. But since my site doesn't reflect UV light,
nobody can tell...
Jim
October 27, 2003 Bill Dempwolf
Buyers Premiums
Brian R While I agree with your basic premise of buyer's premiums in an
e-world, I don't see why you wouldn't bid on such an auction. I would treat the
buyer's premium the same I do for shipping and handling. That is, I would reduce
the amount I am willing to bid by the 15% buyer's premium, then snipe the lot at
my maximum bid (less buyer's premium and shipping and handling). Either the lot
is worth that amount (in which case I'd bid) or it isn't (in which case I
wouldn't bid).
Bill
October 27, 2003 Brian R
Whew!
OK, I went back, and looked closely at the Bennet auction.
It appears to be an avenue, where one can place a bid on the books.
NOT a stand alone electronic auction.
Now I understand clark's statement,
about how this is a nice wave of things to come.
In that case, I agree.
Scared the heck out of me though....:o)
October 27, 2003 2030 Clark (reperf)
Continental J Grills
Bill
In "The United States Postage Stamps of the 19th Century", by Lester G
Brookman, Vol. II pages 194 and 195 (Linquist edition 1966), after a
discussion about not finding I grills on National values above 7 cents, he
starts, mid paragraph with the following quote:
"The "Continental Grill" is known as the "J" grill and is about 7 x 9 1/2 mm in
area. We are extremely skeptical about the
validity of this so-called "Continental grill" and since few collectors ever saw
one, and it is of little
import if they did, it is best to give this particular grill scant
consideration."
He then goes on in a long pair of paragraphs to question John Luff's information
and the notion that his "friend" was so lucky or "psychic" to find one or two
copies of each on eight denominations and a cardboard proof item, unlike any
other. He ends with the quote (take note APEX, PF and PSE partisans):
"Might not this be a mistake not yet recognized? And if it is a msitake,
wouldn't John Luff be the first to want it corrected? That is the way we feel
about it and we feel certain that Luff would say that we have a perfect right to
our opinion - and you to yours - whatever that may be."
My original question was whether there is new research validating the J grills.
October 27, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
388 pair
Clark
Well I'm kinda clueless yet about these older stamps, but let me guess. The "as
is" pair offered in your link has perf holes that look a little too perfect to
you and too small so the pair probably began life as imperforate stamps, like
the other pair did. At least the left side perfs on one are not aligned
perfectly with the other perf rows though.
But the dark heavily inked line of the line pair looks like the same heavy
inking I saw on a certified single with traces of the line showing.
Jim G
Thanks for the information earlier on the counterfeiting laws, the other
government sites often don't make it clear if they apply to just US stamps or
foreign items as well.
And I noticed some time ago that you did add the Scott #2531A '91 Liberty torch
variety to your album. Cool!
Dunc
"No comment on the pissing contests, despite the temptation."
.
.
.
.
.
"Aaaargh! Okay, which society would be selected to judge such an event, and
would they favor accuracy, distance, or volume?"
October 27, 2003 Brian R
buyer's premiums
I would like to clarify my comments.
I've nothing against buyers premiums.
Except, of course, an ingrained lack of desire to pay them.
I've heard all of the reasons.
There is rent to pay, along with heating and light bills,
Catalogs are expensive to produce and mail, etc.
All these reasons sound completely valid to me.
Afterall, if I don't like it, I don't have to bid.
HOWEVER, once the same auctions are plunked into the "e-world",
ALL of those reasons are invalid.A buyers premium, in an electronic
auction, is an outright rape, pure and simple.
I will quit collecting before I ever pay one.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
John, I always look out for Canadian Circle numerals, been doing it for about 40
years. Hard to find them these days, some other XXXXXXX must have seen them
before me,
Dvid B.
October 27, 2003 2013 Clark (reperf)
388 and 482A
prometheus
You would have a better chance paying $2.97 for the "482A" lot. Who in their
right mind would sell a genuine line pair of #388 on eBay when it could be
listed and sold in "Rarities of the World" or some other major auction? I still
have 10 pairs of fake 388s, which I am in the process of placing in reference
collections where they will stay out of circulation. They are of interest
because I know for sure who made them and unfortunately they were made in large
quantities.
Actually, your best odds are with three card monte.
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Various
CLARK; I am not familiar with Brookman's feelings about the Continental grill or
I've forgotton them. Can you enlighten me? I am as reasonably familiar with the
CBNCo grill as most, I guess, and have expertized a number of them, all, I
believe, on the 3c, which is why I am interested to learn what Brookman thought.
BRIAN R; I was suprised to see Bennett with a 15% BP since they have
traditionally been a 10% house. I am wondering whether it's 15% ONLY for eBay
bidders and 10% for other bidders? If so, I wonder if that's entirely legal? If
not, then suddenly they are a 15% house!
JIM G; We both know that there will be some pissing contents. I think the
attempt to keep them at a minimum is what's important. I think there is a good
basis now for serious, responsible discussions on the subject of expertizing. I
thought Ken L's earlier posts today were all tempered moreso than some of his
much earlier and I think Randy's last post lays the groundwork for some open
discussions. Scott T. hopefully will now respond to Ken's pertinent questions
about the PF and then let's see where we can go from there.
One quick comment about the $20. State Dept that is referenced here and the fact
that it received a good PSE cert. after professional restoration artist Nancy
Poli removed a magenta pen "presentation" cancel from it, and that is the fact
that as an expert, I frankly would not under ordinary circumstances ever check
with UV the face of a stamp that I strongly felt was OG AND NH. Once I've
decided that it's OG and NH, there is nothing to make me suspect that something
has been cleaned from the face. For those unfamiliar with presentation copies,
they were mint stamps, with OG (thus originally NH) to which a small magenta pen
marking was applied on the face, sometimes in a small "X" and sometimes in a
straight line across the stamp. They were given, we are told, to foreign postal
authorities as samples of newly issued stamps. I only tell all this so that the
neutral viewers among us can better appreciate how such an erroneous opinion
could have easily been made.
October 27, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
Various
Patrick L= I have the 300 - 310 Precancelled Chicago and see them a lot.
Donald F- I have all my stamps, 21,000 + Postcards ,1114 Covers all on
CD. My recent worry is the report I read that CD's are not the Long term storage
solution and the Info stored will degrade .
JIM G - I enjoy internet Pissing contests among well matched opponents ,
I think it helps Me form my view of the situation , and while sometimes a waste
of Bandwidth, I think that sometimes the light needs to be broken down by the
prism of Life.
Just to avoid the glare.
Clark - Please enlighten on the coils ,Do i understand the new rules if I
bid and won that pair sent for cert and got refused I get my
money back OR does the AS IS disclaimer and low start save the PS
JOHN Mag Stamps Do you really doubt the description on that listing I'm
sure most of them are 482A's aren't U? I almost joined ebay to bid on some of
your canadian stuff, almost.
David B Do you play with the images to read those almost cancels , Or is
it just that you have seen/know so many it is apparent to you??
October 27, 2003 Brian R
hmmmm
An ebay live auction with a 15% buyers premium.
I wonder how that'll fly in the e-world?
I know a traditional auction without one is the exception
The other way around for people at home with their monitors.
I predict a 15% non-pay situation, when bidders realize, that's their fee.
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Jim W-S, now there's a userid I know. You have an absolutely fascinating
collection there and I note many have no "courtesy of" caption. I really like
the way you organized it. I've bookmarked your page, too. :-) It's going to be
something enjoyable one of those frosty Iowa nights.
October 27, 2003 1912 Clark (reperf)
Continental J Grills and 388
To the experts and others present:
Here is a
J Grill with a certificate. The Matthew Bennett listings may be the start of
a very positive change at eBay.
Since Lester Brookman was not particularly fond of the J grills, does that mean
there may be some doubt as to their authenticity? The stamp has a 1980 APS
certificate. What would be the likely outcome in a re-certification by APEX, PF
or PSE?
Also, what might this
388 line pair just listed on eBay and this fake
388 pair have in common?
October 27, 2003 David Benson
John, most probably they were both after the cancel.
David Benson
October 27, 2003 John
This is a good example of what happens when someone does the sniping thing.look
here.I can'y believe it!
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Randy, Ken, Scott, and whoever else, it seems that every philatelist past
a certain age or experience level has a history with some other philatelist. So
it only stands to reason that as more people of greater experience show up, this
board is going to be inundated with more pissing contests. I've seen it on
Richard's board as well. The added experience being brought to the boards is
great for relative newbies like me, because it's the only chance we get to
see what happens behind the scenes at places like Siegels or APEX or PSE or
whatever. But the pissing contests are a waste of time.
Even with the pissing contests, some of this is useful. I'd heard snippets
about the $20 Official, and hearing more about that is a good thing, but hearing
"who did what to whom" isn't so much. Even then, it's nice to learn some of the
experts' biases, so I can put into context advice I've heard from them, and I
can form a more objective opinion about how to participate in the hobby.
I don't know where to draw the line. And to be honest, even if I did know
where to draw the line, I don't believe for a second that some of you would
listen to me if I told you that you'd crossed it. You're too old, too set in
your ways, too confident in the righteousness of your own words or actions, or
simply too determined to draw blood. Whatever.
But as someone who values this community and wants to see it remain relevant,
I'd really like to encourage all of you guys to please carefully consider
your postings right before you click on the "Submit Entry" button, and
decide whether or not the rest of us will really benefit from whatever you've
typed in. Because from what I've seen, that's not the case more often than I'd
like to see. As a contributor, I do this, and maybe half the time over the past
two days, I've decided that no, the board wouldn't benefit from whatever
I've typed, and I've cleared my message without sending it. It would be nice if
just a little more restraint was shown on this board.
Jim
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Donald
I like to "exhibit" my thematic
collection though it forms but a small part of my total collection.
Not for insurance but, I hope educational purposes.
The vast majority of the stamps have little monetary value, but I find them
pretty and exhibiting them has taught me a lot about web sites.
And also has made me a lot of new friends who have contributed their duplicates
to make it a web site rather than my web site. Though, obviously I get
the last word as to what is exhibitied.
October 27, 2003 John@Magnolia Satmps
J.W.Starke(also know as the Professor)
My wife likes your long hair! But then again mine was longer when I played in
the bubblegum band in the late 60s and early 70s..Yummy Yummy!
John
October 27, 2003 Randy Shoemaker
REply to Ken L.
I guess you just can't help yourself. By the way, PSE has always admitted we
made an error on the State Department stamp...thanks to Nanci Poli who claims
she never works on stamps, especially a NH Dollar State Dep't. I really don't
think you want to start going over individual opinions in public either. Trust
me.
The real point of this discussion should be what makes an Expert committee work,
how does each arrive at solid opinions and where should the collector go when he
has a question. Does value mean something? Turnaround time? Ease of use?
Approachability? Services provided? Other intangibles? The quality of experts
employed? The experts level of experience? Use of scientific equipment? and a
host of other questions I'm sure. Maybe the collecting community might get
something out of that discussion.
-Randy Shoemaker
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Donald, in case it wasn't clear from the site itself, you can click on
any single stamp on any album page, and an enlarged image of the single will pop
up. I don't have enlargements of booklet panes or se-tenant blocks/strips (but I
do have them of coil pairs).
Jim
October 27, 2003 John@ magnolia stamps
How many 482a's can be in this lot?
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Jim G, impressive! You're sane. I've got a used (throughout) collection
so I have a few more items than you and instead of pages I'm re-mounting and
scanning at the same time (individual stamps). Now you can say I'm nuts. The two
very nice ladies appear sane and I'm guessing they're not you're sisters.
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Donald, seen my web site?
From the feedback I've gotten at shows, where people see me paging through my
collection images and comparing my holdings with dealer stock, I get the
impression that very few people do it. Many ask me what software I use,
suggesting that there's a lot of interest in doing it. But I think most would
give up once the reality of the effort set in.
Jim
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Reply to Randy Shoemaker
Why bother, you ask? Well, just for a couple of small points. Despite his feisty
denial here, I have called and spoken to J. Randall on a handful of occasions,
each one being when I was writing an article for publication, and each time I
got a runaround. First was when I published in The Philatelic Communicator his
memo to his experts that stated which kinds of faults to “call” and which not to
call on the worksheet. Second was when I wrote the article for Linn’s on the
cleaned cancel $20 State Department Official, certified by PSE as “unused, o.g.”
That time he said he’d find and send me a copy of the worksheet, but when it
never arrived, I called again and he said he could not find it. This is
significant only because Dick Champagne, whose name appeared on the certificate,
could not recall having seen the stamp. I’d still like to see it, if it has
turned up. Another time was when Joe Puleo boasted of his involvement in
launching PSE. Randy denied it, but agreed that he had given Puleo the interview
published in The Stamper. He was evasive when I asked how Puleo came into
possession of his confidential ASDA complaint against the Sachses. I’m sure he’s
just had a lapse of memory about these conversations, so I forgive him. I won’t
denounce him as a witless windbag or any of the other colorful terms that grace
this board when temperatures rise.
Bill Weiss, thanks, but no need to apologize.
Good night all.
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
True Story
Six years ago APEX certified a mint pair of the legendary Orangeburg coil, Scott
389, as genuine, after Mick Hadley identified it at Boys Town and referred Steve
Schoening of Boys Town to APEX. Mick has the best collection and exhibit of U.S.
government coil stamps ever assembled. Every Washington-Franklin specialist
collector and dealer I know regards Mick as an expert on government coils.
When the item came in, George Brett examined at it (who knows U.S. stamp better
than he?), followed by W-F specialist collectors and authors Larry Weiss and
George Wagner, Mark Larkin (who owned more Orangeburg coils than anyone else
ever, including one on a Bell & Co. cover, the only user of the stamp), and me.
(When Larry Weiss lived in New York, he, along with Ed Siskin, another APEX
committee member, were regarded by the PF as the leading Washington-Franklin
experts.) We unanimously signed on it as genuine. Everything was right -- star
plate spacing, reversed inverted watermark, color shade, and height. Boys Town
allowed us to exhibit it at APS Stampshow in Milwaukee that year.
A couple of years later, Boys Town consigned it to the R.A. Siegel auction for
its Rarities of the World sale. But according to Steve Schoening, Scott Trepel
rejected the APEX certificate, so he sent it to the PF. Several of their experts
said it was a fake. The PF's senior expert Bill Crowe even published an article
in the PF newsletter on how to expertize an Orangeburg, which got many things
wrong, though a comprehensive series of articles by George Griffenhagen in the
United States Specialist had corrected the misinformation that previous
generations had been taught.
When Mercer and I visited the PF during that time, Bill Crowe told us he was
going to give it a bad certificate, but Providence intervened to prevent that.
What saved PF from self-inflicted ignominy was that the donor to Boys Town had
made a mistake. He had switched his 389 (perf 12) and 394 (perf 8-1/2) 3-cent
W-F coil pairs in his album, then gave the rare one to Boys Town by mistake and
kept the cheap one. But he had an old 1960s PF cert proving the 389 was his, so
Boys Town had Siegel retrieve it and return it. Finally the owner sold it a
couple of years ago through Shreves, with a new PF certificate.
One member of PF's committee told me later that it had been a shameful
experience, but he felt that some of the negative opinions were "political." All
this as I report it here is very one-sided, and possibly even unfair, but this
was a great disappointment to me, and part of the reason I take umbrage at those
who disparage our APEX process.
Everybody makes mistakes including APEX, so I don't gloat about any of this. And
every wrong opinion hurts all expert committees. But that's why we need the full
range of collector, researcher, scholar, and dealer experts, not just one kind,
and why we need to use the latest scientific techniques.
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Cross-posts
MR. LAWRENCE - Very sorry that my post crossed over yours, as yours is certainly
much more valuable, timely and interesting than mine!
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Does anyone else scan their collection as a permanent record? Now that I have a
substantial part of it done, I've also found it's really handy to see what mine
looks like when I look at auction scans. Most people think I'm nuts. Think,
though, what I'll be able to show police if it's ever stolen.
One thing it's done is given me a real appreciation for what goes into a
Siegel auction catalog. It's also made me newly appreciative of just how many
stamps I have.
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Reply to Scott Trepel
The first point I need to make is that not one iota of my postings has
disparaged the PF staff, except for those who were corrupt and are no longer
around. Even during their tenure, the PF had wonderful, dedicated people, who
often supplied writers like me with inside information, helping to hasten the
necessary cleanup. So posturing as their champion scores no point against me.
Just the opposite. I have always advocated and practiced the highest degree of
exchange and cooperation between APEX and the PF. But my understanding – I hope
you’ll correct me if I’m wrong – is that you have opposed it, Scott. Until a few
years ago, PF senior expert William Crowe was a valued member of the APS Expert
Committee. His opinions were especially important in instances where the best
opinion is obtained by comparison with referemce material in the Luff
collection, because those stamps are the basis of the Scott catalog listings.
We, in turn, have always provided whatever information or experience of ours can
help the PF. After we exposed Ray Gregor’s fakes, I gave Bill Crowe a complete
file of all his material that we had been able to discover. We invited Bill, Lou
Grunin, and Bob Odenweller to demonstrations of the CS-16 Crimescope. But then
Bill resigned from our committee, and has been unwilling to examine APEX
submissions very since. My source on the PF Board said that occurred at your
insistence. Is that true? If so, I urge you to reverse the decision. In recent
conversations with George Kramer, I have proposed greater cooperation between
APEX and the PF, and he agrees. I look forward toward greater cooperation
between our organizations.
I do not for a minute question your sincerity, Scott. But the difficult part of
this discussion is that you and your PF loyalist cadres have always asserted
that the PF is best, no matter how bad it got. The Wurdeman scandal, the
Ivy/Sachs scandal, and the Rosende scandal came and went without a moment’s
contrition from the PF’s defenders. Such loyalty is touching, I suppose, but to
outsiders it has more the aroma of vested interests circling the wagons, and
does not promote confidence. Thus investigative reporters like myself, whom you
often treat as adversaries, are left to dig out the truth as best we can and to
report it without benefit of an official accounting. Fortunately for all
concerned, the evidence we unearthed supported the view that real reforms were
implemented. But if even a small number of Jack Molesworth’s tales about
uncompensated victims are true, some wrongs still ought to be addressed.
As for special treatment for privileged big dealers and donors, I would happily
apologize if I’m mistaken, and I hope I am. But if I am, so is almost every
stamp dealer I know; they assume that the big firms have privileged access, and
are not shy in griping about that. A few years ago I tried to persuade a major
dealer who is also a personal friend and supporter to send more of his material
to APEX. He said that because of his volume, he gets express treatment from the
PF, and that being at the head of the queue is important in the timing of his
sales. He asked if APEX would do the same, and I said No, every item gets logged
in and processed in sequence. Besides that conversation, a former PF employee
told me about the frequent calls from one major auction firm owner (not Scott,
who is a gentleman), demanding service that required putting his work ahead of
all the rest.
That is history. At present those of us who are trying to develop a closer
working relationship are meeting resistance from people who, by all appearances,
have a vested interest in discrediting APEX. From this discussion, Scott is not
among them, and I’m pleased about that. But it hasn’t always been so.
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Precancels
19th Century precancels exist as far back as, I believe, 1844, with the first
recorded being pen precancels used on stamps of Independent Mail Carriers, Hale
& Co, and the American Letter Mail Co., handstamp precancels began in 1847 and
continued all through the 19th C. The Scott Specialized lists a number of them
on various stamps. While I personally like the 19th C. precancel material, the
countless examples that exist from the 20th century leave me cold - but God
bless anyone who does like them, and that's what makes this hobby interesting,
the diverse things which folks like to collect.
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Context
Let me set forth a few basic points before I return to the debate. All
recognized philatelic expertizing services perform a good and necessary service
for the stamp hobby. The presence of several, each with its own strengths and
varying perspectives and experience, is good for all of us. By giving collectors
a choice, they all have challenges and incentives to perform as well and as
efficiently as possible, and to provide the most competent opinions.
Though it isn’t widely known, many experts examine submissions for two or three
committees. On a couple of opinions, dealers have upbraided me for opinions on
APEX certificates on stamps that were returned to them, but when I examined the
worksheets, the signatures were well-known dealers who also examine stamps for
the PF and PSE. There are few instances of serious disagreements among experts.
Human nature is such that people prefer to associate with familiar colleagues
and communities, while sometimes being uncomfortable in unfamiliar situations.
Habits are hard to break, especially if there are no strong reasons to break
them. Psychologically, most people when challenged will defend their habits as
virtues.
On-line chats carry with them all these burdens, so it’s exceptionally important
in this debate to keep the basics firmly in mind. For the purpose of this
exchange, almost every APEX or PF or PSE certificate will express the same
consensus of expert opinion. So our disagreements mostly concern which committee
is most reliable to evaluate exceptionally difficult stamps or covers. Few
collectors submit such material for certification.
The suggestion that three experts is better than one or two to certify a
splendid Graf Zeppelin stamp or a not-so-splendid $5 Columbian commemorative is
silly, in my opinion, and needlessly mystifies what experts do. But a complex
cover may need to be examined by a specialist in the stamp(s) on it, an expert
in U.S. postal markings of the period and another of a foreign country’s postal
history, a scholar of ship schedules, a historian of the origin and destination
towns and their people, a researcher in writing materials of the period, and a
forensic examiner. In the former examples, all expert committees will sparkle.
In the latter, whichever team can assemble the best group and technology will
excel, and that won’t be the same team every time.
So here we are. I am a partisan of APEX, trying my best to assure that APEX has
the ability to assemble that team for you any time you need it, at a modest
cost, and as efficiently as possible. Scott Trepel is a worthy partisan of the
Philatelic Foundation, asserting the same for his team. Randy Shoemaker also has
made his appearance, though the worth of his statement is less evident.
Finally, before rejoining the debate, bear in mind that tone is sometimes
difficult to detect on chat boards. I personally enjoy spirited debate, and I
intend no offense to anyone. Others, especially some who take offense easily,
wrongly regard almost any sharply worded exchange as an expression of hostility,
or to take criticisms personally, no matter how carefully focused the postings
may be. This boards participants include some malevolent posters, but not many.
October 27, 2003 Bill Dempwolf <bdempwolf
at austin.rr.com>
Precancels
Patrick precancels on the 1902-03 series are not particularly scarce,
although some collectors do value precancels on this issue. Styles from Elgin
catalog between $0.10 and $2.00 in the Town and Type catalog. Can you describe
the precancel on your stamp? I'd guess it is either L1-TS (CV= $0.50) or L2-TS
(CV = $0.25). These types have Elgin on one line, Ills on another line, and 3
bars; one above Elgin, one between the town and state, and one below Ills. They
would be the only types that look like this.
A good resource for precancel information on the web is
here. There is a link
on that page to articles on precancels, one of which discusses the history of
precancels. It mentions postal regulations just after the turn of the century.
Prior to that there are precancels that are well known, ranging well back into
the 19th century. These precancels do not look like "modern" precancels, with
City and State names between bars. They include lines drawn across stamps,
stars, a script letter W, etc.
Bill
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Bob H, sorry, I didn't connect that there were no known imperforates.
Thick head sometimes. The opinion now seems quite appropriate.
October 27, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Just to clarify the facts regarding my submission to the expert. Submission was
done through a third party here in the US, who sent the stuff over for me with
his own material. Third party is both a collector and dealer. I am fairly
certain that the third party told the expertizer that some of the material sent
belonged to someone else, without naming me by name. Expertizer then contacts
third party, says the item is genuine (without providing any details), and asks
about possible sale, without discussing price. Third party contacts me and
relays the message. I say I am not interested in selling. I get the item back
expertized as genuine.
October 27, 2003 Bob H.
And yes, they could have given a "no opinion" - which is all I could have argued
for.
October 27, 2003 17:17 Patrick Lemon <plemon@paladigm.com>
Precancels
For anyone knowledgeable in precancels - I can across a US #300 on cover
precancelled Elgin, Ill. I wasn't aware that precancels had started that early.
My questions are: 1) When did precancels first begin? and 2) Is there any value
to early precancels?
October 27, 2003 Bob H.
imperf
The item was imperforate. Three large margins and one ok. There are NO
imperforates recorded for this stamp. Therefore it was given an opinion that
said it was the genuine stamp (which I didn't need an expert to tell me) with
perfs trimmed. That is probably correct, and I paraphrased what I was told, but
in effect, without a pair at least known, there is no way anyone could certify
it as a genuine imperf.
I could have argued, but again, I would not expect anyone to agree that it
was a new discovery on the basis of that stamp. It did not cost me anything to
speak of - the dealer gave it to me for the cost of the cert.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Donald & Bill,
I cannot comment as I do not know the arrangements between a German expertiser
and the BPP. There may be a clause in the original application form that forbids
it. Will have to wait til a BPP certifier makes a comment. I have sent an email
to one for his opinion, see what he says when he shows,
David B.
October 27, 2003 Rob Faux <rfaux
"at" thefauxden "dot" net>
Two odd requests
At the risk of derailing whatever is going on here, I have two requests that I
only have time to type, then I must go. Please respond to me via email, but I
will also try to peak in here tomorrow.
1. I have a student who is looking to attend school in Australia for a semester.
He is currently looking at the U at Sydney, the U at Melbourne and Macquarrie.
If anyone is willing to give me some feedback or more local knowledge regarding
these schools, he (and I) would be grateful.
2. My nephew is in a class that is currently sending a letter around that asks
recipients to 1. send a note to the school asking for a postcard that
tells/shows something about where people live. and 2. send the note on to
someone else in a different location who would be willing to do the same. This
would go on until May, at which time the last person sends the letter back to
the school.
I think it would be a great learning experience for these kids if I could
arrange a string of people from different countries and locations to mail this
thing around and send postcards to them. Those who are interested, please
contact me via email.
Rob
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Bob H, are you saying the expertizer you contacted was in effect telling
you he identified the item and wrote "genuine, but altered" when in effect he
was saying "I don't know which it is"? Or do I have that wrong?
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
DONALD F; Well put by you and I totally agree!
October 27, 2003 Donald Fritze
Lavar, David, Jim, Bill, your discussion is the stuff murder movies are
made of. I agree the expertizer is sending the strong appearance of a conflict
of interest which should not be present in that setting. An executive is
prohibited from trading his stock using information known only within the
company. The mere accidental appearance of that circumstance may prompt
investigation. There is information in the expertizer's head which can never be
discounted enough. I believe expertizers should simply not invite the sale of
material on which they opine. It's one of the prices for occupying the top dog
position.
October 27, 2003 Jim Lawler
Bookmark
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
David B
Yes, nowadays it is probably difficult to get away with it.
And any honest expertizer wouldn't want to even try.
Gone are the days when the submitter and expertizer (or even committee) are the
only ones that even saw the item.
Nowadays, both the item and certs can be viewed by thousands on the internet.
As George and other have shown, the hard work in correlating altered with
previously unaltered stamps is an extremely feasible proposition.
Likewise getting "a friend" to buy a stamp or cover cheap on eBay and then
having it turn up in an international display would be pretty difficult to get
away with.
Lets just say not everyone is honest and monetary rewards, if sufficiently high,
may transcend societal acceptance.
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Offer To Buy
In my humble opinion, it is entirely inappropriate for an expert to use that
position to make an offer. First of all, in the US, all submissions are totally
secret from the experts. I don't have the foggiest idea who a particular
submittor is, and nor should I. As an expert, I have seen lots of things I would
have liked to own, either for resale or for me personally, but it strikes me as
a serious abuse of my position to even think about it, and to do so IMO would
constitute a conflict of interest. About the only way I can see it as a
possibility would be for me to attach a note onto the finished item and ask the
committee chairman to pass the note onto the owner, but even at that I get a
funny feeling that I would be doing something inappropriate.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Jim, too many implications for a certifier if he does naughty things. The word
gets around and his livelyhood may be at risk as well as his good name. It is
very difficult to get on the list of certifiers and once off, that's it,
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
David B
I'm not in disagreement.
The way I read it was that Lavar was asking for a cert and the expertizer
was making an offer before providing the cert.
If the expertizer was honest, I am sure they followed Lavars guidelines
and provided an accurate cert.
If they were not honest, they could easily have provided a false cert, waited
for Lavar to list it on eBay or wherever and got a rare item at a cheap
price.
Of course, they would then have to lose the cert or get it recertified.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Jim, it may have been an innocent comment as the expertiser may not have known
the intent of the sender. He may have thought a cerificate was requested as the
sender may want to sell it with a certificate. If the expert is a collector of
that type of material I cannot see anything wrong with the request. If the
intent was for possible resale at a profit then the motive was wrong and
unethical,
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Chalk another one up to Bob H.
Dang bob, you're worse than me.
Lavar
I agree with you entirely.
If you submit an item that you suspect is rare and the expertizer
knows that it is rare, they should not have used their position as an expert
to become in contact with such material and to attempt to obtain it for
themselves at a price which might be severely overridden were it placed on the
open market with an accurate description (if only by themselves).
October 27, 2003 Lavar Taylor
I thought I would add another topic to the discussion on expertizing. On two
occasions when I submitted a large group of material to a BPP expertizer in
Germany, the expertizer told me that he wanted to buy a particular item for his
own collection. I said "no thanks" because I wanted the items for my own
collection. There is, of course, nothing illegal with making an offer to buy a
particular item submitted for expertization, but it seems to me that expertizers
are in a unique position because of their level of knowledge. I would like to
think that the expertizers in question would not have taken advantage of his
position if I had expressed an interest in selling, but it seems to me a policy
of not soliciting a direct sale of material which you have in your possession
for expertizing is the policy that will most promote a feeling of confidence
among all of us non-experts. The expert can express an interest in an item
without making an offer to buy it (such as by telling the owner that, if he ever
wants to sell the item, the owner should feel free to contact him/her). Comments
anyone?
October 27, 2003 Bob H.
off-subject
Jim,
"bare" the brunt?? The image that brings to mind is bizarre...
To keep on topic, I have sent one item out to be expertized, and was not
surprised when it came back with what was in effect a bad opinion. I sent it in
as an imperf, and it came back as "genuine, but with trimmed perfs.." I strongly
suspect the opinion is correct, but asked one of the signers, who said, in
effect, that until a pair shows up, there is no way to prove it one way or
another. I agree, but was glad I knew who the opiners were so I could at least
ask.
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Scott
Again I have to agree and disagee slightly but I'll do so within my own field
rather than philately.
On the good side, once a person is awarded a Ph.D. they are regarded as the
expert in that particular field.
A thesis defense should be a mere formality since of the members on the committe,
only perhaps the thesis supervisor has an inkling of the knowledge gained by the
Ph.D. candidate.
Theoretically, that person, if above reproach should be able to serve as
an unbiased critic of whatever information (publishable articles) that appear
before them.
Be they the only person who could make such a decision.
Unfortunately, several years ago a Ph.D. student at a prominant University
presented a thesis describing completely new minerals comprising various
compounds of Mercury.
The Ph.D. was duly awarded. An abreviated version of the thesis was printed in
the American Mineralogist, a very respected journal.
Subsequent analysis showed the data for the thesis to be totally fabricated.
The Ph.D. was rescinded (a very rare occurence) and the thesis supervisor (and
journal editors) had to bare the brunt of a very hostile scientific community.
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
BTW, before I get accused of being a long-haired hippie, I was a "mod" as
opposed to a "rocker" in my youth.
(See Who, The, Quadrophenia, 1973)
October 27, 2003 Scott Trepel
Expertizing
Jim W-S
I don't think we disagree. The PF does very little "marketing", but it has
maintained market share over the years thru the reliability of its opinions and
service. PSE has earned its share of the market thru fast, reliable service at
the low and mid-level price range. APEX is trying to become more widely accepted
by promoting its technological "edge". Each has its own strengths and
weaknesses, and the marketplace is quick to adapt, even during change.
As for the Royal, BPA and the numerous Anglo-European "experts" who operate
outside of committees, my experience with them has closely paralleled the
American side (without the individual experts). The Royal has always been
somewhat inaccessible and "deliberate" (a nice word for slow). The BPA is
relatively faster, but I must say 2 out of 10 certificates are bizarre, to say
the least. For example, I submitted a few classic Canadian advertising covers I
bought in auctions here. They were genuine, but the BPA certificates came back
as "stamps do not belong and fake markings", a totally off the wall opinion, but
I didn't have the strength to fight, so I returned them to the auctioneer.
Lastly, the danger of "sole" expertisers is the potential for corruption,
deterioration or bias.
I think the pursuit of market share thru innovation and improvement is perfectly
healthy for expertizing groups. The last thing we want is the old Civil Service
mentality of entrenchment and undeniable job security!
October 27, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Scott
I have to disagree with you a little bit (at least I hope you see it that way).
An auction house probably submits maybe hundreds of stamps for certs per year.
Conversely a collector may onl submit one pre year or even one per lifetime.
They need to know in advance where they are going to get the "best value for
money".
That, to many, depends on the reputation of the expertizing body.
A reputation is not earned overnight and obviously the expertise of the
expertizing committees change as members die and new "stars" emerge.
The Royal has earned a good reputation firstly because of duration and secondly
because they have astutely avoided getting into "a competition for the market
share".
When expertizing is controlled by marketing rather than effectiveness, I think
it is the consumer who suffers.
October 27, 2003 Scott Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
http://www.siegelauctions.com
PSE
Randy S: Both you and I addressed Ken L's remarks, but I would say your posting
was a bit more colorful than mine.
If we let the smoke clear and look at the basic issue, we have competition for
market share among the three services: PF, PSE and APEX. The marketplace only
cares about quality of service and acceptance of certificates. Ken L. can fire
all of the arrows in his quiver (and you as well), but at the end of the day,
stamp collectors will gravitate to the place that makes them feel secure.
October 27, 2003 David Detrich <ddetr@aol.com>
Expertizing list
Jim
Thank you for the addition breakdown of hinge categories.
On famous or unusual, I did not expect those terms to be used but more: If a
famous forgery that it be identified by forger. Same with cancel.
Incidentally I don't believe in all of these myself but I have seen these
advocated or offered by some.
Finally, what photo on APS-Ebay stamp marking?
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
David, I'm opposed to subjective/relative descriptions on certs. So I
wouldn't want to see "brilliant" or "faded" color terms. I likewise expect a
stamp to be "never hinged", "previously hinged", or "with a hinge remnant", and
no "lightly hinged" or the like. I'm opposed to a centering description for this
reason and because centering is something which is self-evident from the photo
and which doesn't serve to identify the issue in question.
I'm also uncomfortable with your mention of "unusual cancel", "famous
forgery", and so on. A cert should identify the cancel or forgery, if the
expertizer feels it's worth mentioning, but it shouldn't say that the cancel is
rare or whatever.
One other problem with relative terms is that they can change over time. A
stamp's color can fade, at which point the cert saying "brilliant" is no longer
valid. A cache of an unusual cancel or issue may be discovered, at which point
the cancel or issue is no longer unusual. And so on.
Jim
October 27, 2003 David Detrich <ddetr@aol.com>
Nazi covers
Knud-Erik
Unless the policy has changed recently the Ebay policy is that stamps no matter
how offensive are okay. But postal stationary and postal history in general
bearing even the mildest whiff of Nazism is verboten. No one even accused Ebay
of making sense.
David
October 27, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
New Nazi Policy enforcement
Knud-Erik: I just fired off an email to the powers to be to try to get an
explanation of what is going on. I will post again when I get some answers.
October 27, 2003 David Detrich <ddetr@aol.com>
Expertizing list
I apologize if this has been covered but my reading of this site has been
greatly limited by my limited access in the late evenings when I have the time
to do so. But I have seen that the topic of expertizing has taken hold. This is
particularly true with the APS and Ebay policy on expertizing and the
permanently marking of stamps.
In connection with that I would propose that not all individuals, in fact not
all expertizing services would agree as to what should be included in the
expertizing purposes. I have included a list of possible categories with stamps
below. This list could probably be added to but I would suggest that all the
items there are items some might consider.
What do think?
If even a major part of them are covered, how does one intelligently mark a
stamp?
(Sorry, I have not included covers as these would cover much of the material for
stamps but another host of complexity)
List for certification
Is the item a postal stamp (as opposed to revenue or cinderella)?
Which variety of the issue is it? (Color, perf, paper, watermark, phosphor,
plate, etc)
In considering above what catalog or other source is used for possible
varieties?
If the stamp has an overprint, is it legitimate?
If the stamp has a cancel is it legitimate?
Is it a postal cancel or revenue?
Is cancel unusual?
If the stamp is mint, is the gum original?
If original, has the gum been disturbed to cover hinge marks, thins etc.
Are there any flaws in gum (hinge marks, etc.)
Has the item been altered (for example, has a grill been added)?
Has the item been repaired (perfs added, thins filled, tears mended, creases
ironed, etc)?
If the item is imperf, is the item one with the perfs cut off?
If the item is perf, have these been added to a fully or partially imperf item?
If the item is perf, was the item reperf for what ever reason?
Is the stamp a forgery?
If so, is it a famous forgery?
Is the stamp a counterfeit?
What is the description of the centering of the design (assuming there is a
rigid definition for each category)?
Is the stamp an error or can an explanation be given such as color changing?
Does one include descriptive terms such as brilliant (or faded) color?
October 27, 2003 Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/GB_Special_Issues/
GB Smiler generic sheets with your own photos
Well folks, I decided to buy a few sheets of my grandchildren for Christmas, and
discovered I could do all the construction on the Royal Mail site. So after some
disagreement about the size of my scan (!) I eventually got through to a
mock up (only half
the teddy here)
of what I would actually get with a photo of my beloved granddaughter next to a
teddy stamp. Great. Then I progressed to “Buy”. Now, having done it by post
before I knew they gave considerable discounts for quantity, so was surprised to
find that on the web site (which must be less work for them) there is no
discount for quantity!. I gave up in disgust.
Then the fount of all wisdom said to me “Why don’t you make the photo
stickers yourself?” Something went “ping” in my brain. Now, I have sheets of
blank address labels for my computer so I proceeded, without much trouble, to
make A4 sheets of self adhesive
photos,
28 to the sheet.
No more paying through the nose for Royal Mail “Smilers” with photos. I will
give the doting parents sheets of stickers to add to their own stamps on
their envelopes! What is more they can put it somewhere on the envelope where
the PO won’t feel obliged to cancel the photo, as well as the stamp, with the
heel of their boot.
Made me realize I could make sheets of self adhesive imperf (illegal) stamps
on gummed paper quite easily. It took me under an hour from scratch.
Pray that I yield not to temptation…please. The bible says that the prayers
of a righteous person are effective. I’m not sure about the unrighteous
ones who may be reading this!
Have a good day.
Colin
October 27, 2003 13.29 Knud-Erik Andersen
http://sudeten.bizland.com/postal_history.htm
Nazi covers - I'm confused!
Alison Ruttenberg - Hi. - Yesterday? you
told me about the good news on listning covers/cards with nazi symbols and today
I got this mail from a friend: "
"Thank you for the update. It's very encouraging. Unfortunately, it
apparently hasn't gotten down to the lower levels. I had all of my lots (33 of
them) pulled last Thursday because of 'offensive feldpost cancellations' and
have received today a justification for doing it. I hope it filters down soon.
There's a lot of items I want to list and, more importantly, be able to
purchase. We'll have to wait and see. Again, thank you for the information."
Now I'm confused - is it or is'n it allowed to list covers and cards with
nazi symbols? The page where eBay write about what is or is'n allowed are very
unclear on this point. Can you clarity this.
Regards
K.E.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Christo, I like the 2nd. one best. The 1st. one is actually addressed to OFS via
CGH.
Impossible to value, est. 800sf., plus this, plus that, makes it almost 1000sf.
if it sells at estimate.
Watch the bidding,
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Dave F Thanks for the advice on the orientation on the Japanese stamp. I
will wait a couple of days for the results of your venture into your revenue
cat.
David B Sorry, some spelling, incomplete words. If you click on the first
link, the David Feldman on-line auction page (showing a selection of current
lots display). In the top righthand corner there is a box with a GO button to
the left of it. Type @20413 in the box and press the GO button - it is important
to use the @before the number. Thia should take you to the particular auction
item. To see the other item, just type @20414. If you want to see enlarged
desriptions and pics just click on the images.
October 27, 2003 anne
wildfires
Dave and Lavar: I've been thinking about you and the other California
posters. The extent of the fires is truly scary.
Dave: Do what you have to do. The board is secondary. Presumably we
won't get into a screaming match (hint hint) but will discuss things politely.
Lavar: On a more pleasant note, I think I saw you last week on the
Leno rerun. You were sitting next to Uncle Sam and wearing a tux, right?
Off to class, Anne
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Christo, having trouble finding it,
You will be bidding against well heeled French bidders who are chasing unusual
destinations. Feldman's realisations (and estimates) for top material are
usually extremely high.
David B.
October 27, 2003 12:27 Dave F. (moderator)
Christo: One more thing. If you can wait a few days, I can probably let
you know what the catalog says. Some of those still have quite low market value
despite their relative scarcity. Note also that this is considered a "local"
issue, from Fukui prefecture. Just for general information, the usual Japanese
catalogs, even the specialized, do not touch revenues, unlike Scott's treatment
for US issues.
October 27, 2003 12:20 Dave F. (moderator)
Bill L., Scott T., Randy S.: Welcome. You are welcome to be heard here at
any time, but especially when there are points of contention that need to be
addressed.
Christo: I have a Japanese revenue catalog somewhere, but not
handy at the moment. That's an area where I'd like to study up, but just haven't
had the time yet. (I've been accumulating revenues though.) On the other hand,
David Benson's advice is good. If it is an item attractive to the
Japanese collector, then it should get a fair run. One suggestion: if you offer
it up, you should change the orientation of the stamp counter-clock-wise 90
degrees, so that "Silk Fabric" reads at the top.
fires in Southern California: Keep your fingers crossed. I have several
friends whom I've helped to pack up. One family has had to evacuate and doesn't
know whether or not they've had damage. Another is waiting for the official
notice to evacuate. I am fortunately about 30 miles from the closest fire right
now, but live about 4 miles from an area that does catch fire from time to time.
If that were to happen, resources are so stretched right now that it could be a
greater catastrophe than in the past.
Either way, my involvement here may be a bit intermittent over the next several
days, as I try to both maintain my regular work and help out friends as much as
possible.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David B: You'll have to use the second option.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
France to COGH Covers
David B: About a year or more ago I mentioned on the boards that I am interested
in collecting covers from France to Cape of Good Hope (for the classical period
ending 1876). I have kept an eye open for some, but they appear to be as scarce
as chicken teeth.
This is the first one I have seen. Is in an auction by David Feldman. I have
copied the page from the site, if it doesn't open, try
This site, click on
auctions, on next page click search lots, and on next page in keyword menu past
@20414. You can also look at @20413. I'll have tothink about those!!
October 27, 2003 12:00 Randy Shoemaker <randyshoemaker@netscape.net>
http://psestamp.com
Expertizing preferences
Rather than begin by engaging in name calling of any perticular service, I take
great exception to Ken Lawrences reckless use of this forum to recant what is a
long laundry list of have-truths and outright lies. Mr. Lawrence has railed
against PSE for years about my 'alterego', dealer bias, reference collctions,
scientific background, specific opinions, etc, ad nauseum. But, interestingly
enough, He has NEVER ONCE contacted me personally, asked even one civil
question, made ANY ATTEMPT at verifying the drivel he spues on the print or
internet page or even come within 100 MILES of the truth! For a supposed
philatelic 'writer', one has to question his motives and biases much more than
mine. The shrill nature of his commentary belies the real crux of the matter.
Mr. Lawrence talks about me with so many purgoritives ('deceptive',
'unscrupulous', 'splits the difference', 'allows submitters to pick the experts
who examine an item', 'potential corruption', 'you aren't getting the quality
opinion you desire', 'revulsion', 'live or die by the reputations of its
examiners', 'doesn't maintain a reference collection for the experts use',
doesn't allow independent researchers to study its work product', 'PSE has gone
through several business reorganizations', suggesting we will close our doors,
likening PSE certs to Steve Ivy's TWO MONTH foray into IN-HOUSE certificates,
'So it will be with todays PSE certificates a generation from now', 'PSE cuts
too many corners'.
All this in just ONE POSTING on this chat board. Those of you out there may or
may not know me. I have been an active professional in this business as a DEALER
or expert since 1969! My reputation as a stamp dealer I proudly proffer is
outstanding. All you out there ask people who have known me 30+ years and ask
them if they know ONE SINGLE TIME...JUST ONE(!), that I lied, cheated,
misrepresented, stole, didn't give everyone the absolute truth about any dealing
I had. GO OUT THERE AND SEE FOR YOURSELF. If you listen to unfounded charges and
fabrications, then that is up to you. All who know me can verify my openness,
honestly and the highest regard for our chosen hobby. Nothing that Ken Lawrence
can say can change the FACTS. Ok KEN, put up or SHUT UP! Your inuendo and
fabrications in this industry have gone on long enough without being challenged.
Here is my CHALLENGE! DIG UP EVERYTHING YOU CAN and confront me face to face,
point by point. If you can't, then simply zip it up. Stick to the facts,
philately or whatever but STOP the LIES and FABRICATIONS. Your bloody pulpit
should be restricted to scholarly endeavors and not mindless, baseless drivel to
make YOU feel good.
The ball is in the TRUTHS court!
-Randy Shoemaker
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David B: Yes, that worked to my advantage. I also used ipix in the past and it
were you guys on the ebay chat board that encouraged ne to make the jump to a
better picture host. The main argument being that the better scans would bring
in better results during selling. So I can only recommend the virtues of having
clear/good quality scans at a reasonable size allowing for fast uploading from a
reliable host.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Christo, then it serves the seller right, he should ahve had a good scan and a
close up of the pair,
I think the Japanese is about 1920,
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
David B: Luckily I asked for a close-up scan. Was sent very promptly by the
seller. I'll also follow your recommendation re the Japanese silk revenue. Would
have been nice to have a stab at the year though.
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
prometheus, I can make no recommendations for expertizers of
postal history. I mentioned that because my entire experience is with U.S.
singles. Not only have I never expertized a postal history piece, but I don't
even own a postal history piece, and my entire experience with postal history
consists of a lunch at WESTPEX with Sarge and Richard F. My comment was intended
as a disclaimer, in light of comments I've heard here and elsewhere about APS
and PSE in particular and postal history expertization.
Jim
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Christo, nice buy, most probably some bidders stayed away because of the
extremely lousy scan. If he had a close up of the stamps the realisation would
have been in 3 figures.
re. the Japanese Silk Revenue, haven't a clue, but there are 1000's of Japanese
Ebayers, list it for $2 and wait for them to bid,
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
NOMAD; Bill C is correct, you can see the watermark SOMETIMES, but not always.
When it can't be seen, the only other option is to remove the stamp from the
cover, check it, then reattach it - which is just what expert committees will do
if necessary. APEX has done this several times for me on items I've submitted as
EKUs where the watermark must be verified.
Regarding the PF and covers, one complaint I've always had about PF and even, to
a certain extent, PSE, is that they tend to ignore cover faults, so your news
about them mentioning a tear is good news to me. All of the expert committees
are quick to identify stamp flaws on a cover but not cover flaws, which has
always amazed me. While I do not advocate calling insignificant cover faults, I
do believe that important faults should be identified.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Promotheus Tiny Covers
Prom: As promised, two (maybe not so tiny) covers. If you would like them,
please send me your mailing address.
First one measures 11.6 x 6.8 cm. Addressed from Utrecht (Netherlands) to
Heilbron (South Africa). Inside a card with a B&W photo announcing birth of baby
girl - 1948. Kind of neat the birth announcement with a bab yon stamp cover!
Tiny Cover 1
The second cover measures 9.7 x 7.4 cm. Sent from Paris (France) to Cambridge
(Mass) and then redirected to Gloucester (Mass). Dated 1926. That's the problems
with these tiny coversd - one tends to run out of space!!
Tiny Cover 2
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Japanese Revenue Stamp
Anybody on the board that can give me some info on this
Japanese Silk
Revenue?. Worthwhile to list on E-bay?
Thanks, Christo
October 27, 2003 9:50 Bill Claghorn (claghorn1p)
http://www.geocities.com/claghorn1p/
Stamp Watermark on Cover
Nomad55 You may be able to see the watermark of the stamp by holding it
up to a bright light and looking through the cover. It depends on the thickness
and opacity of the paper. A red gel overlay might help filter out the stamp
design to see the watermark more clearly. Good luck.
October 27, 2003 nomad55
On the subject of expertization - can any of the major committees determine the
watermark of a stamp on-cover? Does the stamp have to be removed?
Reason for asking - I picked up at a local show over the weekend two covers
franked with imperforate vertical coils, a line strip of 7 on a registered
cover, and a paste-up strip of 4. I'd like to have them certed, but positive ID
of the stamps depends on watermark.
October 27, 2003 nomad55
Brian.....I have used CSA for certs to determine whether a certain stamp was a
genuine on cover use - great for my Texas confederate covers.
For the cover sent to PF, I wanted a positive confirmation on the plate variety
in addtion to the on cover use. I know PF charges extra for plating, so I
identified the stone and position in the original request so as to save the
extra fee - basically I did the leg work for them and expected a 'yes' or 'no'
answer, which is exactly what I got in return.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Prometheus: No problem. It looks like my guesstimate was good. The 10 c bistre
(on the cover beneath stamp is written 43b - so it is probably YT 43 b/Scott
42a) is valued by Scott as $70 and $110 for on cover. I'll verify whether it is
report B once I have the cover in my possession. The quailty of the stamps
appear to be Ok - it is a pair, with at least one having almost four margins,
the other slightly cut in at top. So all in all not a bad purchase in my
opinion. I will try and show you two of my miniature covers later tonight.
October 27, 2003 Brain R
nomad55
I have a simple question for you. This is not ment to be an endorsement, of a
"taking of sides", in this whole expertiztion debate.
Why did you go to the PF, instead of the CSA (or other service)?
October 27, 2003 nomad55
A positive personal experience with PF
Couple weeks back I received a good cert on an item submitted to the PF, a
Confederate constant plate variety on cover. The cert noted a repaired tear in
the cover (which I knew about) - seems to be a way of documenting the condition
of the cover as of XXX date, which I like. In addition as an unexpected bonus,
the PF included a xerox of their reference copy of the subject stamp - a nice
touch!
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Thank You Scott!
SCOTT T.; I appreciate that you came here and stated your opinions. I think we
can have a really interesting and valuable discourse here about the pros and
cons of expertizing as it pertains to the three major US committees, and so long
as we can keep it rational, I believe the readers of this board can benefit from
it.
I must say, speaking personally, that at one time I found the PF to be the most
difficult to communicate with in terms of speaking directly to someone there who
would seem willing to help you. I found Peter Robertson to be terribly
stand-offish, but have now found Bill Crowe to be much more reasonable and easy
to speak to.
Randy Shoemaker has always been the easiest to reach and speak to and is always
willing to give of his trime to any legitimate inquiry. I have not had reason to
speak directly to Mercer at APEX but he approached me some months ago in a
gentlemanly effort to have me put aside my past gripes with APEX, and the end
result of those efforts was that I now also expertize for APEX as well as for
PSE, and frankly, I have been getting a lot more from APEX than from PSE. While
there is no question that PSE does still send out most of their patients to
outside experts, it's still true that Bill L. and Randy S. usually comprise two
out of the three who expertize straight-forward US stuff, so in that regard,
APEX is way ahead of PSE in sending more stuff out to independent experts. I
can't speak for PF since I do not expertize for them, but certainly would if
asked.
October 27, 2003 Scott R. Trepel <strepel@siegelauctions.com>
http://www.siegelauctions.com
PF
Bill W. asked me to review the postings on the relative merits of PF, PSE and
APEX. I read them and have the following response.
NUMBER ONE
The first thing I want to do is refute Ken L's remark that I, as one of the big
auctioneers, get "preferential" treatment. With 23 years experience submitting
stamps, I can assure you that I do NOT receive any form of preferential
treatment. I grimace over PF opinions and wait for items as much as anyone (in
fact, thru sheer volume, a lot more than most others.) Ken's comment is
inaccurate, and it insults the PF employees who work hard to maintain blind
justice in expertizing. I respectfully ask Ken to reconsider his remark and
retract it, not for me but for the PF employees whose reputations he has tainted
with the suggestion of favoritism.
NUMBER TWO
What is true is that I regard the expertizing process -- at PF, PSE, APEX, CSA,
RPS or BPA (or anywhere) -- as a trial. And I do feel that certain items in
which I have great faith, backed by information and experience, deserve an
advocate, and in those situations I will play a more active role in the
expertizing process.
Therefore, if I submit one of three recorded Goliad 10c Dark Blue provisional
stamps to the PF (or any committee)-- a stamp that was called counterfeit by the
CSA -- I will produce evidence to back up my opinion that it is genuine. If I
win the case, it has nothing to do with "preferential" treatment and everything
to do with scholarship. Bill Crowe will verify that I did just that in the case
of the Goliad stamp. I secured a "genuine" PFC for a very rare, genuine stamp.
Likewise, the PF (Bill Crowe) will confirm that I have submitted items and
specifically asked the PF to regard them as suspicious, even though I have a
financial interest in the outcome.
NUMBER THREE
Now, speaking as a PF Board member, I can assure everyone that we are taking
significant steps to improving our service. Someone here noticed an improvement
during the past 2 years. There will be even more as we convert to a digital
imaging system and better archiving facility. Bill Crowe, Brian Bleckwynn and
Dave Petruzelli have been actively seeking opinions in specialized areas to
improve the quality of opinions rendered. And we are taking careful steps to
introduce new scientific equipment into the expertizing process (see P.S.
below).
I have no complaint about APEX. I think APEX serves the philatelic community
well. And in certain areas, I am very interested in knowing what APEX has to
say. As an aside, Ken would serve APEX more effectively in this discussion by
concentrating more on the good work APEX is doing and less on criticism of PSE
and PF.
HOWEVER, as a professional, I have found no reason in the marketplace to change
the standard for transactions. For U.S. stamps, the PF is the last word. (For
foreign, it's a bit different). The point is, faced with conflicating opinions,
I must have ONE expertizing service that is the final decision-maker or
arbitrator. The market continues to tell me that the PF is the one it wants.
Nothing Ken has said or can say changes that reality.
POSTSCRIPT
Re Science: Y. Souren published a booklet called "Philately of Tomorrow", in
which he extolled the virtues of his modern scientific equipment, which he
claimed would replace experts in expertizing. It is a worthwhile read and an
excellent example of how wrong someone can be when they rely too heavily on
equipment. Souren thoroughly vindicated the "Knapp Shift", which of course has
been proven to be a fake.
The APEX is doing fine work in adapting forensic analysis for philatelic
expertizing (so is PSE and the PF), but I think any scientist will agree that
the observations and data derived from forensic analysis must be carefully
analyzed by experienced people. There is no such thing as a "FAKE-O-METER" with
green and red lights that gives us the answer.
Ken L, I urge you to refrain from firing shots at others when there is an
alternative way of seeking validation. I spent a considerable part of my youth
going to Grateful Dead concerts, so I have a weak spot for "hippies".
October 27, 2003 Matt Liebson
Prometheus: you may want to look for one that's a couple of years old. The last
two editions (I think) have been only available as hardbound with color
illustrations. An impressive book, but at $99 or so very expensive.
Christo: Quite alright. Being mistaken for Bill Weiss is probably not a bad
thing. (Bill may not share that sentiment about me!)
October 27, 2003 prometheus
Christo -
I misread your post as Value On cover not just the stamps. My Bad .
I could have posted those.
Matt L - Thanks for the Info , another book I should get.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Matt Liebson: I apologise for attributing your comments to Bill Weiss!
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Prometheus: First off, because I didn't have my catalogue with me, I was
interested in what the stamps were cataloguing. So when I was bidding on this
issue, I was be bidding on it in terms of CV for the stamps alone (I must add
blindly, because I didn't get a response from the board - I will see tonight at
home how far off my guesstimate was!).
Bill W is correct. Scott classic stamps issue, and some of the French catalogues
(e.g. Yvert and Telliert, Ceres, Dallay) quote prices on cover. Also, as he
states, that is only a guide. An example is
This Cover I was interested in buying. The markings were not the same as
what I am used to on these type of covers (but then I am still ery much a newbie
like you). Some suggested that $ 150 is a good buy. I sniped for $279 (blind I
guess, or maybe just dumb, unknowledgeable), but the guy who was the bidder must
know something more. I am still hoping that someone could explain the
significance of the markings(or even rare-ity) of this cover.
At the end of the day, "attractiveness" of a cover plays a big role for me (I
suppose similar to why men differ in their opinion to what a nice/beautiful
woman is - beauty is in the eye of the beholder).
October 27, 2003 Bill Weiss
Expertizing
Good morning everyone. Ken L. should know me well enough by now to know that my
earlier post was not "ridicule". I am as seriously interested in copetent
expertizing as you are, and you should know that by now and no longer assume
that I am blindly promoting any one committee over any other or have any other
ulterior motive. I believe that the primary reason most dealers I know want PF
or PSE certs is because either A. Their clients want them or B. They sincerely
believe the opinions are accurate. I don't think that either of these reasons
automatically makes them an enemy of APS. It's like prferring one food over
another. You don't necessarily hate the one you like less.
One way we can add to this discussion in a positive way is to invite someone
like Scott Trepel over here from Frajola's board and ask him why his firm favors
PF in their terms of sale. I have always assumed that it was twofold; Scott is
on the PF Board I believe, thus is obviously a PF fan and second, I would assume
he believes they give accurate opinions. It would be interesting to have him
comment and I will send him an email now to invite him here.
October 27, 2003 Matt Liebson
Prometheus: The Scott Classic Catalogue (which covers 1840-1940) lists on-cover
values for many countries' pre-1900 material. It is an area they've been
expanding in recent years.
I know Michel catalogs have fairly detailed on-cover valuations for German
material at least, and I'm sure that there are plenty of other catalogs out
there that have more or less coverage of cover prices.
That said, I think on-cover values are at best a vague guide and are often
misleading, since those values don't usually account for rates, usages,
postmarks, etc.
October 27, 2003 prometheus
Christo
Where would you look something like that Up, Used on cover values?
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
Cat Value
And this is
Why I wanted to know.
October 27, 2003 0613 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
THIS DISCUSSION IS GREAT
Please continue
Ken L - I find your posts very concise, informative and more real than
some of the hedged posts I have seen ( I like olde hippies , My parents are
flower children)
ON THE RULES OF COPIES To all who posted about this WHY are Not the laws
enforced??
JIM W - Lavar Great Postal posts
Jim G Who would you recommend for Postal History stuff ?
Dave P I am an outsider and New , I came away with the same feeling on
certs, and have NOT changed my thoughts yet.
MR MODERATOR Thanks again for this GREAT Forum !!!!!
and too the 100 or so Lurkers and Posters that looked at my fresh stuff on my
site I thank you. Also to those that emailed Thoughts, ideas, opinions Thanks a
lot, I still do not understand why you won't post something on the board.
CLARK The Seigel census link is neat I can't read the adverts on those
covers they show , Is there a place that might list who used these stamps. ??
October 27, 2003 8:12 a.m c.d.t. John@Magnolia
Stamps
Prometheus
thatnks in advance,I go back to work tomorrow so I'll probably get it when I
get back..
Duncan
in regards to the fake inverts,Hmm! I just could not resist have a stamp that
I could not otherwise afford so I ordered the complete set to go along with
these.look
here
Stamphick
Yeah Sure, I already have one stamp that has 4 certs from the APS each one
says something differnt,anything from Genuine MNH to Removed cancel and regummed,
I'll just stick to my own opinion it has served fairly well so far with only one
comlaint in over 30 yrs of collecting and selling.
As most of you know or have figured out by now I usually take sides with the
underdog,But in Kens case I will not The APS has dug this hole and it will be
interesting to see them dig their (Attn. Jim Starke I spelled right this time)
way out as they claim that they are understaffed as it is.I don't see how they
can police e-bay as they can't police their own dealers and shows.
Now if I left out anybody I'm sorry!
JOHN in Ms. where the sun has come back out
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Bill Weiss
Please go back and read what I wrote. This is a quote from my very first post on
the subject: "I’m biased in favor of APEX, because I’m one of its experts, I
have trained many of its experts, and I have worked hard to make it the best in
the world." I have never claimed to be unbiased, so your ridicule is misplaced.
But the facts I reported are true, and have not been challenged by anyone.
I also wrote, in my initial post on PSE, "Shoemaker’s gimmick was putting the
names of the experts on the certificates. This was grossly deceptive, but
effective." Note I said it was effective (as a marketing ploy).
But I think you'll admit that if you want to sell a U.S. essay or proof with a
PSE certificate bearing Bill Langs's name, you'll be embarrassed by it, even if
you think the opinion is accurate.
One reason Langs won't accept APEX certificates is because we find the faults in
stamps he sells as flawless. That happened recently. Langs told his customer he
is a PSE expert, and scoffed at the APEX opinion. So I asked the owner to send
the stamp to me, examined it (in fluid), and pointed out the faults so he could
see them for himself, a good educational exercise. It was a textbook example of
why buyers should have their stamps certified.
More collectors (in contrast to dealers) submit their stamps to APEX than to any
other service, because they rightly trust us to be unbiased about their stamps
and covers. PF and PSE mainly serve the dealer community. About 75 percent of PF
submissions come from major auction houses, which get discounts and preferential
treatment. That's the bias that you failed to mention in your Linn's article.
In almost all cases, the opinions will be the same. But as I wrote originally,
the breadth and depth of the APS expert committee, consisting of the greatest
scholars and the most experienced collectors, as well as dealer professionals,
is not matched by any other committee. Our forensic equipment leads all others.
The one big advantage that the PF has is the Luff reference collection, on which
many scarce shades of classic stamps are based. PF and APEX cooperate well, but
PSE has refused to divulge the basis of its difficult or controversial opinions.
A big advantage that PF and PSE have over APEX is that they return submissions
faster, because they do most examining in-house. (Even when PSE sends out
material, it often has two in-house examiners. That's why Shoemaker fills one of
the positions with his alter ego name, J. Randall.) APEX sends out nearly all
submissions, usually to more than one committee member, so our procedure takes
longer.
By the way, Billy Langs, why do you call me an "ex" hippie? Is that supposed to
be a slur?
October 27, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Marvin Frey
Has your Scott 482a pair been certified by a reputable service? If not, it isn't
credible. Nearly all putative examples of 482a that are submitted turn out to be
strongly impressed 409s, where the owner hasn't observed the watermark.
October 27, 2003 03:44 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a registered cover from
Grenadae to
the United States in 1922. Visit Grenada!
jimbo
October 27, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
October 27, 2003 Christo van Zyl
CAT Value needed
Hi! Anybody who can help with a CV for France, 1870/1 10 centimes Ceres imperf
pair (Bordeaux issue) on cover. Am at work and catalogues not closeby. I think I
should bring one to work!!
October 27, 2003 0020 Clark (reperf)
482A
Marvin Frey,
I assume the pair is new discovery?
From Siegel 482A Census: "Our census of Scott 482A records a [used]pair, three
covers, one unused single and 32 used singles for a total of 38 stamps. Most
examples are either cut well into the design or have the Schermack perfs trimmed
away on one side." See
482A.
If they are not certified yet, it would be useful to check Richard Prothero's
article, a couple of years ago, in the US Specialist giving details regarding
unequivocal Type Ia indicators. Unfortunately, most certificates are probably
based on an experts opinion, "I know a Type Ia when I see one", rather than a
more informed opinion based on the results of an examination of the plate proofs
for plates 10209 and 10208.
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Jim, what I don't understand is that it appears that neither Ebay or the APS
have seen those clauses. It seems clear to me that all of Addies material has
been verboten since it first appeared.
David B.
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
There are two really useful notes in the rules quoted below. First, it
explicitly covers foreign material, which is really nice to see. Second, it says
that a cancellation must be "official". So a color copy of a U.S. or foreign
stamp with a forged overprint is illegal (as in all of Addie's offerings),
unless it follows the 3/4 - 1 1/2 rule.
Jim
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Jim, presume that Ebay will forward it to the APS for confirmation. Shouldn't
take too long for someone there to make a decision and then Whammo.
David B.
October 27, 2003 Roger Heath
Edited Post
Color Copies -
When I first arrived in Hawaii I wanted to get a number of my GB stamps color
copied at a local print shop. (This was 10 years ago, and color copies were
good, but expensive.) The owners of the print shop would not copy any stamps at
that time!!! Through communicaiton with APS, I was able to get a brochure that
quoted the same rule as posted below. All my stamps were used so the owner had
no problems, but wanted to keep a copy of the brochure for himself. Same size
color copies of unused stamps are illegal, same size color copies are OK, if
stamps are cancelled. Remember the US government is only concerned with
potential mail fraud, and those auction inverts look like they might be good
enough to do the job. (Glue and perfs, doesn't get any better - LOL)
Roger - bed time Sunday night 10:00pm HST
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
David, I'm concerned that eBay may get confused by his "error" argument.
It's nice that the USPS reissued the Pan-Am inverts as normal stamps, so that
argument doesn't apply.
I reported them to eBay, explained it all, and included the Treasury link.
Jim
October 27, 2003 David Benson
Jim, I hope that the APS and Ebay have read that. To simplify it, it says all
color replicas must be smaller or larger but black and white can be the same
size but must be used with a genuine cancel. Sounds easy for them to get rid of
sellers that make their own reproductions of any countries stamps.
David Benson
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Oops, link.
Jim
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Duncan, how's this, from the U.S. Treasury Department web site:
U.S. Postage Stamps, Foreign Postage Stamps, and Revenue Stamps
Printed illustrations of United States and foreign stamps are permissible
for any non-fraudulent purpose. Black and white illustrations of uncanceled
United States and foreign postage stamps are permissible in any size. Color
illustrations of uncanceled United States and foreign postage stamps must be
less than three-fourths or more than one and one-half times the size of the
genuine stamp. Canceled United States and foreign postage stamps may be of any
size whether the illustrations are in color or black and white.
Note: Canceled U.S. and foreign postage stamps must bear an official
cancellation mark, i.e., the stamps must have been used for postage. Also, the
plates and negatives, including glossy prints, of any United States or foreign
obligations must be destroyed after their final use for the purpose for which
they were made.
Printed illustrations of United States and foreign revenue stamps are
permissible in black and white only. There are no size restrictions for
revenue stamps.
Jim
October 27, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Invert copies
Duncan, that person is wrong on almost all points, as far as I know, but
I can't provide you with a reference. If errors were illegal, than virtually any
Shreves or Siegel auction would contain illegal material, which clearly isn't
the case (and law enforcement has checked out those auctions for other reasons
several times, in connection with stolen collections, "the ring", etc.).
Even if he was correct on all points, the fact that his Pan Am inverts can be
passed off as the recent invert reissues (which are *not* errors and which makes
his argument meaningless) means that he's in a world of hurt if the USPS
notices.
Jim
October 27, 2003 Dave P
Expert Certs.
Having re-read the whole board, and as an "outsider", the impression given is
that you cannot trust any American Certs. I am sure this cannot be right, but
anyone new to the hobby reading the remarks here would come to the same
conclusion.
October 27, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Good evening/day to all. Today's featured item of postal history focuses on mail
from the US to Germany during WWI.
This card is
a 1c McKinley postal card uprated with a 1c Pan Pac stamp to pay the 2c postal
card rate to Germany. The postmark is indistinct, but the card is addressed to
Berlin. At first glance, there is nothing special about this card. A closer look
at the front reveals an anamoly. The sender's return address is listed as
Hamilton, Ontario (Canada). Why would someone from Hamilton travel to the US
(probably to Buffalo) to mail a card to Germany? The answer is revealed by
looking at the
reverse . At the upper left is the date on which the card was written:
August 18, 1914. By this date Canada and Germany were at war, so there was no
direct mail service between Canada and Germany. Wish I could read the message.
Interestingly, I have also managed to acquire some mail sent from Germany to
this same correspondent in Canada at the beginning of WWI, which I will show
later this week.
Well the fires are taking their toll here in SoCal. Had to evacuate my 84
year old mom from her place in Escondido. Flames were very close when my wife
picked her up (I was in church and didn't have my cell phone on). I'll say a
prayer for those who were not as fortunate as my mom.
October 26, 2003 22.31 Knud-Erik Andersen
Good morning/afternoon/evening to you all.
K.E.
October 26, 2003 David Benson
Richard, gone are the days when certifiers certified that the stamp was genuine
and not it's condition.
David Benson
October 26, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
I assume all this fuss about APEX, PSE and PF is in regards to certifying U.S.
items and not non-U.S. items?
October 26, 2003 marvin frey <marvfrey@aol.com>
482a
i held a mint pair of 482a in my hands and can assure everyone it exists.
hope this comment is relavant since i scan read some comments about 482[sic]
482a
October 26, 2003 marvin frey <marvfrey@aol.com>
none in particular
October 26, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Bill Langs, your complaints about Ken's characterization of you may very
well be valid. But I'd find it a lot easier to take complaints about personal
attacks seriously if they didn't include perjoratives such as "ex hippie".
Then again, I went to Berkeley, so I may just be sensitive to such issues.
Jim
October 26, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Just to fillow up on Bill Weiss' comments, I have absolutely no direct
experience that makes me forego APEX certs. I'm simply not that experienced a
philatelist. I primarily rely on certs to prevent myself from getting burned.
While I understand the theory behind recognizing regums and reperfs, I've never
actually spotted a regum, and I've never spotted a reperf without the aid of a
scan (not an option when inspecting lots in person).
Lacking the experience to directly contradict an expertized opinion (which
would have been handy when PSE rejected that E9), I'm in no position to
recognize a bad opinion, and I therefore am in no position to judge which
services are better than which others. I've made my decisions by getting
opinions from dealers and expert who have impressed me with the quality of their
offerings or shared experience. I've had one expert who I trust that told me it
was a waste of time to mention APEX certs on my album pages. One of my preferred
dealers is actually a PSE expertizer who thinks that grading is the greatest
thing since sliced bread. All of the dealers I frequent allow either PF or PSE
(and in most cases, I don't know their position on APEX). I don't know how
Siegel or Shreves view APEX, but they have a stated preference for PF (I know
they both tolerate PSE). Rumsey has a stated preference for either PF or PSE
(and, interestingly, they expressly disallow grades).
So those are all of the factors that went into my PF preference. I've never
once frequented a dealer or auction house with a stated preference for APEX, and
I've encountered more than one who won't offer extensions for them. Lacking
direct experience to influence me otherwise, given so many stated PF
preferences, and given my distaste for PSE policies such as grading and slabbing,
PF is my service of choice. But if I had more personal experience, or if I was a
postal historian instead of a classics collector, or if I had a better grasp of
the personal prejudices of the dealers and houses I frequent, I might very well
make an entirely different decision.
Jim
October 26, 2003 Brian R
Bill L
Welcome! Good to see you posting here. I saw your exchange on Frajola's board
last month. I undersatnd completely, those BEP cutouts were put up by the guy
doing the auctions, not you. I was very impressed by how calm and reasoned your
responses were. That will work here as well. No need to call names, although
your reputation, is a pretty good reason.
I hope you'll continue to post, for there are A LOT of things I don't know, or
understand, about US issues.
October 26, 2003 8:06pm Bill Langs <wlangs@aol.com>
http://www.wlangs.com
Shooting another sniper out of his tree
Ken Lawrence......your assertions about me are erroneous and the type I would
expect from a biased, self-serving ex hippie. First, you need to read the
Frajola chat board where I have explained IN DETAIL all about the souvineer card
cutouts.....which are very collectable by the way. Second, APS certs on US
stamps are considered by leading experts in the trade, such as myself, as a
distant third behind the PF and the PSE. The question I ask myself is "Will an
APS cert enhance the value of my philatelic item?"........the answer is always
NO.....In fact, I will not honor an APS cert on any stamp purchased on ebay or
from me directly. I will honor PF opinions and PSE opinions. Third, Ken, I have
already learned, in very short order, that making public individual attacks on
the board can and will be dealt with ....you are certainly no exception.
Finally, Ken, I reserve my opinions about you and will hope you will give up
some of your crusades.......it must be nice to have all the free time to chase
and devote to them......I have a business to run and a terrific son to raise.
October 26, 2003 Bill Weiss
Various
Good evening everyone, I have just returned from a tough day playing poker and
have quickly read today's posts. Nothing earthshattering, but I do note that my
friend Mr Lawrence is giving us his unbiased opinion of the APEX committee
versus the competition. God love him! I must say that in recent months I have
become a bigger fan of APEX than I have ever been. On the other hand, I think
Ken often forgets that MOST of the folks who prefer other committees to APEX do
not necessarily have an axe to grind, they just find another service to be
better (in their view) than APEX. Jum Griffit's post was a good example. Jim has
no axe to grind, but he has concluded that the PF is for him. I feel the same
way. I've always tried to tell Ken, sometimes with little luck, that as an
auction firm I only care about the quality of the opinions being rendered. Sure,
some other factors, such as cost, time, ease of submission, ease in
communicating with the chaiman of the committee, etc., are considerations too,
but not nearly as important as the accuracy of the opinion. Ken tends to always
think that some folks have an ulterior motive, to which I disagree. Some may,
but not all, so when a group of dealers, for example, say they prefer one
committee over another, I don't see it as a vast conspiracy, as Ken sometimes
does.
October 26, 2003 prometheus
Thanks allison
Nice looking Canadians listed
I really liked the Newfoundlands wish they were used for my book.
October 26, 2003 anne
Allison: It's stories like that that make it impossible for me to throw
away ANYTHING. My mother was worse, however, she maintainted an extensive
collection of paper and plastic bags, empty boxes, and rubber bands. Just in
case. (although come to think of it, the shoe boxes and mailing boxes are
accumulating in the stamp room--just in case)
Good night to all and to all sweet dreams of Danish bundleware, all neatly
tied; a clean desk from which emerged a second pair of tweezers (oops--tongs),
and fascinating discussions of exertizing.
October 26, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Forgeries, etc.
Prometheus: I have two selling IDs: eddiephilatelic for individual stmaps or
small lots and wholesale_stamps_lots for bulk lots.
Duncan Doenitz: That guy is playing with fire. He needs to put a thick black
line through the denomination on the face of each stamp at the very least, or
stamp it replica on the front (not back). I have seen replica C13-C15 for sale
and they are stamped as replicas or reproductions on the back. I wonder what the
postal inspectors would think of this? Technically, these zepps are still valid
for postage, although would anyone really use one for postage these days? My
father gave up on stamp collecting in 1942 when he went off the college at the
age of 16. He left his stamp collection at home. The family lore (not sure I
believe it) is that he had a bunch of mint zepps, Columbians, Trans-Mississippi
sets, and my Grandmother used the mint ones for postage (sending packages to her
relatives in Europe) and threw away the used ones as "garbage." She also threw
away my Uncle's comic book collection that had many mint 1920s and 1930s comic
books.
October 26, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
US forgeries on eBay
Jeez. The link posted earlier has probably been deleted since the writer was
anonymous, but it led to an inverted Jenny C3a "replica".
Strange thing is, the seller has a Mankato Minnesota address but his offerings
are on eBay UK. He has listed 152 auctions of counterfeit US stamps since
September 18th, so roughly 100 people have dealt in counterfeit US stamps in
violation of US laws due to those sales.
One of his auctions is
here.
A letter to the seller yielded this information:
1) He states that owning real inverts is also illegal.
2) No one has jurisdiction over them since they were never intended for
circulation.
3) Others are offering US copies on eBay, he is not to be confused with "those
trash".
4) Seller is not trying to fool anyone.
Does anyone have some legal advice for this seller? I feel sorry for him if US
officials decide to pursue the buyers of his goods. I doubt if the government
would agree with his logic since the real inverts and his creations could be
used for postage. In fact his ads suggest you might "lick em and stick em".
He's selling some of the forgeries in bulk lots, I wonder if he's considered
selling full sheets of 100? With a face value of $24, he'd do well even as
discount postage.
Dunc
[cough*lickemyouknowyouwantto*cough]
October 26, 2003 18:04 Dave F. (moderator)
Could we just lay off the sarcasm for a while? Most people don't enjoy having
the board in turmoil so much of the time.
October 26, 2003 stamphick <stamphick@dospalos.org>
expertizing
John.. You won't have any problems if you send your stamp to the expert
APS lobyist expertisier. You will be assured that you will get an opinion
that cannot be challenged.
David
October 26, 2003 prometheus
John Mag Stamps
One Day I too will have really Olde covers.
Saw your complaint of no mail sending you a modern Patriotic
Cover made with some stuff I had laying around. Whats Allison's selling ID I
can't even look at them.
October 26, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Lawsuits against ebay
Brian R: Yeah, I will be happy to charge $250 per hour attorney time to read the
ebay user agreement out loud to that guy. No ebay user can sue ebay for damages,
ebay has limited its liability as a condition of membership. The only possible
liability against ebay itself is for is if it fails to refund fees or
overcharges for final value fees or some similar type thing. And then, as per
the user agreement, you have to arbitrate the dispute.
October 26, 2003 John@Magnolia
Prometheus
I've got covers that go back to 1813.
October 26, 2003 John@Magnolia Stamps
Experts
I would like everyone to keep in mind that when sending off for a cert.that you
are subject to get a differnt opinion each time.A classic example was about 15
yrs ago I sent a beautiful mint state 1803 U.S. silver dollar to the P.G.S. for
grading,it came back as a MS63 thusly making it a genuine rare coin.About 5 yrs
later I sold the coin to another collector,he inturn resubmitted the coin to the
same service in the same sealed container,it was returned as MS60 now the coin
is worth several hundred dollars less I refunded the differance,3 yrs ago he
sold the coin to a dealer and he sent it off still in the sealed slab that it
was returned to the 2nd guy in.Now it comes back as a AU59,Wow a big
differance,Stamps are the same it all depends on who is looking at them and how
they feel at the time that they are looking.I was told that at one time it would
depend on how many piece's there were out there,and if the guy that was doing
the certification had one like and his was one of the few know exaples,and you
submitted a better quality example he would automaticly try to downgrade yours
to keep the value of his hi.This in my humble opinion is the same thing that has
happened in the stamp world in many cases where a stamp lets say where canceled
stamp is worth more than a mint never hinged stamp of the same variety,(ie)#39
There are just a hand full of certifide copys with a value around 7 grand
each,And whats the 1st thing you here when a non certifde copy come up?
This has been a great week down here in the south as I had a whole 3 glorius
days of relaxing and fishing.I caught no fish but we had a good time at
J.P.Colman state park.
I also notice that the stamps that I submitted to Alison are doing faily well on
e-bay so come on folks get in there and BID,I need the money.Ha Ha.
John in Ms. where its now raining!
October 26, 2003 Prometheus
Brian
This batch of covers all to same guy Light bill, phone bill, Church mailings
1880's to 1922 these 40 covers are part of a lot of 120 that I have paid 1/3 of
money Dude sent me a third for first payment.
Wish the Guy with the stampless pile would do that.
I get those when he gets all my money.
October 26, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
Jim W-S
Neat
On page 8 at my link above ( Mysterions and more) you can see my SG for USA(reds)
color chart - The two missing were Perfins a friend wanted.
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Forgot to add, change title to 2,3,4 for other pages.
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Pro
If you are using SG color, try
this link
October 26, 2003 prometheus
Brian
As a poor College student - Hope springs eternal.
I am just trying to get an Idea of what to look/watch for.
Was hoping that just Dates would be enuf for a start, But now I learn Dates in
book are Not exact.
Am still trying to get a handle on colors also, The differences in the wonder
Gauge and my SG #214 Educator pack of red shades are not helping either.
October 26, 2003 Brian R
how many knew this would happen?
Heeeeeey Alison, there is a guy over on the ebay board agitating to start
a class action suit, over his missing "my ebay" page.
I think he needs a good lawyer :o) :o)
October 26, 2003 Brian R
prometheus
I agree with you about old letters, they're fascinating.
Recently, I got the thick stack of old covers, I told the board about.
Couple of dozen letters (all with enclosures) from 1899-1931.
Most postings used a W/F coil varient as postage.
All letters concern the constuction of a particular sewer project.
In standard bureacratic fasion, the sewer took 32 years to complete.
Many of the letters between parties clarify, that due to the time involved,
certain principals refered to, have either died or retired.
Unfortunatly, every one of the W/F coil varients used, turned out to be as
common as what is now found in those sewers. :o(
October 26, 2003 prometheus
Ken and Clark
Thanks for the responses , see how little I know.
Just got 40 covers/ with enclosures (i love things inside)
Most are coils .
The factoid from Ken L That they may be 482's makes me shake my head because I
had used the dates from Scott's to divide groups,
I did not notice that the 459 wasn't listed as a Shermack type 3 usage.
Clark would you know if the Edison Electric Illuminating Company
used any good coils of this type??
October 26, 2003 Jim Griffith <griffith@dweeb.org>
http://album.dweeb.org
Expertizing services
Ken, when I started getting my stuff expertized about six years ago, I
went straight to PSE. People I talked to said "use PSE or PF", and PF really
made you jump through hoops to use their services. They didn't have a web site,
they'd send you blank forms one at a time, and they made it seem like they were
doing a favor selling you their services. Plus, there was PF's 90-day
turnaround. SO I used PSE exclusively, for two or three years.
Then PSE started screwing around, offering slabbing, offering grading, making
grading the default, charging people for ungraded certs, etc., and they kept
changing their minds as people told them in no uncertain terms to knock it off.
When they tried charging for ungraded certs, that's the point at which I said
"enough" and switched to PF, which I use now. PF has made something of an effort
over the past couple of years to be more approachable, which I've appreciated.
I exclusively collect mint NH U.S. singles and booklet panes. For the most
part, I've never disagreed with PSE's certs (well, there was an E9 that came
back reperforated that I think they got wrong), but they had this habit of
finding the slightest excuse to certify a stamp as previously hinged, which was
annoying, and probably wrong.
Anyways, that's my experience. I know you're firmly routed in APEX, and
you've undoubtedly got a lot of customers who swear by you. But from my
experience buying U.S. classics from the bigger auction houses and dealers over
the past six years or so, most will tolerate and accept the authenticity of an
APEX certificate, but they will usually give extensions for PF or PSE only (and
most prefer PF). I'm sure these things change over time, but that's the state I
see right now. So when I read Bill's article, it confirmed my own personal
opinion (and Bill's an east coast guy, while I'm west coast). Just FYI.
Jim
October 26, 2003 1239 Clark (reperf)
NOIP Wash Frank Imperf Shermack question
prometheus
Regretfully, the answer is no. Used examples of the imperf rotary coil #459 are
exceedingly rare. One batch of #459 coils was was privately perforated by the US
Automatic Vending Company. I happened to discover the first known used copy in a
mix in the late 1960s.
The #459 coils were created in error, and except for the one batch were not used
for private perforations. The Bureau discontinued imperforate coils and
continued to issue imperforate sheets of 400 until conversion of all 2 cent
stamp printing to the rotary press in the mid 1920s, at which time perforated
rotary coils, for use in affixing machines, wound with the gum out, were
available until the 1960s.
October 26, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Prometheus
Despite what Scott says, Scott 482 could exist as early as ANY unwatermarked
2-cent Washington, which would be September 1916. The Bureau wasn't checking
watermarks; it was shipping unfinished full imperforate sheets to every post
office that had Mailometer Company customers. Scott 459 was never issued in
imperforate sheets, so it cannot have genuine Schermack Type III perforations.
The watermarked "2 CENTS 2" design of the W-F series is Scott 409. The way to
tell if yours is 409 or 482 is to lift the stamp. But you should not do that
yourself, because if it's 482, it's the earliest use of that stamp, and is worth
a lot of money.
October 26, 2003 1200 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
NOIP Wash Frank Imperf Shermack question
Ok Here is question and I hope I figured this out on my own,
my scotts special shows issue date of 482 2 cent imperf 0f 1916 as dec 8 1916,
so My oct 21 imperf schermack must be before # 482 ,
So going back next logical stamp imperf 2 cent wash for shermacking would be -
#459 0f 1914
to go back to next would be 1912
and i'm guess that Penn Terminal Station used a lot of stamps so the Affixing
machine would have used up the old ones and Make mine the 459
Does this seem like Logical Stamp Detecting
Cover and stamp in Question are on page 6 of my site linked above
Titled Schermack ??
Is this the right way to figure these out.
October 26, 2003 Dave P
Although my items are back on my Ebay the invoice function is not working.
I was rather pleased with the realisation on
this lot. Just shows what happens to a 50p envelope when it is addressed to
someone important!
October 26, 2003 11:33 Dave F. (moderator)
eBay glitches
eBay is acknowledging some of these problems on their System Announcement Page:
http://www2.ebay.com/aw/announce.shtml
October 26, 2003 Roger Heath
Ebay Glitches
I've been able to see my watch page, and everything appears normal, except I
wished to add an auction to my watch and a window that "This function is not
currently available' showed.
The servers must be getting overwhelmed with fake auctions, so you guys will
just have to view Ebay "as is".
Roger
October 26, 2003 prometheus
Has any body Tried Or seen one of the new One
Day Auctions yet.
Just Wondering ??
October 26, 2003 PaulB <Paulb147atNTLdotcom>
ARGHHH!
Brian
UK has gone up the swannee as well, all my Watchings are a massive 0. Lucky I've
a supply of post-its
October 26, 2003 Brian
...or I've been NARU'ed and they didn't bother to tell me.
October 26, 2003 Brian R
ARGHHH!
Now my entire "my ebay page" has dissipated into the ether! I KNEW I should
never have trusted anything so important to ebay programmers. Looks like I'm
back to tiny post-it-notes stuck to the screen. :o(
October 26, 2003 Brian R
one of many to come I fear....
Of course,
it's a fake. It's not even close and the wrong color as well! How many
sellers put up $2000+ items, no reserve, for 1/1000 of the value? The official
ebay, no more of these things unless backstamped policy, starts in exactly seven
days. I fear a landslide of crap about to descend on the listings.
What a real one
looks like
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dave P
Sanabria changed from being entire world in I think 1966.
I have a 1963 version, which works just as well, except for pricing.
You can probably pick up a copy on eBay for about $10.
The Yukon is cataloged at $2.00 mint and $5.00 used in it.
$25.00 for double impression and $25.00 for "arrways".
I could possibly believe Paul's figures from revenue catalog though I doubt that
they would command those prices at auction.
October 26, 2003 Dave P
Jim W-S Looks like another book to add to my buy list. Those Yukon stamps
are a full strip of 10, so at least they are not bogus to be chucked.
In passing, Ebay Uk is having big problems. My Ebay and sellers search are not
functioning (or only for a few minutes, the UK chat board is mostly down and
Turbolister is unable to connect to Ebay. And if that is today, what will happen
next Sunday when all the FLD's end?
October 26, 2003 10:13 Dave F. (moderator)
anonymous posts deleted
The anonymous posts made in the last several hours have been deleted. I
originally tried to leave them on, but the situation seems to quickly get out of
hand. So, regardless of their merit and content, they are gone.
The anonymous posters know what they need to do in order to post. And I am
confirming email addresses for new posters, by the way.
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Colin
But its not supposed to snow in the desert !!
Probably wont be around long since the sun has come out.
Dave P
Sanabria is really useful for picking up items like
this
October 26, 2003 08.53 am Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_GB_Machins/
Iomoon
’snow use complaining Jim, we can’t control the weather, whether we
like it or not! Pretty chilly here in Yorkshire UK as well, but no snow yet.
I’m just trying to get used to the clocks going back one hour and what it has
done to the finishing times of my auctions!
Colin
October 26, 2003 Dunc
C3a
The unfortunate thing is, the seller of the C3a has over 30 listings of
counterfeit US stamps, with as many as six bidders already jumping on them. His
suggestion to "lick em and stick em" suggests that he hasn't quite thought about
the implications of what he's doing.
Wait until he decides to sell full panes of 100.
It does however raise the important question as to what happens when a bad eBay
auction run to completion before it can be examined. Also, it would be nice to
see questionable auctions put on "pause" until questions can be resolved.
Tweezers vs tongs
I've always thought of them as "stamp tongs", that way I avoid getting barbeque
sauce on the stamps. Incidentally, my stamp tongs went missing too and had to be
replaced. I suspect the stamp fairy.
Dunc
October 26, 2003 Brian R
various
Richard W I'll admit that tweezers is a more discriptive term.
Unfortunately, here in the US, that definition is already in use by the objects
that women pluck their eyebrows with. We try hard not to say tweezers, because
invariablely some newbie will immediately perforate a classic with "ladies
tongs". :o)
BTW--I perfer the large oversized "paddle" versions. Those svelte little tongs I
refer to as "stamp spears". :o)
oh boy, another C3a This one isn't so bad. At least, it's refered to
as a replica. Not quite as pathetic as one of those actions that says "I just
found this and I'm not sure if it's real...." I would, however, love to see what
a 1916 perforator looks like.
To me, It looks like that stamp is printed, on paper from a cocktail napkin.
Ken L Interesting info on the expertising services. Thank you for
sharing it. I must admit though, PSE having the experts sign the certs is
brilliant marketing, and personally, I like it.
October 26, 2003 Duncan Doenitz
Counterfeits
The C3a US Inverted Jenny
Thanks for the link, whoever you are, poster known as "what the...?"
Several people have mentioned the "report" page at eBay, and since Dave F
has kindly provided a simple link to that same page at the top of this forum, it
offers a quick and easy way to test the new relationship between APS and eBay,
since the seller of that C3a and several other mint US forgeries has auctions
extending past the deadline period and into the new era of a "new and improved"
eBay Stamps market.
Anyway, the seller is probably unaware that he has just embarked on a career in
counterfeiting.
Dunc
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
APS site seems to be down Richard,
maybe the Yankees stole it in retaliation for losing to the marlins :-Þ
October 26, 2003 Richard Warren
Where's the APS site gone to today? Or is it just my server?
October 26, 2003 Michael Walter
Bob Hohertz
Great website!! I added it to my favorites!
October 26, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Dang, living in the middle of the desert we seem to be the only place in the US
with snow.
And it was 85 degree on friday.
October 26, 2003 Dave P
tweezers v tongs
Not quite the end of the thread. UK tongs can be small - sugar tongs. I think
the UK distinction is that tweezers have flat sides at the end, tongs (again in
the UK) have cup-shaped ends, so sugar-tongs and coal-tongs, but
eyebrow-tweezers and stamp-tweezers.
October 26, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Naming Names
To understand why PSE's system of putting three names on certificates is
deceptive, reread my original post on the subject. However, even if Randy
Shoemaker were more scrupulous about this than he is, it's a bad idea. First,
because it tries to split the difference between the U.S. and German systems,
yet it lacks the rigor of the German guilds -- requirements that the signing
experts limit their opinions to specific subjects on which they are required to
have complete reference material, for example. Second, an expert certificate is
and ought to be perceived as an institutional opinion, not a private one. When
someone challenges an APEX certificate, that person should direct his or her
complaint to APS for resolution, not lobby one of the experts who opined on the
stamp. Third, it's a small step from PSE's policy to allowing submitters to
guess or even to select who will examine their stamps, which opens the gate to
potential corruption. (And if Randy then says, No, you can't choose the experts,
why shouldn't you get indignant that you aren't getting the quality opinion you
desire?) Worst of all, though, is the revulsion when owners of the stamps become
sufficiently sophisticated to realize that some of these names are people they
don't trust. At one time PSE touted William Langs as its essay-proof expert.
Bill Langs is one of the biggest dealers in essays and proofs; he's also the
fellow who was selling cutouts from souvenir cards on eBay described as essays
until he was ordered to desist. Langs tells his customers he's a PSE expert;
active PSE experts say he isn't. Either way, when a service chooses to live or
die by the reputations of its examiners, doesn't maintain a reference collection
for the experts to use, and doesn't allow independent researchers to study its
work product, that's not going to build a durable basis for future confidence.
PSE already has gone through several business reorganizations, and has
flip-flopped on what services to offer. I don't know any reputable auction firm
that will accept PSE's grading or slabbing, which have always been Randy's
ideals. If/when PSE closes its doors, who will want to buy stamps that have its
certificates? Back in the early 1980s the Steve Ivy firm had its own in-house
stamp certifying service, which issued graded opinions on stamps purchased at
its auctions. These occasionally turn up in estates, and are regarded as a joke.
So it will be with today's PSE certificates a generation from now. Several weeks
ago, Bill Weiss published in Linn's his poll of a couple dozen stamp dealers
dealers. Surprise! They preferred PF and PSE. Shall I rebut that with a poll of
200 or so stamp collectors who prefer APEX? There's always going to be some
tension between expert services that mainly serve the interests of sellers and
those that mainly serve the interests of buyers, which is part of what underlies
this debate. But even putting the former in the best light, PSE cuts too many
corners.
October 26, 2003 Richard W
tweezers v tongs
Bill D - Didn't realise that, thanks for the clarification. I guess here
we make the distinction by size, whether the ends are pointed or blunt, but over
there you make it by the shape of the ends? Glad we settled that. Hmm, maybe
this is the end of this particular thread.
October 26, 2003 Bill Dempwolf
Richard W in the US tongs are also large objects used to pick up large
items such as coal or wood in a fire. Tweezers are small objects used to pluck
hair, etc. Tweezers have sharp edges which could damage stamps. Not sure the
genesis of calling stamp tongs tongs instead of tweezers.
Bill
October 26, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
October 26, 2003 03:10 Jim Watson
Today in Postal History
Good Morning, Everyone!
Today's dated postal history item is a folded letter from
France in
1855. Learn how the wine harvest is going! Is this going to be a vintage year?
Lavar
Interesting covers. Makes the beginning of an early rate study. I can't give you
an answer about the possible plate variety.
Roger,
Nice to find an item which researches on the internet. Dalcroze was an
interesting person.
October 26, 2003 Richard W
distinctions
Here in the UK "tongs" are BIG things, that you'd use to put coal on the fire
with, or to turn over the meat on the barbie. To handle stamps, we use
"tweezers", which I think is more expressive. It's one of those small but
important things that mark us apart, like braces and suspenders, petrol and gas,
or trousers and pants. However, there is no verb "to tweeze".
Having had a go at Ken Lawrence, I'd also like to say that I found his piece
on expertising absolutely fascinating, and appreciate the time spent on writing
it. Thanks!
October 26, 2003 00.17 Knud-Erik Andersen
Roger - Interesting card - it's a pitty there ain't pictures on my
wrappers! :O)
Lavar - Nice covers from an interesting period. Keep on showing. :O)
K.E.
October 26, 2003 Roger Heath
Postcard delight
Hi Lavar, it's good to see you back and posting neat things again. I'm not upset
about missing out on the job, I wonder if Arnold read this chat Board and will
steal our paln for making California solvent. We're sort of lucky because Ebay
has put the screws to our plan. California will just have figure out another
way.
This is one of the interesting aspects of collecting postal history.
Recently Scott Starling in Australia sent me this (front,
back) as an extra along with another with another razor cancel cover I'd
purchased. Tonight I’m scanning and filing “razors” of which this is sharp. I
always “google” the names of possible “famous” people either from pictures or
names on addresses. Tonight I read about
Jaques
Dalcroze for 1/2 hour, he led a very
interesting
life. As the sender of this card wrote in 1903, “C’est magnifique.”
Roger
October 26, 2003 Lavar Taylor
Good evening/day to all. Today's featured items of postal history focus on mail
from the US to Germany in the 1870's, prior to the UPU. I was fortunate to
acquire recently a small group of 14 covers going from the US to Germany in late
1874/early 1875. Below are five examples from this group.
Here is a
3c postal stationery entire, Scott type U45, uprated with a 3c Washington and 1c
Franklin, to pay the 7c rate for closed mail via England (per B&W). It was
mailed on Oct. 27, 1874, received in Leipzig on Nov. 9. A close up of the 3c
stamp is seen
here . Note the chunk taken out of George's head at the top. Being a
relative novice of early US issues, I have no idea if this is a constant plate
variety or just a production freak.
Here is
an item similar to the prior item, except that the stationery entire is Scott
type U44, much scarcer than the prior item. This was mailed on Jan. 5, 1875.
Here is a
6c Lincoln paying the 6c direct mail rate. It was mailed on Oct. 12, 1874 and
received in Leizig on Oct. 27.
Here is a
6c Lincoln and a 1c Franklin used to pay the 7c rate. It was mailed Oct. 13,
1874 and received in Leipzig on Oct. 26.
Finally, here
is a pair of 3c Washingtons and a 1c Franklin used to pay the 7c rate. This
was mailed Sept. 1, 1874. Note the manuscript month and date added to the cancel
at the left.
The rest of the items are similar to the ones shown. All of the items came
with the original correspondence inside. Nothing spectacular is in the contents,
but they make interesting reading some 130 years later.
October 26, 2003 Greg Ioannou (g.1)
Admin Bid Cancellation
You see that when the bidder has had his/her/its registration cancelled -- the
bidder was NARU'd.
October 25, 2003 Jim "jaywild"
Too good to be true
These stamps can’t be 99s, because the receiving mark on the back is dated
1867, and EKU for Scott 99 is November 1868. I sent the seller a kindly email.
Jim
October 25, 2003 Marius
Tong uses
Anne Great for extracting overlong nose hairs. Try It! :-)
October 25, 2003 anne
Good night to all and to all sweet dreams of reading cancels without going
blind, locating your stamp tongs (found one pair finally), and finding creative
uses for them (they do work for cleaning fuzz out of mice but you have to catch
the mouse first).
October 25, 2003 Chris
Apollo flown covers?
Did any covers go to the moon?
If so, is there a census and any ideas on prices?
Chris - have blaster, will travel
October 25, 2003 20:37 Dave F. (moderator)
Terence: As several other people have said, the board should just reload
for you automatically after you have made a post. At other times, you should be
able to hit the "refresh" button on your browser. No doubt you're an experienced
user and you already know all this, but I don't have any other ideas at the
moment.
Please keep trying and please keep checking in.
October 25, 2003 Roger Heath
Admin Bid Cancel
Has anyone seen or been aware of this kind of
bid cancellation in a private auction? This seller within the last month had
a nearly identical card that sold for about the same price, which I attributed
to the recipient being Gustav Mahler. But here again is another card with
similar bidding pattern, but one bidder had an Adminsistrative Cancellation. How
would anyone know if there was an irregularity with the bidder? I don't get this
at all!
Roger
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Terence - When you get back to the main StampChats Post, you refresh your
browser window, right?
October 25, 2003 Bob H.
Terence: No - all working per normal here.
October 25, 2003 Terence Hines
Test again.
I can't see the current postings on this board unless I post something myself.
Anyone else have this problem?
Terence Hines
October 25, 2003 Bob H.
Prom - Thanks much for looking at it.
October 25, 2003 949 EDST pm prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
BOB H Great Site
Neat and one of the Best I have ever seen in it's ease of use and Just
Enough/Not too much Info .
Thanks for linking it.
October 25, 2003 Roger Heath
Synapses
Terence -
Maybe you need to clear your cache and start over. It sounds like your pages are
reloading, try a force refresh. Just a thought.
Roger
October 25, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Experts and Bill Weiss
Bill Weiss: Yes, I am not personally advocating getting litigious against
experts. If someone came to me with a potential malpractice case against a
philatelic expert or expertization committee, it would take a pretty extreme set
of facts for me to consider taking the case. I disline professional malpractice
litigation (against doctors, attorneys, and others) because of what it is doing
to the market for experts. My malpractice insurance has skyrocketed, even though
I have personally never done anything wrong, but because the legal malpractice
litigation has increased so dramatically. Medical malpractice premiums are
pricing some physicians right out of the market and it is difficult to find
neonatal experts (for example) because it is too expensive for this practice
area.
October 25, 2003 Terence Hines
wierd
Test
October 25, 2003 Bill Weiss
Expert Committees
I see Mr Lawrence has spent a good deal of time today trying to educate everyone
about expert committees! I am amazed that considering I couldn't get him to even
look here a few weeks ago that he is now so prolific! On the other hand, no-one
has as much passion for the APEX committe as Ken, which sometimes causes him to
be too harsh on the other committees!
While virtually everuthing Ken has said here is true, he does have a biased
viewpoint about expert committees and therefore that must always be kept in mind
when rreadsing what he writes about that subject. He tends to overlook some of
the GOOD points about his competitors! I disagree with him completely, for
example, when it comes to the placing of expert's names on certificates. I think
when PSE introduced that inovation to their service, it immediately gave it more
credibility than the other two services with their anonymous certs. It DOESN'T
mean that made their service perfect, but in my view there is nothing like
knowing WHO expertized your submission. In that way, if you are knowledgeable
yourself, you can determine how comfortable you are with the experts who
examined your submission. Ken is right, however, that recently PSE has
semi-discontinued putting the names on the certs. I was severely chastised by
PSE recently when I wrote in a Linn's article that the reason trhey discontinued
putting the names on the certs was because the bulk of the material was now
being expertized "in house" (as is the bulk of PF's submissions), I was told
that is NOT the case, and I now believe that to be so.
PSE also, to their credit, recently did a major turnaround after announcing a
policy to discontinue expertizing some specialty areas, and receiving complaints
from many (including me!), they quickly reversed themselves and restored their
full-service policy.
In recent months I started expertizing for APS and I now believe that APS does a
really good job, particularly in US, which is my area of expertise. I give APEX
all the credit in the world for being willing to send a particular patient to as
many experts as is necessary to get a concensus, which is how it should be done.
PSE too does this, as I've been involved in some cases there wher many experts
were consulted to gain a concensus.
To ALISON, I am pleased to hear you qualify your earlier statements about suing
experts. Most, if not all, experts are folks such as me who manage to aquire a
lot of knowledge mainly because we are exposed to so much material and take the
study of that material seriously. I have a friend in the business for over 45
years and he still doen't know 1/3 of what I know about the material - but he's
a great salesman! To sue folks who are trying their best to render opinions, for
the meager sums they are paid ($1.50 for APS, $3.00 for PSE) in between trying
to make a living otherwise, is silly, and I'm glad to hear you didn't mean it
quite the way it originally came out. Thanks!
October 25, 2003 Bill Weiss
2c "D" Grill
MIKE W; Good evening! To answer your question about US Scott #85 (2c with "D"
Grill), it is an easy stamp to expertize because it is the only 1867-68 grill
that has 15 vertical rows, thus all anyone needs to do is count the vertical
rows! It is a scarce, but not rare stamp in used condition, and is usually found
in "Average" condition - kind of like you describe your copy. It is rare in
mint/unused condition and is very rare in premium-centered condition.
October 25, 2003 Terence Hines
Now that's wierd!
Very wierd! Until I loaded my previous post, I couldn't see any of the posts on
this board for the last several hours. What gives???
Terence Hines
October 25, 2003 Terence Hines
Where is everyone?
Where is everyone? When I download this board, there have been no new posts for
several hours!
Terence Hines
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Thanks, Ken L. Looks like you may see more of that now.
Anne, tongs also work very well for picking fuzz out of a mouse.
October 25, 2003 Chris
NZ limted edition sheets?
In Scott's there are a number of notes about sheets that were distributed only
as part of some
package, with only 2000 being printed. They are refered to as the "limited
edition" sheets in the
notes. Any idea what these go for and how hard are they to find?
NZ philately seems to be a place where Scott's does worse than average.
Chris - have a Len Jury, but it is pretty terse.
October 25, 2003 Bob Hohertz <fsa71
- that's an AOL addy>
Private Die Proprietary Site
On a more serious note, I've been spending time over the last year or so putting
together a reference site for the US Private Die Proprietary (Match & Medicine)
stamps. There are things still to be done with it, but I hope it's ready to be
launched as it is.
If anyone would care to take a look at it and make comments it would be
appreciated. E-mail address is above. Site is
HERE.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Donald Fritze
Basically, it's a nuisance to serve non-members, who insist they and their
advisors know better than we do, and how dare we not agree with them? They are
usually not stamp collectors, and have no interest in our hobby. They are people
who send in a U.S. Scott 552 believing they own a 596, or a sun-bleached
"error," expecting to pay off the mortgage and take a world cruise. They tend to
be abusive when we tell them the truth, and require lots of hopeless
back-and-forth, all of which requires uncompensated staff time, often my time to
write full explanations.
October 25, 2003 Bob Hohertz
tongs
Anne, your boys wouldn't have, by any chance, decided to pick fleas off the
dog....
October 25, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Anne - I still can't find the tongs I lost 7 months ago. Found lot's of perf
gauges though, for all the good they do me now since I don't mess with too many
perforated stamps. Going throuh my house is like going through Wal-Mart, you can
find all kinds of stuff you don't need, in abundance, but when you're looking
for something particular.....
October 25, 2003 anne
Oh yteah, and my color filters are missing too.
October 25, 2003 anne
I've just done the unthinkable--I cleaned off my stamp desk (or at least most of
it). I found 3 colour guides, numerous pens, pencils, and markers, some of which
work, four brands of hinges, fragments of mounts, several magnifiers, 7 perf
gauges (8 if you count the Kiusalas), and an ebay pen. But no tongs. Arghhhh...
October 25, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Ken L.
I recently read through your extremely interesting article on the Trucial
States.
The Disney stamps were not illegal from the perspective that the issuing
authorities approved their distribution.
They were deemed illegal in that they were infringing Disney's copyright.
Disney appears to have more legal clout or say so, when it comes to their
copyrighted images than newly emergent or financially strapped countries which
have better things to do than take people like Clive Feigenbaum to court.
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Ken L, if you see this, could you please elaborate a little on what
creates a cost difference between member and non-member submissions to APEX. In
your first post you spoke about historic losses on non-member submissions and
I'm unable to think of why that would be since member fees have historically
been less.
October 25, 2003 anne
Ok, who stole my tongs???
October 25, 2003 prometheus <Prometheus@1Internetdrive.com>
http://interestingcancels.mysite.freeserve.com/
Keep on discoursing
please More info in a few days than a year and a day any where else.
October 25, 2003 Michael Walter
Brian R / Bill Weiss
Yes I was pleased with the auction. I would not have put it on eBay without your
opinion. :o)
Bill Weiss: I just purchased a nice scott #84 (2 cent black Jackson with D
grill) today. Of course it came with a 1999 certification. It is average
centered with light ccl. (Scott values the item in the grade of fine) I have
looked on ebay for a while for one of these and was hard pressed to find one.
Even most of the auction catalogues did not have this issue. Needless to say it
is my new baby :o). My question to you is: have you expertised a lot of these?
Any thought or comments on the issue? I really do like to learn about every
stamp I buy.
October 25, 2003 15:03 Dave F. (moderator)
and to others: Please don't stir the pot. If you vent, then genuine
information gets buried in the vitriol, and otherwise legitimate readers leave
because they do not wish to be consistently exposed to such negativity.
Please, everyone, be respectful of the board and each other.
October 25, 2003 14:59 Dave F. (moderator)
David B: I ask you please not to go there right now, for the interests of
everyone. Thank you.
October 25, 2003 David Benson
I would like to publicly thank Ebay and the APS for all the work to make Ebay a
safer place for Stamp buyers. It is of benefit to both members and non members
of the APS.
It appears that there is now no need for concern about backstamping fakes or
forgeries, just list them on any non US site,
David Benson
October 25, 2003 14:55 Dave F. (moderator)
eBay reporting page
I might also add that the eBay page to which Jim linked has had the incorrect
title programmed into it for a long time. This means that the page title is not
accurate if you bookmark it or just have it as a tab in Windows. It reads as
"Unsolicited Commercial Email (Spam): Overview".
Jim, if for some reason you decide to report the technical error about the
incorrect link you mentioned, perhaps you could add this one, too. (As if your
plate weren't full enough!) Thanks, though, if you do.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Disney
I was once the premier collector and exhibitor of Walt Disney material. My
exhibit, which was a special invited display at Pacific 97 (gold medal prix
d'honneur)and a Court of Honor exhibit at many national shows, included
everything -- essays, proofs, stamps mint and used, covers, cinderellas,
autographs, and so forth. I showed both authorized and so-called illegal stamps
properly used on covers sent through the international mail. The Walt Disney
Company licensed the government of San Marino to issue a set that featured
Disney characters, but did not authorize the sets issued shortly afterward by
Sharjah and Fujeira. It brought suit against the French printers and
distributors of those stamps, which returned a verdict in Disney's favor.
Defendants were ordered to cease and desist; their remaining stocks were
confiscated. Nevertheless, these issues have never disappeared from the market,
they are listed by Minkus, Michel, Brookman, and Official Trucial States
catalogs, and so forth. They were not "illegal" in the sense that word is
currently used. They were issued under properly executed contracts by sovereign
postal administrations, sold at their post offices, and used on mail. Oddly, the
philatelic community tends to condemn the authorized issues marketed by
InterGovenmental Philatelic Corp. with equal vigor to its opprobrium directed
against the so-called "Sand Dune" issues. For its part, IGPC condemns the San
Marino set as "illegal," though it was athorized by Disney.
October 25, 2003 Richard W
Ken L - Thanks, I understand. Fair enough. Just wondered.
October 25, 2003 14:43 Jim Watson
APS and eBay Arrangements
Ken L.,
Thanks for the reasoned response. Sometime the board might ask that the annual
audit include a process audit of APEX activity. I'm sure it is well run but
sometimes processes and people change.
Stamp Selling Page
I did finally do what the rest of you did and found that the Stamp Selling page
report link led to what appeared to be the standard report link althoug I am
unsure about whether the link is exactly the same or not. And I did find out
what is wrong with the link which eBay has placed at the bottom of its Stamp
Selling page - they left in one too many spaces.
Here's a link that works:
Stamp Selling page.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Richard Warren
I am Chairman of the APS Board of Vice Presidents, the disciplinary arm of the
Society. In the event charges of unethical content are brought against a member,
I must be able to weigh all the evidence and render an unbiased opinion. It
would be entirely inappropriate for me to comment on allegations against any APS
member in good standing based on published allegations.
October 25, 2003 Richard Warren
Stampdile & APS
Ken L - Maybe I shouldn't really stir, given the way in which things have
settled down on this board now, which is good for all concerned, but I just
wondered - are you happy with Stampdile's APS membership, given the
circumstances I outlined below?
October 25, 2003 Dave P
Illegals
Since these have been mentioned again, I have to say I feel very strongly about
the issue. IMO the proliferation of illegals can, in the long run, do more to
harm the hobby than any of the forgery scams. The money lost to poor nations
whose name is used in this way is enormous, and other losers are the charities
who find their logos used without recompense, The WWF and Rotary International
are but two examples. I think it shocking that any respectable organisation
should allow any dealer in this rubbish to be a member.
I think I have read that the only effective action ever taken was by the Disney
Corporation (breach of copywrite), does anyone know the details?
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Replies: APEX and eBay
Jim Watson:
The APEX system is pretty much self-auditing continually. Each expert must sign
his/her opinion on the submission form. The expertizing process is double blind.
Submitters don't know who will examine their stamps, and experts don't know who
the owners are, nor what other experts will view the same item. Next, Mercer
Bristow, Director of Expertizing, must distill those opinions into a certificate
statement and sign it. The entire package -- the stamp or cover, worksheet, and
photo certificate, then goes to Robert Lamb, Executive Director, for his
approval and signature. Many times I have seen Bob do independent research or
reference comparison before signing, and on rare occasions he has sent an item
back to Mercer for further consideration by the committee. Despite all that,
APEX is fallible. When mistakes are called to Mercer's attention, he corrects
them. When opinions are challenged, a review is conducted, usually by a
different team than originally examined the item. Short of outright
counterfeiting a certificate, and forging two signatures and the Society seal, I
can't see where the system could be corrupted. The certificates themselves are
printed on security paper, the submissions are serially numbered and
photographed in color, the numbered photographs appear on the numbered
certificates. Still, APS is audited annually by auditors who are free to examine
every department and to recommend whatever internal controls they deem
necessary. To my knowledge, we have implemented all the internal controls they
have recommended.
Anne:
APS watchdogs will definitely be stretched too thin, until management and the
Board of Directors have sufficient experience to deem the experiment a success,
and to negotiate a financial arrangement that covers all the costs. Impatient
people, especially non-members, in this chat group fail to understand that until
we see how big the problem is, and if these procedures really work, and if we
need to consider other remedies, there's no way we can possibly calculate a
budget, prepare a job description, provide office space (which doesn't exist in
our overcrowded headquarters building), and create a full-time staff position to
handle the job. But the Board expects that eventually that is what we'll do.
October 25, 2003 01.54 pm Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_Japan_stamps
Jim Watson
That’s as far as I got too. I didn’t log in as I was not going to report
anything.
KLThank you for your very informative posts. I am glad that APS is
developing an involvement with eBay – it can only be for the good of the hobby,
which is what we all care about.
Colin
October 25, 2003 13:51 Dave F. (moderator)
eBay reporting page
Jim W: I didn't follow your link mentioned earlier, but it sounds like it
gets you to the same place as the link at the top of this page ("Top Links"
column, 3rd bullet point). That takes the reader directly to the Stamps topic. I
notice that the page has expanded over the last few days, and there is
elaboration on why they are doing this.
At the bottom of that page, there is a link entitled "Report listing violations
or problems with another eBay member". Unfortunately, only "Report" is linked,
and I think it's a little easy to miss. Given all the other links on the page,
it does seem like it's a bit subtle.
Once you click on that, it requires you to log in. Once you've done that, it
prepopulates a form with your user information, gives this statement:
Please enter your question or concern (including details) into this form, then
click Submit.
and then asks you two questions:
- the item number(s) of the auctions in question (you can submit up to 10 at a
time)
- "Your concern / question"
Note that there is an unpublished limit on the number of characters or words you
can put into that second field, because I've hit its upper limit before.
You then have the option to have a copy of your message sent back to you. Then
press "submit" and that's it.
As others have said before, it's a shame that they made it so easy to report a
post and so hard to report an auction lot in violation, but that's the way it
is.
October 25, 2003 anne
APEX
I've only had occasion to use APEX once, and that was with a Luxemberg Officiel
(particulars of the stamp excape me now, except that it was a yellowish-orange
Armory). Forgeries are common for both the basic stamp and the overprinted
version. APEX declined to render an opinion and sent the stamp back because
their expertizer had misplaced his reference copy. I respect that since it
speaks for the honesty of the process. The stamp, btw, was eventually sent off
to Europe and the opinion came back that the stamp was legit, but the o/p
wasn't.
On the other hand, I routinely see unidentified fakes and forgeries in the
circuit books, along with a very occasional "pulled by APS Sales Division" mark.
K-E I'm drooling over your treasures, especially the Japanese one. 16
years is a long time to remember someone who used to live in a place. No doubt
there's a story behind that note, if only someone knew it.
October 25, 2003 13.47 Knud-Erik Andersen
Re: My best find for a long time.
David - How interesting! :o) It'a small world.
Dave F. - Thank you for your comments - I have saved them. :O)
Roger - In Denmark, Carsten Jensen have made a census of Danish items of
mail (covers, cards, stationeries etc.) sent abroad from 1851 - 1905 which is a
very comprehensive work and which is constantly updated. After 1905, it's my own
long experience and recordings together with some other important stationery
collectors in Denmark, which lead me to the question of Richard B. - I'm
as far I know, the only "pure" postal wrapper collector in Denmark but many
other collect them, in connection with other thing as special types of stamps or
as a collector of stationeries of all types.
I guess my good "finds," is a mixture of a lot of hard work, a lot of luck and
some good supliers. :O)
K.E.
October 25, 2003 David Benson
Waded through a few more of the non US sites, no sign of anything regarding
rules for selling stamps,
David Benson
October 25, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Lawsuits against Philatelic Experts
Bill Weiss: In case I did not make it clear, I am not advocating professional
malpractice cases against Philatelic Experts. If this becomes a popular thing to
do, then all that will happen is that people will not be willing to offer
services as experts, or obtaining opinions will be extremely expensive (in order
to cover risk of loss of lawsuits and malpractice insurance premiums).
Eventually, though, a lawsuit is going to happen -- if a very expensive stamp is
not correctly expertized and there alot of money at stake.
Ken Lawrence made some interesting comments along those lines. Such as:
"Sometimes experts have rendered corrupt opinions that favor certain submitters
or settle scores against ones who are out of favor," and his discussion of the
Sachs brothers scandal about the corrupt PF Certificates. Also, if you recall my
earlier post about Dr. Dub and how he tried to manipulate the Sudetenland
overprint market by only certifying overprints on the stamps that he owned large
quantities of and debunking the other overprint stamps that he did not have in
quantity -- doing all of this in order to drive up the price of his own stamp
stock in order to make a profit in the post WWII market. This is the type of
nefarious activity that is likely to lead to lawsuits against experts, more so
than a garden variety negligence of a philatelic expert.
October 25, 2003 anne
Afternoon/morning/evening
Hi Ken Glad to see you're back. We sometimes forget that we all have the
same goal--what's best for the hobby--even if we disagree about what that is or
how to get there.
Haven't caught up with all the posts yet, but I think Jimbo's long post
about the ebay/APS codes of ethics is a good one. The situation may not be
optimal--the APS watchdogs may be stretched too thin, etc etc, but making those
explicit statements about fakes and forgeries, alterations gives us a major
weapon. We should next focus on how to make that weapon more effective.
Expanding the number of qualified philatelists on the Community Watch committee
is one. I've made several other suggestions over the last few days. Surely there
are other things that we can do as well. We need to work with what we have, and
believe me, the potential is there.
October 25, 2003 13:22 Jim Watson
APS and eBay Arrangements
Colin Judd,
I'm not exactly sure that the link on the Selling Stamps page really does
send off a report on a stamp lot. I have clicked on it and come to a page which
requires an eBay login. I have not yet logged in and I do know eBay sometimes
does some dumb things with their links. And, furthermore, I am not sure that
using the existing reporting system wouldn't work for such a report. I am rather
satisfied that I haven't had an occasion to use such a link for a couple of
years.
Ken L.,
Thanks for the input on expertising. Now, how can APS a) have APEX perceived as
at least the equal of any of the others, and b) assure that the problems that
have occurred elsewhere do not occur in APEX? For example, are written
procedures used by APS and is the process ever audited? (I know; I know; I hate
auditors, too, but it is a method of maintaining quality control of such an
activity.)
October 25, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
Danish wrappers
K.E. - Along with Rogers questions, I would like to know if collecting Danish
wrappers is popular there? You seem to find a lot of interesting items in that
field, are there alot of others competing for the same items?
October 25, 2003 David Benson
Richard, perhaps a letter to the ASDA asking them to look at the UPU site on
illegals may help.
David Benson
October 25, 2003 Roger Heath
Knud - Wrappers
Really nice! Just out of curiosity besides the Venezuela and the Japan items,
which of the others will be include in your exhibit. Your points were so close
to a Gold, these new wrappers must help. Another question, who creates a census
of Danish wrappers for you to know they are only example to different countries?
Roger
October 25, 2003 12:55 Dave F. (moderator)
Knud-Erik: I can't translate that note verbatim, in part because it's
written in pre-World War II Japanese, and in part because I'm not near my
Japanese dictionaries at the moment.
But, I can make out most of the gist of the message, and it's simply saying what
the red message in English says. It says that the person used to live in
Yokohama but returned back to his home country 16 years prior.
I'm not sure if the English was written first, and then the Japanese label
attached, or the other way around. I could construct an argument for either
case.
There is one item at the end of the message that I can't figure out, but it
seems like I should be able to. Since Japanese written this way reads
top-to-bottom from right-to-left, the end of the message is thus the far left
column. It looks like it's written in pencil by someone else. It's mostly
written in the alphabet reserved for foreign names and words (katakana), which I
can read, but still can't figure out what it means. It may contain a tiny kernel
of additional information.
Sorry that I can't be of more help on this at the moment, but a very interesting
piece. Congratulations on acquiring and exhibiting it!
October 25, 2003 Roger Heath
APS Non Profit
Brian -
I’m certain a non-profit can make money by having fee structures in place for
services rendered. APS does that with its expertizing services and sales
division which includes circuit books and an on-line store. Non-profit income
must be used to maintain the stated purposes of the organization. I can’t
believe that APS’ non-profit status precludes it from establishing a per auction
review fee with Ebay to cover costs of additional employees, etc.
As a member of APS, I don’t think my APS General Fund dues should be spent
providing Ebay with services it should be funding itself, but I’ll defer to the
Board to make the best decision.
Ken L-
Thanks for the informative posts concerning expertising services. Most of us
have very limited experience with these services and questions arise here where
collectors are asked, "who's best?" Your post provides some of the differences
between the organizations.
Roger
October 25, 2003 Richard Warren
APS/Ebay, illegals & Stampdile
Tom Mazza - Tom, I don't know you, but thanks so much for your post:
"I spoke to Bob Lamb and Joe Savarese at the Megashow about Stampdile. I was
told that they were members in good standing of APS and ASDA, respectively, and
so long as they did not misdescribe their material, would be welcome at their
shows."
I didn't even know that Stampdile was an APS member, but yes, when you
search, Clive Feigenbaum is a dealer member indeed - APS # -200093-DR. Now
Stampdile, as "stamps2buy" (Power Seller, no less), are currently busy again on
Ebay. And their Myanmar items, for a start, are identifiable as illegals from
the UPU circular, but are merely described as “Stamps from "Union Of Myanmar"”.
That's misdscribed, isn't it? I wonder if Bob Lamb appreciated this? Well, if he
didn't, he will soon.
Same Bob Lamb minuted as suggesting that APS should think about illegals on
Ebay but "not right now" ...
October 25, 2003 David Benson
Knud, the one to Australia is interesting but for a non philatelic reason. It is
addressed to the Synagogue, Adelaide. My father was the Chief Rabbi there in the
early 1950's.
David B.
October 25, 2003 12.29 Knud-Erik Andersen
My best find for a long time.
As promished is here my "finds" from the local exhibition last weekend.
- Send locally 1921 but returned with the mailman's writing on the back:
Moved, don't know where to. Ø23c (the mailman' number) Sørensen (the mailman's
name.) Front
- Back
- Send to Germany 1916 and here put in due with German due marking and
-cancel. Front.
- Send to Sweden 1905 with due marking and here added a Swedish due cancel.
Front. Nice
Swedish arrival Train (TPO) cancel on
back.
- Send to Venezuela 1922 - first recorded Danish wrapper to Venezuela!
Front.
- This one should interest David B. :O) send to Australia 1915 1913?)
- very few recorded.
Front.
- And now to my best find for a long time! :O) Send to Japan 1925 and
returned, as the polite Japaneese mailman wrote on the front: "This Gentleman
has gone to his home 16 years ago".!! Lots of interesting markings which I
would be happy to get some explanations on. As I can't read Japaneese, I will
be very happy if someone can, or know someone who can, translate the writing
on the label and on the wrapper.
Front a.
Front b.
Back. By the way, this is the only recorded Danish wrapper to Japan sofar.
:O)
K.E.
October 25, 2003 Brian R
Michael W
I noticed that the unused CSA #3 you shared earlier just ended. Despite a cut in
margin, and a thin, it got thirty bids and $137! Congratulations! Did you notice
that a full four margin(no gum) example, is only a couple of hours behind it in
the listings, sans any bids at a $90 start?
That origional CSA gum sure is nasty, but ain't it grand?
Thankfully, I haven't seen the scammers, come up with a version that
effectively simulates that stuff yet. This is good news for your realization,
philately, and the general health of the stamp licking public in general. :o)
October 25, 2003 David Moser <stamphick@earthlink.net>
:Pictairn
Another source of revenue on Pictairn is ham radio. A lady there whose name
excapes me right now is a ham radio operator & realizes some income from
providing confirmed amateur radio contacts with hams worldwide.
David
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Lawsuits against APS
Hardly a month goes by without the mail bringing letters from one or two lawyers
who threaten to sue APS on behalf of aggrieved clients. This experience is as
old as the Society, which was founded in 1886. Occasionally one of the threats
actually materializes, in which case the APS robustly defends itself in court.
Most of the time, discovery reveals that the plaintiffs’ motives are not
wholesome, and that the evidence favors APS, which exists only to serve its
members and the stamp hobby. Sometimes the opposing attorneys also fail the
clean-hands test.
In Russell Case’s recent lawsuit, a central issue in dispute was the
responsibility of experts and expertizing services, because part of the reason
APS expelled Case in 1996 concerned his shortcomings as chairman and chief of
the GPS Expertizing Committee. The court upheld the APS view, which was
supported by testimony at trial of the Philatelic Foundation’s chairman. Case
has appealed the court’s denial of his claim.
Some would-be plaintiffs believe that APS has deep pockets, but that isn’t so.
The headquarters building and most of its valuable contents are owned by the
American Philatelic Research Library, not by the APS. Contrary to the
semiliterate posts here by an anonymous coward, APS dues do not pay for the
acquisition and renovation of the Historic Match Factory in Bellefonte, which
will become the new American Philatelic Center. (I wish they did.) The APRL is a
separate corporation with separate staff and its own governing Board of
Trustees. The APRL is a public library, whose services are not limited to APS
members. Its tax exemption is much older than the Society’s, and it currenly is
exempt from state taxes that APS has to pay.
I can’t recall any instance where someone sued APRL. Several people have sued
APS, and those cases have been resolved in the Society’s favor. I can recall
only one instance during my tenure in the leadership when it seemed that a
litigant had brought a case in good faith, and that one was resolved by both
sides agreeing to compulsory arbitration.
October 25, 2003 11:52 Dave F. (moderator)
Ken L.: Thanks very much for these very informative posts. This is new
information for many of us, and a worthwhile review for others.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Expertizing – Part 4
The culture of philatelic expertizing in the United States is very different
from its counterparts abroad. In Germany and other countries of continental
Europe, expertizing is a closed profession, and each expert’s field is narrowly
circumscribed. Within his field, the single expert’s opinion is standard, and
typically is permanently marked on the stamp or cover with a tiny signature
handstamp. This guild system has led to colossal scandals. Sometimes experts
have rendered corrupt opinions that favor certain submitters or settle scores
against ones who are out of favor. Being unaccountable to stamp owners, entire
categories of stamps were expertized as genuine that are now proven to be fake.
At one time the experts guaranteed their opinions, and in this country the
Germany Philatelic Society passed along that guarantee to users of its
expertizing service. After the Wall came down and the truth became known, the
German government relieved the experts of liability for their guaranteed
opinions by legislation, but that did not protect the GPS. So the GPS closed
down its service, hoping to avoid costly challenges. One has to sympathize with
the heirs of GPS members who rely on those falsely authenticated stamps when
they try to sell them. These are some of the reasons why most of us prefer our
open procedure, imperfect as it may be, to the one that confers official status
on some and arbitrarily denies it to others.
[End of posting]
October 25, 2003 Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_stamps
Pitcairn Islands and reporting dicey eBay
auctions
Jim Watson
I see that when you have gone into “Help”, then selected “S”, then selected
“Selling Stamps” and then scrolled right down to the bottom there is a “Report”
button to connect you to Customer Services to report an auction contravening
their Code of Practice. Not in exactly an obvious place!
Brian R
When I was a kid, the one country I could be sure I had ALL the stamps of,
was Pitcairn. Yes, as Dave P says, their main export is stamps, apart
from lobster fishing, I believe. Even today a relation of mine shows proudly the
first set hinged (minus the 4d & 8d) and I haven’t the heart to tell him how
little it is worth! See Jim W – S’s link – you beat me to it Jim , but
you had them on your website already didn’t you. They still issue some of the
most delightful stamps ever.
Colin
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Expertizing – Part 3
J. Randall Shoemaker founded Professional Stamp Grading Service, soon changed to
Professional Stamp Expertizing and more recently to Professional Stamp Experts,
in the late 1980s as a for-profit rival to PF and APEX. As the name suggests,
his experts were stamp dealers. He paid the highest fees to experts (originally
$5 per item, later reduced to $3 when his dreams of glory faded). He lured them
with visions of slabbed graded stamps for investors, comparable to the coin
hobby’s experience with Professional Coin Grading Service.
Slabbing was a hard sell, and didn’t actually take root until a few years ago;
grading came even later. Shoemaker’s gimmick was putting the names of the
experts on the certificates. This was grossly deceptive, but effective. It was
deceptive because sometimes the experts whose names appeared actually held
opposite opinions to those that appeared on the certificates. It was deceptive
because it implied that those three were the only opining experts. It was
deceptive because it implied some universally agreed standard of three experts
per submission; in reality, for simple opinions, one opinion may be adequate,
while for difficult material, ten may not be sufficient. It was/is deceptive
because Shoemaker’s own signature often appeared/appears twice, once as “J.
Randall,” expert, and again as “R. Shoemaker,” chairman.
I've been told by one of PSE's experts that PSE has on occasion certified stamps
in Shoemaker's own stock as genuine in all respects when his own specialist
experts don't agree. Shoemaker himself refused to comment when I asked him if
this is so.
These days PSE does nearly all of its work in-house, and thus has dropped the
names from most certificates. Shoemaker will occasionally provide the basis for
PSE opinions to favored customers and dealers, but he steadfastly refuses to
open his records to researchers like me.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Expertizing – Part 2
The Philatelic Foundation was born in 1945, founded by Louise Boyd Dale and a
coterie of wealthy East Coast collectors who wanted an amateur service
controlled by collectors, which excluded dealers from participation and
influence, and which certified only stamps of the classic era. It is an arm of
the New York Department of Education. Its greatest asset is the reference
collection of stamps assembled by John N. Luff, which, even after being pillaged
of its gems, is still the best anywhere.
The PF experienced several political battles and shakeups during its formative
years, which eventually opened its membership to the trade and expanded its
breadth to incorporate modern material. In recent years it experienced several
scandals.
Readers of stamp papers learned in 1984 that a PF staff computer operator had
been bribed by a prominent West Coast dealer to change opinions on PF-issued
certificates, declaring faked and altered stamps to be genuine. Several
participants in that conspiracy were prosecuted as criminals, and all but one
were convicted. The serial numbers of the bad certificates are known, but the
owners of most of them have never been notified nor made whole.
A few years later, an investigation by Boston stamp dealer Jack Molesworth
proved that Richard and Laurence Sachs were buying properly described faulty
stamps at low prices from major auction firms, arranging to have their
appearances altered to resemble pristine stamps of high quality, and securing
“clean” PF certificates of authenticity. Often the Sachs brothers were permitted
to opine on their own stamps. These were then resold based on those corrupt PF
certificates at Steve Ivy auctions, where they achieved stunning realizations.
As far as anyone knows, the buyers of those stamps were never notified or
compensated.
The PF/Ivy/Sachs scandal was brought into public view by a notorious stamp
swindler named Joseph J. Puleo Jr., who offered his own faked and altered stamps
to crooked dealers on a wholesale basis. Puleo bought a small tabloid paper, The
Stamper, to publicize the PF scandal, and to deflect collector anger from
himself. His antics, including time in jail for his part in a ring of coin
swindlers, had been reported in Linn’s, and in articles that I published in The
Philatelic Communicator. Puleo’s and Molesworth’s denunciations of the PF,
accurate though they were, were miraculously timed to coincide with the launch
of Professional Stamp Expertizing, PSE’s original name, as a rival to the PF,
with full-page ads for PSE in Puleo’s rag.
As if these scandals were insufficient, the PF was scandalized again in the
1990s when its leaders were discovered to be living high from spending the PF’s
assets, throwing lavish parties for their friends, employing family members at
inflated salaries, using PF credit cards for private purchases, and keeping a
cellar stocked with vintage wines. Public exposure of those antics led to a
group of reformers taking charge, which persevered until things were
substantially cleaned up. One reform was forbidding owners to sign on their own
material, and eventually taking almost the entire operation in-house, using
staff experts.
Throughout all these ups and downs, PF has remained the big dealers’ preferred
service, because they sit on its Board of Directors, and because they get
discounts and preferential service. Their self-serving preference is seldom
visible when they take verbal potshots at APEX.
The basis of PF opinions is not public information, but trusted insiders,
favored researchers, and major donors can gain access to information
selectively.
The new PF Chairman, George Jay Kramer, has dramatically changed PF for the
better. I think PF’s dark days are past. I had submitted an item for review in
1996, but not being a big PF user I got no consideration until George heard my
complaint and got action on it this past month.
October 25, 2003 Ken Lawrence <apsken@aol.com>
Expertizing – Part 1
Philatelic expertizing is a process akin to fine art and historical manuscript
authentication, an intellectual activity that is constantly evolving. Sometimes
new discoveries, new technologies, or new scholarship alters previous
understanding. This process cannot be reduced to knowledge testable by a pop
quiz. Further, no expert claims to be expert in every field, and many are
narrowly specialized.
The American Philatelic Expertizing Service (APEX) is celebrating its centenary
in 2003. I’m biased in favor of APEX, because I’m one of its experts, I have
trained many of its experts, and I have worked hard to make it the best in the
world. The APS Expert Committee, whose members examine and opine on submissions
to APEX, is the broadest and most representative committee in the world, and
employs the most advanced technology of any. The APEX reference collection
covers the whole world. The American Philatelic Research Library, headquartered
in the same building, has the largest private holdings of published philatelic
references in the world.
Some APEX committee members are dealers whose expertise stems from many years of
examining tens of thousands of stamps and covers. Some are specialist collectors
who have spent their lives assembling suitable material. Some are scholars whose
published work is seminal for specific collecting areas. As Director of
Expertizing, Mercer Bristow’s job is to decide which committee members are best
to examine each submission, how many opinions are prudent for each, and how to
resolve conflicting opinions among the experts.
APEX does not break even or make a profit, but historically APS has lost the
most money on non-member submissions. Last year, the APS Board changed the
policy, limiting submissions to members. Now that the relationship with eBay
allows consignors whose material is challenged to submit their stamps to any of
the recognized expertizing services for certification, we have had to reverse
that policy, as a public service that our members subsidize. (APS Sales Division
and Internet Sales also accept certificates of any recognized committee.) Except
for the member/nonmember price discrepancy whenever it goes into effect, APEX
does not favor any submitter or class of submissions.
APEX cannot compete financially against for-profit competitors that do in-house
expertizing. The cost of registered or Express Mail postage to and from our
experts prevents us from competing at that level. In all probability,
economy-minded nonmember eBay sellers will choose Professional Stamp Experts as
their preferred service. Each APEX expert is paid $1.50 per stamp or cover
examined, which for most of us doesn’t equate to minimum wage. Many experts
donate their honoraria back to the society. In its entire 100-year history, APEX
has never had a scandal nor any instance of corruption. Owners or others with a
financial interest in any item are not permitted to expertise it. Owners who
disagree with any APEX opinion are invited to resubmit it for review free of
charge, and to present any evidence that might support a different opinion.
In the mid-1980s, APS offered a separate expertizing service called PESA
(Philatelic Expertizing Service of America) which provided guaranteed,
indemnified opinions. It failed because only one major stamp dealer and
practically no collectors wanted to pay the premium. I personally favor
guaranteed opinions for all certificates, and have advocated that change since
1991. I believe support for this proposal is increasing.
Anyone can request the basis of an APEX opinion, which will be promptly and
cheerfully provided.
October 25, 2003 David Benson
Jim Watson, thnaks for the link to the new Ebay.US selling policy. I checked
various overseas sites and no sign of the policy noted.
David Benson
October 25, 2003 David Benson
Dave P. That Tristan cover hasn't even started to realise it's potential yet.
Early commercial covers are extremely scarce and most probably that will double
or triple before it finishes,
David Benson
October 25, 2003 Lavar Taylor
My definition of an expert: Someone who has made more mistakes in a particular
area of knowledge than any one else.
October 25, 2003 10.59 Knud-Erik Andersen
Re: Nazi cancels
Alison Ruttenberg - Thank you for your comment about this issue. :O) What
a relief - now I don't have to use other auction sites for these kind of covers.
K.E.
October 25, 2003 Bill Weiss
Suing Experts
ALISON; Thank you for your additional comments, but in my humble opinion (no pun
intended!) when the day comes that lawyers believe it's a wise course of action
to sue an expertizer or an expert committee for issuing an OPINION, which was
duly requested by the applicant, along with his agreement in the form of his
signature, that what he will receive is only an OPINION, then I predict that
will be the end of expertizing as we now know it. I fully appreciate that
financial harm can, and does, come from errors of opinion, but I still can not
believe that the solution is to hold the experts as negligent. Wouldn't a far
better solution be to INSURE the owners of the expertized material against any
future differing opinion? That way you don't kill the messenger!
October 25, 2003 Brian R
OH NO!
Here is a full stock page of mutilated WW1 patriotics, and assorted ad
covers. I think the seller must be a luker of this board. Note he takes the
extra care to state, "please don't blame me for this, I'm just auctioning the
remaining bits." LOL, even though this is sad. :o(
October 25, 2003 8:50 AM Tom Mazza
I guess the moral of the story is that anyone can be sued for anything, which
(at least in New York) is a long way from collecting pots of money for a laundry
list of non-forseeable damages. Maybe it's easier in Colorado, but I tend to
doubt it.
I spoke to Bob Lamb and Joe Savarese at the Megashow about Stampdile. I was told
that they were members in good standing of APS and ASDA, respectively, and so
long as they did not misdescribe their material, would be welcome at their
shows.
Bob also described the APS approach to fakes/forgeries on their Stampstore as
more nuanced, but that eBay chose the blunt instrument approach.
tcm
October 25, 2003 Dave P
Picairn
Brian Yep Pitcairn of Bounty fame has issued stamps since GVI, for a
population currently of about 90. It is one of the few British colonies left.
Colin Those small colonies whose chief export was stamps have all
suffered in recent years. The usual story, too many stamps killed the golden
goose. Wholesalers offer issues from the eighties at well under face. Their
postal history on the other hand has boomed, try getting a genuine early
pre-stamp cover from Pitcairn! As for Canada, someone on the Ebay board (John
M?) was bemoaning the fact that the bottom seems to have fallen out of the
market there (except perhaps for the classics). Don't know why, perhaps it will
come back in fashion. I am always surprised about what does and doesn't sell on
Ebay. I have sold a couple of Biafra lots (straight mint stamps) which I thought
would struggle and they attracted plenty of bids.
October 25, 2003 Richard Ballhagen (spain_1850)
I'm not an APS member (let my membership lapse a while ago), but I've got a
question about the "code". In reading the line "* I agree not knowingly to
sell, trade, produce, or advertise repaired, reperforated, regummed,
altered, or otherwise modified philatelic items unless that condition is clearly
stated. . . One meaning I get out of this is that a seller who produces his
own forgeries, even if marked as such, must also clearly state that they
are the ones who produced them, is this correct?
October 25, 2003 Jim Whitford-Stark
Brian
Pitcairn Islands
October 25, 2003 Brian R
Colin
Pitcairn? It that the tiny island of H.M.S. Bounty fame? I never even
knew, that it was a country, or that it has issued it's own stamps! Do share
some examples. :o)
October 25, 2003 08.06 am Colin Judd UK
http://mysite.freeserve.com/xzephyr_stamps
Covers or ordinary stamps?
Dave P
Nice special Tristan Cover! But how about ordinary stamps? I don’t see much
of a sale for them, or for that matter a lot of other countries that I have
collected for 50 years or more – Pitcairn, Canada, Australia, N Zealand,
Falkland Islands.
Colin
October 25, 2003 Brian R
my LAST post an this
Roger I think you're wrong on your take of ebay/APS. The APS is supposed
to be a non-profit organization, why chide them over acting like one? Multiple
memebers of this board, spend countless Quixotic hours, trying to persue the
scammers too. I sincerely believe, that both are doing it, out of the love of
philately.
The simple fact, that they have decided to willingly wade into this fray, has
me seriously considering applying for memebership (and i'm not a "joiner"). I
suspect I'm not the only one, who is impressed by their actions, even if they
aren't quick to talk about it here.
October 25, 2003 Alison Ruttenberg
Nazi Items, Negligence of Experts and Tortious
Interference
Clark: Yes, as with many legal and medical terms, microsoft word does not
recognize the word "tortious;" however, it is the correct legal term. (Everytime
I write a brief dealing with this tort, my word document, I see all the red
underlines....) It is sometimes spelled tortuous in the case law, but tortious
with an i is the most preferred. Going to westlaw.com and search for the number
of cases, there are 20,108 published cases on tortious interference and 197
cases on tortuous interference. To recap: Cannot sue ebay for tortious
interference, but if a third party notifies a bidder and induces him not to go
through with contract or to retract, this could state a cause of action for
tortious interference.
knud-Erik: Yes, according to Dan Neary, any WWII era item of postal history is
allowed no matter if Swastika is part of the stamp, cancel, censor tape,
overprint, cachet or just on the picture part of the postcard.
Bill Weiss: More on negligence of experts. There is no definitive formula for
when a mistake becomes actionable negligence. The case law talks about deviating
from the established or recognized standard of care in the industry. So, if an
expert misses a regum job because the gum slopped over onto the fibers in the
perf or a little on the front, negligence. I am sitting here trying to think up
a really good example of a mistake by an expert that could not ever be
considered negligence, but cannot think of one!! In my opinion, no one should be
rendering written expert opinions over their signature without professional
liability insurance.
Duncan D: I forgot to clarify something yesterday in response to your post. What
I meant by my statement that a seller does not commit fraud if he clearly
identifies his stamps as forgeries, is assuming that the sale of that particular
type of forgery is legal in the first place. If he is selling US stamps that are
just run off his laser printer and could be used for postal fraud, then it is a
crime in the first place to sell them. If he is listing a classic forgery,
forged overprint etc. and correctly identifies it as such as discloses all the
MATERIAL facts about the forgery (such as the fact that the overprint was
recently applied), then there is no civil fraud.
October 25, 2003 Richard Warren
APS, Ebay, illegals
For what it's worth, email from Janet Klug:
"I take your point regarding illegal stamps. I can assure you that the APS
Board will be reviewing the fakes and forgeries policy at its next board
meeting, and by extension illegals as well."
October 25, 2003 07:03 Jim Watson
APS and eBay Arrangements
Donald F.,
Yes, I understand that Code of Ethics brings up the established Code of Ethics.
I haven't tried it as a search but if you try a search for Code of Conduct
the4 right one might be found. The title is different. [In fact searching for
code of conduct returns the right page as the 5th item.]
BTW, I haven't yet completed a review of the October American Philatelist to
references to the eBay relationship. And I still have to find the minutes of the
early May Board meeting to see if any activity was noted there.
October 25, 2003 Dave P
Tristan da Cunha
I noticed David B passed a brief comment on Tristan covers on the Ebay
board in responce to a question. Not allowed to post an auction link there, so
this auction shows their popularity!
October 25, 2003 06:57 Jim Watson
APS and eBay Arrangements
Donald F.,
BTW, I agree with you on the questions concerning timeliness of notice
concerning the APS actions about eBay. The first mention of the relationship
which I have found was the special telephone conference on
May
28, 2003, which appears to have occurred soon after eBay had opened
discussions with the APS. The next reference is the
August6, 2003, meeting which has been previously linked to here. [Note:
there seems to be some confusion on the dates of these events but the dates I've
used are the headers on the text pages.] The other related item in the available
material from the eBay search on the APS site is the link I provided earlier to
the recently posted Code of Conduct. There was a short note from Lamb in his
column in the American Philatelist in the September issue. There was also a
session held in conjunction with the recent national StampShow in Ohio. The
minutes were promised to be posted for that session however, seem not yet to be
available. The reason for my being able to post this is that I'm trying to
search for just what was available to the lay membership before the fact.
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Jim, try searching for "Code of Ethics". "1. American Philatelic Society
-- Code of Ethics" is not the same page.
October 25, 2003 Jim Lawler
Greetings
and
an
Indiana
"Good
Morning"
to
you
all
Jim L.
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
So what constitutes an "expert"? How do I know the guy/gal reviewing my
submission even has any related reference material? Now that I think about it, I
don't think I do.
October 25, 2003 06:42 Jim Watson
APS and eBay Arrangements
Donald F.,
If you will follow the link I have provided in my large-type posting below 'link
to Code of Conduct' you will find that the page is now posted on the
stamps.org site of the APS. It wasn't posted until recently. It also is found on
the APS site by searching for ebay. It comes up as "3. American Philatelic
Society -- Code of Ethics" in my search of the APS site.
October 25, 2003 Matt Liebson
I think that it would be difficult to get a set of standards together even among
the US expertizing firms, even without regard to the numerous major European
organizations (and that's without even getting down to the individuals who serve
as independent experts), nor is there any overall body that would necessarily be
capable of enforcing such guidelines.
That said, if any of the services ever want to acquire insurance such that their
opinions could be guaranteed (at least in limited circumstances), a set of
standards would probably be helpful.
How's that for obfuscation? We train long and hard to be able to do that.
October 25, 2003 06.42 Knud-Erik Andersen
This board
For the first time, I allmost wish this was a treaded board. I'm more and more
getting tired on the debate about APS/eBay, law and fake/forgeries. I'm sure I'm
not alone and I see many are missing (I hope to the balcony!) If this board
shall survive, as a comprehensive chatboard and not a more and more specialist
board like Richard F's, I think it's time to change the subject. If I, as a
newcommer, had visited this bord, during the last days, with a philatelic
question, I would have gone elsewhere!
just my 5 øre. :O)
K.E.
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Matt, what do you think?
October 25, 2003 Donald Fritze
Expertizing Standards
Bill and Alison, for Actuaries and Accountants, there are published
standards of practice. Failure to abide by the standards without being able to
reasonably justify your action (i.e.-argue why the standard is inappropriate or
fails to reflect accepted practice or something similar) is grounds for claims
of negligence. Is there any standard for expertizing? Does there need to be?
October 25, 2003 Matt Liebson
Bill: I've never really dealt in professional liability or negligent opinion
type issues, but in many, if not most cases, there is not a direct correlation
between "wrong" and "negligent", at least in my mind. The gap widens in
circumstances, such as philately, where there is a great deal of "art" and
subjectivity in the decisionmaking process. If
|